Effectiveness of a complex intervention of group-based nutrition and physical activity to prevent frailty in pre-frail older adults (SUPER): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of frailty with age is becoming a public health priority in countries with ageing populations. Pre-frailty presents a window of opportunity to prevent the development of frailty in community-dwelling older adults. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a complex intervention that combined a nutrition-based intervention and a physical activity intervention, along with the effectiveness of each intervention individually, to reduce physical frailty in pre-frail older adults over 2 years. METHODS: In this single-blind, 2 x 2 factorial, randomised, controlled trial, we recruited pre-frail community-dwelling older adults in Aotearoa New Zealand via mail through general medical practices. To be eligible, participants had to be pre-frail according to self-reported FRAIL scores of 1 or 2, aged 75 years or older (or 60 years or older for Maori and Pacific Peoples), not terminally ill or with advanced dementia as judged by a general practitioner, able to stand, medically safe to participate in low-intensity exercise, and able to use kitchen utensils safely. Participants were randomly allocated to receive an 8-week Senior Chef programme (SC group), a 10-week Steady As You Go programme (SAYGO group), a 10-week combined SC and SAYGO intervention (combined group), or a 10-week social programme (control group), using computer-generated block randomisation administered through an electronic data capture system by local study coordinators. Assessors were masked to group allocation for all assessments. SC is a group-based nutrition education and cooking class programme (3 h weekly), SAYGO is a group-based strength and balance exercise programme (1 h weekly), and the social control programme was a seated, group socialising activity (once a week). Masked assessors ascertained Fried frailty scores at baseline, end of intervention, and at 6, 12, and 24 months after the programme. The primary outcome was change in Fried frailty score at 2 years. Intention-to-treat analyses were completed for all randomised participants, and all participants who had a high (≥75%) adherence were analysed per protocol. This study is registered at ANZCTR, ACTRN12614000827639. FINDINGS: Between May 12, 2016 and April 9, 2018, we assessed 2678 older adults for eligibility, of whom 468 (17%) consented and completed baseline assessment, with a mean age of 80·3 years (SD 5·1) and a mean Fried score of 1·9 (1·2); 59% were women. We randomly allocated these participants into the four groups: 117 in the SC group, 118 in the SAYGO group, 118 in the combined group, and 115 in the control group; 318 participants attended the 24-month follow-up: 89 in the SC group, 78 in the SAYGO group, 73 in the combined group, and 78 in the control group. At the 24-month follow-up, there were no differences in mean Fried scores between the intervention groups and the control group. No adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: The study did not find that the combined SC and SAYGO programme was effective in reducing frailty in pre-frail older adults. Although some short-term benefits were observed in each individual programme, there was no clear evidence of long-term impact. Further research is needed to evaluate combinations of group-based programmes for community-dwelling older adults to optimise their physical function. FUNDING: Health Research Council New Zealand and Ageing Well Challenge (Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment).

Preparation and support for physical activity following hospital discharge after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A survey of current practice in New Zealand.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Engagement in physical activity following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has many benefits and also many potential barriers, especially during the first few months. It is important to explore current clinical practice before investigating ways to optimally prepare and support people to progressively increase their physical activity post-hospital discharge and to navigate the challenges. The aim of the study was to explore current practice in New Zealand hospital services for preparing and supporting people who have had CABG surgery to engage in physical activity following hospital discharge. METHODS: Locality authorisation to participate in the study was sought from all 11 hospitals providing cardiac surgery services in New Zealand. The most senior health professional responsible for preparing people to engage in physical activity following CABG surgery was invited to participate by completing a purpose designed questionnaire on behalf of their hospital service. Respondents were also requested to provide any patient information handouts regarding progressive physical activity engagement following CABG surgery. RESULTS: Responses were received from all nine hospitals that granted locality authorisation. All nine hospitals prepared people to engage in aerobic exercise prior to discharge, predominantly through the provision of a walking schedule. In contrast, no hospitals provided information about engagement in resistance exercise. There was wide variability in both the advice provided regarding sternal precautions and time to return to activities of daily living. Additionally, the facilitation of some elements of self-management for physical activity, in particular problem solving and providing follow up support outside of the cardiac rehabilitation setting was provided infrequently. DISCUSSION: The findings demonstrated variability in service delivery in a number of areas and highlighted potential areas for improvement in light of what is known from the literature. Provision of follow up support for those unable to access outpatient cardiac rehabilitation is a key need.

Factors influencing physical activity engagement following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A mixed methods systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Engagement in physical activity during the initial months following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is important in order to improve health, quality of life and functional outcomes. There are, however, many potential barriers to physical activity engagement during the recovery period. No review studies have focused on barriers and facilitators to engagement in physical activity during the early stages of recovery following CABG surgery. OBJECTIVE: To explore the factors that influence engagement in physical activity during the first three months following CABG surgery. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched. Extracted data from selected studies were synthesised using the Joanna Briggs Institute convergent integrated approach. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Four main themes that influenced engagement were identified: sociodemographic variables; physical symptoms; psychosocial factors; and environmental factors. More barriers were identified than facilitating factors. Psychosocial factors were the most commonly reported barriers in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review provide insights into factors that inhibit and facilitate engagement in physical activity following CABG surgery. Further research specifically exploring factors that influence engagement, especially facilitators, is required.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an online-delivered group-based pain management programme in improving pain-related disability for people with persistent pain-protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (iSelf-help trial).

INTRODUCTION: Persistent non-cancer pain affects one in five adults and is more common in Maori-the Indigenous population of New Zealand (NZ), adults over 65 years, and people living in areas of high deprivation. Despite the evidence supporting multidisciplinary pain management programmes (PMPs), access to PMPs is poor due to long waiting lists. Although online-delivered PMPs enhance access, none have been codesigned with patients or compared with group-based, in-person PMPs. This non-inferiority trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a cocreated, culturally appropriate, online-delivered PMP (iSelf-help) compared with in-person PMP in reducing pain-related disability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Mixed-methods, using a modified participatory action research (PAR) framework, involving three phases. Phase I involved cocreation and cultural appropriateness of iSelf-help by PAR team members. Phase II: The proposed iSelf-help trial is a pragmatic, multicentred, assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Adults (n=180, age ≥18 years) with persistent non-cancer pain eligible for a PMP will be recruited and block randomised (with equal probabilities) to intervention (iSelf-help) and control groups (in-person PMP). The iSelf-help participants will participate in two 60-minute video-conferencing sessions weekly for 12 weeks with access to cocreated resources via smartphone application and a password-protected website. The control participants will receive group-based, in-person delivered PMP. Primary outcome is pain-related disability assessed via modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at 6 months post intervention. Secondary outcomes include anxiety, depression, stress, pain severity, quality of life, acceptance, self-efficacy, catastrophising and fear avoidance. Data will be collected at baseline, after the 12-week intervention, and at 3 and 6 months post intervention. We will conduct economic analyses and mixed-method process evaluations (Phase IIA). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Health and Disability Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (HDEC18/CEN/162). Phase III involves dissemination of findings guided by the PAR team as outcomes become apparent. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12619000771156.

Exploring Factors Influencing Low Back Pain in People With Nondysvascular Lower Limb Amputation: A National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal impairment in people with lower limb amputation. Given the multifactorial nature of LBP, exploring the factors influencing the presence and intensity of LBP is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To investigate which physical, personal, and amputee-specific factors predicted the presence and intensity of LBP in persons with nondysvascular transfemoral amputation (TFA) and transtibial amputation (TTA). DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional survey. SETTING: A national random sample of people with nondysvascular TFA and TTA. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N = 526) with unilateral TFA and TTA due to nondysvascular etiology (ie, trauma, tumors, and congenital causes) and a minimum prosthesis use of 1 year since amputation were invited to participate in the survey. The data from 208 participants (43.4% response rate) were used for multivariate regression analysis. METHODS (INDEPENDENT VARIABLES): Personal (ie, age, body mass, gender, work status, and presence of comorbid conditions), amputee-specific (ie, level of amputation, years of prosthesis use, presence of phantom-limb pain, residual-limb problems, and nonamputated limb pain), and physical factors (ie, pain-provoking postures including standing, bending, lifting, walking, sitting, sit-to-stand, and climbing stairs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES (DEPENDENT VARIABLES): LBP presence and intensity. RESULTS: A multivariate logistic regression model showed that the presence of 2 or more comorbid conditions (prevalence odds ratio [POR] = 4.34, P = .01), residual-limb problems (POR = 3.76, P < .01), and phantom-limb pain (POR = 2.46, P = .01) influenced the presence of LBP. Given the high LBP prevalence (63%) in the study, there is a tendency for overestimation of POR, and the results must be interpreted with caution. In those with LBP, the presence of residual-limb problems (ß = 0.21, P = .01) and experiencing LBP symptoms during sit-to-stand task (ß = 0.22, P = .03) were positively associated with LBP intensity, whereas being employed demonstrated a negative association (ß = -0.18, P = .03) in the multivariate linear regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation professionals should be cognizant of the influence that comorbid conditions, residual-limb problems, and phantom pain have on the presence of LBP in people with nondysvascular lower limb amputation. Further prospective studies could investigate the underlying causal mechanisms of LBP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Outcomes of a community-based lifestyle programme for adults with diabetes or pre-diabetes.

INTRODUCTION Diabetes, a long-term condition increasing in prevalence, requires ongoing healthcare management. Exercise alongside lifestyle education and support is effective for diabetes management. AIM To investigate clinical outcomes and acceptability of a community-based lifestyle programme for adults with diabetes/prediabetes at programme completion and 3-month follow-up. METHODS The 12-week community programme included twice-weekly sessions of self-management education and exercise, supervised by a physiotherapist, physiotherapy students and a nurse. Clinical outcomes assessed were cardiorespiratory fitness, waist circumference, exercise behaviour and self-efficacy. A standardised evaluation form was used to assess programme acceptability. RESULTS Clinically significant improvements were found from baseline (n = 36) to programme completion (n = 25) and 3-months follow-up (n = 20) for the six minute walk test (87 m (95%CI 65-109; p ≤ 0.01), 60 m (95%CI 21-100; p ≤ 0.01)), waist circumference (-3 cm (95%CI -6 to -1), -3 cm (95%CI -6 to 1)), exercise behaviour (aerobic exercise 53 min/week (95%CI 26 to 81; p ≤ 0.01), 71 min/week (95%CI 25 to 118; p ≤ 0.01)) and self-efficacy (0.7 (95%CI -0.2 to 1.6), 0.8 (95%CI 0.04 to 1.5)). Good programme acceptability was demonstrated by themes suggesting a culturally supportive, motivating, friendly, informative atmosphere within the programme. The attrition rate was 30% but there were no adverse medical events related to the programme. DISCUSSION The programme was safe and culturally acceptable and outcomes demonstrated clinical benefit to participants. The attrition rate was largely due to medical reasons unrelated to the programme. This model of a community-based lifestyle programme has the potential to be reproduced in other regions and in adults with similar long-term conditions. KEYWORDS Diabetes Mellitus Type II; Prediabetic state; Co-morbidity; Exercise; Self-management.

Walking is a Feasible Physical Activity for People with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Exercise has been recognized as important in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Walking is a low-cost and low-impact activity, requiring little supervision. It requires no specialist training, is suited to a variety of environments and is inherently a clinically meaningful measure of independence. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a designed walking programme for people with RA successfully facilitated regular physical activity in participants, without detriment to pain levels. METHODS: Thirty-three people with RA were recruited from Dunedin Hospital rheumatology outpatient clinics and enrolled in a walking randomized controlled trial (RCT) feasibility study. Participants were randomly allocated to the walking intervention (n = 11) or control (n = 22) groups. Control participants received a nutrition education session, and the walking intervention group received instructions on a walking route with three loops, to be completed 3-4 times per week. The walking route shape was designed so that the length of the walk could be tailored by participants. Both groups were assessed at baseline and six weeks later. The primary outcome measures were feasibility, acceptability and safety. The principal secondary outcome was change in walking speed after the intervention. Additional outcome measures were a step-up test, activity limitations (on the Health Assessment Questionnaire), global well-being (on the European Quality of Life Questionnaire), self-efficacy for managing arthritis symptoms, self-efficacy for physical activity, daily pedometer readings and a daily visual analogue scale for pain. RESULTS: Participants successfully completed the walk for the suggested frequency, indicating feasibility and acceptability. There were no reported adverse effects of participation and the walking intervention group did not have higher daily pain levels than the control group, indicating safety. The walking intervention group showed a pattern of improvements in self-efficacy and global well-being; no changes in these outcomes were noted in the control group. No outcome measure showed statistically significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Walking appears to be a feasible, acceptable and safe intervention for people with RA. These findings inform the design and power requirements of larger trials of structured walking interventions. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.