Evaluation of reduced ('Lite') compression versus brief bandaging to manage post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty surgery; a single-centre randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Investigate efficacy of reduced compression bandage for the control of pain after total knee arthroplasty. PATIENTS & METHODS: Prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial involving data for 56 out of 94 consented patients; 29 standard care versus 27 Andoflex TLC Calamine Lite. Comparison of standard care (non-compression bandage applied for up to one day) versus Andoflex TLC Calamine Lite (25-30 mmHg) two-layer compression bandage worn for five days. Outcomes measured with validated pain (McGill, 10-cm visual scale) and functionality (KOOS) tools. RESULTS: At day 5 post-surgery, the median pain level was 3.0 cm vs 4.0 cm (p-value 0.47, Mann-Whitney U test) respectively. Generic pain levels, pain types, and knee functionality did not differ between the interventions at days 3/5/12 and week 6 post-surgery. An exception was the degree of 'tender' pain at day 12, which was significantly lower in the Andoflex TLC Calamine Lite arm (p-value 0.041, Mann-Whitney U test). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that application of Andoflex TLC Calamine Lite, administration of oxycodone, and male sex were all significantly associated with less 'tender' pain. CONCLUSION: Reduced compression bandaging does not affect overall pain levels post knee arthroplasty surgery, but may alleviate pain experienced as 'tender', highlighting the different types of pain that may be experienced. Patients' need for, and the use of, opioid medication (oxycodone) is a significant confounding variable when assessing adjuvant therapy to control pain. The applicability of reduced compression bandaging may therefore be limited and is less efficient than medical pain control.

Satisfactory 5-year functional outcomes following primary ACL reconstructions from the UK National Ligament Registry.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the 10-year findings from the UK National Ligament Registry (NLR). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for prospectively collected data on the NLR between January 2013 and December 2022. All patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) on the registry were included. Surgical characteristics were analysed, including surgeon grade and case volume, concomitant knee procedures, venous thromboembolic prophylaxis, graft characteristics, femoral and tibial tunnel drilling, and fixation methods. Clinical outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years following the index procedure. RESULTS: During the study period, 17,492 unilateral ACLR procedures were recorded. Autograft was used in 98%, most commonly a combined semitendinosus and gracilis graft (77%) or patella tendon graft (31%). Allograft was used in only 1% of the patients. In 52% of cases, ACLR was associated with an additional procedure, with isolated medial meniscal surgery being the most common (21%). Femoral tunnel drilling was mostly performed through an anteromedial portal (73%) and tibial tunnel drilling using an outside-in technique (92%). The most common method of femoral graft fixation was with an Endobutton fixed loop suspensory device (77%), while interference screws predominated for tibial tunnel fixation (86%). Patients who underwent ACLR surgery showed significant improvement in their functional outcome scores at six months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Data from the NLR shows a detailed description of the current trends and evolution of ACLR in the United Kingdom over the last 10 years. Satisfactory functional outcomes were observed 5 years postoperatively. This study provides useful information on the prevalence of ACL-associated injuries and current surgical techniques with the aim of improving the quality of clinical care and patients' outcomes. Moreover, it provides surgeons with a benchmark against which to compare current practices and functional outcomes following ACLR across the United Kingdom. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Ten-year results from the UK National Ligament Registry: Patient characteristics and factors predicting nonresponders for completion of outcome scores.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report the demographic and mechanism of injury data in the UK National Ligament Registry (NLR) at 10 years and determine factors leading to poor compliance with completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Scores (PROMs). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for prospectively collected data on the NLR between January 2013 and December 2022. All patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) were included. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury and patient compliance with completing PROMs were analysed. Patient characteristics were further analysed in relation to compliance with completing the different PROMs at the predefined time points. Patients were identified as nonresponders if they had not completed either 1- or 2-year postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). RESULTS: A total of 17,492 patients were included in this study. The average age for patients undergoing ACLR between 2013 and 2022 was 29.4 (SD, 10.3). Seventy percent were men and 30% women. Football was the most common activity associated with an ACL injury. Patient compliance with recording PROMs was 55% preoperatively and 37%, 32% and 24% at 1-, 2- and 5-year postoperative follow-up, respectively. Nonresponders represented 54% of eligible patients. Multivariate analyses showed that sex, age, smoking, time interval between injury and surgery and low socioeconomic status were associated with low compliance with postoperative PROM completion (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study reports the demographic characteristics for patients on the NLR since 2013. Male sex, young age, increased waiting time between injury and surgery, smoking and lower socioeconomic class were predictors of low compliance with completion of postoperative PROMs on the UK NLR. Understanding the factors that affect patient compliance with PROMs improves our ability to provide targeted interventions and information to specific patient populations with the aim of enhancing inclusiveness and representation of population in the registry. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.