Anorectal Malformation Patients in Australia and Europe: Different Location, Same Problem? A Retrospective Comparative Registry-based Study.

Anorectal malformations (ARM) encompass a spectrum of rare congenital defects of the rectum and anus, requiring specialized reconstructive surgery. To improve epidemiological and clinical research in rare diseases such as ARM, collaborative efforts and patient registries are key. This retrospective study pools clinical data over a 30-year period from two ARM patient registries (The Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) in Melbourne, Australia, and the ARM-Network Consortium in Europe). It aims to draw comparisons on demographics, management, and outcomes between ARM patients in Australia and Europe. A total of 2947 ARM patients were included in the analyses. The RCH cohort had more complex ARM types (including rectal atresia and recto-vaginal fistula) and more associated anomalies, specifically skeletal, cardiac, and/or trachea-esophageal, than ARM-Net patients. Other patient characteristics were similar. Treatments clearly differed between the groups. European surgeons favoured the PSARP approach for both less complex and more complex ARM types, where Australian surgeons opted more often for cutback surgery in less complex, and laparoscopic assistance in more complex types. Complications were differently distributed, with less complications after LAARP and more after PSARP at RCH, compared to ARM-Net. While RCH patients more often required a redo, ARM-Net patients more commonly underwent anal dilatations. Anorectal malformation patients in Australia and Europe had minor differences in disease characteristics, and both operative and medical approaches differed. Joint efforts such as the present study emphasize the importance of collaboration to elucidate areas of improvement where surgeons may learn from each other across the world, ultimately improving patient outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Original Research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A Quality Assessment of the ARM-Net Registry Design and Data Collection.

BACKGROUND: Registries are important in rare disease research. The Anorectal Malformation Network (ARM-Net) registry is a well-established European patient registry collecting demographic, clinical, and functional outcome data. We assessed the quality of this registry through review of the structure, data elements, collected data, and user experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Design and data elements were assessed for completeness, consistency, usefulness, accuracy, validity, and comparability. An intra- and inter-user variability study was conducted through monitoring and re-registration of patients. User experience was assessed via a questionnaire on registration, design of registry, and satisfaction. RESULTS: We evaluated 119 data elements, of which 107 were utilized and comprised 42 string and 65 numeric elements. A minority (37.0%) of the 2278 included records had complete data, though this improved to 83.5% when follow-up elements were excluded. Intra-observer variability demonstrated 11.7% incongruence, while inter-observer variability was 14.7%. Users were predominantly pediatric surgeons and typically registered patients within 11-30 min. Users did not experience any significant difficulties with data entry and were generally satisfied with the registry, but preferred more longitudinal data and patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The ARM-Net registry presents one of the largest ARM cohorts. Although its collected data are valuable, they are susceptible to error and user variability. Continuous evaluations are required to maintain relevant and high-quality data and to achieve long-term sustainability. With the recommendations resulting from this study, we call for rare disease patient registries to take example and aim to continuously improve their data quality to enhance the small, but impactful, field of rare disease research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Perioperative opioid use in paediatric inguinal hernia patients: A systematic review and retrospective audit of practice.

BACKGROUND: Opioids play a major role in postoperative pain management in children, but their administration remains an under investigated topic. This study aimed to describe perioperative opioid prescribing practices for paediatric inguinal hernia patients in the literature and at The Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) in Melbourne, Australia. MATERIAL/METHOD: A systematic review of English articles (published from 2009 to 2019) was conducted on paediatric (0-18y) inguinal hernia patients who received a postoperative or discharge opioid prescription, or both. The review was combined with a retrospective audit of RCH patients. Demographic, surgical, and analgesic details were collected from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (n = 1166; combined mean age 4.93y) met the systematic review criteria. The percentage of patients receiving opioids postoperatively overall ranged from 3.33-100%, and doses ranged from 0.07 to 0.35 mg/kg oMEDD. At the RCH, perioperative opioid use was analyzed from 150 inguinal hernia patients (male - 113, median age - 3 months old). Postoperatively, 26 (17.3%) patients received opioids. The most commonly administered opioids were fentanyl (0.04-0.60 mg/kg oMEDD) in the post anaesthesia care unit and oxycodone (0.14-0.40 mg/kg oMEDD) in the first 24 h postoperatively. Older age at surgery, female sex and absence of regional anaesthesia were significantly associated with higher risk of total opioid use. No patients received an opioid prescription at discharge. CONCLUSION: There is demonstratable variability in opioid prescribing practices for paediatric inguinal hernia patients as described in the literature. At our institution opioids were not used frequently in postoperative period.