Preemptive Mechanical Ventilation Based on Dynamic Physiology in the Alveolar Microenvironment: Novel Considerations of Time-Dependent Properties of the Respiratory System.

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a serious clinical problem with the current treatment being supportive in the form of mechanical ventilation. However, mechanical ventilation can be a double-edged sword; if set properly, it can significantly reduce ARDS associated mortality but if set improperly it can have unintended consequences causing a secondary ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). The hallmark of ARDS pathology is a heterogeneous lung injury, which predisposes the lung to a secondary VILI. The current standard of care approach is to wait until ARDS is well established and then apply a low tidal volume (LVt) strategy to avoid over-distending the remaining normal lung. However, even with the use of LVt strategy, the mortality of ARDS remains unacceptably high at ~40%. In this review, we analyze the lung pathophysiology associated with ARDS that renders the lung highly vulnerable to a secondary VILI. The current standard of care LVt strategy is critiqued as well as new strategies used in combination with LVt to protect the lung. Using the current understanding of alveolar mechanics (i.e. the dynamic change in alveolar size and shape with tidal ventilation) we provide a rationale for why the current protective ventilation strategies have not further reduced ARDS mortality. New strategies of protective ventilation based on dynamic physiology in the micro-environment (i.e. alveoli and alveolar ducts) are discussed. Current evidence suggests that alveolar inflation and deflation is viscoelastic in nature, with a fast and slow phase in both alveolar recruitment and collapse. Using this knowledge, a ventilation strategy with a prolonged time at inspiration would recruit alveoli and a brief release time at expiration would prevent alveolar collapse, converting heterogeneous to homogeneous lung inflation significantly reducing ARDS incidence and mortality.

Limiting ventilator-associated lung injury in a preterm porcine neonatal model.

PURPOSE: Preterm infants are prone to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), with severe cases requiring mechanical ventilation for support. However, there are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal ventilation strategy. We hypothesized that airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) would mitigate lung injury in a preterm porcine neonatal model. METHODS: Preterm piglets were delivered on gestational day 98 (85% of 115day term), instrumented, and randomized to volume guarantee (VG; n=10) with low tidal volumes (5.5cm3kg-1) and PEEP 4cmH2O or APRV (n=10) with initial ventilator settings: PHigh 18cmH2O, PLow 0cmH2O, THigh 1.30s, TLow 0.15s. Ventilator setting changes were made in response to clinical parameters in both groups. Animals were monitored continuously for 24hours. RESULTS: The mortality rates between the two groups were not significantly different (p>0.05). The VG group had relatively increased oxygen requirements (FiO2 50%±9%) compared with the APRV group (FiO2 28%±5%; p>0.05) and a decrease in PaO2/FiO2 ratio (VG 162±33mmHg; APRV 251±45mmHg; p<0.05). The compliance of the VG group (0.51±0.07L·cmH2O-1) was significantly less than the APRV group (0.90±0.06L·cmH2O-1; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that APRV improves oxygenation and compliance as compared with VG. This preliminary work suggests further study into the clinical uses of APRV in the neonate is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not Applicable (Basic Science Animal Study).

Effect of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation on Dynamic Alveolar Heterogeneity.

IMPORTANCE: Ventilator-induced lung injury may arise from heterogeneous lung microanatomy, whereby some alveoli remain collapsed throughout the breath cycle while their more compliant or surfactant-replete neighbors become overdistended, and this is called dynamic alveolar heterogeneity. OBJECTIVE: To determine how dynamic alveolar heterogeneity is influenced by 2 modes of mechanical ventilation: low tidal-volume ventilation (LTVV) and airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), using in vivo microscopy to directly measure alveolar size distributions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a randomized, nonblinded laboratory animal study conducted between January 2013 and December 2014, 14 rats (450-500 g in size) were randomized to a control group with uninjured lungs (n = 4) and 2 experimental groups with surfactant deactivation induced by polysorbate lavage: the LTVV group (n = 5) and the APRV group (n = 5). For all groups, a thoracotomy and in vivo microscopy were performed. Following lung injury induced by polysorbate lavage, the LTVV group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and progressively higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (5, 10, 16, 20, and 24 cm H2O). Following lung injury induced by polysorbate lavage, the APRV group was ventilated with a progressively shorter time at low pressure, which increased the ratio of the end-expiratory flow rate (EEFR) to the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR; from 10% to 25% to 50% to 75%). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Alveolar areas were quantified (using PEEP and EEFR to PEFR ratio) to determine dynamic heterogeneity. RESULTS: Following lung injury induced by polysorbate lavage, a higher PEEP (20-24 cm H2O) with LTVV resulted in alveolar occupancy (reported as percentage of total frame area) at inspiration (39.9%-42.2%) and expiration (35.9%-38.7%) similar to that in the control group (inspiration 53.3%; expiration 50.3%; P > .01). Likewise, APRV with an increased EEFR to PEFR ratio (50%-75%) resulted in alveolar occupancy at inspiration (46.7%-47.9%) and expiration (40.2%-46.6%) similar to that in the control group (P > .01). At inspiration, the distribution of the alveolar area of the control group was similar to that of the APRV group (P > .01) (but not to that of the LTVV group [P < .01]). A lower PEEP (5-10 cm H2O) and a decreased EEFR to PEFR ratio (≤50%) demonstrated dynamic heterogeneity between inspiration and expiration (P < .01 for both) with a greater percentage of large alveoli at expiration. Dynamic alveolar homogeneity between inspiration and expiration occurred with higher PEEP (16-24 cm H2O) (P > .01) and an increased EEFR to PEFR ratio (75%) (P > .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Increasing PEEP during LTVV increased alveolar recruitment and dynamic homogeneity but had a significantly different alveolar size distribution compared with the control group. By comparison, reducing the time at low pressure (EEFR to PEFR ratio of 75%) in the APRV group provided dynamic homogeneity and a closer approximation of the dynamics observed in the control group.

Predicting the response of the injured lung to the mechanical breath profile.

Mechanical ventilation is a crucial component of the supportive care provided to patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Current practice stipulates the use of a low tidal volume (VT) of 6 ml/kg ideal body weight, the presumptive notion being that this limits overdistension of the tissues and thus reduces volutrauma. We have recently found, however, that airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is efficacious at preventing ventilator-induced lung injury, yet APRV has a very different mechanical breath profile compared with conventional low-VT ventilation. To gain insight into the relative merits of these two ventilation modes, we measured lung mechanics and derecruitability in rats before and following Tween lavage. We fit to these lung mechanics measurements a computational model of the lung that accounts for both the degree of tissue distension of the open lung and the amount of lung derecruitment that takes place as a function of time. Using this model, we predicted how tissue distension, open lung fraction, and intratidal recruitment vary as a function of ventilator settings both for conventional low-VT ventilation and for APRV. Our predictions indicate that APRV is more effective at recruiting the lung than low-VT ventilation, but without causing more overdistension of the tissues. On the other hand, low-VT ventilation generally produces less intratidal recruitment than APRV. Predictions such as these may be useful for deciding on the relative benefits of different ventilation modes and thus may serve as a means for determining how to ventilate a given lung in the least injurious fashion.

Mechanical breath profile of airway pressure release ventilation: the effect on alveolar recruitment and microstrain in acute lung injury.

IMPORTANCE: Improper mechanical ventilation settings can exacerbate acute lung injury by causing a secondary ventilator-induced lung injury. It is therefore important to establish the mechanism by which the ventilator induces lung injury to develop protective ventilation strategies. It has been postulated that the mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury is the result of heterogeneous, elevated strain on the pulmonary parenchyma. Acute lung injury has been associated with increases in whole-lung macrostrain, which is correlated with increased pathology. However, the effect of mechanical ventilation on alveolar microstrain remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the mechanical breath profile of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), consisting of a prolonged pressure-time profile and brief expiratory release phase, reduces microstrain. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a randomized, nonblinded laboratory animal study, rats were randomized into a controlled mandatory ventilation group (n = 3) and an APRV group (n = 3). Lung injury was induced by polysorbate lavage. A thoracotomy was performed and an in vivo microscope was placed on the lungs to measure alveolar mechanics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: In the controlled mandatory ventilation group, multiple levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 5, 10, 16, 20, and 24 cm H2O) were tested. In the APRV group, decreasing durations of expiratory release (time at low pressure [T(low)]) were tested. The T(low) was set to achieve ratios of termination of peak expiratory flow rate (T-PEFR) to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75% (the smaller this ratio is [ie, 10%], the more time the lung is exposed to low pressure during the release phase, which decreases end-expiratory lung volume and potentiates derecruitment). Alveolar perimeters were measured at peak inspiration and end expiration using digital image analysis, and strain was calculated by normalizing the change in alveolar perimeter length to the original length. Macrostrain was measured by volume displacement. RESULTS: Higher PEEP (16-24 cm H2O) and a brief T(low) (APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75%) reduced microstrain. Microstrain was minimized with an APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75% (mean [SEM], 0.05 [0.03]) and PEEP of 16 cm H2O (mean [SEM], 0.09 [0.08]), but an APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75% also promoted alveolar recruitment compared with PEEP of 16 cm H2O (mean [SEM] total inspiratory area, 52.0% [2.9%] vs 29.4% [4.3%], respectively; P < .05). Whole-lung strain was correlated with alveolar microstrain in tested settings (P < .05) except PEEP of 16 cm H2O (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Increased positive-end expiratory pressure and reduced time at low pressure (decreased T(low)) reduced alveolar microstrain. Reduced microstrain and improved alveolar recruitment using an APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75% may be the mechanism of lung protection seen in previous clinical and animal studies.

Airway pressure release ventilation prevents ventilator-induced lung injury in normal lungs.

IMPORTANCE: Up to 25% of patients with normal lungs develop acute lung injury (ALI) secondary to mechanical ventilation, with 60% to 80% progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Once established, ARDS is treated with mechanical ventilation that can paradoxically elevate mortality. A ventilation strategy that reduces the incidence of ARDS could change the clinical paradigm from treatment to prevention. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that (1) mechanical ventilation with tidal volume (VT) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings used routinely on surgery patients causes ALI/ARDS in normal rats and (2) preemptive application of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) blocks drivers of lung injury (ie, surfactant deactivation and alveolar edema) and prevents ARDS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Rats were anesthetized and tracheostomy was performed at State University of New York Upstate Medical University. Arterial and venous lines, a peritoneal catheter, and a rectal temperature probe were inserted. Animals were randomized into 3 groups and followed up for 6 hours: spontaneous breathing ventilation (SBV, n = 5), continuous mandatory ventilation (CMV, n = 6), and APRV (n = 5). Rats in the CMV group were ventilated with Vt of 10 cc/kg and PEEP of 0.5 cm H2O. Airway pressure release ventilation was set with a P(High) of 15 to 20 cm H2O; P(Low) was set at 0 cm H2O. Time at P(High) (T(High)) was 1.3 to 1.5 seconds and a T(Low) was set to terminate at 75% of the peak expiratory flow rate (0.11-0.14 seconds), creating a minimum 90% cycle time spent at P(High). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lungs were harvested for histopathologic analysis at necropsy. RESULTS: Acute lung injury/ARDS developed in the CMV group (mean [SE] PaO2/FiO2 ratio, 242.96 [24.82]) and was prevented with preemptive APRV (mean [SE] PaO2/FIO2 ratio, 478.00 [41.38]; P < .05). Airway pressure release ventilation also significantly reduced histopathologic changes and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid total protein (endothelial permeability) and preserved surfactant proteins A and B concentrations as compared with the CMV group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Continuous mandatory ventilation in normal rats for 6 hours with Vt and PEEP settings similar to those of surgery patients caused ALI. Preemptive application of APRV blocked early drivers of lung injury, preventing ARDS. Our data suggest that APRV applied early could reduce the incidence of ARDS in patients at risk.

Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce mortality in high-risk trauma patients: a systematic review of observational trauma ARDS literature.

BACKGROUND: Adult respiratory distress syndrome is often refractory to treatment and develops after entering the health care system. This suggests an opportunity to prevent this syndrome before it develops. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that early application of airway pressure release ventilation in high-risk trauma patients reduces hospital mortality as compared with similarly injured patients on conventional ventilation. METHODS: Systematic review of observational data in patients who received conventional ventilation in other trauma centers were compared with patients treated with early airway pressure release ventilation in our trauma center. Relevant studies were identified in a PubMed and MEDLINE search from 1995 to 2012 and included prospective and retrospective observational and cohort studies enrolling 100 or more adult trauma patients with reported adult respiratory distress syndrome incidence and mortality data. RESULTS: Early airway pressure release ventilation as compared with the other trauma centers represented lower mean adult respiratory distress syndrome incidence (14.0% vs. 1.3%) and in-hospital mortality (14.1% vs. 3.9%). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that early airway pressure release ventilation may prevent progression of acute lung injury in high-risk trauma patients, reducing trauma-related adult respiratory distress syndrome mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level IV.

Early airway pressure release ventilation prevents ARDS-a novel preventive approach to lung injury.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) afflicts 200,000 patients annually with a mortality rate of 30% to 60% despite wide use of low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation, the present standard of care. High-permeability alveolar edema and instability occur early in the development of ARDS, before clinical signs of lung injury, and represent potential targets for therapy. We hypothesize that early application of a protective ventilation strategy (airway pressure release ventilation [APRV]) will stabilize alveoli and reduce alveolar edema, preventing the development of ARDS. Yorkshire pigs (30-40 kg) were anesthetized and subjected to two-hit injury: (a) intestinal ischemia-reperfusion, (b) peritoneal sepsis, or sham surgery. Following surgery, pigs were randomized into APRV (n = 4), according to current published guidelines for APRV; LTV ventilation (n = 3), using the current published ARDS Network guidelines (6 mL/kg); or sham (n = 5). The clinical care of all pigs was administered per the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Animals were killed, and necropsy performed at 48 h. Arterial blood gases were measured to assess for the development of clinical lung injury. Lung tissue epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) was measured to assess alveolar permeability. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) surfactant protein A was measured to assess alveolar stability. Lung edema content and histopathology were analyzed at 48 h. Airway pressure release ventilation pigs did not develop ARDS. In contrast, pigs in the LTV ventilation met ARDS criteria (PaO2/FIO2 ratio) (APRV: baseline = 471 ± 16; 48 h = 392 ± 8; vs. LTV ventilation: baseline = 551 ± 28; 48 h = 138 ± 88; P < 0.001). Airway pressure release ventilation preserved alveolar epithelial integrity demonstrated by higher levels of E-cadherin in lung tissue as compared with LTV ventilation (P < 0.05). Surfactant protein A levels were higher in BALF from the APRV group, suggesting APRV preserved alveolar stability. Quantitative histologic scoring showed improvements in all stigmata of ARDS in the APRV group versus the LTV ventilation (P < 0.05). Airway pressure release ventilation had significantly lower lung edema (wet-dry weight) than LTV ventilation (P < 0.05). Protective ventilation with APRV immediately following injury prevents development of ARDS. Reduction in lung edema, preservation of lung E-cadherin, and surfactant protein A abundance in BALF suggest that APRV attenuates lung permeability, edema, and surfactant degradation. Protective ventilation could change the clinical paradigm from supportive care for ARDS with LTV ventilation to preventing development of ARDS with APRV.

Early stabilizing alveolar ventilation prevents acute respiratory distress syndrome: a novel timing-based ventilatory intervention to avert lung injury.

BACKGROUND: Established acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is often refractory to treatment. Clinical trials have demonstrated modest treatment effects, and mortality remains high. Ventilator strategies must be developed to prevent ARDS. HYPOTHESIS: Early ventilatory intervention will block progression to ARDS if the ventilator mode (1) maintains alveolar stability and (2) reduces pulmonary edema formation. METHODS: Yorkshire pigs (38-45 kg) were anesthetized and subjected to a "two-hit" ischemia-reperfusion and peritoneal sepsis. After injury, animals were randomized into two groups: early preventative ventilation (airway pressure release ventilation [APRV]) versus nonpreventative ventilation (NPV) and followed for 48 hours. All animals received anesthesia, antibiotics, and fluid or vasopressor therapy as per the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Titrated for optimal alveolar stability were the following ventilation parameters: (1) NPV group--tidal volume, 10 mL/kg + positive end-expiratory pressure - 5 cm/H2O volume-cycled mode; (2) APRV group--tidal volume, 10 to 15 mL/kg; high pressure, low pressure, time duration of inspiration (Thigh), and time duration of release phase (Tlow). Physiological data and plasma were collected throughout the 48-hour study period, followed by BAL and necropsy. RESULTS: APRV prevented the development of ARDS (p < 0.001 vs. NPV) by PaO2/FIO2 ratio. Quantitative histological scoring showed that APRV prevented lung tissue injury (p < 0.001 vs. NPV). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed that APRV lowered total protein and interleukin 6 while preserving surfactant proteins A and B (p < 0.05 vs. NPV). APRV significantly lowered lung water (p < 0.001 vs. NPV). Plasma interleukin 6 concentrations were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Early preventative mechanical ventilation with APRV blocked ARDS development, preserved surfactant proteins, and reduced pulmonary inflammation and edema despite systemic inflammation similar to NPV. These data suggest that early preventative ventilation strategies stabilizing alveoli and reducing pulmonary edema can attenuate ARDS after ischemia-reperfusion and sepsis.

Resuscitation before stabilization of femoral fractures limits acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with multiple traumatic injuries despite low use of damage control orthopedics.

BACKGROUND: Femoral shaft fractures are associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The idea that primary intramedullary nailing increases the incidence of ARDS has theoretical support. Our approach to treating femoral fractures in patients with multiple traumatic injuries is to perform reamed nailing after adequate resuscitation has been shown by normalizing lactate plus optimized ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters. Damage control orthopedics (DCO) with primary external fixation usually is reserved for those rare patients who do not respond to resuscitation. Our hypothesis was that this approach yields a low rate of ARDS. METHODS: A prospective trauma database was searched for all femoral shaft fractures treated at a Level I trauma center during a 3-year period, yielding 582 patients. Exclusion criteria included death before treatment (n = 9), age younger than 16 years (n = 16), age older than 65 years (n = 35), fractures that were not amenable to nail fixation (n = 31), shaft fractures treated with a plate (n = 3), patients with bilateral femoral shaft fractures who had a primary nail placed in one femur and an external fixator on the other limb (n = 1), and patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) 17, only 12% were initially treated with DCO, and 88% were treated with primary reamed nailing. The 227 patients achieved successful early resuscitation as shown by lactate values that decreased significantly on the operative day compared with presenting values (p < 0.05). ARDS rates were low, including rates for the subgroup of patients with lung injury (thoracic Abbreviated Injury Scale score >2, n = 175) who were treated with nailing and had an ARDS rate of 2.0% and a death rate of 2.0%. The ARDS rate for the most severely injured patients who underwent nailing (ISS >28, thoracic Abbreviated Injury Scale score >2, n = 78) was only 3.3%, and 1.7% died. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of resuscitation before reamed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures, our rate of ARDS was lower (p < 0.001) than that of a similar study reported in the literature in which the DCO approach was used in up to 36% of patients (p < 0.001) and was more in keeping with previously reported rates of ARDS. This remained true despite frequent use of early reamed femoral nailing and infrequent use of DCO. An explanation for the discrepancy between the centers might be differences in preoperative resuscitation or medical care provided to treat shock.

Ventilator strategies for posttraumatic acute respiratory distress syndrome: airway pressure release ventilation and the role of spontaneous breathing in critically ill patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients who experience severe trauma are at increased risk for the development of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The management strategies used to treat respiratory failure in this patient population should be comprehensive. Current trends in the management of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome consist of maintaining acceptable gas exchange while limiting ventilator-associated lung injury. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, two distinct forms of ventilator-associated lung injury are recognized to produce alveolar stress failure and have been termed low-volume lung injury (intratidal alveolar recruitment and derecruitment) and high-volume lung injury (alveolar stretch and overdistension). Pathologically, alveolar stress failure from low- and high-volume ventilation can produce lung injury in animal models and is termed ventilator-induced lung injury. The management goal in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome challenges clinicians to achieve the optimal balance that both limits the forms of alveolar stress failure and maintains effective gas exchange. The integration of new ventilator modes that include the augmentation of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation may be beneficial and may improve the ability to attain these goals. SUMMARY: Airway pressure release ventilation is a mode of mechanical ventilation that maintains lung volume to limit intra tidal recruitment /derecruitment and improves gas exchange while limiting over distension. Clinical and experimental data demonstrate improvements in arterial oxygenation, ventilation-perfusion matching (less shunt and dead space ventilation), cardiac output, oxygen delivery, and lower airway pressures during airway pressure release ventilation. Mechanical ventilation with airway pressure release ventilation permits spontaneous breathing throughout the entire respiratory cycle, improves patient comfort, reduces the use of sedation, and may reduce ventilator days.