The impact of surgical experience and frequency of practice on perioperative outcomes in pancreatic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the impact of surgical experience and frequency of practice on perioperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic surgery. METHODS: 1281 patients that underwent pancreatic resections from 1993 to 2013 were retrospectively analyzed using logistic regression models. All cases were stratified according to the surgeon's level of experience, which was based on the number of previously performed pancreatic resections and the extent of received supervision (novice: n <  20 / intensive; intermediate: n = 21-90 / decreasing; and experienced surgeon: n > 90 / none). Additional stratification was based on the frequency of practice (sporadic: 3 resections > 6 weeks, frequent: 3 resections ≤6 weeks). RESULTS: The novice and experienced categories were related to a decreased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.82 and 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.82) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.17-1.16 and 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.83) compared to the intermediate category. Frequent practice was associated with a significantly lower risk of delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.98) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the importance of supervision within a pancreatic surgery training program. In addition, our data underline the need of a sufficient patient caseload to ensure frequent practice.

Patient-reported outcomes and outcome predictors after primary total hip arthroplasty: results from the Dresden Hip Surgery Registry.

PURPOSE: To investigate response rates and predictors of treatment success in patients treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A prospective register-based cohort study including all consecutive primary THAs was conducted -between 01/2006-12/2011. Primary outcomes were changes in WOMAC, according to OMERACT-OARSI, and minimal important difference (MID) in quality of life (EQ-5D) between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Socioeconomic and clinical predictors on treatment success were analysed by bivariate/multivariate regression. RESULTS: The study population included 2,553 patients (mean age 60.8 years; 52.8% female) and 2,391 (93.7%) at follow-up. 2,194 (93.8%) (OMERACT-OARSI) and 2,131 (83.5%) (EQ-5D MID) patients were classified as responders. Predictors for treatment success vs treatment failure were not identified. Obese patients and patients living alone showed less pronounced, and patients with higher educational level more pronounced, improvements in the WOMAC at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with THA leads to improvement in function, decline in pain and increase in quality of life in the vast majority of patients.

[Indication for total knee arthroplasty: evidence mapping]. / Indikation zur endoprothetischen Versorgung des Kniegelenks - ein Evidence Mapping.

BACKGROUND: Joint replacement surgery is one of the most often performed routine procedures for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in Germany. Currently, there is no consensus on indication criteria for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). OBJECTIVES: The topic indication for TKA was processed using six guiding questions concerning: 1) Common practice in determining the indication for TKA; 2) Inclusion criteria in clinical trials; 3) Treatment goals/goal criteria; 4) Predictors for goal attainment; 5) Economic aspects of determining a TKA indication; 6) Guidelines of the "Working Group of Scientific Medical Societies" (AWMF) in other areas. METHODS: The evidence mapping was conducted by systematically searching Medline via Ovid, the Cochrane Library, through hand searching national guidelines and selected journals as well as the AWMF guideline portal. RESULTS OF THE GUIDING QUESTIONS: 1) In Germany there is currently no consented guideline regarding indications for TKA surgery. 2) Indication criteria for clinical trials are: diagnosed osteoarthritis of the knee, limitations of age and BMI. The most common criteria for exclusion include rheumatoid/inflammatory arthritis, secondary diagnoses and allergies. 3) As yet, no international initiatives have been identified which, by involving all relevant stakeholders, have reached consensus regarding the indication criteria for TKA. 4) A variety of predictors were identified with effects on individual treatment goals acting in different directions. 5) Very few studies were identified concerning economic aspects of determining TKA indication. 6) Comparable AWMF guidelines are currently not available. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that specific systematic reviews are needed to explore the following questions: What are the treatment goals of a TKA intervention? For whom are these relevant? And how are they measured? Continuous analyses are recommended in the field of predictors for a positive TKA outcome.