Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 297, 2024 May 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709326

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to address if detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) can be increased by additional perilesional biopsies (PB) in magnetic resonance (MR)/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized, surgeon-blinded study was conducted between February 2020 and July 2022. Patients were included with PSA levels < 20 ng/ml and ≥ one PI-RADS lesion (grades 3-5) per prostate lobe. Prostate biopsy was performed by two urologists. The first performed the MR-fusion biopsy with 3-5 targeted biopsies (TB) and 6 PB in a standardized pattern. The second performed the systematic (12-fold) biopsy (SB) without knowledge of the MR images. Primary outcome of this study is absence or presence of csPCa (≥ ISUP grade 2) comparing TB, PB and SB, using McNemar test. RESULTS: Analyses were performed for each PI-RADS lesion (n = 218). There was a statistically significant difference in csPC detection rate of TB + SB between PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions (18.0% vs. 42.5% vs. 82.6%, p < 0.001) and TB + PB (19.7% vs. 29.1% vs. 78.3%). Comparing only maximum ISUP grade per lesion, even SB plus TB plus PB did not detect more csPCa compared to SB plus TB (41.3% vs. 39.9%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We present prospective study data investigating the role of perilesional biopsy in detection of prostate cancer. We detected no statistically significant difference in the detection of csPCa by the addition of PB. Therefore, we recommend continuing 12-fold bilateral SB in addition to TB.


Assuntos
Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Método Simples-Cego
2.
Urol Int ; 2024 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744263

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Despite increasing resistance of enterobacteria against fluoroquinolones (FLU), they are still widely used during transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB). This study was designed to analyse infectious complications and risk factors between FLU, cephalosporines (CEPH) and selective other antibiotics (O-AB) used during TRPB. METHODS: 664 patients were included retrospectively (152 FLU, 452 CEPH and 60 O-AB). Infectious complications were defined as: fever >38.0°C, in-house definition of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) (if all applied: fever >38.0°C, leucocytosis >11.000/µl and positive urine dipstick) or postinterventional bacteriuria. Hospitalisation rate, -duration and comorbidities were also assessed. Chi-Square and Fishers exact test were used for group comparison. Multivariate regression analysis assessed the association of comorbidities with infectious complications. RESULTS: FLU and CEPH were indifferent regarding infectious complications, however in the O-AB group significantly more common compared to FLU and CEPH (11.6%, 13.3%, 25%, p<0.05). Duration of hospital stay in CEPH was significantly shorter compared to FLU and O-AB (4.1 vs. 6.3 vs. 8.2 days, p<0.05). Arterial hypertension showed increased association with fever (OR 6.002 [1.178;30.597] p=0.031) and cUTI (OR 6.006 [1.207;29.891] p=0.029). CONCLUSION: Infectious complications were low and indifferent between FLU and CEPH but significantly more frequent in O-AB. Arterial hypertension was significantly associated with postinterventional fever and cUTI.

3.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 236, 2024 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619659

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We evaluate differences of patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM) based urinary continence and sexual function 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RPE) based on perioperative, surgical, and patient-specific characteristics in a large European academic urology center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All men enrolled in the Prostate Cancer Outcome Study (PCO) study who were treated with RPE between 2017 and 2021 completed EPIC-26 information surveys before and 12 months after RPE. Survey data were linked to clinical data of our institution. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the correlation between individual surgeons, patient characteristics, patient clinical data, and their urinary continence and sexual function. RESULTS: In total, data of 429 men were analyzed: unstratified mean (SD) EPIC-26 domain score for urinary function decreased from 93.3 (0.7) to 60.4 (1.5) one year after RPE, respectively for sexual function from 64.95 (1.6) to 23.24 (1.1). Patients with preoperative adequate urinary function (EPIC-26 score > 80) reported significantly different mean urinary function scores between 53.35 (28.88) and 66.25 (25.15), p= 0.001, stratified by surgeons experience. On binary logistic regression analyses, only nerve sparing techniques (OR: 1,83, 95% CI: 1.01;3.21; p = 0.045) and low body mass index (OR: 0.91, CI: 0.85;0.99, p= 0.032) predicted adequate postoperative urinary function. CONCLUSIONS: The results show how using provider-specific data from a larger cohort study enables to develop institution-specific analysis for functional outcomes after RPE. These models can be used for internal quality improvement as well as enhanced and provider-specific patient communication and shared decision making.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Melhoria de Qualidade , Masculino , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Prostatectomia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925488

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Due to a lack of time and staff, informed consent (IC) in clinical practice often lacks clarity, comprehensibility and scope of information. Digital media offer great potential to enhance IC. Aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of multimedia-supported compared to traditional paper-based IC. METHODS: In the randomized, controlled, three-arm DICon (Digital Informed Consent for urological surgery) study 70 patients with an indication for prostate biopsy were randomized 1:1:1 to receive traditional paper-based IC vs. multimedia-supported information before IC vs. multimedia-supported information during IC. Patient satisfaction, anxiety and information gain were measured by validated questionnaires 2 weeks and directly before the procedure and time efficiency was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test (one-way ANOVA) and two-way ANOVA (with bonferroni post-test). RESULTS: Multimedia information prior to the consultation saved 32.9% time compared to paper-based (5.3 min. vs. 9.5 min; p < 0.05) and 60.4% time compared to shared multimedia information (5.3 min. vs. 13.9 min.; p < 0.001), with no difference in satisfaction (62.6 vs. 62.7 vs. 68.6 of max. 80; p = 0.07), anxiety (8 vs. 8.1 vs. 7 of max. 16; p = 0.35), or information gain (6.5 vs. 5.7 vs. 6.7 of max. 10; p = 0.23). Results on satisfaction (56.6 vs. 62.6 vs. 66; p = 0.06), anxiety (7.2 vs. 7.2 vs. 6.8; p = 0.84), and information gain (7 vs. 6.4 vs. 5.9; p = 0.43) remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Multimedia-supported IC prior to consultation provided improved time efficiency (33% gain) compared to traditional paper-based IC, with comparable satisfaction, anxiety and information gain. Multimedia-supported information materials should therefore be used more frequently in patient education.

5.
Front Surg ; 10: 1264164, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37799119

RESUMO

Introduction: Understanding tumor localization in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate is challenging for urologists but of great importance in mpMRI-fused prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of 3D printed models of the prostate to help urologists to locate tumors. Methods and Participants: 20 urologists from University Medical Center Mainz (Germany) were asked to plot the location of a cancer suspicious lesion (PI-RADS ≥ 4) on a total of 30 mpMRI on a prostate sector diagram. The following 3 groups (as matched triplets) were divided into: mpMRI only, mpMRI with radiological report and mpMRI with 3D printed model (scaled 1:1). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way and two-way ANOVA (with bonferroni post-test). Results: Overall, localization of the suspicious lesion was superior with the radiological report (median of max. 10 [IQR]: MRI 2 [IQR 1;5], MRI + report: 8 [6.3;9], MRI + 3D model 3 [1.3;5.8]; p < 0.001). Residents with <1 year of experience had a significantly higher detection rate using a 3D printed model [5 (5;5.8)] compared to mpMRI alone [1.5 (1;3.5)] (p < 0.05). Regarding the estimation of index lesion extension, the 3D model showed a significant benefit (mean percentage difference [95% CI]: MRI alone 234% [17.1;451.5], MRI + report 114% [78.5;149.6], MRI + 3D model 17% [-7.4;41.3] (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Urologists still need the written radiological report for a sufficient understanding of tumor localization. The effectiveness of the 3D printed model regarding tumor localization is particularly evident in young residents (<1 year) and leads to a better overall assessment of the tumor extension.

6.
Biomedicines ; 11(9)2023 Sep 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37760923

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of advanced urothelial (aUC) and renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), biomarkers such as PD-1 and PD-L1 are not robust prognostic markers for immunotherapy (IO) response. Previously, a significant association between IO and a change in splenic volume (SV) was described for several tumour entities. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the first correlation of SV to IO in aUC and aRCC. METHODS: All patients with aUC (05/2017-10/2021) and aRCC (01/2012-05/2022) treated with IO at our academic centre were included. SV was measured at baseline, 3 and 9 months after initiation of IO using an in-house developed convolutional neural network-based spleen segmentation method. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression models for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were used. RESULTS: In total, 35 patients with aUC and 30 patients with aRCC were included in the analysis. Lower SV at the three-month follow-up was significantly associated with improved OS in the aRCC group. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a new, innovative artificial intelligence-based approach of a radiological surrogate marker for IO response in aUC and aRCC which presents a promising new predictive imaging marker. The data presented implicate improved OS with lower follow-up SV in patients with aRCC.

7.
World J Urol ; 41(5): 1293-1299, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36920492

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Focal therapy (FT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) is only recommended within the context of clinical trials by international guidelines. We aimed to investigate oncological follow-up and safety data of focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment. METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective study of 29 patients with PCa treated with (focal) HIFU between 2016 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were unilateral PCa detected by mpMRI-US-fusion prostate biopsy and maximum prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 15 ng/ml. Follow-up included mpMRI-US fusion-re-biopsies 12 and 24 months after HIFU. No re-treatment of HIFU was allowed. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS), defined as freedom from intervention due to cancer progression. RESULTS: Median follow-up of all patients was 23 months, median age was 67 years and median preoperative PSA was 6.8 ng/ml. One year after HIFU treatment PCa was still detected in 13/ 29 patients histologically (44.8%). Two years after HIFU another 7/29 patients (24.1%) were diagnosed with PCa. Until now, PCa recurrence was detected in 11/29 patients (37.93%) which represents an FFS rate of 62%.One patient developed local metastatic disease 2 years after focal HIFU. Adverse events (AE) were low with 70% of patients remaining with sufficient erectile function for intercourse and 97% reporting full maintenance of urinary continence. CONCLUSION: HIFU treatment in carefully selected patients is feasible. However, HIFU was oncologically not as safe as expected because of progression rates of 37.93% and risk of progression towards metastatic disease. Thus, we stopped usage of HIFU in our department.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Ultrassom Focalizado Transretal de Alta Intensidade , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Próstata/cirurgia , Próstata/patologia
8.
Urol Case Rep ; 46: 102318, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36632283

RESUMO

We present a case of bladder cancer with a singular cardiac metastasis. A 51-year-old female patient was referred to our department for painless macrohematuria. We confirmed the diagnosis of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder with partial squamous cell differentiation. Computed tomography (CT) staging demonstrated a singular cardiac metastasis. Two months after receiving six cycles of chemotherapy control CT scan revealed massive tumour progression. The singular cardiac metastasis size increased to approximately two thirds of right ventricle size. Singular cardiac metastases of urothelial carcinoma are extremely rare and show rapid progression, hence introduction to therapy should not be delayed.

9.
World J Urol ; 40(12): 2947-2954, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36318314

RESUMO

PURPOSE: EAU guidelines recommend multiparametric MRI of the prostate (mpMRI) prior to biopsy to increase accuracy and reduce biopsies. Whether biopsy can be avoided in case of negative mpMRI remains unclear. Aim of this study is to evaluate predictors of overall prostate cancer (PCa) in negative mpMRI. METHODS: A total of 216 patients from 2018 to 2020 with suspicion of PCa and negative mpMRI (PI-RADS ≤ 2) were interviewed by telephone about outcome and further follow-up. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as ISUP ≥ 2. Patients with vs. without biopsy and with vs. without PCa were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of PCa occurrence in patients with negative mpMRI. RESULTS: 15.7% and 5.1% of patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2 on mpMRI showed PCa and csPCa, respectively. PCa patients had higher PSAD (0.14 vs. 0.09 ng/ml2; p = 0.001) and lower prostate volume (50.5 vs. 74.0 ml; p = 0.003). Patients without biopsy (25%) after MRI were older (69 vs. 65.5 years; p = 0.027), showed lower PSA (5.7 vs. 6.73 ng/ml; p = 0.033) and lower PSA density (0.09 vs. 0.1 ng/ml2; p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis revealed age (OR 1.09 [1.02-1.16]; p = 0.011), prostate volume (OR 0.982 [0.065; 0.997]; p = 0.027), total PSA level (OR 1.22 [1.01-1.47], p = 0.033), free PSA (OR 0.431 [0.177; 0.927]; p = 0.049) and no PI-RADS lesion vs PI-RADS 1-2 lesion (OR 0.38 [0.15-0.91], p = 0.032.) as predictive factors for the endpoint presence of PCa. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsy for selected patient groups (higher age, prostate volume and free PSA as well as lower PSA-Density) with negative mpMRI can be avoided, if sufficient follow-up care is guaranteed. Detailed counseling regarding residual risk for undetected prostate cancer should be mandatory.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análise , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Próstata/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Int J Med Robot ; 18(3): e2366, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35034415

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: MRI-guided targeted biopsy has become standard of care for diagnosis of prostate cancer, with establishment of several biopsy techniques and platforms. Augmented reality smart glasses have emerged as novel technology to support image-guided interventions. We aimed to investigate its usage while prostate biopsy. METHODS: MRI with PIRADS-lesions ≥3 was uploaded to smart glasses (Vuzix BladeR ) and augmented reality smart glasses-assisted targeted biopsy (SMART-TB) of the prostate was performed using cognitive fusion technology at the point of care. Detection rates were compared to systematic biopsy. Feasibility for SMART-TB was assessed (10 domains from bad [1] to excellent [10]). RESULTS: SMART-TB was performed for four patients. Prostate cancer detection was more likely for SMART-TB (46%; 13/28) than for systematic biopsy (27%; 13/48). Feasibility scores were high [8-10] for practicality, multitasking, execution speed, comfort and device weight and low [1-4] for handling, battery and image quality. Median execution time: 28 min; Investment cost smart glass: 1017 USD. CONCLUSION: First description of SMART-TB demonstrated convenient feasibility. This novel technology might enhance diagnosis of prostate cancer in future.


Assuntos
Realidade Aumentada , Neoplasias da Próstata , Cognição , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Tecnologia
11.
World J Urol ; 39(9): 3139-3145, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32623500

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic captures healthcare resources worldwide, data on the impact of prioritization strategies in urology during pandemic are absent. We aimed to quantitatively assess the global change in surgical and oncological clinical practice in the early COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, we designed a 12-item online survey on the global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practice in urology. Demographic survey data, change of clinical practice, current performance of procedures, and current commencement of treatment for 5 conditions in medical urological oncology were evaluated. RESULTS: 235 urologists from 44 countries responded. Out of them, 93% indicated a change of clinical practice due to COVID-19. In a 4-tiered surgery down-escalation scheme, 44% reported to make first cancellations, 23% secondary cancellations, 20% last cancellations and 13% emergency cases only. Oncological surgeries had low cancellation rates (%): transurethral resection of bladder tumor (27%), radical cystectomy (21-24%), nephroureterectomy (21%), radical nephrectomy (18%), and radical orchiectomy (8%). (Neo)adjuvant/palliative treatment is currently not started by more than half of the urologists. COVID-19 high-risk-countries had higher total cancellation rates for non-oncological procedures (78% vs. 68%, p = 0.01) and were performing oncological treatment for metastatic diseases at a lower rate (35% vs. 48%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected clinical practice of 93% of urologists worldwide. The impact of implementing surgical prioritization protocols with moderate cancellation rates for oncological surgeries and delay or reduction in (neo)adjuvant/palliative treatment will have to be evaluated after the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Padrões de Prática Médica , Triagem , Neoplasias Urológicas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudos Transversais , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Oncologia/métodos , Oncologia/organização & administração , Oncologia/tendências , Avaliação das Necessidades , Inovação Organizacional , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , SARS-CoV-2 , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem/organização & administração , Triagem/tendências , Neoplasias Urológicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Eur Urol ; 78(1): 16-20, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32362498

RESUMO

The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed considerable strain on hospital resources. We explored whether telemedicine (defined as a videoconference) might help. We undertook prospective structured phone interviews of urological patients (n = 399). We evaluated their suitability for telemedicine (judged by a panel of four physicians) and their risks from COVID-19 (10 factors for a poor outcome), and collected willingness for telemedicine and demographic data. Risk factors for an adverse outcome from COVID-19 infection were common (94.5% had one or more) and most patients (63.2%) were judged suitable for telemedicine. When asked, 84.7% of patients wished for a telemedical rather than a face-to-face consultation. Those favouring telemedicine were younger (68 [58-75] vs 76 [70-79.2] yr, p < 0.001). There was no difference in preference with oncological (mean 86%) or benign diagnoses (mean 85%), or with COVID-19 risks factors. In subgroup analysis, men with prostate cancer preferred telemedicine (odds ratio: 2.93 [1.07-8.03], p = 0.037). We concluded that many urological patients have risk factors for a poor outcome from COVID-19 and most preferred telemedicine consultations at this time. This appears to be a solution to offer contact-free continuity of care. PATIENT SUMMARY: Risk factors for a severe course of coronavirus disease 2019 are common (94.5%) in urology patients. Most patients wished for a telemedical consultation (84.7%). This appears to be a solution to offer contact-free continuity of care.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Consulta Remota/métodos , Telemedicina/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/complicações , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Humanos , Oncologia/métodos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA