Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: impact on reflux and weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most commonly performed weight loss operation, and its 2 most common complications are postoperative reflux and weight recurrence. There is limited evidence to guide decision-making in treating these conditions. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of conversion of SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for GERD management and weight loss. SETTING: Forty-one hospitals in Michigan. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining patients who underwent conversion of SG to RYGB from 2014 to 2022. The primary outcomes were changes in GERD-HRQL scores, anti-reflux medication use, and weight from baseline to 1 year after conversion. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications and resource utilization. RESULTS: Among 2133 patients undergoing conversion, 279 (13%) patients had baseline and 1-year GERD-HRQL survey data and anti-reflux medication data. GERD-HRQL scores decreased significantly from 24.6 to 6.6 (P < .01). Among these, 207 patients (74%) required anti-reflux medication at baseline, with only 76 patients (27%) requiring anti-reflux medication at 1 year postoperatively (P < .01). Of the 380 patients (18%) with weight loss data, mean weight decreased by 68.4lbs, with a 24.3% decline in total body weight and 51.5% decline in excess body weight. In terms of 30-day complications, 308 (14%) patients experienced any complication and 89 (4%) experienced a serious complication, but there were no leaks, perforations, or deaths. Three-hundred and fifty-five (17%) patients presented to the emergency department and 64 (3%) patients underwent reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest reported experience with conversion from SG to RYGB. We found that conversion to RYGB is associated with significant improvement in GERD symptoms, reduction in anti-reflux medication use, and significant weight loss and is therefore an effective treatment for GERD and weight regain after SG. However, the risks and benefits of conversion surgery should be carefully considered, especially in patients with significant comorbidity burden.

Ready Day One: What Residents and Program Directors Think is Needed for a Successful Transition to Residency.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perceived gaps in preparedness, current on-boarding practices, and need for specialty wide resources in the transition to residency training in obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional survey of current U.S. OB/GYN residents and program directors (PDs) at the time of the resident in-training exam was conducted in 2022. Both groups provide demographic information and identified specific knowledge, skills, and abilities in need of more preparation at the start of residency. PDs were queried on perceptions of readiness for their current first year class, educational on-boarding practices, and their preference for standardized curricular materials and assessment tools. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare perceptions of skills deficits between PDs and residents, and the relationship of preparedness to program type and resident year in training. RESULTS: Response rates for residents and program directors were 64.9% and 72.6% respectively. A majority (115/200, 57.5%) of program directors agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, "In general, I feel that my new interns are well prepared for residency when they arrive at my program." Both groups agreed that basic suturing and ultrasound skills were deficits. Residents identified a need for better preparation in management of inpatient issues while PDs identified time management skills as lacking. There was considerable heterogeneity of program on-boarding practices across the specialty. Most PDs agreed or strongly agreed that a standardized curriculum (80.5%, 161/200) and assessment tools (75.3%, 150/199) would be helpful. CONCLUSION: OBGYN PDs feel that not all residents arrive prepared for residency and overwhelmingly support the development of standardized transition curricular and assessment tools, similar to the curriculum developed in general surgery. Based on input from PDs and residents, early curricular efforts should focus on basic surgical, ultrasound, and time management skills and on management of inpatient issues.

Applicant Experience in Communication With Residency Programs After the Introduction of Program Signaling.

OBJECTIVE: Examine the applicant experience after introduction of program signaling for the 2023 obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency application cycle. DESIGN: Responses to an online survey of OBGYN applicants participating in the 2023 match who participated in residency program signaling were compared to responses from a similar survey conducted in 2022. Demographic information included personal and academic background and how applicants and advisors communicated with programs. Numbers of applications and interviews, second look visits, away rotations, manner of contact, and timing of communication was compared. Statistical analysis included ANOVA for interval data, and χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests for categorical data. RESULTS: A total of 711 of 2631 (27%) applicants responded in 2022 and 606 of 2492 (24.3%) responded in 2023. Approximately 2/3 of gold signals and 1/3 of silver signals led to an interview. There was no change in number of applications or interviews per applicant, but there was a broader distribution of interviews per applicant in 2023. Applicants in 2023 were less likely to engage in preinterview communication or do an away rotation to indicate interest in a program. There was decreased communication between applicants and programs after signaling was introduced. Informal communication continued to differ by racial and medical school background. Applicants from DO programs and international medical graduates (IMG) had more communication with programs than MD applicants but received fewer interview invitations. Fewer Black and Latin(x)/Hispanic applicants had faculty reach out to residency programs on their behalf compared to White and Asian applicants. There were differences in the number of interviews received based on racial and ethnic identity. CONCLUSIONS: In the first year after implementation of program signaling, there was a decrease in preinterview communication and a broader distribution of interviews among applicants. Further efforts to create standard means of program communication may help to begin leveling the uneven playing field for applicants.

Speaker Introductions at Grand Rounds: Differences in Formality of Address by Gender and Specialty.

Background: Despite increasing representation of women in medicine, gender bias remains pervasive. The authors sought to evaluate speaker introductions by gender in the grand rounds of multiple specialties at a large academic institution to understand the cultural context of this behavior and identify predictors of formality. Materials and Methods: The authors reviewed grand rounds recordings of speakers with doctorates presenting to the departments of family medicine, general surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, and pediatrics at one institution from 2014 to 2019. The primary outcome was whether a speaker's professional title was used as the first form of address. The authors assessed factors correlated with professional introduction using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Speakers were introduced professionally in 346/615 recordings (56.3%). Female introducers were more likely to introduce speakers professionally (odds ratio [OR]: 2.52). A significant interaction existed between speaker gender and home institution: female speakers visiting from an external institution were less likely than male external speakers to be introduced professionally (OR: 0.49), whereas female speakers internal to the institution were more likely to be introduced professionally than male internal speakers (OR: 1.75). Use of professional titles varied by specialty and was higher than average for family medicine (83.2%), surgery (75.8%), and pediatrics (64.0%) and lower for internal medicine (37.5%) and obstetrics and gynecology (50.7%). Conclusions: These findings suggest a complex relationship between gender and formality of introduction that merits further investigation. Understanding differences in culture across specialties is important to inform efforts to promote equity.

Identifying Medical Student Mistreatment in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the mistreatment identified within the University of Michigan's Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) clerkship and compare the rates of mistreatment to that of other clerkships in an effort to improve the learning environment. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study looking at multiple sources of data from 2015 to 2018 about student mistreatment including end-of-rotation and teaching evaluations completed by students, as well as an online reporting system available to medical students. For evaluations, students were asked to rate their agreement with statements on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, to 5 = strongly agree). Narrative comments were also solicited and evaluated. SETTING: University of Michigan Medical School and Michigan Medicine Ob/Gyn Department, Ann Arbor, Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 513 students rotated through the Ob/Gyn clerkship between 2015 and 2018 and were asked to complete evaluations. RESULTS: Five hundred and five of the 513 students completed evaluations between 2015 and 2018. In response to the statement, "Students are treated in a professional/respectful manner in this clerkship," the Ob/Gyn clerkship's mean scores on a 5-point scale were 4.45 (in 2015-2016), 4.52 (in 2016-2017), and 4.27 (in 2017-2018). These means, as well as the means to 3 other professionalism questions, were lower than the range of 4.42 to 4.84 for all other third-year clerkships over this time. The mean scores were also lower for Ob/gyn when compared to the Surgery clerkship. A total of 32 narrative comments were submitted by students between 2015 and 2017 related to mistreatment or unprofessional behavior. Frequent themes included students being treated as "stupid" or discouraged from asking questions (8 comments), being treated in an unprofessional manner by staff (7 comments), feeling ignored or marginalized by faculty (4 comments), and faculty unprofessional behavior toward others (4 comments). CONCLUSIONS: Students on the Ob/Gyn clerkship reported a higher rate of mistreatment compared to other clerkships. Efforts are being made by the Ob/Gyn department to communicate these data on mistreatment to educators in order to improve the Ob/Gyn culture and learning environment for medical students.

Student Evaluation of Faculty Physicians: Gender Differences in Teaching Evaluations.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether there is a difference in medical student teaching evaluations for male and female clinical physician faculty. METHODS: The authors examined all teaching evaluations completed by clinical students at one North American medical school in the surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, and internal medicine clinical rotations from 2008 to 2012. The authors focused on how students rated physician faculty on their "overall quality of teaching" using a 5-point response scale (1 = Poor to 5 = Excellent). Linear mixed-effects models provided estimated mean differences in evaluation outcomes by faculty gender. RESULTS: There were 14,107 teaching evaluations of 965 physician faculty. Of these evaluations, 7688 (54%) were for male physician faculty and 6419 (46%) were for female physician faculty. Female physicians received significantly lower mean evaluation scores in all four rotations. The discrepancy was largest in the surgery rotation (males = 4.23, females = 4.01, p = 0.003). Pediatrics showed the next greatest difference (males = 4.44, females = 4.29, p = 0.009), followed by obstetrics and gynecology (males = 4.38, females = 4.26, p = 0.026), and internal medicine (males = 4.35, females = 4.27, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Female physicians received lower teaching evaluations in all four core clinical rotations. This comprehensive examination adds to the medical literature by illuminating subtle differences in evaluations based on physician gender, and provides further evidence of disparities for women in academic medicine.

The flipped classroom for medical students.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this curricular innovation project were to implement a flipped classroom curriculum for the gynaecologic oncology topics of the obstetrics and gynaecology medical student clerkship, and to evaluate student satisfaction with the change. METHODS: Four short online videos on the topics of endometrial hyperplasia, cervical dysplasia, evaluation of an adnexal mass, and ovarian cancer were created, and students were instructed to view them prior to a class-time active learning session. The Learning Activity Management System (lams) open-source online platform was used to create an active learning class-time activity that consisted of a coached discussion of cases. Student satisfaction with the two aspects of the flipped curriculum was obtained. In addition, lecture assessment for the gynaecologic oncology topics and aggregate student performance on the gynaecological oncology questions of the US National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Subject Examination were compared before and after implementation of the curriculum. RESULTS: Eighty-nine students rotated on the clerkship during the pilot period of analysis. Seventy-one students (80%) viewed the videos prior to the class session, and 84 (94%) attended the session. Student satisfaction was very high for both parts of the curriculum. There was no significant difference in aggregate student performance on the gynaecological oncology questions of the NBME Subject Examination. The flipped classroom curriculum demonstrates a promising platform for using technology to make better use of students' time DISCUSSION: Our implementation of the flipped classroom curriculum for the gynaecologic oncology topics successfully demonstrates a promising platform for using technology to make better use of our students' time, and for increasing their satisfaction with the necessary didactic learning of the clerkship.

Core clerkship directors: their current resources and the rewards of the role.

PURPOSE: To conduct a national multidisciplinary investigation assessing core clinical clerkships and their directors, variances in resources from national guidelines, and the impact of the clerkship director role on faculty members' academic productivity, advancement, and satisfaction. METHOD: A multidisciplinary working group of the Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE), representing all seven core clinical disciplines, created and distributed a survey to clerkship directors at 125 U.S. MD-granting medical schools, in academic year 2006-2007. RESULTS: A total of 544 clerkship directors from Internal Medicine (96), Family Medicine (91), Psychiatry, (91), Pediatrics (79), Surgery (71), Neurology (60), and Obstetrics-Gynecology (56) responded, representing over 60% of U.S. core clinical clerkships. The clerkship directors were similar across disciplines in demographics and academic productivity, though clinical and clerkship activities varied. Departmental staff support for clerkships averaged 0.69 people, distinctly less than the ACE's 2003 guideline of a full-time coordinator in all disciplines' clerkships. Clerkship directors reported heavy clinical responsibilities, which, as in previous studies, were negatively related to academic productivity. However, many clerkship directors felt the role enhanced their academic advancement; a large majority felt it significantly enhanced their career satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The resources and rewards of the clerkship director role were similar across disciplines. Expectations of clerkship directors were considerable, including responsibility for clinical material and the learning environment. Resources for many fall short of those stated in the ACE guidelines, particularly regarding support staff. However, the findings indicate that the clerkship director role can have benefits for academic advancement and strongly enhances career satisfaction.

Multidimensional effects of the 80-hour work week at the University of Michigan Medical School.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of the new resident work-hour restrictions on medical students, as measured by their perceptions of the quality of their experiences during the required clerkships. METHOD: Evaluations of four clerkships were compared for two student cohorts at the University of Michigan Medical School. The first cohort, from the class of 2002-03, completed their clinical clerkships the year before the work-hour restrictions were implemented, and the second cohort, from the class of 2003-04, completed their clerkships the same year the restrictions were implemented. RESULTS: There were significant and notable differences in the experiences of the two cohorts. Students' perceptions of the quality of their experiences in the surgery-oriented clerkships (obstetrics-gynecology and surgery) in particular were significantly lower (i.e., more negative) in the 2003-04 cohort than in the previous cohort for the same clerkships. The nonsurgery-oriented clerkships (internal medicine and pediatrics) hired hospitalists, who offset the residents' workload (internal medicine) and assumed teaching responsibilities (pediatrics). Between 2002-03 and 2003-04, students' perceptions of the quality of their experience in the internal medicine clerkship remained mostly stable, and increased in several areas for the students in the pediatrics clerkship. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of resident work-hour restrictions had significant effects on the education of the medical students studied. These effects need to be carefully analyzed and considered to ensure quality education for medical students. The findings also highlight that the nature of students' perceptions was related to preparations made (or not) by specific clerkships as restricted work-hour regulations were adopted.

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Histologic findings and proposed management.

OBJECTIVE: To increase understanding of the clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) on cervical cytology and to suggest a management plan. STUDY DESIGN: All Pap smears classified as AGUS over a period of five years at the University of Michigan Medical Center were reviewed and the diagnosis confirmed. The charts of these patients were reviewed for demographics, significant previous medical history, symptoms, diagnostic studies performed and final histologic diagnoses. RESULTS: In 1993-1998, a total of 208,041 Pap smears were read. Two hundred seven smears from 189 patients were classified as AGUS, for an incidence of 0.1%. There were 136 patients with follow-up information and 114 patients with histologic diagnoses. In 55 of the 114 patients (48%), significant histologic abnormalities were observed, including 11 endometrial cancers, 1 invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix, 3 adenocarcinomas in situ of the cervix, 18 CIN 3 lesions and 5 CIN 2 lesions. Among 20 patients with Pap smears subclassified as "atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, favor benign process," there were two CIN 2, five CIN 3 and one adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of AGUS requires an aggressive workup because of the high rate of cancer and precancerous lesions. The evaluation, at the very least, should include colposcopy with directed biopsies and endocervical curettage. Postmenopausal patients, those with irregular bleeding and those with high risk characteristics should also undergo endometrial biopsy.