Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 22(1): 141, 2022 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35346064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Regional lymph node metastases are the main adverse prognostic factor in patients with rectal cancer without distant metastases. There are discrepancies, however, regarding additional risk factors in the group of ypN + M0 patients. The purpose of the study was to assess clinical and pathological factors affecting long-term oncological outcomes in the group of ypN + M0 patients after radical rectal anterior resection. METHODS: 112 patients with ypN + M0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and radical anterior resection were subject to a retrospective analysis. The effect of potential factors on survival was assessed with the use of Kaplan-Meier curves together with a log-rank test and multiple factor Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In the multiple factor Cox analysis, adverse factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) were: the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) (hazard ratio HR: 3.11, 95% CI 1.01-9.56, p = 0.047), presence of perineural invasion (HR: 7.27, 95% CI 2.74-19.3, p < 0.001) and occurrence of postoperative complications (HR: 6.79, 95% CI 2.09-22.11, p = 0.001), while a positive factor was the negative lymph node (NLN) count > 7 (HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.88, p = 0.026). In the disease-specific survival (DSS) analysis, an adverse factor was the use of ACEIs (HR: 4.275, 95% CI 1.44-12.694, p = 0.009), while a positive effect was caused by NLN > 5 (HR: 0.22, 95% CI 0.082-0.586, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ACEIs may have a negative effect on long-term treatment outcomes in patients with ypN + M0 rectal cancer. In this group of patients, the NLN count seems to be an important prognostic factor, as well.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Retais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(7): 1962-1970, 2022 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35175985

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Ameloblastoma (AM) is the most common, locally aggressive odontogenic tumor. It comprises about 1% of all head and neck neoplasms. It occurs mainly in young adults in their 3rd and 4th decade of life. It localizes in the mandible in about 80% of the cases. According to the 2017 WHO classification, 4 types of ameloblastoma can be distinguished: ameloblastoma (previously referred to as solid/multicystic-SMA; the "conventional type" AM), unicystic (AM-UA), extraosseous/peripheral (AM-PA), and malignant/metastatic (AM-MA). Solid, multicystic is the most common type. It is characteristic for its aggressiveness and high risk of recurrence. Radical resection with consecutive reconstruction is the treatment of choice of mandibular ameloblastomas.In this study, the authors present their experience in the surgical treatment of mandibular ameloblastomas with vascularized free flap reconstructions. They discuss new technological possibilities that could improve the precision of the reconstructive procedure and therefore result in the better aesthetic outcome.The retrospective study of a group of 21 patients suffering from mandibular ameloblastoma who underwent segmental man-dibulectomy with simultaneous microvascular free flap reconstruction was conducted. A thorough clinical analysis with various aspects was performed. Tumors resected before 2017 were double checked patomorphologically and assigned to the corrected subtype group.Seven patients were admitted to the department due to recurrent ameloblastoma. The most common localization of the tumor was the mandibular body ( n = 6) andbodywith ramus of the mandible ( n = 6). A total amount of 10 iliac crest free flaps and 12 fibular free flaps were performed. Complications were reported in 4 patients. A purulent oro-cutaneus fistula occurred in 3 patients. There was a flap failure in each reconstructive group. The virtual surgical planning with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography was used in 3 patients. Dentition implantation was conducted in 4 patients (3 simultaneously, 1 postponed). The mean follow-up was 5 years and 8 months.Radical resection that covers radical segmental mandibulect-omy with immediate microvascular free flap reconstruction is a first-line and only effective treatment of mandibular ameloblas-tomas, that eliminates the risk of recurrence. The extent of surgical margins seems not to influence the recurrence rate, yet further investigation with statistical analysis should be performed. The choice of the adequate free flap must be adapted to dimensions and localization of the tumor and to each patient individually.New technologies such as virtual surgical planning with 3D models and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography can make the reconstruction more accurate, improving patient's quality of life.


Assuntos
Ameloblastoma , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Neoplasias Mandibulares , Reconstrução Mandibular , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Ameloblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Ameloblastoma/patologia , Ameloblastoma/cirurgia , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Estética Dentária , Fíbula/cirurgia , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Neoplasias Mandibulares/patologia , Neoplasias Mandibulares/cirurgia , Reconstrução Mandibular/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Pol Przegl Chir ; 92(5): 1-7, 2020 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33028725

RESUMO

<b>Introduction:</b> The nose is the central and probably the most important organ of the face. In view of the three-dimensional shape and variety of tissues, reconstructive surgery after tumor resection in this anatomical region requires the surgeon's knowledge of anatomy. <br><b>Materials and Method:</b> In the years 2010-2019, 48 patients were treated in the Oncological and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic for extended nasal tumors, which required the use of free microvascular flaps after resection for functional and aesthetic supply of anatomical structures of the nose. <br><b>Results:</b> In 48 patients, a total of 92 free microvascular flaps were used for nasal reconstruction including: radial forearm free flap in 24 patients, radial forearm free flap with radial bone in 14 patients, auricular free flap in 16 patients, radial forearm free flap in combination with auricle free flap in 7 patients, double auricular free flap in 6 patients, radial forearm free flap in combination with double auricular free flap in 4 patients. Total necrosis of the free flap was noted in 4 cases, partial in 6 patients. <br><b>Conclusions:</b> The presented surgical techniques using microvascular free flaps constitute a recognized method of treatment and should be used in everyday surgeon practice. The results demonstrated in this article allow to obtain optimal functional and aesthetic effects.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasais/cirurgia , Nariz/cirurgia , Rinoplastia/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/irrigação sanguínea , Expansão de Tecido/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Antebraço , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nariz/patologia , Neoplasias Nasais/patologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA