Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Virol ; 96(4): e29603, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619025

RESUMO

This study aims to assess the safety, virological, and clinical outcomes of convalescent plasma transfusion (CPT) in immunocompromised patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included all immunosuppressed patients with COVID-19 and RNAemia from May 2020 to March 2023 treated with CPT. We included 81 patients with hematological malignancies (HM), transplants, or autoimmune diseases (69% treated with anti-CD20). Sixty patients (74%) were vaccinated, and 14 had pre-CPT serology >264 BAU/mL. The median delay between symptom onset and CPT was 23 days [13-31]. At D7 post-CPT, plasma PCR was negative in 43/64 patients (67.2%), and serology became positive in 25/30 patients (82%). Post-CPT positive serology was associated with RNAemia negativity (p < 0.001). The overall mortality rate at D28 was 26%, being higher in patients with non-B-cell HM (62%) than with B-cell HM (25%) or with no HM (11%) (p = 0.02). Patients receiving anti-CD20 without chemotherapy had the lowest mortality rate (8%). Positive RNAemia at D7 was associated with mortality at D28 in univariate analysis (HR: 3.05 [1.14-8.19]). Eight patients had adverse events, two of which were severe but transient. Our findings suggest that CPT can abolish RNAemia and ameliorate the clinical course in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , Transfusão de Componentes Sanguíneos , Soroterapia para COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Plasma , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Viremia
2.
Acta Oncol ; 62(12): 1905-1912, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37948066

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Integrating telemedicine into cancer care remains a major challenge. There are little clinical evidence for teleconsultation efficacy and safety in daily oncology practice. This study as a pioneering experience, aimed to analyze patient and physician opinions regarding the implementation of telemedicine consultations, and to identify major limitations of telehealth spread in an oncology institute. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During COVID-19 lockdown, patients and physicians who took part to at least one video-based teleconsultation between March and May 2020, were enrolled in this observational study. All eligible patients received an anonymous online questionnaire. On the other hand, all physicians eligible to participate were asked through email to complete a questionnaire. RESULTS: In this study, 31 physicians and 304 patients consented to participate in this study by answering the questionnaire and were included. Regarding telemedicine satisfaction, 65.8% of patients were satisfied. The lack of clinical examination was the major limitation reported by 77% of patients. Patients belonging to a high socio-professional category were statistically more dissatisfied with the relationship with their doctor (OR = 2.31 and 95% CI [1.12; 4.74]). CONCLUSION: This study showed promising results of incorporating video-based teleconsultations into cancer patient management. Randomized clinical trials are needed in order to accelerate the digital implementation in clinical practice.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Médicos , Telemedicina , Humanos , Telemedicina/métodos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Satisfação Pessoal , Neoplasias/terapia
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(10): 1440-1448, 2023 11 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37369092

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is increasingly affecting older patients. However, data on their management are sparse, and the benefits of surgery in this population are unclear. METHODS: We included patients with left-sided IE (LSIE) aged ≥ 80 years enrolled in a prospective endocarditis cohort managed in Aquitaine, France, from 2013 to 2020. Geriatric data were collected retrospectively to identify factors associated with the 1-year risk of death using Cox regression. RESULTS: We included 163 patients with LSIE (median age, 84 years; men, 59%; rate of prosthetic LSIE, 45%). Of the 105 (64%) patients with potential surgical indications, 38 (36%) underwent valve surgery: they were younger, more likely to be men with aortic involvement, and had a lower Charlson comorbidity index. Moreover, they had better functional status at admission (ie, the ability to walk unassisted and a higher median activities of daily living [ADL] score; n = 5/6 vs 3/6, P = .01). The 1-year mortality rate in LSIE patients without surgical indications was 28%; it was lower in those who were operated on compared with those who were not despite a surgical indication (16% vs 66%, P < .001). Impaired functional status at admission was strongly associated with mortality regardless of surgical status. In patients unable to walk unassisted or with an ADL score <4, there was no significant surgical benefit for 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery improves the prognosis of older patients with LSIE and good functional status. Surgical futility should be discussed in patients with altered autonomy. The endocarditis team should include a geriatric specialist.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Idoso , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Atividades Cotidianas , Endocardite/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar
4.
Immunotherapy ; 13(18): 1491-1499, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743547

RESUMO

Aim: To describe the effects of a summertime pause (SP) in immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT). Patients & methods: We conducted a prospective single-center observational study, including 44 patients undergoing intravenous IgRT between May and June 2019 in a French teaching hospital. Results: IgRT was interrupted in 23 patients from June to October. Patients who underwent an SP were older, more likely to have secondary immunodeficiency (SID) and received lower doses of immunoglobulin and more antibiotics during winter. Most patients who did not undergo an SP had severe primary immunodeficiency. The SP did not increase the risk of infection, improved the quality of life and reduced treatment costs. Conclusion: SP in IgRT is a safe practice and should be considered for patients with mild SID.


Lay abstract Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) is an expensive treatment used to prevent infections in patients with immunodeficiency. Becauase most of the infections occur during winter, it is sometimes possible to interrupt IgRT during summer. In our study between May and October 2019, the 23 patients who underwent a summertime pause (SP) did not have more infections than the 21 who did not; the former also described an improvement in their quality of life. However, the physicians proposed SP to patients with a specific type of immunodeficiency, with fewer infections during winter and lower doses of IgRT. We report here for the first time the safety and benefits of a summertime pause in IgRT, for selected patients with less severe immunodeficiency.


Assuntos
Imunização Passiva , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/tratamento farmacológico , Estações do Ano , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA