Histologic features of allograft livers in patients treated for rejection before biopsy.

Liver biopsy is essential for management in liver transplant patients with clinical features suspicious for acute cellular rejection (ACR). As more patients are transplanted for noninfectious indications, it has become increasingly common for them to receive treatment for presumed ACR before biopsy. The effect of pretreatment on the classic histologic triad of ACR's mixed portal inflammation, endothelialitis, and bile duct damage is not well described. Here we report a retrospective study of 70 liver transplant biopsies performed on 53 patients for suspected ACR between 2018 and 2021. Thirty-seven biopsies had a clinical diagnosis of ACR after biopsy. Pretreatment with steroids, antithymocyte globulin, or other increased immunosuppression was given before biopsy in 17 of 37 cases; 20 not-pretreated cases acted as controls. A representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide from each biopsy was reviewed independently in a blinded fashion by 3 hepatic pathologists, graded according to the Banff system, assigned a Rejection Activity Index (RAI), and assessed for other histologic features. We found that pretreated biopsies had significantly less portal inflammation (P < .001), less endothelialitis (P < .001), lower RAI (P < .001), and less prominent eosinophils (P = .048) compared to not-pretreated biopsies. There was no significant difference for the other examined variables, including bile duct inflammation/damage (P = .32). Our findings suggest that portal inflammation and endothelialitis become less prominent with pretreatment, whereas bile duct inflammation/damage may take longer to resolve. When evaluating biopsies for suspected ACR, the finding of bile duct inflammation/damage should raise the possibility of partially treated ACR, even in the absence of endothelialitis and portal inflammation.

Histologic mimics and diagnostic pitfalls of gastrointestinal endoscopic lifting media, ORISE™ gel and Eleview®.

Synthetic lifting media, ORISE™ gel and Eleview®, are increasingly used in gastrointestinal endoscopy, but neither comparative features nor pitfalls are well-established. Media histopathology, morphologic mimics, and complications are described, along with helpful stains and endoscopist media preference. A 3-year retrospective search was performed. A total of 123 cases (108 endoscopies and 15 subsequent surgeries) were identified. ORISE gel was used in 86 (79.6%), Eleview in 20 (13.9%), and others in 7 (6.5%). ORISE gel was histologically identified in 58.1% (n = 50) of endoscopic specimens and all 15 resections. Eleview media were not detected histologically. ORISE gel mimicked mucin in hematoxylin and eosin-stained biopsies, concerning for adenocarcinoma misdiagnosis and/or upstaging, but did not stain for mucin. Acid-fast bacterial staining highlights ORISE gel for specific and definitive identification. In resections, ORISE evolves into an amorphous eosinophilic material, often with exuberant giant cell reaction and transmural bowel penetration. Polyp formation leads to polypectomy in one patient, and operative lesions concerning for adenocarcinoma resulted in frozen sections in two patients. ORISE gel mimics mucin, malignant masses, amyloid, pulse granulomata, elastofibromas, and infectious granulomata. No significant endoscopist media preference was identified. Recognition of ORISE gel in tissues eliminates multiple pitfalls. Eleview was not detectable, yielded none of the pitfalls seen with ORISE gel, and, on our survey, has equivalent endoscopist acceptance. In this largest published series to date, Eleview is clearly preferable to ORISE gel.

Detection of coxsackievirus A6 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin biopsy specimens using immunohistochemistry and real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR.

Background: Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), classically a childhood viral infection, has an atypical and severe clinical presentation in adults. Coxsackievirus A6 is a leading cause of atypical HFMD, but current diagnostic methods utilizing formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin biopsy specimens often lack sensitivity and specificity. Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin biopsies from seven case patients with clinical and histopathological suspicion of atypical HFMD were evaluated by coxsackievirus A6 (CVA6) immunohistochemistry, enterovirus-specific conventional reverse transcriptase-PCR with subsequent Sanger sequencing targeting the 5'UTR, and CVA6-specific real-time PCR targeting the VP1 gene. Results: The CVA6-specific antibody demonstrated appropriate antigen distribution and staining intensity in keratinocytes in all cases. Conventional RT-PCR and sequencing also detected the presence of enterovirus, and CVA6-specific real-time RT-PCR analysis identified CVA6. Conclusion: Applying these immunohistochemistry and molecular techniques to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, CVA6 was determined to be the causative infectious agent in seven cases of atypical hand, foot, and mouth disease.