Impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) negatively impacts prognosis of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement and revascularization is generally recommended at the time of surgery. Implications of CAD and preprocedural revascularization in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are not known. METHOD: Patients who underwent successful TAVI from January 2005 to December 2007 were retrospectively divided into five groups according to the extent of CAD assessed with the Duke Myocardial Jeopardy Score: no CAD, CAD with DMJS 0, 2, 4, and > or =6. Study endpoints included 30-day and 1-year survival, evolution of symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and mitral regurgitation (MR) and need of revascularization during follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were included, among which 104 (76.5%) had coexisting CAD. Thirty-day mortality in the five study groups was respectively 6.3, 14.6, 7.1, 5.6, and 17.7% with no statistically significant difference between groups (P = 0.56). Overall survival rate at one year was 77.9% (95% CL: 70.9, 84.9) with no difference between groups (P = 0.63). Symptoms, LVEF, and MR all significantly improved in the first month after TAVI, but the extent of improvement did not differ between groups (P > 0.08). Revascularization after TAVI was uncommon. CONCLUSION: The presence of CAD or nonrevascularized myocardium was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events in this initial cohort. On the basis of these early results, complete revascularization may not constitute a prerequisite of TAVI. This conclusion will require re-assessment as experience accrues in patients with extensive CAD.

Abbreviated infusion of eptifibatide after successful coronary intervention The BRIEF-PCI (Brief Infusion of Eptifibatide Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the early discontinuation of eptifibatide infusion in nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a higher frequency of periprocedural ischemic myonecrosis. BACKGROUND: The recommended regimen for eptifibatide is a double bolus followed by an infusion for 18 h. It is not known whether the infusion can be shortened if the PCI is uncomplicated. METHODS: We enrolled 624 patients with stable angina, acute coronary syndrome, or recent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (>48 h) who underwent successful coronary stenting and received eptifibatide. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either an 18-h infusion or an abbreviated infusion of <2 h. The primary end point was the incidence of periprocedural myonecrosis defined as troponin-I elevation >0.26 microg/l. Secondary end points included death, myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization at 30 days, and in-hospital major bleeding using the REPLACE-2 (Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events) trial criteria. RESULTS: The incidence of periprocedural myonecrosis was 30.1% in the <2-h group versus 28.3% in the 18-h group (mean difference: 1.8%; upper bound of 95% confidence interval: 7.8%; p < 0.012 for noninferiority). The 30-day incidence of myocardial infarction, death, and target vessel revascularization was similar in both groups (p = NS). Major bleeding was less frequent in the <2-h group (1.0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: After uncomplicated PCI, eptifibatide infusion can be abbreviated safely to <2 h. It is not inferior to the standard 18-h infusion in preventing ischemic outcome, and it may be associated with less major bleeding. (Brief Infusion of Eptifibatide Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [BRIEF PCI]; NCT00111566).

Direct stenting with TAXUS stents seems to be as safe and effective as with predilatation. A post hoc analysis of TAXUS II.

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: Although direct coronary stenting does not improve angiographic outcome, it makes sense by reducing procedure times, radiation exposure and costs. Other potential advantages of direct stenting may be a reduction of myocardial ischemia time, which could be clinically relevant in high-risk patients. With the introduction of drug-eluting stents, however, concern arose that direct stenting would possibly damage the polymer coating and change or diminish the efficacy of the programmed drug release. Also, concerns about safety by preventing optimal apposition of single stent struts developed. It is the purpose of this paper to retrospectively analyze the data from the TAXUS-II Trial (536 patients) regarding patients with and without direct stenting. While predilatation was recommended per protocol, direct stenting was not forbidden: thus, direct stenting was performed in 49 patients (TAXUS n = 23, control n = 26). RESULTS: In the TAXUS groups, there was no significant difference regarding major adverse cardiac events (MACE; 7.5% vs. 4.3%), angiographic restenosis in the analysis segment (4.8% vs. 4.3%), late loss (0.28 +/- 0.36 vs. 0.33 +/- 0.30 mm) or intravascular ultrasound-(IVUS-)measured volume obstruction (7.95 +/- 9.84% vs. 5.61 +/- 7.91%) at six months between the predilated and directly stented patients. The same was true for the patients receiving the control stent. Compared with the directly stented control group, the statistically significant positive effects of TAXUS direct stenting were maintained, regarding angiographic restenosis in the analysis segment (4.3% vs. 30.8%), late loss (0.33 +/- 0.30 vs. 0.80 +/- 0.62 mm) or IVUS-measured volume obstruction (5.61 +/- 7.91% vs. 22.50 +/- 21.62%) at six months. MACE was reduced from 19.2% to 4.3%; due to the small number of patients this trend did not reach statistical significance. After predilatation, all parameters were significantly improved by the TAXUS stent. CONCLUSION: Comparison of patients receiving TAXUS stents with or without predilatation revealed no differences in clinical, angiographic or IVUS parameters at six months. This suggests that direct stenting with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent is feasible, safe and equally effective. Randomized trials comparing stenting after predilatation versus direct stenting with drug-eluting stents are warranted.

Local intracoronary administration of antisense oligonucleotide against c-myc for the prevention of in-stent restenosis: results of the randomized investigation by the Thoraxcenter of antisense DNA using local delivery and IVUS after coronary stenting (ITALICS) trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine whether antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) directed against the nuclear proto-oncogene c-myc could inhibit restenosis when given by local delivery immediately after coronary stent implantation. BACKGROUND: Failure of conventional pharmacologic therapies to reduce the incidence of coronary restenosis after percutaneous revascularization techniques has prompted interest in the use of agents that target intracellular central regulatory mechanisms. METHODS: Eighty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg of phosphorothioate-modified 15-mer antisense ODN or saline vehicle by intracoronary local delivery after coronary stent implantation. The primary end point was percent neointimal volume obstruction measured by computerized analysis of electrocardiogram-gated intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at six-month follow-up. Secondary end points included clinical outcome and quantitative coronary angiography analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of follow-up IVUS data was performed on 77 patients. In-stent volume obstruction was similar between groups (44 +/- 16% and 46 +/- 14%, placebo vs. ODN; p = 0.57; 95% confidence interval: -1.13 to 0.85). Minimum luminal diameter increased from 0.84 +/- 0.36 and 0.90 +/- 0.45 (p = 0.55) to 2.70 +/- 0.37 and 2.80 +/- 0.37 (p = 0.28) after stent implantation, which decreased to 1.50 +/- 0.61 and 1.50 +/- 0.53 (p = 0.98) by six months, yielding similar loss indexes (placebo vs. ODN, respectively). There were no differences in angiographic restenosis rates (38.5 and 34.2%; p = 0.81; placebo vs. ODN) or clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 10 mg of phosphorothioate-modified ODN directed against c-myc does not reduce neointimal volume obstruction or the angiographic restenosis rate in this patient population.

Clinical and angiographic results with the NIR stent: First International NIR Endovascular Stent Study (FINESS-II).

BACKGROUND: Although safety and efficacy of the NIR trade mark stent have been reported, the long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes have yet to be investigated. The FINESS-II study (First International NIR Endovascular Stent Study) was designed to assess the procedural safety of single 9 and 16 mm NIR stent implantation, the six-month restenosis rate and finally the six- and 12-month clinical outcome of patients treated with this novel coronary stent. METHODS: Patients with angina and a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery of >3 and <5 mm diameter were included in this multicentre, prospective, observational trial. Clinical follow-up was obtained at one, six and 12 months. Angiography was performed before and after the stent implantation and at six months. The primary endpoint included major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization) within 30 days after the procedure. Major bleeding complications and subacute stent thrombosis within the first 30 days were also reported as specific endpoints. Secondary endpoints were major cardiac-event-free survival at six- and 12-month follow-up and angiographic restenosis at six months. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (81% male, mean age 60 +/- 10 years), with stable (54%), unstable (40%) angina pectoris or silent ischemia (6%) were enrolled. The target vessel diameter was 2.94 +/- 0.54 mm. The minimal lumen diameter pre, post and at follow-up was 1.04 +/- 0.32 mm, 2.64 +/- 0.42 mm and 1.88 +/- 0.63 mm, respectively. Restenosis rate according to the >50% diameter stenosis criterion at six month follow-up was 19% (26/136). At 12 months, the event-free survival rate was 83% (two deaths, one Q-wave and three non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions, four bypass surgery and 17 target lesion revascularizations), while 87% of the patients were free of angina pectoris. CONCLUSION: the outcome of the FINESS-II trial is comparable to those observed in previous stent trials (Benestent II), indicating that the coronary NIR stent is safe and effective as a primary device for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions in patients with (un)stable angina pectoris.

Clinical and angiographic results with the beStent: the Registry for Optimal beStent Evaluation (ROSE) trial.

BACKGROUND: Although safety and efficacy of the beStent (Medtronic Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, USA) have been described, the long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes have yet to be investigated. The ROSE (Registry for Optimal beStent Evaluation) trial was designed to assess the procedural safety of single 15 mm beStent implantation, and the six-month angiographic and 12-month clinical outcomes of patients treated with this novel coronary stent. METHODS: Patients with angina and a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery of >/=2.75 mm diameter were included in this multicenter, prospective, observational trial. Clinical follow-up was obtained at one, six and 12 months. Angiography was performed before and after the stent implantation and at six months. The primary end-point included major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization), major bleeding complications, and thrombotic occlusions at one-month follow-up. Secondary end-points were major cardiac-event-free survival at six- and 12-month follow-up and angiographic restenosis at six months. A total of 120 patients (80% male, mean age 58.6 +/- 10.6 years) with stable (48%) or unstable (44%) angina pectoris were allocated. The target vessel reference diameter pre-procedure was 2.85 +/- 0.52 mm. RESULTS: Minimal lumen diameter pre/post and at follow-up was 0.97 +/- 0.28 mm, 2.53 +/- 0.40 mm and 1.86 +/- 0.63 mm, respectively. Restenosis rate according to the >50% diameter stenosis criterion at six-month follow-up was 21.5%. At 12 months, the event-free survival rate was 75% (no deaths, two Q-wave and seven non-Q-wave infarctions, five bypass surgery interventions and 16 target lesion revascularizations), whilst 87% of the patients were free of angina pectoris. CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively high percentage of small vessels, the outcome of the ROSE trial is comparable to those observed in previous stent trials, indicating that the coronary beStent is safe and effective as a primary device for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions in patients with (un)stable angina pectoris.

First clinical experience with the R Stent: a new highly flexible stainless steel tube intracoronary stent.

BACKGROUND: Coronary stents have been used with increasing frequency and in increasingly complex coronary disease. A new 316 LVM stainless steel coronary stent, the R Stent, has been designed to provide maximum flexibility for tracking and high radial strength post-deployment. PURPOSE: To assess the clinical feasibility of the R Stent in a tertiary referral population of patients with coronary heart disease. Specific objectives are to assess the R Stent's deployment success, angiographic and procedural success (<20% residual stenosis and >TIMI 2 flow), safety (absence of complications), and 30-day clinical success (angiographic/procedural success plus no major adverse coronary events). METHODS: Between April and November 1998, stent deployment was attempted in 27 patients with stable (46%) or unstable (54%) angina pectoris who qualified for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Eighty per cent of patients had a pre-existing history of myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and several of the lesions were anatomically complex (totally occluded, n 32; thrombus present, n 32; heavily calcified, n 33; ostial, n 31; >20 mm long, n 39; angulation >45 degrees, n 37). Lesions in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts were excluded. Adjunctive medical management included intraprocedural aspirin and heparin and post-procedural aspirin and ticlopidine. After deployment, patients were followed up in the hospital and at 30 days post procedure. RESULTS: Stent deployment was achieved in 32 of 33 attempts (26 of 27 patients). There was one deployment failure in a long, calcified ostial and proximal left coronary lesion. In the 26 successful deployments, TIMI 3 flow was achieved. One other patient experienced a painless increase in creatine kinase to 375 (CK-MB of 59) at 12 h without ECG changes. At 30 days, there were no deaths, no myocardial infarctions, no subacute thromboses, no repeat interventions, no bypass surgeries and no bleeding complications. Only the patient with post-procedural CK-MB elevation experience recurrence of CCS class 2 angina within the 30 days. CONCLUSION: The R Stent is a promising new device for the treatment of complex coronary heart disease. A larger, more broadly-based study is warranted.