University students' and staff attitudes toward the implementation of a "tobacco-free" policy: A view from Qatar.

Objectives: Tobacco-free campus policies are needed to create environments conducive to prevention or quitting in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), where the use of various tobacco products is on the rise among university students. The objectives of this study were to assess overall support for a 100% tobacco-free campus policy and its predictors among different stakeholder groups at the largest national university in Qatar and to understand attitudes towards specific policy components. Study design: A cross-sectional online survey of faculty and students. Methods: We measured sociodemographic variables, tobacco use, and support for components of a 100% tobacco-free campus policy. A total score for support was calculated, and associations with selected predictors were assessed using multivariable linear regression. Results: 413 respondents participated in the survey. A majority of faculty/staff and students (76.6% and 75.5%, respectively) supported the implementation of a 100% tobacco-free campus policy, with a majority supporting extension of the policy beyond cigarettes. Support for other components of the policy varied. Among students, overall support was lower among males and tobacco users and higher among the married. Among faculty and staff, support was lower among Qatari nationals and tobacco users. Conclusion: In the context of a growing tobacco crisis in the EMR, implementing and understanding the impact of tobacco-free campus policies is essential. This paper underscores the importance of addressing diverse stakeholder attitudes and providing empirical evidence to guide policy implementation and evaluation.

Clinical characteristics and surgical approach in Duane retraction syndrome: a study of 691 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical findings of different types of Duane retraction syndrome (DRS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. METHODS: This study was performed on 691 patients with DRS who underwent surgery. Clinical examinations included laterality, abnormal head posture (AHP), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error, amblyopia, deviation, overshoots, and type of surgery. RESULTS: The mean age of patients with DRS was 16.7 ± 12.5 (range 1.0-73) years. The patients included 396 (57.3%) women and 295 (42.7%) men (P < 0.001). DRS type I, was observed in 429 (62.1%), II in 168 (24.3%), III in 88 (12.7%) and IV in 6 (0.9%) patients. Unilateral DRS was observed OS in 628 (90.9%) [471 (%78.9) and OD in 157 (21.1%) eyes (P < 0.001)]. O ther clinical findings were AHP (n = 522, 78.1%), overshoot (n = 236, 34.2%) and amblyopia (n = 118, 17.1%). The prevalence of overshoot in types I, II, and III was 17.5% (75/429), 60.7% (102/168) and 64.8% (57/88), respectively (P < 0.001). The prevalence of amblyopia was significantly lower in patients with AHP (80/522, 15.3%) compared to patients with normal head posture (38/169, 22.5%) (P = 0.023). The mean angle of deviation in the primary position (PP) at distance was 21.7 ± 11.5 △ for esotropic group and 17.8 ± 12.4 △ for exotropic group. Sixty-two (9.0%) patients required second surgery for resolving residual misalignment (1.1 surgeries for each patient). CONCLUSIONS: About two-thirds of DRS patients had AHP, one-third had overshoots, and one-sixth had amblyopia. The results show that different types of DRS are associated with different epidemiological and clinical characteristics.

Management of minor upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the community using the Glasgow Blatchford Score.

BACKGROUND: The Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) is a validated risk assessment tool in primary upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, which accurately predicts the need for intervention (endoscopic therapy, blood transfusion or surgery) or death. AIMS: To identify the GBS that predicts lack of intervention or death and to apply this to clinical practice by managing low-risk patients in the community. METHODS: GBSs prospectively calculated on 232 patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage to identify low-risk score. Patients with low-risk of requiring intervention (GBS