Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 39(7): 889-901, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25970683

RESUMO

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (ccpRCC) and renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor (RAT) share morphologic similarities with clear cell (ccRCC) and papillary RCC (pRCC). It is a matter of controversy whether their morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features allow the definition of a separate renal carcinoma entity. The aim of our project was to investigate specific renal immunohistochemical biomarkers involved in the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway and mutations in the VHL gene to clarify the relationship between ccpRCC and RAT. We investigated 28 ccpRCC and 9 RAT samples by immunohistochemistry using 25 markers. VHL gene mutations and allele losses were investigated by Sanger sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clinical follow-up data were obtained for a subset of the patients. No tumor recurrence or tumor-related death was observed in any of the patients. Immunohistochemistry and molecular analyses led to the reclassification of 3 tumors as ccRCC and TFE3 translocation carcinomas. The immunohistochemical profile of ccpRCC and RAT samples was very similar but not identical, differing from both ccRCC and pRCC. Especially, the parafibromin and hKIM-1 expression exhibited differences in ccpRCC/RAT compared with ccRCC and pRCC. Genetic analysis revealed VHL mutations in 2/27 (7%) and 1/7 (14%) ccpRCC and RAT samples, respectively. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis disclosed a 3p loss in 2/20 (10%) ccpRCC samples. ccpRCC and RAT have a specific morphologic and immunohistochemical profile, but they share similarities with the more aggressive renal tumors. On the basis of our results, we regard ccpRCC/RAT as a distinct entity of RCCs.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Renais/classificação , Carcinoma de Células Renais/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renais/imunologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Neoplasias Renais/genética , Neoplasias Renais/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 18(6): 333-42, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25263387

RESUMO

The diagnosis of intraductal carcinoma (IDC) of the prostate remains subjective because 3 sets of diagnostic criteria are in use. An internet survey was compiled from 38 photomicrographs showing duct proliferations: 14 signed out as high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), 17 IDC, and 7 invasive cribriform/ductal carcinoma. Each image was assessed for the presence of 9 histologic criteria ascribed to IDC. Thirty-nine respondents were asked to rate images as (1) benign/reactive, (2) HGPIN, (3) borderline between HGPIN and IDC, (4) IDC, or (5) invasive cribriform/ductal carcinoma. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.68. There was 70% overall agreement with HGPIN, 43% with IDC, and 73% with invasive carcinoma (P < .001, χ(2)). Respondents considered 19 (50%) of 38 cases as IDC candidates, of which 5 (26%) had a two-thirds consensus for IDC; two-thirds consensus for either borderline or IDC was reached in 9 (47%). Two-thirds consensus other than IDC was reached in the remaining 19 of 38 cases, with 15 supporting HGPIN and 4 supporting invasive carcinoma. Findings that differed across diagnostic categories were lumen-spanning neoplastic cells (P < .001), 2× benign duct diameters (P < .001), duct space contours (round, irregular, and branched) (P < .001), papillary growth (P = .048), dense cribriform or solid growth (both P = .023), and comedonecrosis (P = .015). When the 19 of 38 images that attained consensus for HGPIN or invasive carcinoma were removed from consideration, lack of IDC consensus was most often attributable to only loose cribriform growth (5/19), central nuclear maturation (5/19), or comedonecrosis (3/19). Of the 9 histologic criteria, only 1 retained significant correlation with a consensus diagnosis of IDC: the presence of solid areas (P = .038). One case that attained IDC consensus had less than 2× duct enlargement yet still had severe nuclear atypia and nucleomegaly. Six fold nuclear enlargement was not significant (P = .083), although no image had both 6× nuclei and papillary or loose cribriform growth: a combination postulated as sufficient criteria for IDC. Finally, 20.5% of respondents agreed that an isolated diagnosis of IDC on needle biopsy warrants definitive therapy, 20.5% disagreed, and 59.0% considered the decision to depend upon clinicopathologic variables. Although IDC diagnosis remains challenging, we propose these criteria: a lumen-spanning proliferation of neoplastic cells in preexisting ducts with a dense cribriform or partial solid growth pattern. Solid growth, in any part of the duct space, emerges as the most reproducible finding to rule in a diagnosis of IDC. Comedonecrosis is a rarer finding, but in most cases, it should rule in IDC. Duct space enlargement to greater than 2× the diameter of the largest, adjacent benign spaces is usually present in IDC, although there may be rare exceptions.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Médicos , Prognóstico , Neoplasia Prostática Intraepitelial/patologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
3.
Hum Pathol ; 44(12): 2727-35, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24074533

RESUMO

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous, frequently multifocal disease with a broad spectrum of clinical, pathologic, and molecular characteristics. The TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangement is highly specific for prostate cancer. We used immunohistochemistry as a surrogate marker of the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion to study the heterogeneity of ERG expression in 280 prostate core needle biopsy series from 256 patients with early prostate cancer defined as 3 or less positive cores with no more than 50% of cancer per biopsy and a Gleason score of 7 or lower (3 + 4). Among the 163 patients with 2 or 3 cancer-positive biopsies, we found a subset of 19 patients (11.7%) with heterogeneous ERG expression. Thirteen (68.4%) of these patients showed biopsies with distinct positive and negative ERG staining in separate cores. The remaining 6 patients showed a mixture of both positive and negative staining within 1 biopsy core. This was either caused by different cancer foci (n = 3) or by one single, ERG-heterogeneous cancer focus (n = 3) in 1 core. Furthermore, we observed a heterogeneous ERG staining pattern over time in 6 (2.3%) of the 256 patients, in biopsies taken at various time points. An interobserver study of 21 cases with 2 separate cancer foci revealed that heterogeneity of ERG status in different cancer foci can be suspected based on morphologic differences (κ = 0.44). We conclude that heterogeneity of ERG expression is detectable in 10% to 15% of core biopsies of early prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to explore the clinical impact of heterogeneous ERG status in this patient group.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Transativadores/metabolismo , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Próstata/metabolismo , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Regulador Transcricional ERG
4.
Hum Pathol ; 42(5): 702-9, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21237492

RESUMO

The diagnostic performance of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostatic biopsies has recently been questioned, and molecular analysis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia has been proposed for improved prediction of prostate cancer. Here, we retrospectively studied the value of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and the immunohistochemical markers α-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase, Bcl-2, annexin II, and Ki-67 for better risk stratification of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in our local Swiss population. From an initial 165 diagnoses of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, we refuted 61 (37%) after consensus expert review. We used 30 reviewed high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia cases with simultaneous biopsy prostate cancer as positive controls. Rebiopsies were performed in 66 patients with isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and the median time interval between initial and repeat biopsy was 3 months. Twenty (30%) of the rebiopsies were positive for prostate cancer, and 10 (15%) showed persistent isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Another 2 (3%) of the 66 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer in a second rebiopsy. Mean prostate-specific antigen serum levels did not significantly differ between the 22 patients with prostate cancer and the 44 without prostate cancer in rebiopsies, and the 30 positive control patients, respectively (median values, 8.1, 7.7, and 8.8 ng/mL). None of the immunohistochemical markers, including α-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase, Bcl-2, annexin II, and Ki-67, revealed a statistically significant association with the risk of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies. Taken together, the 33% risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer after a diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia justifies rebiopsy, at least in our not systematically prostate-specific antigen-screened population. There is not enough evidence that immunohistochemical markers can reproducibly stratify the risk of prostate cancer after a diagnosis of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Neoplasia Prostática Intraepitelial/sangue , Neoplasia Prostática Intraepitelial/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Anexina A2/sangue , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Endócrino/normas , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Antígeno Ki-67/sangue , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-bcl-2/sangue , Racemases e Epimerases/sangue , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Coloração e Rotulagem
5.
Urol Int ; 78(4): 318-22, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17495489

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prostate biopsy protocols using twelve cores rather than the standard six cores have consistently shown improved prostate cancer detection rates. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the improved rate of prostate cancer detection in patients with low prostate-specific antigen levels warrants the standardization of a twelve-core biopsy protocol in this group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical and pathological records from 241 patients treated between 2000 and 2003 were evaluated, and the impact of a twelve-core biopsy protocol on the prostate cancer detection rate relative to prostate-specific antigen levels compared to the standardized six-core biopsies was analyzed. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 34% (81/241) of the patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. An additional 23.5% (19/81) of the carcinomas were diagnosed using the twelve-core biopsy protocol, and 84.2% (16/19) of these fulfilled the clinical significance criterion developed by Epstein and coworkers (see text). Interestingly, the greatest increase was found in the patient group with prostate-specific antigen levels < or =4 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low prostate-specific antigen levels (< or =4 ng/ml) would benefit from the standardized use of a twelve-core biopsy protocol using peripheral cores.


Assuntos
Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 30(2): 242-8, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16434900

RESUMO

Histology is considered a sensitive method for detection of Helicobacter pylori, in gastric biopsies. We investigated the diagnostic potential of qualitative nested (nPCR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detection of H. pylori using different primers on 126 archived gastric biopsies with inflammation and correlated the inflammatory changes with the presence and density of bacteria. H. pylori was detected in 42.8% biopsies by histology and PCR, an additional 15 samples were positive exclusively by PCR: nPCR was positive in all histologically positive samples, but qPCR failed to detect H. pylori in 10 biopsies. The inflammatory score was significantly higher in biopsies positive for H. pylori only by PCR showed a significant higher inflammatory score compared with negative biopsies (mean of neutrophils score, 1.60 vs. 0.90, P < 0.01; mean of mononuclear cells score, 2.27 vs. 1.67, P < 0.01), whereas the inflammatory score was similar compared with biopsies positive for H. pylori by histology (mean of neutrophils score, 1.60 vs. 1.56, not significant; mean of mononuclear cells score, 2.27 vs. 2.20, not significant). A weak correlation between inflammatory score and the density of H. pylori detected by histology was observed. The mean values of H. pylori DNA were significantly higher in histologic-positive than in histologic negative biopsies. We have shown that PCR can detect H. pylori in about 20% of histologic-negative gastric biopsies, indicating the clinical relevance of H. pylori detection by PCR in biopsies with characteristic inflammatory changes.


Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Gastrite/microbiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Animais , Biópsia , Doença Crônica , Gastrite/patologia , Humanos , Inflamação/microbiologia , Inflamação/patologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
8.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 126(9): 1057-63, 2002 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12204054

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a limited immunohistochemical panel can help differentiate metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma from primary enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract and urothelial (transitional cell) carcinoma with glandular differentiation, which appear morphologically similar but most often necessitate different treatment protocols. DESIGN: We examined lower urinary tract tumors (5 urinary bladder, 2 urethral) from 7 patients with a history of colonic adenocarcinoma. The differential diagnoses in these cases included metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma, primary enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract, and urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation. An immunohistochemical panel consisting of cytokeratin 7 (CK-7), cytokeratin 20 (CK-20), and villin was evaluated in all cases. Four primary enteric-type adenocarcinomas of the urinary tract and 5 conventional urothelial carcinomas were also studied to compare morphologic features and immunohistochemical staining patterns. RESULTS: Of the 7 cases, 6 were determined to be metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma and 1 was diagnosed as a primary urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation. All 6 metastatic colonic adenocarcinomas, 6 of the 7 primary colonic adenocarcinomas, and all 4 primary enteric-type adenocarcinomas of the urinary tract were CK-20 positive (1 was CK-20 negative), villin positive, and CK-7 negative. The single urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation and all 5 control cases of urothelial carcinoma were CK-7 and CK-20 positive, and villin negative. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) villin is expressed in primary enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract; (2) in difficult cases, urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation can be distinguished from colonic adenocarcinoma because the former is CK-7 positive, CK-20 positive, and villin negative, whereas the latter is CK-20 positive, villin positive, and CK-7 negative; (3) clinical information is essential when evaluating lower urinary tract tumors that are clinically and morphologically similar to enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract; and (4) the similar immunohistochemical profiles of metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma and primary enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract may be in keeping with the hypothesis that the latter arise from intestinal metaplasia.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias Urológicas/secundário , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Transformação Celular Neoplásica , Neoplasias do Colo/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Urológicas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirurgia , Urotélio/metabolismo , Urotélio/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA