Best-Evidence Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of mini-open carpal tunnel release (mOCTR) using best-evidence synthesis methods. Methods: We systematically searched for prospective studies published from January 2013 to July 2023 that reported outcomes from a minimum of 50 mOCTR cases. The outcomes included Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS) and Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS), pain visual analog scale (VAS), complication rate, and reoperation rate. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects meta-analysis, with metaregression to identify the associations between patient- and study-level factors with surgical outcomes. Results: The meta-analysis included 23 studies with 2,303 patients followed for median durations ranging from 6 to 12 months depending on the outcome. Mini-open carpal tunnel release resulted in statistically significant and clinically important improvements in Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (mean difference = -25.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -36.4 to -14.5; P < .001), BCTQ-SSS (mean difference = -2.2; 95% CI: -2.5 to -1.9; P < .001), BCTQ-FSS (mean difference = -2.1; 95% CI: -2.4 to -1.7; P < .001), and pain VAS (mean difference = -5.1; 95% CI: -6.2 to -4.1; P < .001). The sole predictor of improvement in BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and pain VAS was a higher preoperative score for the respective variable (all P < .001). The risk of complications (mainly short-term pillar pain or scar complications) was 8.9% (95% CI: 4.0%-13.8%) and increased with longer incision lengths (P = .008). Revision carpal tunnel release was performed in 0.6% (95% CI: 0.1%-1.0%) of the cases during follow-up. No cases of median nerve transection were reported. Conclusions: Based on a best-evidence meta-analysis of contemporary studies, mOCTR significantly improved function and pain, with a relatively low risk of mainly temporary complications. Patient outcomes after mOCTR were influenced by patient symptomatology and surgical incision length. Clinical relevance: Mini-open carpal tunnel release is an effective surgical option that significantly improves symptoms and function, especially for patients with more severe baseline dysfunction. Surgeons should use the shortest incision that allows adequate visualization to safely divide the transverse carpal ligament.

Best-Evidence Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Outcomes.

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) using best-evidence synthesis methods. Methods: A systematic search of multiple databases was conducted for prospective contemporary studies published between January 2013 and January 2023 with at least 50 ECTR cases. Outcomes included the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH) measured on a 0-100 scale, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS) and Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS) on a 1-5 scale, pain visual analog scale on a 0-10 scale, conversion to open carpal tunnel release (CTR), complications, and reoperations. Outcomes were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Metaregression was used to determine the association of patient- and study-level factors with ECTR outcomes. Results: A total of 17 studies with 1,632 patients treated with ECTR were included. Median follow-up durations ranged from 4 to 7 months depending on the outcome. Statistically significant and clinically important improvements were noted after ECTR for Q-DASH, BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and pain visual analog scale scores, with mean differences from baseline of -28.8, -1.8, -1.5, and -5.1, respectively (P < .001 for all). In metaregression, the strongest predictor of improvement in Q-DASH, BCTQ-SSS, and BCTQ-FSS was a greater preoperative score for that variable (all P ≤ .005), indicating that patients with worse symptoms improved the most. The risks of conversion to open CTR, complications, and revision CTR were 0.7%, 0.7%, and 0.5%, respectively. Conclusions: In a best-evidence synthesis of contemporary studies, ECTR resulted in significant improvements in function and pain, with a low risk of conversion to open surgery, complications, and reoperations over short-term follow-up. Clinical relevance: Patients treated with ECTR can expect generally favorable clinical outcomes over the short term. However, long-term outcomes after ECTR are not well characterized.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Revision Within 1 Year of Primary Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: The annual volume of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in the United States has been estimated to be 577 000 per year. Our objectives were to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for revision CTR within 1 year of primary CTR. METHODS: We identified all adult patients undergoing primary CTR from October 2015 to September 2019 in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We used the CPT modifier codes to determine laterality of index and revision procedures. We estimated multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models to evaluate risk factors for revision CTR within 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 80 423 primary CTR procedures, 178 (0.22%) underwent a revision CTR within 1 year of the index surgery. The mean (SD) age of the entire cohort was 58.69 (14.43) years, 61.1% were women, 73.2% were non-Hispanic white, 42.9% were covered through private insurance, and 9.5% had diabetes mellitus. Workers' compensation insurance (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.98, P = .02) and simultaneous bilateral CTR (OR = 14.91, 95% CI, 9.62-23.12, P < .001) were associated with revision CTR within 1 year of the index procedure. No models demonstrated an association between endoscopic technique or surgeon volume and revision CTR. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of revision CTR within 1 year was lower than that previously reported. Patients covered by workers' compensation and those undergoing simultaneous bilateral CTR had higher likelihood of a revision CTR within 1 year, whereas endoscopic technique and surgeon volume were not associated with revision CTR within 1 year.

Carpometacarpal Joint Pathology in the Thumb and Hand: Evaluation and Management of Difficult Conditions.

Thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty with complete trapeziectomy with or without suspensionplasty, ligament reconstruction, and/or tendon interposition is largely considered equivalent techniques in providing pain relief and improving function for patients with thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. In cases of continued pain, instability, and dysfunction following an index surgery, one must first identify the cause of failure. Any options for revision surgery depend on addressing the specific cause of persistent symptoms with awareness of available options. Most of the patients undergoing revision surgeries can achieve good to fair outcomes.

Bringing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Into Practice: A Review of the Latest Developments in PROM Use in the Evaluation and Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

As health care systems globally shift toward optimizing value, defined as health outcomes achieved per dollar spent across a full cycle of care, there has been increasing focus on using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to gauge success. Patient-reported outcome measures are validated questionnaires that allow patients to share their health status across several domains (eg, pain or physical function). This trend has been particularly notable in hand surgery, with PROM use investigated for many common hand conditions, including carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren contracture, trigger finger, osteoarthritis, and wrist ganglion. The purpose of this article is to review recent developments in the use of PROM instruments, including the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, for the evaluation and treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The considerable progress in establishing PROMs for use in carpal tunnel syndrome is reviewed, and future improvements are proposed to standardize PROM use and bring PROMs into day-to-day clinical practice for individualized patient treatment decision-making and counseling.

Using MaxDiff Analysis to Elicit Patients' Treatment Preferences for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 60 Years and Older.

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine how the attributes of surgical and nonsurgical distal radius fracture (DRF) treatments affect patient treatment preferences. METHODS: Two hundred fifty patients aged 60 years and older were contacted from a single-hand surgeon's practice, and 172 chose to participate. We built a series of best-worst scaling experiments for the MaxDiff analysis to determine the relative importance of treatment attributes. Hierarchical Bayes analysis was used to generate individual-level item scores (ISs) for each attribute that together have a total sum of 100. RESULTS: One hundred general hand clinic patients without a history of a DRF and 43 patients with a history of a DRF completed the survey. For the general hand clinic patients, the most important attributes to avoid when choosing a DRF treatment (in descending order) were the longer time to full recovery (IS, 24.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.4-26.3), longer time spent in a cast (IS, 22.8; 95% CI, 21.5-24.2), and higher complication rates (IS, 18.4; 95% CI, 16.9-19.8). Meanwhile, for patients with a history of a DRF, the most important attributes to avoid (in descending order) were a longer time to full recovery (IS, 25.6; 95% CI, 23.3-27.9), longer time spent in a cast (IS, 22.8; 95% CI, 19.9-25.7), and abnormal alignment of the radius on x-ray (IS, 18.3; 95% CI, 15.4-21.3). For both the groups, the least concerning attributes based on the IS were appearance-scar, appearance-bump, and the need for anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Eliciting patient preferences is a vital component of shared decision-making and advancing patient-centered care. As conceptualized in this MaxDiff analysis, when choosing a DRF treatment, patients mostly want to avoid a longer time to full recovery and a longer time in a cast, whereas patients have the least concern about appearance and need for anesthesia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Eliciting patient preferences is a vital component of shared decision-making. Our results may provide guidance to surgeons in discussions on the relative benefits of surgical and nonsurgical DRF treatments, by quantifying the most and least important factors to patients.

Protocol of a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Office-Based Carpal Tunnel Release With Ultrasound Guidance (ROBUST).

Background Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a common surgical procedure for patients with severe or refractory carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) symptoms. Historically, CTR procedures have been performed in a hospital or an ambulatory surgery center (ASC). However, due to advancements in techniques, greater patient demand, and concerns about growing healthcare costs, there is a distinct trend toward performing CTR procedures in an office-based setting. Several small studies with limited follow-up duration have demonstrated the feasibility of CTR with ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) when performed in an office-based setting. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of office-based CTR-US in a large cohort of patients (n=140) with symptomatic CTS followed for two years post-treatment. Design and methods ROBUST is a prospective multicenter observational study in which 140 subjects at up to 12 sites in the United States will be treated with CTR-US in an office-based setting. The primary endpoint of the study is the change in the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale score. Secondary endpoints include time to return to normal daily activities, time to return to work among employed subjects, change in the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale score, change in the Michigan Hand Questionnaire overall and domain scores, change in the Numeric Pain Scale score, change in the EuroQoL-5 Dimension 5-Level score, global satisfaction scores, and the incidence of device or procedure-related adverse events. The primary analysis of study endpoints will occur three months post-treatment. Patient follow-up in this study will continue for two years. Conclusions A central institutional review board approved the study protocol, and a data safety monitoring board will provide study oversight. The authors plan to report study results at medical conferences and in peer-reviewed medical journals. The outcomes of ROBUST will provide physicians, patients, and payors with important safety and effectiveness data regarding the clinical utility of CTR-US when performed in an office setting.

What Factors Are Associated With Revision Cubital Tunnel Release Within 3 Years?

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that patient demographics such as age, payer factors such as insurance type, clinical characteristics such as preoperative opioid use, and disease grade but not surgical procedure are associated with revision surgery to treat cubital tunnel syndrome. However, prior studies evaluating factors associated with revision surgery after primary cubital tunnel release have been relatively small and have involved patients from a single institution or included only a single payer. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What percentage of patients who underwent cubital tunnel release underwent revision within 3 years? (2) What factors are associated with revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years of primary cubital tunnel release? METHODS: We identified all adult patients who underwent primary cubital tunnel release from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017, in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database using Current Procedural Terminology codes. We chose this database because it includes all payers and nearly all facilities in a large geographic area where cubital tunnel release may be performed. We used Current Procedural Terminology modifier codes to determine the laterality of primary and revision procedures. The mean age of the cohort overall was 53 ± 14 years, 43% (8490 of 19,683) were women, and 73% (14,308 of 19,683) were non-Hispanic White. The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database organization does not include a listing of all state residents and thus does not allow for censoring of patients who move out of state. All patients were followed for 3 years. We developed a multivariable hierarchical logistic regression model to model factors independently associated with revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years. Key explanatory variables included age, gender, race or ethnicity, insurance, patient residential location, medical comorbidities, concomitant procedures, whether the procedure was unilateral or bilateral, and year. The model also controlled for facility-level random effects to account for the clustering of observations among these entities. RESULTS: The risk of revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years of the primary procedure was 0.7% (141 of 19,683). The median time to revision cubital tunnel release was 448 days (interquartile range 210 to 861 days). After controlling for patient-level covariates and facility random effects, and compared with their respective counterparts, the odds of revision surgery were higher for patients with workers compensation insurance (odds ratio 2.14 [95% confidence interval 1.38 to 3.32]; p < 0.001), a simultaneous bilateral index procedure (OR 12.26 [95% CI 5.93 to 25.32]; p < 0.001), and those who underwent submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve (OR 2.82 [95% CI 1.35 to 5.89]; p = 0.006). The odds of revision surgery were lower with increasing age (OR 0.79 per 10 years [95% CI 0.69 to 0.91]; p < 0.001) and a concomitant carpal tunnel release (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.98]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The risk of revision cubital tunnel release was low. Surgeons should be cautious when performing simultaneous bilateral cubital tunnel release and when performing submuscular transposition in the setting of primary cubital tunnel release. Patients with workers compensation insurance should be informed they are at increased odds for undergoing subsequent revision cubital tunnel release within 3 years. Future work may seek to better understand whether these same effects are seen in other populations. Future work might also evaluate how these and other factors such as disease severity could affect functional outcomes and the trajectory of recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Older Patients Demonstrate PROMIS Outcomes Comparable to Younger Cohorts After Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: The utility of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in monitoring clinical progress after carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients of different ages remains unknown. We sought to evaluate early PROMIS scores in elderly patients (ie, those aged ≥65 years) after CTR and compare those with all younger patients after CTR. METHODS: Patients presenting to a single academic medical center for CTR between September 2018 and January 2020 completed PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and upper extremity (UE) computer adaptive tests and answered a single 5-point Likert-scale question evaluating subjective changes in their condition following CTR. Patients were divided into 3 age groups, and preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores were compared. RESULTS: In all, 214 patients fit inclusion criteria: 86 aged 18-54 years, 71 aged 55-64 years, and 57 aged ≥65 years. Subjective improvement was reported in 70.9% (n = 61), 84.5% (n = 60), and 71.9% (n = 41) of patients aged ≤54, 55-64, and ≥65 years, respectively. Patients aged ≤54 years showed significantly worse UE scores (P = .02), whereas those aged 55-64 years demonstrated significant worsening in all 3 PROMIS domains (P < .01). Patients aged ≥65 years who reported subjective improvement after CTR demonstrated significant improvement in PI scores (P = .03), whereas significant worsening of all PROMIS scores was observed in the subset of patients aged 55-64 years who reported subjective improvement (P < .01, .04, and .04 for PF, PI, and UE, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients showed worsening in PROMIS scores after CTR, whereas elderly patients did not show similar magnitude reductions in PROMIS scores. Moreover, the subset of elderly patients endorsing subjective improvement after CTR had reduced PI scores, consistent with less postoperative pain limitations.

Evaluation of Clinical Recovery After Surgical Treatment for Hand Ischemia From Vasospastic and Occlusive Disease Using PROMIS.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature describing the recovery trajectory after surgery for upper extremity ischemia. Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), Upper Extremity (UE), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression domains, we aimed to describe the postoperative recovery of such patients. METHODS: We queried our PROMIS database for patients undergoing surgery for vasospastic or occlusive disease over a 4.5-year period. Inclusion criteria were preoperative, early (average 3 weeks) and late (average 6 months) postoperative PROMIS PF and/or UE, PI, and Depression scores. The change in PROMIS scores was calculated for each time point. Changes in PROMIS scores were compared with minimal clinically important difference estimates. RESULTS: We identified 13 patients undergoing 13 surgical interventions that met inclusion criteria. More than one-half of our patients were men (n = 7 [54%]), and more than one-half of the surgeries (n = 7 [54%]) were for isolated occlusive diagnoses, with the remainder for vasospastic disease. At short-term postoperative follow-up, the change in PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression scores was -6.34 (SD: 9.13), -6.81 (SD: 9.61), 3.16 (SD: 5.78), and -3.05 (SD: 8.37), respectively. At mid-term postoperative follow-up, the change in PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression scores was 4.45 (SD: 10.33), 8.04 (SD: 13.84), -7.03 (SD: 7.06), and -12.27 (SD: 10.85), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest patients undergoing surgical treatment for upper extremity ischemia experience a worsening of functional symptoms initially, as expected, followed by notable improvement.

Evaluation of PROMIS Scores 6 Weeks after Conservative Management of Carpometacarpal Thumb Arthritis.

Patient-reported outcome measures are being increasingly emphasized to assign value to care' given the current trend toward pay-for-performance healthcare. We sought to determine if the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), a general questionnaire, is sensitive enough to detect improvement after corticosteroid injection or splinting/hand therapy for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis. Methods: This is a retrospective study analyzing two groups with thumb CMC arthritis: 88 patients who received splinting/hand therapy and 6-week follow-up and 70 patients with steroid injection and 6-week follow-up. PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Depression, and Upper Extremity (UE) scores were collected at each visit. We used paired t-tests to compare 6-week follow-up scores to baseline scores within each group. Results: The mean age for the steroid injection group was 60.1 years old, and it was 61.8 years old for the returning splinting/hand therapy group. There were no significant differences in PROMIS PF, PI, Depression, or UE scores for patients who returned after 6 weeks of treatment with splinting/hand therapy. Moreover, at 6 weeks postinjection, PROMIS PF and UE scores marginally increased, whereas PI and Depression scores decreased with statistical significance. Conclusions: Hand surgeons should be aware of the limitations of PROMIS when evaluating patients after conservative treatment for thumb CMC arthritis. There were no significant differences in PROMIS scores for patients with thumb CMC arthritis who returned after receiving splinting/hand therapy for 6 weeks. Meanwhile, PI scores can be used primarily to monitor for improvement after steroid injection for thumb CMC arthritis.

Complications and Clinical Outcomes Following Zone I Flexor Tendon Repair Using All-Inside Suture Fixation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate complications and outcomes of an all-inside repair technique for flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) avulsions. METHODS: A retrospective review of a single institution database identified all FDP avulsions that were repaired using an all-inside technique by a single surgeon. In this method, 2 Keith needles are drilled from the volar to dorsal aspect, exiting proximal to the nail matrix and within the extensor tendon. Nonabsorbable sutures were placed in the flexor tendon and passed through the bone tunnels, tying dorsally over the distal phalanx. The demographics characteristics, injury characteristics, the surgical procedure, postoperative complications, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were included in the study. The average age was 40 years (range, 21-68 years), and 2 patients were women. Seventeen fingers were included: 14 ring fingers, 1 index finger, and 2 little fingers. Six patients had an associated distal phalanx fracture and one had an associated distal interphalangeal joint dislocation. The average time between injury and surgery was 9 days (range, 2-18 days). Four patients had complications: 3 with erythema related to infection, which appeared to be a reaction to the suture prompting removal, and 1 with a subungual mass related to the suture at removal. One patient had persistent pain. Postoperative range of motion, assessed using the Strickland criteria, was excellent or good in 5 (33%) of 15 patients, but this was predominantly due to motion at the proximal joints as overall DIP motion was limited. Patients had a mean distal interphalangeal joint range of motion of 24° (range, 0° to 55°). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, repair of FDP avulsions via all-inside suture fixation is associated with limited distal interphalangeal joint motion and an incidence of infection (24%) at final follow-up. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Value-Based Health Care in Hand Surgery: Where Are We & Where Do We Go From Here?

Health care delivery is broken. The cost of care continues to skyrocket and the outcomes most important to patients are often a mystery. Further, care is often delivered via a fee-for-service model where surgeons are rewarded for the quantity, not the quality, of services provided. Such a health care delivery system is not sustainable and does not incentivize stakeholders to focus on the most important element of the health care delivery "puzzle": the patient. Fortunately, we are in the midst of transforming our health care delivery system, with a focus on optimizing the value of care delivery (ie, health outcomes achieved per dollar spent across a full care cycle). In hand surgery, progress has been made as part of this health system evolution. However, there remains much to accomplish. In this article, the authors review the 6 components of a strategic agenda for moving to a high-value health care delivery system for hand surgery, focusing on where we are today and where we need to go from here.

Outcomes following surgical treatment of distal radial fracture: a comparison of older and younger patients using PROMIS.

The purpose of this study was to assess the recovery patterns following surgery for distal radial fracture (DRF) in patients over (n = 99) and under (n = 273) the age of 65 using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) questionnaires. Both the older and younger cohorts showed postoperative improvement in PF and PI. The younger cohort had higher PF scores from 1 to 6 months postoperatively, however, PI scores were not significantly different between the cohorts during any period. A greater proportion of younger patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference improvement on the PROMIS PF (80% versus 66%) and PI (88% versus 75%) scales. To appropriately manage postoperative expectations, older patients should be counselled that they would likely experience most of their functional recovery by 3 months and limitations due to pain would likely be stable by 1 month.Level of evidence: II.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference in Patients Following Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture.

PURPOSE: We estimated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) computer adaptive tests (CATs) following surgical treatment of distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: Adult patients surgically treated between November 2017 and November 2020 for isolated DRF were identified. Demographic and patient-reported outcome data were extracted from the electronic health record. Outcomes of interest were the PROMIS PF and PI CATs. Inclusion criteria were met if: (1) PROMIS PF and PI scores were available at preoperative and postoperative visits; and (2) a postoperative clinical anchor question asking about overall response to treatment was answered. An anchor-based MCID estimate was determined by calculating the average absolute score change in PROMIS PF and PI for patients who indicated a mild change to the anchor question. A distribution-based MCID estimate was also calculated using the standard error of measurement and effect sizes of change. RESULTS: The changes in PROMIS PF and PI scores were significantly different between patients who gave responses of much change (n = 73), mild change (n = 51), and no change (n = 19) to the clinical anchor question. The average score changes in the mild change group for PROMIS PF and PI were 5.2 (SD, 3.7) and 6.8 (SD, 4.3) points, respectively, representing the anchor-based MCID estimates. The PROMIS PI anchor-based estimate was moderately correlated with the preoperative score (r = -0.41), time between visits (r = -0.39), and age (r = 0.30). The distribution-based MCID estimates were 3.8 (SD, 1.3) and 3.7 (SD, 1.3) points for the PROMIS PF and PI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MCIDs were estimated as 5.2 and 6.8 for the PROMIS PF and PI CATs, respectively, following surgery for DRF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As reports continue to publish a consistent range of MCID values, researchers can be confident in these values and begin using them across a broader spectrum of conditions treated by hand surgeons.

Assessing Factors Associated With Altmetric Attention Score: A Preliminary Study of 3 Hand Surgery Journals.

BACKGROUND: Traditional measures of evaluating scholarly output do not capture the impact social media can provide in disseminating and promoting research. We sought to better understand the level of online attention that high-quality hand research received. METHODS: Scientific manuscripts published from 2017 in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) (JHS-A), Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (JHS-E), and HAND were recorded. Manuscript characteristics were determined, including the number of citations. Altmetric Attention Score (AAS), a measure of a manuscript's online attention and impact, was determined, as well as Twitter mentions, Facebook mentions, and news outlet mentions. Spearman rho (ρ) correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the number of citations and AAS. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine which manuscript factors were associated with AAS. RESULTS: A total of 323 manuscripts were identified. There was a weak positive correlation between the number of citations and AAS; however, this relationship did not exist for each individual journal. Publication in HAND and JHS-E were associated with lower average manuscript AAS when using JHS-A as the reference group. Two additional factors were also associated with increased manuscript AAS: (1) being a clinical study focused on a specific upper extremity anatomical location; and (2) increasing number of institutions on a study. CONCLUSIONS: Publication in HAND and JHS-E were associated with lower manuscript AAS when using JHS-A as the reference group, suggesting that HAND and JHS-E have room for improvement in using social media to share their high-quality hand surgery scientific articles.

How to Shoot and Edit High-Quality Surgical Videos for Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.

A surgical video can improve patient care, surgical education, as well as scientific presentations and publications. Previous authors have outlined a basic understanding of how to produce high-quality surgical videos. With continuous technological improvements in video-filming hardware and editing software, multiple options for producing high-quality surgical videos are available. This article described important aspects of filming and editing videos to create a video that the surgeon can watch before performing the procedure. The authors reviewed camera terminology, including resolution, optical and digital zoom, shutter speed, and frame rate, as well as equipment options or setup for recording high-quality surgical videos. We provided information regarding computer requirements and editing on Windows and Macintosh operating systems, optimizing educational value for the viewer.

PROMIS Measures in Patients with Ganglion Cysts: Who Chooses Surgical Excision Over Non-Operative Management?

Background: Ganglion cysts are common soft tissue masses of the hand and wrist. It is unclear why some patients pursue surgical excision and others do not. The objective of this study is to compare Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) scores between patients with ganglion cysts undergoing surgical versus non-surgical treatment. Methods: Patients presenting to a tertiary, academic hand clinic diagnosed with a wrist ganglion cyst, based on clinical exam, were identified. PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression scores at the time of diagnosis were reviewed. Data were then stratified according to surgical or non-surgical intervention, with subgroup analysis of dorsal versus volar ganglions and patients that chose to trial cyst aspiration. All results were compared utilizing the appropriate statistical methods. Results: Of 757 ganglion cyst patients, 264 underwent surgical excision and 493 were treated non-surgically. No difference was noted in PROMIS PF or Depression scores. However, the surgical cohort reported significantly increased preoperative PI scores (Table 2). A higher percentage of patients treated non-surgically received an aspiration attempt compared to those who ultimately received surgery (Table 3). Finally, patients with volar ganglion cysts had significantly increased PI and depression scores, as well as lower PF scores (Table 4). Conclusions: Presenting PROMIS PI may indicate an increased tendency to pursue surgical treatments and aid in the identification of ganglion cyst patients who are more likely to pursue surgical excision. Further research should focus on correlating absolute differences in PROMIS values with clinical significance.

Evaluating Immediate and Short-Term Postoperative Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Ulnar Shortening for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome Using PROMIS.

Background The early recovery trajectory of patients undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is unknown. Questions/Purposes Using PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE), Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression, we asked (1) do patients undergoing operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome present at their preoperative visit with notable impairment?; (2) At immediate follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity?; and (3) At short-term follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity? Materials and Methods We identified patients from 01/2017 to 12/2019 at our institution undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome who completed all PROMIS domains at a preoperative visit and at least one postoperative time point (i.e., less than 4 weeks and/or greater than 12 weeks). Distribution- and anchor-based minimal clinically important difference estimates were used to evaluate clinically appreciable changes in symptoms over time. Results A total of 38 patients met our inclusion criteria. The average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores from preoperative to immediate postoperative follow-up were -3.8, -4.3, 3.2, and 0.5, respectively. However, by short-term follow-up, the average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores were 3.7, 3.2, -4.7, and -3.9, respectively. Conclusions Patients have worsening function at the immediate postoperative follow-up. By short-term postoperative follow-up, functional status and PI levels improve. Our findings can help hand surgeons provide evidence-based guidance on expected initial recovery following operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome. Level of Evidence This is a level II, prognostic study.