Double Inferior Vena Cava with Major Predominance of the Left Inferior Vena Cava: A Cadaver Case Report.

We encountered a case of a double inferior vena cava with major predominance of the left inferior vena cava during an anatomical dissection course for medical students in 2015. The right inferior vena cava (normal inferior vena cava) was 2.0 mm wide, and the left inferior vena cava was 23.2 mm wide. The fine right inferior vena cava began at the right common iliac vein, ascended along the right side of the abdominal aorta, and then joined the left inferior vena cava at the level of the lower margin of the first lumbar vertebra. The dominant left inferior vena cava started from the left common iliac vein and ascended along the left side of the abdominal aorta. Most patients with a double inferior vena cava are asymptomatic, and these variants are incidentally detected by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Their presence may have significant implications for surgery, particularly abdominal surgery in patients with paraaortic lymphadenopathy and in those undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy or inferior vena cava filter placement. We herein discuss the embryology of a double inferior vena cava based on detailed anatomical data of the variations of a double inferior vena cava, including those that require clinical attention.

The Key Structure of the Facial Soft Tissue: The Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System.

The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) was advocated by Mitz and Peyronie in 1976. The concept of this superficial fascia was established by surgical findings of facelift surgery and is familiar to plastic surgeons and anatomists. However, detailed characteristics of this fascia are still not widely known among head and neck surgeons. Moreover, the SMAS is generally located at the parotid and cheek regions and divides facial fat into superficial and deep layers. The SMAS connects to the superficial temporal fascia cranially and to the platysma caudally. The frontal muscle and the peripheral part of the orbicularis oculi are also in the same plane. The exact expanse of the SMAS in the face is controversial. Some authors claimed that the SMAS exists in the upper lip, whereas others denied the continuity of the SMAS to the superficial temporal fascia in a histological study. There are various other opinions regarding SMAS aside from those mentioned above. The concept of the SMAS is very important for facial soft tissue surgeries because the SMAS is a good surgical landmark to avoid facial nerve injuries. Therefore, this article summarized SMAS from an anatomical point of view.

Three sublayers in the SMAS: Observations of facial soft tissue using the stretched tissue dissection method focusing on the SMAS.

The characteristics of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), including the morphology of each part and the connection between tissues, remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to clarify the anatomy of the SMAS using our new dissection method. In this study, six hemi-sides of heads from formalin-preserved cadavers were used. Three were used for creating a horizontal section and three were used for creating the section along the axial line perpendicular to the surface of the skin, resulting in a gradual change from the coronal section at the lateral to the sagittal section at the median. The resected head was cut into slices with widths of 7 mm. The stretched tissue dissection method was performed by fixing a tissue slice to a board and pulling the skin outward to stretch the soft tissue. Blunt dissection was then performed under a microscope. The SMAS comprises three layers: superficial, intermediate, and deep. The superficial layer is a thin membrane directly connecting to the septa in the subcutaneous fat. The deep layer is the connective tissue in contact with the sub-SMAS structure. The layer surrounded by the superficial and deep layer of the SMAS is the intermediate layer, containing connective tissue, adipose tissue, and facial muscles. The detailed findings of the SMAS obtained using this method resolve theoretical discrepancies and provide important insight for the field of facial surgery.