To report hounsfeld units or not: There is no question.

INTRODUCTION: Most adrenal incidentalomas are not appropriately evaluated. Reporting the mass in the radiology report summary and providing recommendations in the report can positively impact evaluation. This study evaluated the effect of reporting Hounsfield units(HU) on adrenal incidentaloma follow-up. METHODS: Patients with adrenal incidentalomas identified on noncontrast CT scan from 2015 to 2020 â€‹at a tertiary care institution were studied. Chart review was conducted. Patient and imaging characteristics were compared between patients who did and did not have HU reported. Outcomes of interest were 1)outpatient referral, 2)biochemical evaluation, and 3)dedicated imaging if appropriate. Multivariate analysis determined the impact of HU, reporting in the summary and provision of recommendations on the outcomes. RESULTS: 363 patients were studied, 36(9.9 â€‹%) had HU reported. When HU were used in addition to recommendations and reporting in the summary, the likelihood of outpatient referral increased from 10.1 to 32.6-fold (95%CI 7.7-138.1, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Similarly, the likelihood of biochemical workup increased from 2.5 to 7.8-fold (95%CI 2.5-24.1, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSION: Recording adrenal incidentaloma HU on non-contrast CT scans was associated with increased rates of outpatient referral and biochemical workup.

Older age impacts outcomes after adrenalectomy.

BACKGROUND: Adrenalectomy is well tolerated with low complication rates. It is unclear if these excellent outcomes are consistent across all age groups. METHODS: The 2015-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets were used. Patients who underwent adrenalectomy were identified and grouped based on age: ≤60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80, and >80 years. Patient characteristics, surgical indications, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared between age groups. Primary outcome measures were mortality, morbidity, postoperative length of stay, non-home discharge, and unplanned readmission. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Adrenalectomy was performed on 6,114 patients. Younger patients more frequently had surgery for non-functional benign neoplasms compared with older (55.7% vs 52.8% vs 45.9% vs 45.3%, for patients ≤60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80, and >80 years, respectively, P < .001), and less frequently had surgery for malignancy (8.8% vs 14.4% vs 22.5% vs 24.5%, P < .001). The median length of stay for patients ≤60 was 1 day compared with 2 days for patients 61-70, 71-80, and >80 (P < .001). The overall mortality rate was <1% and did not differ based on age (P = .18). Morbidity occurred less frequently in the younger age groups (7.3% vs 8.9% vs 11.2% vs 16.0%, P < .001) compared with older. Similar trends were seen for non-home discharge (1.4% vs 2.5% vs 4.8% vs 17.0%, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, patients aged >80 had a 2-fold increased likelihood of morbidity and a 9-fold increased likelihood of non-home discharge compared to patients aged ≤60. CONCLUSION: Older age is associated with morbidity and non-home discharge after adrenalectomy. Knowledge of these risks is critical when counseling an aging surgical population.