Effects of Preoperative Glucocorticoid Use on Patients Undergoing Single-Level Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Registry Study.

Objective Spinal fusions are gaining popularity as a means of treating spinal deformity and instability from a range of pathologies. The prevalence of glucocorticoid use has also increased in recent decades, and their systemic effects are well-documented. Although commonly used in the preoperative period, the effects of steroids on outcomes among patients undergoing spinal fusions are inadequately described. This study compares the odds of developing complications among patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusions with and without preoperative glucocorticoid use in hopes of establishing more evidence-based parameters for guiding preoperative steroid use. Methods The TriNetX multi-institutional electronic health record database was used to perform a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of clinical outcomes of two cohorts of patients who underwent posterior or posterolateral single-level lumbar fusions with and without interbody fusion, those who used glucocorticoids for at least one week within a year of fusion and those who did not. The outcomes of interest were examined within 30 days of the operation and included death, reoperation, deep or superficial surgical site infection (SSI), pneumonia, reintubation, ventilator dependence, tracheostomy, acute kidney injury (AKI), renal insufficiency, pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep venous thrombosis (DVT), urinary tract infection (UTI), emergency department (ED) visit, sepsis, and myocardial infarction (MI). Results The odds of developing pneumonia within 30 days of spinal fusion in the cohort that used glucocorticoids within one year of operation compared to the cohort without glucocorticoid use was 0.67 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 0.59-0.69). The odds of requiring a tracheostomy within 30 days of spinal fusion in the cohort that used glucocorticoids within one year of operation compared to the cohort without glucocorticoid use was 0.39 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 0.26-0.60). The odds of reoperation, deep and superficial SSI, and ED visits within 30 days of operation were significantly higher for the same glucocorticoid-receiving cohort, with odds ratios of 1.4 (p=0.003, 95% CI: 1.11-1.65), 1.86 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 1.31-2.63), 2.28 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 1.57-3.31), and 1.25 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 1.17-1.33), respectively. After propensity score-matching, there was no significant difference between the odds of death, DVT, PE, MI, UTI, AKI, sepsis, reintubation, and ventilator dependence between the two cohorts. Conclusion In support of much of the current literature regarding preoperative glucocorticoid use and rates of complications, patients who underwent a single-level lumbar fusion and have used glucocorticoids for at least a week within a year of operation experienced significantly higher odds of reoperation, deep and superficial SSI, and ED visits. However, these patients using glucocorticoids were also found to have lower odds of developing pneumonia, renal insufficiency, and tracheostomy requirement than those who did not use steroids within a year of surgery.

Epidural Steroid Injection Prior to Spinal Surgery: A Step-Wise and Wise Approach.

BACKGROUND: An epidural steroid injection (ESI) is used to treat a number of morbid central nervous system pathologies and is considered a reasonably safe procedure. This study aimed to determine the relative infection risk after spinal surgery by comparing outcomes in spinal surgery patients who received an ESI shortly prior to the surgery against those who did not receive an ESI shortly prior to the surgery. METHODS: The present study is a retrospective cohort study using a multi-institutional healthcare database, TriNetX, to collect data on patients who received spinal surgery with and without having had ESIs six months before surgery. Two cohorts were generated: Cohort 1 included patients who had received an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery, and cohort 2 included patients who did not have an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery. The patients in cohort 2 had propensity scores matched 1:1 to those in cohort 1 using common baseline demographics, comorbidities and spinal procedure indications. The spinal procedures and surgeries considered for the analysis included open procedures for any purpose, including exploration, decompression, resection, revision or biopsy. Multiple outcomes were compared across these two cohorts in the three months following the spinal procedure/surgery, including the occurrence of death, surgical site infection, epidural and/or spinal abscess, and dural tear. RESULTS: An ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery was associated with a significant decrease in the likelihood epidural/spinal abscess in the three months after surgery. There was no change in mortality, wound infection or identification of dural tear in the three months after spinal surgery for those who received an ESI six months before spinal surgery. CONCLUSION: This data suggests that epidural steroid injections' anti-inflammatory effects provide benefits before surgery beyond symptomatic relief. Given that the degeneration of spinal pathologies is typically advanced rather than corrected by the body's inflammatory response, it is likely that preventing hyperactivation of the body's immune system in the months preceding surgical intervention, a traumatic insult, is protective compared to no intervention and, importantly, without major adverse effects.

Risk of Glioblastoma Multiforme in Patients Taking Ion Channel Blockers.

Background Ion channels play a role in the development and progression of glioblastoma multiforme. This study investigates the association between the risk of developing glioblastoma multiforme in patients taking these medications. Methods A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis was performed using the TriNetX multinational electronic health record database for patients taking verapamil, digoxin, amiodarone, or diltiazem versus those not taking these medications. The outcome of interest was the incidence of glioblastoma multiforme. Results Verapamil users had an OR of 0.494 (p < 0.0001) of developing glioblastoma versus verapamil non-users. Patients on digoxin had an OR of 0.793 (p = 0.2393), patients on amiodarone had an OR of 0.600 (p = 0.0035), patients on diltiazem had an OR of 0.584 (p < 0.0001), and patients on verapamil, digoxin, amiodarone, or diltiazem had an OR of 0.641 (p < 0.0001) of developing glioblastoma versus patients not taking these medications. Conclusion In patients taking the ion channel blockers diltiazem, amiodarone, or verapamil, the odds of developing glioblastoma multiforme were lower than in patients not taking these medications.

Pregnancy and Childbirth in Women With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Background Idiopathic intracranial hypertension affects many women of childbearing age. However, the literature is sparse regarding pregnancy outcomes for these women. The goal of this study is to investigate the relationship between pregnancy outcomes in patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Methodology The TriNetX Research Network database was used to query 57 healthcare organizations for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension while pregnant (cohort 1) versus those who were pregnant without idiopathic intracranial hypertension (cohort 2). Cohorts were propensity-score matched for confounders related to pregnancy outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were ectopic or molar pregnancy, cesarean section, abortion, preterm labor, depression, pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, and mortality. Chi-square analysis and logistic analysis were used on categorical variables. Results Ectopic/molar pregnancy was seen in 106 (1.75%) versus 117 (1.93%) (odds ratio (OR) 0.904, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.694, 1.179), p = 0.4572) patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Cesarean section was seen in 785 (12.94%) versus 886 (14.59%) (OR 0.869, 95% CI (0.784, 0.964), p = 0.0078) patients, abortion in 536 (8.83%) versus 682 (11.24%) (OR 0.765, 95% CI (0.679, 0.862), p < 0.0001), preterm labor in 498 (8.206%) versus 668 (11.01%) (OR 0.723, 95% CI (0.640, 0.816), p < 0.0001), depression in 1,057 (17.42%) versus 1,061 (17.48%) (OR 0.995, 95% CI (0.906, 1.093), p = 0.9238), and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia in 501 (8.26%) versus 492 (8.11%) (OR 0.1.02, 95% CI (0.896, 1.161), p = 0.7657). Mortality was seen in 68 patients in cohort 1 versus 13 patients in cohort 2 (OR 5.279, 95% CI (2.913, 9.564), p < 0.0001). Conclusions This retrospective study examined pregnancy outcomes for pregnant women with a diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension do not have an increase in rates of abortion, ectopic/molar pregnancy, cesarean section, preterm labor, or depression when compared to women without idiopathic intracranial hypertension. The mortality rate was higher in the idiopathic intracranial hypertension cohort, but still very low. This study demonstrates that pregnancy is generally well tolerated in the idiopathic intracranial hypertension population.

Anxiety as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Delirium in Elective Spine Deformity Surgeries: A National Database Study.

Introduction Generalized anxiety disorder has become one of the most prevalent mental health disorders in the United States. In addition, postoperative delirium has been shown to increase hospital stay, increase mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Few studies have looked at the prevalence of postoperative delirium in patients diagnosed with anxiety undergoing elective spinal deformity procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine if anxiety is a risk factor for postoperative delirium in elective spinal deformity surgeries. Methods The authors performed a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX Research Database. Patients diagnosed with kyphosis or lordosis who then underwent elective spinal correction surgeries were identified. This group was then separated based on the diagnosis of a generalized anxiety disorder before the operation versus no diagnosis. Propensity score adjustment, based on mental disorders and other risk factors, was then used to match cohorts on baseline demographics and characteristics. Analysis was performed on the primary outcome of postoperative delirium, with secondary outcomes of upper respiratory tract infections, surgical site infections, sepsis, ventilator dependence, convulsions, stroke, emergency department visits, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and urinary retention within 30 days after surgery. Results Our search included 1,211 patients with a diagnosis of anxiety and 8,055 patients without anxiety. After propensity score matching, 996 patients remained in each cohort. Statistical analysis showed significant outcomes between the matched cohorts in the anxiety group for postoperative delirium (OR 2.788; 1.587-4.899) and convulsions (OR 1.615; 1.006-2.592). All other outcomes were not significant after propensity score matching. Conclusion These results showed generalized anxiety disorder is a risk factor for postoperative delirium and convulsions after elective spine surgery. Further research is necessary on the effects of mental health disorders on postoperative delirium and other outcomes to better understand the risks in this population.

Pregnancy and Childbirth in Women With Meningioma.

Background Ten percent of women of childbearing age have histologically confirmed meningioma. To date, little is known regarding pregnancy-related outcomes for women with meningioma. Methods We used a de-identified database network (TriNetX's Research Network, https://trinetx.com/) to gather information on pregnant patients with meningioma (cohort 1) versus pregnant patients without meningioma (cohort 2). The primary outcome of interest included the impact of meningioma on mortality at one year. Secondary endpoints included ectopic or molar pregnancy, cesarean section, abortion, preterm labor, depression, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, and craniotomy. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure levels of association between each cohort and the outcomes of interest. Results A total of 1,739 patients were identified in each cohort following propensity-score matching. Mortality was seen in 23 patients (1.32%) in cohort 1 versus 26 patients (1.41%) in cohort 2 (OR 0.88, 95% CI {0.50, 1.55}, p=0.66). Ectopic/ molar pregnancy was seen in 31 (1.78%) versus 42 (2.42%) patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively (OR 0.73, 95% CI {0.046,1.17}, p=0.19). Cesarean section was seen in 126 (7.25%) versus 164 (9.43%) patients, respectively (OR 0.75, 95% CI {0.59,0.97}, p=0.020). Abortion was seen in 128 (7.36%) versus 183 (10.52%) patients, respectively (OR 0.68, 95% CI {0.53,0.86}, p=0.0011). Preterm labor was seen in 75 (4.31%) versus 119 (6.84%) patients, respectively (OR 0.61, 95% CI {0.46,0.83}, p=0.0012). Depression was seen in 258 (14.84%) versus 270 (15.53%) patients, respectively (OR 0.95, 95% CI {0.79,1.14}, p=0.57). Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia was seen in 3.11% versus 5.52% patients, respectively (OR 0.55, 95% CI {0.39,0.77}, p=0.0005). Craniotomy was seen in 74 (4.26%) versus 0 (0%) patients in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively. Conclusion Patients with meningioma were not at higher risk for pregnancy complications, including ectopic/molar pregnancy, cesarean section, abortion, preterm labor, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, and mortality, compared to their non-meningioma counterparts. Still, coordinated care by neurosurgical and obstetrical providers may benefit women with meningiomas who are planning for pregnancy or are currently pregnant.

Evaluating the Evidence: Scientometric Analysis of Highly Cited Neurofibromatosis 1 Publications.

The study of Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is progressing rapidly. This study aimed to identify historical trends in publications focusing on NF1, to find the top 100 most cited publications on this topic, and to evaluate their level of evidence. This study identifies historical trends in publication regarding NF1 with the aim of providing readers useful information about the areas of research being performed, an educational guide to facilitate novice researchers in conducting effective evidence-based medical research, and unique insight into developments and trends of NF 1 research. This study also evaluates the evidence of highly cited papers on NF1. A search of all databases and journals accessible within Elsevier's Scopus was performed on June 27th, 2020, using combinations of the Boolean queries "Neurofibromatosis 1," "Von Recklinghausen," and "NF1," which yielded 13,599 documents. The top 100 most-cited papers were identified, analyzed, and evaluated for level of evidence. Evidence was assessed using the GRADE guidelines. The top 100 most-cited articles span years 1963-2010 and are published in 50 different journals. The average number of citations per publication was 366.5 (range 189-1527). The most cited article is "Neurofibromatosis: Conference Statement" (Stumpf et al., 1988). In this study, the top 100 most-cited works in NF1 are identified, characterized, and analyzed. This study will serve as a historical point of reference for future research, a jumping point for those unfamiliar with the topic, and an educational foundation for future NF1 specialists and researchers.

Outcomes of pregnancy and childbirth in women with hidradenitis suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Many women affected by hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are of childbearing age. To date, the literature is limited on pregnancy-related outcomes for women with HS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate maternal and obstetric outcomes and treatment utilization among women with HS. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Database. Pregnant women with HS (n = 998) and 5:1 age-matched pregnant women without HS (n = 5065) were identified and information on claims related to diagnoses, procedures, and medications were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared to women without HS, pregnant women with HS had significantly lower odds of having a live birth (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.51) and significantly higher odds of having elective terminations (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.13-2.96), gestational hypertension (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.12-1.84), and cesarean deliveries (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.06-1.55), and of receiving HS designated treatment during pregnancy (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 3.56-5.46). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective and convenience sampling and absence of clinical information to correlate HS severity and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with HS have an increased probability of select complicated maternal and obstetric outcomes. Women planning for pregnancy or who are currently pregnant may benefit from coordinated care by dermatologists and obstetric providers.

Evaluating the Evidence: Is Neurolysis or Neurectomy a Better Treatment for Occipital Neuralgia?

Occipital neuralgia, a neuropathy of the occipital nerves, can cause significant pain and distress, resulting in a decrease in the patient's quality of life. Options for surgical treatment involve transection or decompression of the greater and lesser occipital nerves. Current evidence provides no clear consensus regarding one technique over the other. Here, we present a systematic review of the literature to potentially answer this question. Eligible studies compared neurolysis versus neurectomy for the treatment of occipital neuralgia after failure of conservative therapy. Our outcome of interest was resolution of symptoms. We performed a search of MEDLINE/PubMed and Ovid from inception to 2019. Eligible studies included the words "occipital neuralgia" and "surgery." All studies comparing neurolysis to neurectomy were included in the analysis. None of the studies identified were randomized control trials. Each study was evaluated by two independent researchers who assigned a level of evidence according to the American Association of Neurology (AAN) algorithm. Data extracted included mechanism of surgery (neurolysis or neurectomy), resolution of pain symptoms, and length of follow-up. Each study was level IV evidence. After reviewing the data, there was insufficient evidence to recommend one method of treatment over the other. This inconclusive result highlights the importance of a national registry to compare outcomes between the two treatment modalities.

Dilated Epidural Venous Plexus Causing Radiculopathy: A Report of 2 Cases and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: A dilated epidural venous plexus (DEVP) is a rare cause of radiculopathy, back pain, cauda equina syndrome, and other neurological symptoms. This vascular mass can be secondary to inferior vena cava obstruction, portal hypertension, vascular agenesis, and hypercoagulable states. Although rare, DEVP should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients who present with lumbar radiculopathy. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present 2 cases involving patients with lumbar DEVP as well as a literature review of the role of hypercoagulability, vascular anatomy, and inferior vena cava thrombosis in the development of DEVP. The first patient had a history of recurrent deep vein thrombosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and antiphospholipid syndrome. The diagnosis of DEVP was determined after intraoperative biopsy. The patient reported symptom resolution at her 6-month postoperative appointment. The second patient developed DEVP associated with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. She presented with back pain and leg weakness, and DEVP was diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging. A neurosurgeon is currently following the patient. We believe this is the first case of Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome associated with DEVP. CONCLUSIONS: If a patient presents with an enhancing epidural lesion on magnetic resonance imaging and neurological symptoms, DEVP should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Additionally, a search for inferior vena cava thrombosis should be performed as well as risk factors for venous hypertension and hypercoagulable states.

Residency Specialty and National Resident Matching Program Outcomes as Predictors of Academic vs Non-Academic Position as an Attending Physician.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that research can be used as a predictive factor for an academic career for physicians in the fields of radiation oncology, orthopedic surgery, and diagnostic radiology. We seek to determine if this factor is predictive for all medical specialties based on an analysis of public data on physicians who have trained at Hershey Medical Center (HMC) and public National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) charting outcomes. METHODS: We determined the location and job title of all graduates of HMC residency training programs through a combination of publicly available information on HMC's website and other institutions' websites. We separated these into academic and non-academic positions and performed Chi-square analysis to determine if the number of research experiences was predictive of an academic career. RESULTS: Participating in the residency specialties of general surgery, pathology, internal medicine, and neurological surgery are statistically significant predictors of an academic career upon graduation. The average number of research experiences obtained by matched U.S. medical students is not a statistically significant predictor of an academic career upon graduation. CONCLUSION: In contrast to previously published studies, a higher number of research experiences in medical school is not a significant predictor of an academic career for attending physicians who graduated residency at HMC.

Spinal Coccidioidomycosis: A Complication From Medication Noncompliance.

Spinal coccidioidomycosis is a rare disseminated form of coccidioidomycosis infection. According to the literature, majority of patients are African American males. We present a rare case of spinal coccidioidomycosis in a young, Caucasian female with coccidioidomycosis meningitis at age 16 years who presented with bilateral lower extremity weakness after antifungal medication lapse for one year. Imaging revealed cystic arachnoid formations along her thoracic spine. Pathology report confirmed spinal arachnoiditis with coccidioidomycosis. This case report details a rare incidence of spinal coccidioidomycosis and reviews previous literature.

Factors in Orthopaedic Residency Decision-making for Female Applicants: A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedics continues to remain the medical specialty with the lowest sex diversity in the United States. Orthopaedic residency programs are highly motivated to attract the best female candidates in an effort to improve their program diversity, but no studies currently exist that examine the factors of highest importance to female applicants for orthopaedic residency selection. METHODS: A two-part survey was sent to female orthopaedic residents by e-mails available in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery directory, residency program coordinators, Doximity, and institutional websites. The survey included 17 characteristics of residency programs that participants were asked to score for importance and then asked to rank their top five most influential factors when selecting an orthopaedic surgery residency. RESULTS: The most important factors included camaraderie among residents, happiness of current residents, variety/number of cases, fellowship placement, and early surgical/clinical experience, respectively. The least important factors included sex diversity of faculty and residents, number of female residents, concurrent fellows, number of female faculty geographic location near spouse, and finally, attitudes toward maternity leave. DISCUSSION: These data support the notion that efforts by orthopaedic residency programs to improve desirability for female applicants should focus on highlighting some of the more universal, nonsex-related factors such as the happiness and camaraderie among residents and the anticipated clinical experiences. This is opposed to showcasing features, such as maternity leave and number of current female faculty or residents, which would seemingly appeal to female applicants.