Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 30(6): 451-457, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38863290

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study compares the efficacy and safety of lateral approach surgery with and without radial nerve dissection in treating humeral diaphyseal fractures. It assesses clinical, radiological, and complication outcomes, providing a description of the surgical methods and perioperative benefits. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 71 patients admitted between May 2015 and December 2022 who underwent lateral approach surgery for humeral diaphyseal fractures. Group 1, consisting of 34 patients without radial nerve dissection, and Group 2, comprising 37 patients with radial nerve dissection, were compared. Parameters such as age, gender, fracture side (right/left), fracture type, follow-up time, surgical duration, blood loss, radiological and clinical evaluations (including Shoulder-Elbow range of motion [ROM] and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [Q-DASH]), and complications were examined. Surgical techniques and outcomes were documented. RESULTS: Both groups exhibited comparable distributions in age, gender, fracture types, and follow-up times (p>0.05). Group 1 demonstrated significantly lower surgical duration and blood loss compared to Group 2 (p<0.05 for both). Clinical assessment revealed satisfactory shoulder and elbow ROM within functional limits for all patients, with no instances of infection. Q-DASH scores were similar between groups. Postoperative radial nerve palsy occurred in one patient in Group 1 and three patients in Group 2, with all cases resolving uneventfully during outpatient follow-ups. Radiological assessment confirmed uneventful union in all patients. CONCLUSION: Lateral approach surgery without radial nerve dissection for humeral diaphyseal fractures offers comparable effectiveness and safety to conventional surgery, with potential perioperative advantages such as reduced operation time and blood loss.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Úmero , Nervo Radial , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Nervo Radial/lesões , Nervo Radial/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Resultado do Tratamento , Diáfises/cirurgia , Diáfises/lesões , Adulto Jovem
2.
Cureus ; 15(9): e46099, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37900429

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Femoral shaft fractures in childhood constitute an important part of emergency visits to orthopedic clinics. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and reliability of a method in the treatment of simple fractures in the middle of the femoral diaphysis in patients with multiple injuries or in the treatment of cases with a medullary canal that is too narrow for two nails, with a single stretch nail thicker than half the diameter of the canal. METHODS: Between July 2002 and November 2006, examinations were made of 11 femoral fractures in 11 patients who were admitted to the pediatric emergency department of Tepecik Training and Research Hospital with a diagnosis of femoral fracture and who were hospitalized and treated with a single flexible intramedullary titanium nail. RESULTS: In the follow-up, no problem was found in terms of union and length difference in any of the cases, except for a 10º varus deformity present after surgery in one case. CONCLUSIONS: Elastic intramedullary nailing is an effective method in the treatment of simple femoral fractures in children. A single elastic nail provides adequate stability following open reduction with minimal incision in patients whose short operating time must be kept short such as those with head trauma, thoracic trauma, or intra-abdominal pathology, or patients with a narrow medullary canal where two flexible nails cannot pass. We think that it is a feasible method because it causes minimal soft tissue damage.

3.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 142(9): 2245-2252, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34056678

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to determine the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) after hip fracture surgery over the age of 80 and to investigate the factors associated with AKI. METHODS: From January 2015 to January 2020, 589 patients who underwent surgery of hip fractures at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Serum creatinine (sCr) was analysed daily pre- and postoperatively during the hospital stay. Patients were divided into groups; AKI and non-AKI based on KDIGO (Kidney Disease Global Outcomes) criteria. The incidence, risk factors, and mortality of postoperative AKI were investigated. RESULTS: Out of 589 patients, 58 developed an AKI (9.8%). Smoking (p: 0.004), pre and postoperative low albumin level (p < 0.05), pre- and postoperative high potassium level (p < 0.05), pre- and postoperative high urea levels (p < 0.05), high amount of intra-operative bleeding (p: 0.003) and prolonged surgery time (p: 0.003) were found to be risk factors associated with AKI. Although the mortality rate was higher in the AKI group, it was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: AKI is a temporary but common complication following hip fracture surgery, which can also be predicted if risk factors are adequately observed. It typically increases the length of hospital stays, mortality and morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III evidence, Retrospective comparative study.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Fraturas do Quadril , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fraturas do Quadril/complicações , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
Cureus ; 13(2): e13323, 2021 Feb 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33738166

RESUMO

Aim This study aims to analyze the spectrum, management, and outcome of Syrian refugees' fracture over four-year period, highlighting challenges in management and follow-up. Methods This was a retrospective review of Syrian refugee patients operated for fractures at our centre from January 2015 to January 2019. The patients were evaluated for age, gender, mechanism of injury, location and type of fracture, presence of accompanying injuries, surgical technique, complications, mortality and morbidity. The comparison of complications and postop outpatient clinic controls between Turkish citizens and Syrian refugees were also evaluated. Results The study included a total of 455 patients comprising 281 adults (202 males, 79 females) with a mean (SD) age of 41.1 (19.3) years and 174 children with a mean age of 8.8 (4.9) years. The trauma mechanism was most commonly fall in both adult and pediatric patients (86.6% / 73.5%). Whilst lower limb fractures were more common in adults (73.7%), upper limb fractures were more common in children (63.4%). The presence of accompanying trauma was determined in 21 (7.5%) adults and 10 (5.7%) children. Multiple fractures were determined in 12 (4.3%) adults and eight (4.6%) children. Plate fixation (PF) was most used in 137 (48.8%) adult patients and K-wire augmentation was used in 75 (43.1%) pediatric patients. Out of the 455 patients, 41 (14.6%) adults and 13 (7.3%) children developed complications. Whilst three adult patients were died during follow-up, no deaths were recorded in the pediatric patients. Complication rate was 54/455 in Syrian refugees and 32/455 in citizens. It was observed that the complication was significantly higher in immigrants (p: 0.017). Sixty-five (14.2%) Syrian immigrants did not come to the outpatient clinic control at all or once, while this rate was 29/455 (6.3%) for Turkish citizens (p = 0.012). Conclusion Inadequate living conditions and lack of communication faced by refugees reduce the rate of patient follow-up and negatively affect the results of orthopedic trauma.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA