One month follow-up of carotid endarterectomy with in-hospital preoperative aspirin monotherapy and postoperative dual antiplatelet therapy in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients: A multi-center study.

Background: There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal perioperative antiplatelet strategy for carotid artery surgery. This multicentre study aimed to analyse the association between preoperative aspirin monotherapy following postoperative dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and the risk for stroke and death after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: This cohort study included 821 patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CEA. Primary outcomes included any stroke or death up to the one-month postoperative follow-up. Multilevel multivariate regression analyses and descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Patients were predominantly male (53 %), with a mean age of 66.2 years. The primary outcome occurred in 1.6 % of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibited a high risk for stroke or death (P = 0.011). The occurrence of any local complications in the neck was accompanied by an increase in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (P = 0.007). Patients with a high systolic blood pressure (SBP) (P = 0.002) experienced a longer operative duration. The length of hospital stay was longer in the patients with COPD (P = 0.020), minor stroke (P = 0.011), and major stroke (P = 0.001). A positive linear correlation was found between SBP and operative duration in the overall population (ß 0.4 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.7]; P = 0.002). The resultant curve for DBP and any local complications in the neck exhibited a two-stage change and one breakpoint in the entire population (k = 68 mmHg, <68; odds ratio [OR] 0.9 [95 % CI 0.7-1.1], P = 0.461; ≥68: OR 1.1 [95 % CI 1.0-1.1], P = 0.003). Conclusions: Preoperative aspirin monotherapy and postoperative DAPT were safe and effective antiplatelet treatments for patients who underwent CEA.

Retrospective, multicenter study of surgical treatment for carotid body tumors with or without preoperative embolization.

Background: Carotid body tumor (CBT) is the most common head and neck paraganglioma. Whether preoperative embolization benefits CBT patients who will receive surgical resection is still controversial. Methods: In this multi-center retrospective study, we collected data from patients with CBT who received surgical treatment without (group A) or with preoperative embolization (group B) from 2011 to 2019. The primary outcome was the rate of death or stroke after 3 years of follow-up. The secondary outcomes of the study were length of operation (LOO), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), length of stay (LOS), rate of recurrence, and rate of cranial nerve (CN) injuries. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographics, clinical characteristics, complications, and follow-up results of the patients. Results: Between January 2011 and October 2019, 261 consecutive patients (107 male and 154 female) entered analysis. After 3 years of follow-up, no patient died in both groups. Only three patients with stroke were detected: 2/226 (0.9%) in group A vs. 1/35 (2.9%) in group B (p = .308). The LOO in group A was 132.6 ± 64.6 min compared with 152.9 ± 40.4 min in group B (p = .072). IBL in group A was 375.4 ± 497.8 ml compared with 448.0 ± 270.8 ml in group B (p = .400). LOS in group A was 8.3 ± 2.0 days compared with 7.4 ± 1.7 days in group B (p = .016). Seventy-two CN injuries were detected: 65/226 (28.8%) in group A vs. 7/35 (20.0%) in group B (p = .281). There were 65 temporary CN injuries (59 in group A vs. 6 in group B) (p = .254) and seven permanent CN injuries (6 in group A vs. 1 in group B) (p = .945). Three most frequently injured cranial nerves were the pharyngeal branch and superior laryngeal nerve (12.3%), recurrent laryngeal nerve (7.7%) and vagus nerve (7.3%). Conclusion: There was insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of preoperative embolization. CBT resection alone had a similar rate of stoke, recurrence, and CN injuries when compared with CBT resection with preoperative arterial embolization. Meanwhile, CBT resection alone did not increase LOO and IBL.

Low red blood cell predicts high risk of temporary postoperative complications after carotid body tumor surgical resection.

Background: Carotid body tumor (CBT) is a rare paraganglioma located at the carotid bifurcation. The red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit are indexes to be evaluated in blood routine tests. The purpose of this study was to clarify their predictive value for temporary postoperative complications in patients that had undergone CBT surgery. Methods: This retrospective trial included data from 169 patients received surgical treatment for CBT from October 2008 to September 2018 in this retrospective study. Postoperative follow-up was conducted under the guidance of both vascular surgeon and neurologist. The symptoms existed less than 2 years postoperatively were regarded as temporary injuries. The red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were obtained from the complete blood count results of the participants. Analyses of multilevel multivariable regression and descriptive statistics were conducted. Results: The baseline data showed no significant difference. Patients were predominantly women (53.8%), with a mean age of 42.6 years. The total incidence of temporary postoperative complications was 22 (13.0%), including transient ischemic attack (8, 4.7%), tongue bias (7, 4.1%), dysphagia (2, 1.2%), hoarseness (4, 1.8%), and eyelid ptosis (1, 2.4%). The univariate and multivariate regression analysis results revealed that the occurrence of temporary postoperative complications was increased with age [odd ratio (OR, 0.09; 95% CI (CI), 0.9-1.0; P = 0.014], length of operation time (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.0; P = 0.005), Shamblin type II vs. I (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.5; P = 0.008), red blood cell count postoperative (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8; P = 0.026), hemoglobin (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.9-1.0; P = 0.011), and hematocrit (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-1.0; P = 0.025). The smooth curve fitting showed that the trend of complications occurrence rate was reduced with the increase of patients' postoperative red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit. Gender, weight, length of operation, Shamblin type, postoperative red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were included in the risk model with AUC = 0.86. Conclusion: These patients with CBT who received surgical resection with low postoperative red blood cell, hemoglobin, or hematocrit had a high risk of temporary postoperative complications. The risk prediction model established for predicting temporary postoperative complications showed satisfactory prediction effects.

Reverse "cheese wire" fenestration for abdominal aortic dissection repair: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection is one of the most common emergency condition leading to internal organs or lower limb ischemia and aortic rupture. Herein, we described a reverse "cheese wire" endovascular fenestration repair (CWFER) in a patient with complicated abdominal aortic dissection which had never been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old male presented abdominal tear-like pain and acute ischemia of the right lower extremity during the endovascular treatment of celiac trunk aneurysms. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) showed abdominal aortic type B dissection with acute ischemia of the right lower extremity preoperatively. After a detailed preoperative examination, the patient then was performed a reverse CWFER. So far, the patient has been followed-up for 6 months, postoperative CTA demonstrated good stent-graft expansion and perfusion of bilateral common iliac arteries; also, no endoleak was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The right iliac artery in this patient supplied by false lumen, which lead to acute ischemia of the right lower extremity, needed to be treated as an emergency and dealt with promptly. CWFER is a very high-risk treatment that requires the rich experience of vascular surgeon and accurate assessment of aortic dissection. After interventional treatment, the patient recovered uneventfully after 6 months' follow-up.

A Retrospective Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of EXOSEAL Vascular Closure Device to Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Transbrachial Procedures.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of EXOSEAL vascular closure device (EVCD) insertion by comparing its performance with manual compression (MC) in achieving hemostasis at the brachial artery puncture site. METHODS: A retrospective study of brachial artery access by using either MC or EVCD for achieving hemostasis from March 2016 to October 2017 was conducted. Patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing percutaneous transbrachial procedures were included. Time to hemostasis (TTH) was the primary efficacy end point. Seven-day incidence of major access site-related complications was the primary safety end point. TTH and major and minor complications associated with treatment of these 2 groups were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients with TBAD undergoing percutaneous transbrachial procedures entered the analysis. Of these, 107 patients underwent EVCD insertion and 50 patients underwent MC. The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. TTH was significantly shorter for EVCD over MC (P < 0.05). The TTH ≥10 min in the MC group was 100.0% (n = 50), but in the EVCD group, it was ≤2 min, 87.9% (n = 107); 2-5 min, 7.5% (n = 107); and ≥10 min, 4.7% (n = 107). The EVCD group had several major complications, while the MC group had none. Two patients (1.9%, n = 107) required vascular repair, one patient (0.6%, n = 107) required blood transfusion, and 1 patient (0.6%, n = 107) developed upper limb numbness and weakness after EVCD deployment. Minor complication such as the occurrence of hematoma (≤5 cm) in the MC group was 4 (8.0%) but was also 4 (3.7%) in the EVCD group, showing statistically significant difference (P = 0.030). The incidence of ecchymosis was 8 (7.5%) in the EVCD group when compared with 13 (26.0%) in the MC group, which showed statistically significant difference (P = 0.001). Other major and minor complications showed no significant differences between these 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: After invasive procedures by 6F percutaneous access via the brachial artery in preprocedurally fully anticoagulated patients, TTH was significantly reduced in patients who underwent EVCD when compared with patients who underwent MC. MC is a safer and more convenient way to achieve hemostasis but has higher incidence of minor complications.

Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Carotid Body Tumors in Different Shambling Type Without Preoperative Embolization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumor (CBT) is the most common head and neck paragangliomas. Surgical resection is the golden standard management for CBT. While preoperative embolization is still controversial, long-term outcomes and perioperative results are still deficient. We, here, presented the outcomes of surgical treatment for CBT without preoperative embolization at our institution. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected data from 101 patients who received surgical treatment for CBTs without preoperative embolization from 2011 to 2016. In addition, we attempted to conduct 2 years of follow-up under the guidance of both neurologist and vascular surgeon. Patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, complications, and follow-up results were all analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Complete resection of the CBT was achieved in 101 cases (100%). Postoperative adverse events (AEs) mostly observed during hospitalization were as follows: tongue bias (I: 4, 36.4%; II: 8, 19.5%; III: 13, 26.5%), hoarseness (I: 1, 9.1%; II: 4, 9.8%; III: 7, 14.3%), dysphagia (I: 0; II: 2, 4.9%; III: 7, 14.3%), and hematoma (I: 0; II: 0; III: 1, 2.0%). No other serious AEs were observed. The total incidence of AEs in type I patients was 5 (45.5%), 14 (34.1%) in type II, and 28 (57.1%) in type III, and the type III group has significantly higher than the other two groups. At the end of 2 years of follow-up, there were no AEs in type I patients. The number of patients with AEs in type III was greater than that in type II, although there was no significant difference. Based on our findings, 3 most commonly injured cranial nerves (CNs) after surgical resection of CBT were CN XII (hypoglossal nerve, 21.9%), CN X (vagus nerve, 20.3%), and recurrent laryngeal nerve (18.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management without preoperative embolization for CBT patients is a safe and effective therapeutic approach.