RESUMO
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is characterized by substantial changes in the antigenic structure of the Spike (S) protein. Therefore, antibodies induced by primary Omicron infection lack neutralizing activity against earlier variants. In this study, we analyzed whether these antigenic changes impact the sensitivity of commercial anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. Sera from 37 unvaccinated, convalescent individuals after putative primary Omicron infection were tested with a panel of 20 commercial anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. As controls, we used samples from 43 individuals after primary infection with the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral wild-type strain. In addition, variant-specific live-virus neutralization assays were used as a reference for the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in the samples. Notably, in Omicron convalescents, there was a statistically significant reduction in the sensitivity of all antibody assays containing S or its receptor-binding-domain (RBD) as antigens. Furthermore, antibody levels quantified by these assays displayed a weaker correlation with Omicron-specific neutralizing antibody titers than with those against the wild type. In contrast, the sensitivity of nucleocapsid-protein-specific immunoassays was similar in wild-type and Omicron-infected subjects. In summary, the antigenic changes in the Omicron S lead to reduced immunoreactivity in the current commercial S- and RBD-specific antibody assays, impairing their diagnostic performance. IMPORTANCE This study demonstrates that the antigenic changes of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant affect test results from commercial Spike- and RBD-specific antibody assays, significantly diminishing their sensitivities and diagnostic abilities to assess neutralizing antibodies.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Humanos , Testes de Neutralização , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/química , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/metabolismo , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/química , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Anticorpos Antivirais , Anticorpos NeutralizantesRESUMO
Background and Methods: The SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant is the antigenically most distinct variant to date. As the heavily mutated spike protein enables neutralization escape, we studied serum-neutralizing activities of naïve and vaccinated individuals after Omicron BA.1 or BA.2 sub-lineage infections in live virus neutralization tests with Omicron BA.1, Omicron BA.2, wildtype (WT, B1.1), and Delta (B.1.617.2) strains. Serum samples obtained after WT infections and three-dose mRNA vaccinations with and without prior infection were included as controls. Results: Primary BA.1 infections yielded reduced neutralizing antibody levels against WT, Delta, and Omicron BA.2, while samples from BA.2-infected individuals showed almost no cross-neutralization against the other variants. Serum neutralization of Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants was detectable after three-dose mRNA vaccinations, but with reduced titers. Vaccination-breakthrough infections with either Omicron BA.1 or BA.2, however, generated equal cross-neutralizing antibody levels against all SARS-CoV-2 variants tested. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that although Omicron variants are able to enhance cross-neutralizing antibody levels in pre-immune individuals, primary infections with BA.1 or BA.2 induced mostly variant-specific neutralizing antibodies, emphasizing the differently shaped humoral immunity induced by the two Omicron variants. These data thus contribute substantially to the understanding of antibody responses induced by primary Omicron infections or multiple exposures to different SARS-CoV-2 variants and are of particular importance for developing vaccination strategies in the light of future emerging variants.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Anticorpos Amplamente Neutralizantes , Humanos , Glicoproteínas de Membrana , Testes de Neutralização , RNA Mensageiro , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/genética , Proteínas do Envelope ViralRESUMO
PURPOSE: Cisplatin based combination therapy has shown excellent clinical results in patients with testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumor but chemotherapy induced morbidity and reduced patient compliance are limiting factors in this regimen. To decrease cisplatin based combination therapy induced morbidity we examined carboplatin versus etoposide single therapy in an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 SCID mice bearing testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumor xenografts received 120 mg./kg. carboplatin as a single cycle, 60 or 30 mg./kg. carboplatin cycled twice, 80, 50 or 30 mg./kg. etoposide cycled twice, or Ringer solution as the control. An additional 20 sham treated and 20 untreated mice also served as controls. Histological and immunocytochemical testing, in vivo microscopy, vascular corrosion casting, serum tumor markers, complete blood count and real-time polymerase chain reaction were used to monitor therapy efficacy. RESULTS: Carboplatin at 60 mg./kg. cycled twice eradicated the tumor and significantly reduced vascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor-A messenger RNA (p <0.05). Elevated tumor markers returned to baseline after carboplatin administration. Therapy was well tolerated, resulting thrombocytopenia disappeared 6 weeks after therapy and the animals were tumor-free 6 months after treatment. Although 120 mg./kg. carboplatin eradicated the tumor, it resulted in extensive mortality and morbidity. Single treatment 30, 50 and 80 mg./kg. etoposide failed. CONCLUSIONS: Carboplatin single therapy was highly effective in our nonseminomatous germ cell tumor model and it may be examined in future clinical trials in patients with high risk stage I nonseminomatous germ cell cancer for reducing cisplatin based combination therapy induced morbidity. Vascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor messenger RNA were elevated in our animal model and deserve further study in nonseminomatous germ cell tumor cases as potential risk factors.