Pretransplant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a downstaging or bridging therapy for liver transplantation (LT) in hepatocellular carcinoma patients are rapidly increasing. However, the evidence about the feasibility and safety of pre-LT ICI therapy is limited and controversial. To this end, a multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted in 11 Chinese centers. The results showed that 83 recipients received pre-LT ICI therapy during the study period. The median post-LT follow-up was 8.1 (interquartile range 3.3-14.6) months. During the short follow-up, 23 (27.7%) recipients developed allograft rejection, and 7 of them (30.4%) were diagnosed by liver biopsy. Multivariate logistics regression analysis showed that the time interval between the last administration of ICI therapy and LT (TLAT) ≥ 30 days was an independent protective factor for allograft rejection (odds ratio = 0.096, 95% confidence interval 0.026-0.357; P < .001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that allograft rejection was an independent risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio = 9.960, 95% confidence interval 1.006-98.610; P = .043). We conclude that patients who receive a pre-LT ICI therapy with a TLAT shorter than 30 days have a much higher risk of allograft rejection than those with a TLAT longer than 30 days. The presence of rejection episodes might be associated with higher post-LT mortality.

Correlation Between Ultrasonographic Response and Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Drug Levels in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is valuable in tight control algorithms for Crohn's disease (CD). However, the correlation between ultrasonographic response and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drug levels remains unknown. Elucidating this correlation would be helpful in optimizing the use of anti-TNF drugs. Thus, the authors aimed to investigate this correlation. METHODS: Between June 2020 and June 2021, all patients with CD who completed anti-TNF induction therapy were retrospectively included. Ultrasound was performed at week 0 and week 14, and proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-TNF drugs was performed at week 14. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used in the correlation analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (60 treated with infliximab and 32 with adalimumab) were included. At week 14, an ultrasonographic response was detected in 43 patients. Patients with ultrasonographic response had significantly higher median drug levels (5.9 mcg/mL for infliximab; 18.2 mcg/mL for adalimumab) than those without (0.9 mcg/mL for infliximab, P < 0.001; 4.8 mcg/mL for adalimumab, P < 0.001). The ROC curve showed a significant correlation between ultrasonographic response and anti-TNF drug levels (area under the curve = 0.79 for infliximab, P < 0.001; area under the curve = 0.86 for adalimumab, P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off values for infliximab and adalimumab correlated with ultrasonographic response were 5.0 and 10.5 mcg/mL, respectively. An incremental increase was observed in ultrasonographic response with higher anti-TNF drug levels. CONCLUSIONS: Higher anti-TNF drug levels are associated with an increased likelihood of ultrasonographic response in patients with CD.

Predictors of infliximab-induced deep remission in treatment-naïve patients with isolated small bowel Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: Deep remission should be induced early in the disease course of Crohn's disease (CD), because it significantly prevents disease progression. Identifying predictors of deep remission before treatment is important to guide therapeutic strategy. Little is known about the predictors of infliximab-induced deep remission in treatment-naïve patients with isolated small bowel CD. We aimed to investigate the predictors of infliximab-induced deep remission in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2019, all consecutive treatment-naïve patients with isolated small bowel CD who started infliximab induction therapy (5 mg/kg at week 0, 2, and 6) and underwent capsule endoscopy (CE) at week 14 were retrospectively included. Deep remission was defined as clinical remission in combination with CE-identified mucosal healing. Logistic regression was used to investigate the predictors of 14-week deep remission. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were included. At week 14 after infliximab induction therapy, deep remission was found in 42 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a moderate-to-severe endoscopic disease [odds ratio (OR), 0.28; p = .01] and the presence of fibrofatty proliferation (OR, 0.26; p = .04) at baseline were independently associated with a decreased possibility of deep remission. CONCLUSIONS: In treatment-naïve patients with isolated small bowel CD, a moderate-to-severe endoscopic disease and the presence of fibrofatty proliferation at baseline reduce the possibility of infliximab-induced deep remission. Patients with such risk factors may need more aggressive treatment at the beginning of induction therapy to promote deep remission at an early stage.

Efficacy of infliximab in treatment-naïve patients with stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of infliximab in treatment-naïve patients with stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease (CD) has not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of infliximab in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all consecutive treatment-naïve patients with newly diagnosed CD with small bowel stricture who started regular infliximab therapy in Nanfang Hospital between January 2015 and December 2019. An effective infliximab therapy was defined as infliximab continuation without the use of steroids, new biologics, endoscopic interventions or intestinal surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included. After a median 38 months follow-up, an effective infliximab therapy was achieved in 37 patients. Long diagnostic delay (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.78; p= .008), pre-stenotic dilatation (HR 0.17, 95%CI 0.09-0.35; p < .001), long segmental stricture (HR 0.20, 95%CI 0.10-0.41; p < .001), and penetrating disease (HR 0.22, 95%CI 0.10-0.49; p < .001) were negatively correlated with an effective infliximab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is effective in nearly 50% of treatment-naïve patients with CD with small bowel stricture, and an effective therapy is more likely to be achieved in patients without long diagnostic delay, pre-stenotic dilatation, long segmental stricture or penetrating disease.

Impact of capsule endoscopy on prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Capsule endoscopy (CE) can detect lesions outside the scope of ileocolonoscopy in postoperative patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, the impact of such findings on patient outcomes remains unknown. This study is intended to evaluate the impact of CE findings on clinical management and outcomes in asymptomatic patients with CD without pharmacologic prophylaxis after ileocolonic resection. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 37 patients (group 1) received ileocolonoscopy together with CE within 1 year after surgery, whereas 46 patients (group 2) only received ileocolonoscopy. Patients with endoscopic recurrence detected by either ileocolonoscopy or CE received pharmacologic therapy with azathioprine or infliximab. One year later, disease activity was re-evaluated. RESULTS: In group 1, all patients with ileocolonoscopy-identified recurrence also had CE-identified recurrence. In addition, CE detected endoscopic recurrence in 11 patients missed by ileocolonoscopy. Endoscopic remission identified by ileocolonoscopy was confirmed by CE in 13 patients. One year later, endoscopic remission identified by ileocolonoscopy was maintained in all 24 patients, and none had clinical recurrence. Conversely, in group 2, of those with ileocolonoscopy-identified remission, both ileocolonoscopy-identified recurrence and clinical recurrence occurred in 9 of 31 patients 1 year later. The total clinical recurrence rate was 2.7% (1/37) in group 1 versus 21.7% (10/46) in group 2 (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: If endoscopic remission identified by ileocolonoscopy was confirmed by CE, patients could remain free of pharmacologic prophylaxis. If recurrence outside the scope of ileocolonoscopy was detected by CE, initiation of active pharmacologic therapy would be needed.

Results of a second examination of the right side of the colon in screening and surveillance colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Screening colonoscopy is less effective in preventing proximal colon cancers than distal colon cancers. A repeat examination of the right side of the colon may increase the lesion detection. The study aimed to assess the results of a second examination of the right side of the colon with forward-view or retroflexion colonoscopy performed immediately after the initial examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of all primary studies that performed a second examination of the right side of the colon with forward-view or retroflexion colonoscopy performed immediately after the initial examination. RESULTS: Six cohorts of five studies with 4155 participants were included in the final study. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 28.8% of the combined examinations compared with 24.1% of the single examination (P<0.001), for a pooled odds ratio of 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.59]. For retroflexion assessment, ADR was achieved in 25.4% patients in the combined group, compared with 22.3% in the single examination group (P=0.002), for a pooled odds ratio of 1.19 (95% CI: 1.06-1.33). For forward-view assessment, ADR was achieved in 46.0% patients in the combined group, compared with 33.5% in the single examination group (P<0.001), for a pooled odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI: 1.40-2.22). CONCLUSION: For ADR of the right side of the colon, a repeat examination could lead to a modest improvement in the detection of lesions in the proximal colon, irrespective of forward-view or retroflexion assessment.

Risk factors for surgery in patients with retention of endoscopic capsule.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery is still the main means for removing retained endoscopic capsules. This study intended to evaluate risk factors for surgery in patients with capsule retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 5348 consecutive capsule endoscopy examinations were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (1.4%) had capsule retention. Spontaneous passage occurred in 16 patients, of which 14 were asymptomatic. Successful retrieval by double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) was achieved in 14 patients, of which 11 did not need surgery during clinical follow-up. A total of 50 patients underwent surgery. The cumulative rates of surgery were 44.2%, 53.2%, 55.8%, 62.3% and 64.9% at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 60 months after capsule retention, respectively. Intestinal obstruction [hazard ratio (HR) 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-3.76; p = .020] and overt small bowel bleeding (HR 2.01, 95%CI 1.08-3.71; p = .027) during capsule retention were independently associated with an increased risk for surgery. Specific treatment for primary disease (HR 0.22, 95%CI 0.07-0.74, p = .014) and successful endoscopic retrieval (HR 0.20, 95%CI 0.06-0.66; p = .008) were independently associated with a decreased risk for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: For asymptomatic patients, specific medical treatment for primary disease can be maintained until the capsule spontaneously passes or symptoms appear. For patients with slight abdominal pain, DBE can be performed. For patients with intestinal obstruction or overt small bowel bleeding, early surgical consultation should be considered.