Medium-Term Outcomes of Conservative and Surgical Treatments for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Medicare Claims Analysis: Developed by the AUGS Payment Reform Committee.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the 3- to 5-year retreatment outcomes for conservatively and surgically treated urinary incontinence (UI) in a population of women 66 years and older. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used 5% Medicare data to evaluate UI retreatment outcomes of women undergoing physical therapy (PT), pessary treatment, or sling surgery. The data set used inpatient, outpatient, and carrier claims from 2008 to 2016 in women 66 years and older with fee-for-service coverage. Treatment failure was defined as receiving another UI treatment (pessary, PT, sling, Burch urethropexy, or urethral bulking) or repeat sling. A secondary analysis was performed where additional treatment courses of PT or pessary were also considered a treatment failure. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the time from treatment initiation to retreatment. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2013, 13,417 women were included with an index UI treatment, and follow-up continued through 2016. In this cohort, 41.4% received pessary treatment, 31.8% received PT, and 26.8% underwent sling surgery. In the primary analysis, pessaries had the lowest treatment failure rate compared with PT (P<0.001) and sling surgery (P<0.001; survival probability, 0.94 [pessary], 0.90 [PT], 0.88 [sling]). In the analysis where retreatment with PT or a pessary was considered a failure, sling surgery had the lowest retreatment rate (survival probability, 0.58 [pessary], 0.81 [PT], 0.88 [sling]; P<0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: In this administrative database analysis, there was a small but statistically significant difference in treatment failure among women undergoing sling surgery, PT, or pessary treatment, but pessary use was commonly associated with the need for repeat pessary fittings.

Ready for the robot? A cross-sectional survey of OB/GYN fellowship directors' experience and expectations of their incoming fellow's robotic surgical skills.

To describe OB/GYN fellowship directors' (FDs) observations, expectations, and preferences of incoming fellow's robotic surgery preparedness. Cross-sectional study. OB/GYN FDs in gynecologic oncology, minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, and reproductive endocrinology and infertility in the United States. 60 FDs answered the questionnaire. Participants completed an online questionnaire about their preferences and expectations of robotic surgery experience for incoming fellows. FDs observed that many incoming first-year fellows had a baseline understanding of robotic technology (60%) and robotic bedside assist experience (53%). However, few could perform more advanced robotic tasks; with FDs indicating fellows could infrequently robotically suture (18%), or perform the entire hysterectomy (15%). FDs reported higher composite observation than expectation scores (34.3 versus 22.2, p < 0.0001), and higher preference than expectation scores (34.0 versus 22.2, p < 0.0001). The composite expectation score of high-volume divisions was greater than of low-volume divisions (23.7 versus 14.0, p = 0.04). Among the domains identified, FDs most strongly preferred their fellows be able to bedside assist, have a basic understanding of robotic technology, and have basic robotic operative skills. While incoming fellows have more robotic skill than their FDs expect, few are deemed competent to independently operate the robot. Higher volume robotic surgery divisions have higher expectations of the robotic skills of their incoming fellows compared to low-volume divisions; however, FDs neither expected nor preferred their incoming fellows to be fully competent in all aspects of robotic surgery.

Developing an Advanced Alternative Payment Model for Stress Urinary Incontinence.

ABSTRACT: Historically, our health care system has been based on a fee-for-service model, which has resulted in high-cost and fragmented care. The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services is moving toward a paradigm in which health care providers are incentivized to provide cost-effective, coordinated, value-based care in an effort to control costs and ensure high-quality care for all patients. In 2015, the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act repealed the Sustainable Growth Rate and the fee-for-service model, replacing them with a 2-track system: Merit-based Incentive Payment System and the advanced Alternative Payment Model (aAPM) system. In 2016, the American Urogynecologic Society Payment Reform Committee was created and tasked with developing aAPMs for pelvic floor disorders. The purpose of this article is to describe the stress urinary incontinence aAPM framework, the data selected and associated data plan, and some of the challenges considered and encountered during the aAPM development.

A low-cost approach to salpingectomy at cesarean delivery.

There is increasing adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention at the time of gynecologic surgery, which includes the postpartum period. However, there is no consensus on an ideal surgical approach for the parturient vasculature. We describe a safe, low-cost, and accessible approach for bilateral salpingectomy during cesarean delivery that we call the "Mesosalpinx Isolation Salpingectomy Technique" (MIST) that can guide institutions to standardize their postpartum salpingectomy procedures when advanced vessel-sealing devices are not available. In the MIST technique, avascular windows are created within the mesosalpinx close to the tubal vessels. The vasculature is thus fully skeletonized and isolated from the adjacent mesosalpinx before suture ligation, which ensures security of the free-tie to the individual vessels and avoids sharp injury to the mesosalpinx. Not using vessel-sealing devices also eliminates the risk of thermal injury to the adjacent ovarian tissue and vasculature and potentially achieves a cost-savings for the hospital and patient. MIST has been performed in 141 cesarean deliveries in the past 4 years. There were no noted bleeding complications during the salpingectomy procedure, blood transfusions, or instances of postoperative surgical reexploration. In our experience, a surgeon who is new to the procedure takes approximately 15 minutes to complete a bilateral salpingectomy. Those surgeons who are experienced in MIST need only 5 minutes. A video is included that demonstrates the technique.

Variability in gynecologic case volume of obstetrician-gynecologist residents graduating from 2009 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: Residency training in obstetrics-gynecology has changed significantly over time, with residents expected to master an increasing number of surgical procedures. Residency operative case logs are tracked by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, which sets case minimums for all procedures. In 2018, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education created a combined minimally invasive hysterectomy category and now requires graduating residents to complete a minimum of 70 minimally invasive hysterectomies. OBJECTIVES: The objectiges of the study were to evaluate the range of operative gynecological experience across graduating obstetrician-gynecologist residents in the United States and to estimate the number of residents able to meet new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education minimum hysterectomy cases. STUDY DESIGN: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surgical case logs of graduating obstetrician-gynecologist residents from 2009 to 2017 were analyzed for case volume trends. RESULTS: The average total number of gynecological cases per resident decreased from 438.2 to 431.5 (P < .0001). Minimally invasive hysterectomy averages increased from 43.6 to 69.3 (P < .0001), a trend driven principally by an increase in total laparoscopic hysterectomies. Mean case log decreases were noted in invasive cancer (70.7 to 54.3), incontinence and pelvic floor (85.6 to 56.7), and total abdominal hysterectomies (74.4 to 42.9); (P < .0001 for all). Mean increases were seen in total laparoscopic (118.8 to 146.3) and operative hysteroscopy (68.6 to 77.1) cases (P < .0001 for all). The ratio of the 90th percentile to the 10th percentile of resident case logs showed substantial variation in surgical volume for all procedures, although this ratio decreased over time. Graduates who logged 70 minimally invasive hysterectomy cases were estimated to fall at the 51st percentile in 2017; this was down from the 91st percentile in 2009. CONCLUSION: Nationwide, graduates of obstetrician-gynecologist residency experience significant variability in their surgical training. Based on our extrapolation of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education data, approximately half of residency graduates fell below the 70 case minimally invasive hysterectomy minimum in 2017. Meeting the new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education hysterectomy minimums may be challenging for a significant proportion of residency programs. Understanding the scope and variability of gynecology training is needed to continue to improve and address gaps in resident education.