HMGB1-Mediated Cell Death-A Crucial Element in Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure.

Liver resection (LR) is the primary treatment for hepatic tumors, yet posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a significant concern. While the precise etiology of PHLF remains elusive, dysregulated inflammatory processes are pivotal. Therefore, we explored the theragnostic potential of extracellular high-mobility-group-box protein 1 (HMGB1), a key damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) released by hepatocytes, in liver recovery post LR in patients and animal models. Plasma from 96 LR patients and liver tissues from a subset of 24 LR patients were analyzed for HMGB1 levels, and associations with PHLF and liver injury markers were assessed. In a murine LR model, the HMGB1 inhibitor glycyrrhizin, was administered to assess its impact on liver regeneration. Furthermore, plasma levels of keratin-18 (K18) and cleaved cytokeratin-18 (ccK18) were quantified to assess suitability as predictive biomarkers for PHLF. Patients experiencing PHLF exhibited elevated levels of intrahepatic and circulating HMGB1, correlating with markers of liver injury. In a murine LR model, inhibition of HMGB1 improved liver function, reduced steatosis, enhanced regeneration and decreased hepatic cell death. Elevated levels of hepatic cell death markers K18 and ccK18 were detected in patients with PHLF and correlations with levels of circulating HMGB1 was observed. Our study underscores the therapeutic and predictive potential of HMGB1 in PHLF mitigation. Elevated HMGB1, K18, and ccK18 levels correlate with patient outcomes, highlighting their predictive significance. Targeting HMGB1 enhances liver regeneration in murine LR models, emphasizing its role in potential intervention and prediction strategies for liver surgery.

A role for the dehydrogenase DHRS7 (SDR34C1) in prostate cancer.

Several microarray studies of prostate cancer (PCa) samples have suggested altered expression of the "orphan" enzyme short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase DHRS7 (retSDR4, SDR34C1). However, the role of DHRS7 in PCa is largely unknown and the impact of DHRS7 modulation on cancer cell properties has not yet been studied. Here, we investigated DHRS7 expression in normal human prostate and PCa tissue samples at different tumor grade using tissue microarray and immunovisualization. Moreover, we characterized the effects of siRNA-mediated DHRS7 knockdown on the properties of three distinct human prostate cell lines. We found that DHRS7 protein expression decreases alongside tumor grade, as judged by the Gleason level, in PCa tissue samples. The siRNA-mediated knockdown of DHRS7 expression in the human PCa cell lines LNCaP, BPH1, and PC3 significantly increased cell proliferation in LNCaP cells as well as cell migration in all of the investigated cell lines. Furthermore, cell adhesion was decreased upon DHRS7 knockdown in all three cell lines. To begin to understand the mechanisms underlying the effects of DHRS7 depletion, we performed a microarray study with samples from LNCaP cells treated with DHRS7-specific siRNA. Several genes involved in cell proliferation and adhesion pathways were found to be altered in DHRS7-depleted LNCaP cells. Additionally, genes of the BRCA1/2 pathway and the epithelial to mesenchymal transition regulator E-cadherin were altered following DHRS7 knockdown. Based on these results, further research is needed to evaluate the potential role of DHRS7 as a tumor suppressor and whether its loss-of-function promotes PCa progression and metastasis.

Concise review: workshop review: understanding and assessing the risks of stem cell-based therapies.

The field of stem cell therapeutics is moving ever closer to widespread application in the clinic. However, despite the undoubted potential held by these therapies, the balance between risk and benefit remains difficult to predict. As in any new field, a lack of previous application in man and gaps in the underlying science mean that regulators and investigators continue to look for a balance between minimizing potential risk and ensuring therapies are not needlessly kept from patients. Here, we attempt to identify the important safety issues, assessing the current advances in scientific knowledge and how they may translate to clinical therapeutic strategies in the identification and management of these risks. We also investigate the tools and techniques currently available to researchers during preclinical and clinical development of stem cell products, their utility and limitations, and how these tools may be strategically used in the development of these therapies. We conclude that ensuring safety through cutting-edge science and robust assays, coupled with regular and open discussions between regulators and academic/industrial investigators, is likely to prove the most fruitful route to ensuring the safest possible development of new products.