Maxillary Reconstruction with Free Vascularized Fibula: 15-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the midface after maxillectomy is extremely challenging due to the need to reestablish the contour of the midface, maintain oronasal separation, support the orbit, and to restore the dentition. In this study, we present our specific technique, surgical and functional outcomes, and pitfalls to avoid for reconstruction of the midface with the fibula osteocutaneous free flap. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent maxillary reconstruction with a fibula osteocutaneous free flap was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-five flaps were performed in 73 patients (61 patients received a fibula flap only; 12 patients received an additional soft tissue free flap). Reconstructions were performed for 82.2% Cordeiro type 2 and 18.8 % Cordeiro type 3a defects. Osseointegrated dental implants were placed in 95.9% of patients, 13.7% of whom underwent immediate implant placement. Concurrent orbital floor reconstruction was performed in 16.2% of patients. The rate of operative takeback was 18.9%, and total flap loss occurred in 2.7%. Hardware exposure occurred in 11.0% at a mean of 4.4 years postoperatively and palatal fistulae occurred in 5.5%, usually within the first 3 weeks following reconstruction. Functionally, 79.5% demonstrated excellent speech and 80.9% had unrestricted diet postoperatively. The mean follow-up period was 3.4 years. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that maxillary reconstruction with free fibula flap provides reliable reconstruction that restores dental, orbital, and midfacial support. Modifications and nuances to the reconstructive technique learned over time to avoid complications and improve outcomes are described herein.

Free fibula mandible reconstruction for osteoradionecrosis is more challenging than for primary cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible is an unfortunate potential sequela of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. In advanced cases of ORN, mandibulectomy, and free fibula flap reconstruction are required. We hypothesized that patients undergoing fibula free flap reconstruction and mandibulectomy for ORN pose unique challenges and experience more complications than patients undergoing fibula free flaps after oncologic mandibulectomy. METHODS: After IRB approval, we created a database of all free fibula flaps for mandible reconstruction from April 2005 through February 2019. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patient and surgical characteristics and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Four-hundred seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria (168 ORN vs. 311 non-ORN patients). Propensity-matching was performed based on age, BMI, smoking status, preoperative chemotherapy, and virtual surgery planning use, which yielded 159 patients in each group. ORN patients received more double-skin-island fibula flaps than non-OR patients (20.8% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001). Recipient artery other than the facial artery was utilized more commonly in ORN patients (42.1% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001). In the unmatched cohort, ORN patients had higher rates of delayed wound healing (26.2% vs. 16.8%, p = 0.01) and surgical site infections (21.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.02). Rates of flap loss, return to the operating room, hematoma, operative time, and length of stay were similar between the groups. On logistic regression analysis, osteoradionecrosis was an independent risk factor for delayed wound healing. CONCLUSION: Based on these data, mandibular reconstruction with fibula flaps for osteoradionecrosis appears more complicated than mandible reconstruction following de novo cancer resection. Surgeons should anticipate employing two skin islands for intraoral and extraoral resurfacing, utilizing unconventional recipient vessels, and managing the delayed wound healing that ensues more commonly than non-ORN patients.

Comparing Fibula Flap Insetting Techniques for Pediatric Oncologic Extremity Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Extremity reconstruction in skeletally immature patients presents unique challenges in terms of operative technique, bone healing, and limb function. A variety of insetting techniques have been described, with no clearly superior option. The authors hypothesized that vascularized fibula flaps placed in the intramedullary space are associated with shorter union times and better functionality compared with onlay flaps. METHODS: In a cohort study, the authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all pediatric patients who underwent fibula flap extremity reconstruction at a single center from 2001 through 2018. Comorbidities, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Complete fibula union was based on radiographic evidence of significant cortical bridging. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (mean age, 13.6 years; range, 2 to 18 years) underwent pedicled ( n = 7) or free ( n = 26) fibula flap reconstructions in 12 upper extremities and 21 lower extremities. Median follow-up was 69.5 months (interquartile range, 16.3 to 114.6 months). Onlay and intramedullary fibula position compared with intercalary placement (median, 13.5 and 14.6 months versus 3.4 months; P = 0.002) were associated with longer time to complete bone union. Complications including allograft fracture ( P = 0.02) and hardware removal ( P = 0.018) were also associated with longer time to complete union and eventual conversion to megaprosthesis ( P = 0.02, P = 0.038). Thirty-two patients (97%) achieved full union and a functional reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Fibula flap reconstruction is safe and effective for pediatric long-bone reconstruction. Longer fibula union times were associated with onlay and intramedullary fibula placement, allograft fracture, and hardware removal. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Evolution of Medical Modeling and 3D Printing in Microvascular Midface Reconstruction: Literature Review and Experience at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Reconstruction of the midface represents a challenge for reconstructive microsurgeons given the formidable task of restoring both aesthetics and functionality. In particular, preservation of proper globe positioning and maintaining normal vision are as important as restoring the proper projection of the midface and enabling a patient to speak and eat as normally as possible. The introduction of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and medical modeling has revolutionized bony reconstruction of the craniofacial skeleton; however, the overwhelming majority of studies have focused on mandibular reconstruction. Here, we introduce some novel advances in utilizing VSP for bony reconstruction of the midface. The present review aims (1) to provide a review of the literature on the use of VSP in midface reconstruction and (2) to provide some insights from the authors' early experience.

Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Tongue Reconstruction: An Effective and Safe Alternative to the Anterolateral Thigh Flap.

BACKGROUND: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap is a workhorse flap for tongue reconstruction. The authors present an alternative option using the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap for glossectomy reconstruction compared to the ALT flap. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 65 patients who underwent subtotal or total glossectomy reconstruction between 2016 and 2020 (46 ALT vs. 19 PAP flaps). Flap volume was assessed using CT scans at two different time points. Quality of life and functional outcomes were measured using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for head and neck cancer (MDASI-HN). RESULTS: Patients undergoing a PAP flap had significantly lower BMI compared to ALT flaps (22.7±5.0 vs. 25.8±5.1; p=0.014). Donor site and recipient site complications were similar as was the mean flap volume seven months after surgery (30.9% for ALT vs. 28.1% for PAP; p=0.93). Radiation and chemotherapy did not appear to have a significant effect on flap volume change over time. The most frequently reported high-severity items in MDASI-HN were swallowing/chewing and voice/speech for both cohorts. Patients who had reconstruction with a PAP flap had significantly better swallowing function (p=0.034). CONCLUSION: Both the PAP and ALT flaps appear to be safe and effective choices for subtotal and total tongue reconstruction. The PAP flap can serve as an alternative donor site, especially in the setting of malnourished patients with thin lateral thigh thickness undergoing reconstruction of extensive glossectomy defects.

Long-term Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Comparing Skin-Preserving, Staged Versus Delayed Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Skin-preserving, staged, microvascular, breast reconstruction often is preferred in patients requiring postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) but may lead to complications. We compared the long-term surgical and patient-reported outcomes between skin-preserving and delayed microvascular breast reconstruction with and without PMRT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy and microvascular breast reconstruction between January 2016 and April 2022. The primary outcome was any flap-related complication. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes and tissue-expander complications. RESULTS: We identified 1002 reconstructions (672 delayed; 330 skin-preserving) in 812 patients. Mean follow-up was 24.2 ± 19.3 months. PMRT was required in 564 reconstructions (56.3%). In the non-PMRT group, skin-preserving reconstruction was independently associated with shorter hospital stay (ß - 0.32, p = 0.045) and lower odds of 30-days readmission (odds ratio [OR] 0.44, p = 0.042), seroma (OR 0.42, p = 0.036), and hematoma (OR 0.24, p = 0.011) compared with delayed reconstruction. In the PMRT group, skin-preserving reconstruction was independently associated with shorter hospital stay (ß - 1.15, p < 0.001) and operative time (ß - 97.0, p < 0.001) and lower odds of 30-days readmission (OR 0.29, p = 0.005) and infection (OR 0.33, p = 0.023) compared with delayed reconstruction. Skin-preserving reconstruction had a 10.6% tissue expander loss rate and did not differ from delayed reconstruction in terms of patient-reported satisfaction with breast, psychosocial well-being, or sexual well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Skin-preserving, staged, microvascular, breast reconstruction is safe regardless of the need for PMRT, with an acceptable tissue expander loss rate, and is associated with improved flap outcomes and similar patient-reported quality of life to that of delayed reconstruction.

Ensuring Safety While Achieving Beauty: An Evidence-Based Approach to Optimizing Mastectomy and Autologous Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients with Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Although obesity has previously been associated with poor outcomes after mastectomy and breast reconstruction, its impact across the WHO obesity classification spectrum and the differential effects of various optimization strategies on patient outcomes have yet to be delineated. We sought to examine the impact of WHO obesity classification on intraoperative surgical and medical complications, postoperative surgical and patient-reported outcomes of mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction, and delineate outcomes optimization strategies for obese patients. STUDY DESIGN: This is a review of consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction from 2016 to 2022. Primary outcomes were complication rates. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes and optimal management strategies. RESULTS: We identified 1,640 mastectomies and reconstructions in 1,240 patients with mean follow-up of 24.2 ± 19.2 months. Patients with class II/III obesity had higher adjusted risk of wound dehiscence (odds ratio [OR] 3.20; p < 0.001), skin flap necrosis (OR 2.60; p < 0.001), deep venous thrombosis (OR 3.90; p < 0.033), and pulmonary embolism (OR 15.3; p = 0.001) than nonobese patients. Obese patients demonstrated significantly lower satisfaction with breasts (67.3 ± 27.7 vs 73.7 ± 24.0; p = 0.043) and psychological well-being (72.4 ± 27.0 vs 82.0 ± 20.8; p = 0.001) than nonobese patients. Unilateral delayed reconstructions were associated with independently shorter hospital stay (ß -0.65; p = 0.002) and lower adjusted risk of 30-day readmission (OR 0.45; p = 0.031), skin flap necrosis (OR 0.14; p = 0.031), and pulmonary embolism (OR 0.07; p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Obese women should be closely monitored for adverse events and lower quality of life, offered measures to optimize thromboembolic prophylaxis, and advised on the risks and benefits of unilateral delayed reconstruction.

Pharyngeaoesophageal Reconstruction.

Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction is one of the most challenging reconstructive dilemmas that demands extensive planning, meticulous surgical execution, and timely management of postoperative complications. The main goals of reconstruction are to protect critical blood vessels of the neck, to provide alimentary continuity, and to restore functions such as speech and swallowing. With the evolution of techniques, fasciocutaneous flaps have become the gold standard for most defects in this region. Major complications include anastomotic strictures and fistulae, but most patients can tolerate an oral diet and achieve fluent speech after rehabilitation with a tracheoesophageal puncture.

Comparison of Long-term Surgical Outcomes and Microsurgical Skills between Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Trainees.

We compared the surgical skills and outcomes of microsurgical fellows who completed an independent versus integrated plastic surgery residency. Methods: We reviewed outcomes of abdominal wall reconstructions performed autonomously by microsurgical fellows at our institution from March 2005 to June 2019; outcome measures included hernia recurrence, surgical site occurrence, surgical site infection, length of hospital stay, unplanned return to the operating room, and 30-day readmission. The microsurgical skills were prospectively evaluated using the validated Structured Assessment of Microsurgical Skills at the start and end of the fellowship, in an animal laboratory model and clinical microsurgical cases. Multivariable hierarchical models were constructed to evaluate study outcomes. Results: We identified 44 fellows and 118 consecutive patients (52% women) who met our inclusion criteria. Independent fellows performed 55% (n = 65) of cases, and 45% were performed by integrated fellows. We found no significant difference in hernia recurrence, surgical site occurrences, surgical site infections, 30-day readmission, unplanned return to the operating room, or length of stay between the two groups in adjusted models. Although laboratory scores were similar between the groups, integrated fellows demonstrated higher initial clinical scores (42.0 ± 4.9 versus 37.7 ± 5.0, P = 0.04); however, the final clinical scores were similar (50.8 ± 6.0 versus 48.9 ± 5.2, P = 0.45). Conclusions: Independent and integrated fellows demonstrated similar long-term patient outcomes. Although integrated fellows had better initial microsurgical skills, evaluation at the conclusion of fellowship revealed similar performance, indicating that fellowship training allows for further development of competent surgeons.

Free Fillet Flap of Lower Extremity: 38 Amputations with Seven Examples of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces.

BACKGROUND: Extremely high-level lower extremity amputations are rare procedures that require significant soft-tissue and bony reconstruction. This study describes the use of fillet flaps for oncologic reconstruction and the incorporation of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) for chronic pain prevention. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent lower extremity fillet flaps at MD Anderson Cancer Center from January of 2004 through April of 2021. Surgical outcomes were summarized and compared. Numeric rating scale and patient-reported outcomes measures were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-eight fillet flaps were performed for lower extremity reconstruction. Extirpative surgery included external hemipelvectomy (42%), external hemipelvectomy with sacrectomy (32%), and supratrochanteric above-knee amputation (26%). Median defect size was 600 cm 2 , and 50% included a bony component. Twenty-one patients (55%) experienced postoperative complications, with 16 requiring operative intervention. There was an increased trend toward complications in patients with preoperative radiotherapy, although this was not significant (44% versus 65%; P = 0.203). Seven patients underwent TMR or RPNI. In these patients, the mean numeric rating scale residual limb pain score was 2.8 ± 3.4 ( n = 5; range, 0 to 4/10) and phantom limb pain was 4 ± 3.2 ( n = 6; range, 0 to 7/10). The mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Information Systems T scores were as follows: pain intensity, 50.8 ± 10.6 ( n = 6; range, 30.7 to 60.5); pain interference, 59.2 ± 12.1 ( n = 5; range, 40.7 to 70.1); and pain behavior, 62.3 ± 6.7 ( n = 3; range, 54.6 to 67.2). CONCLUSIONS: Lower limb fillet flaps are reliable sources of bone, soft tissue, and nerve for reconstruction of oncologic amputation. TMR or RPNI are important new treatment adjuncts that should be considered during every amputation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Simultaneous Scalp, Skull, Kidney, and Pancreas Transplant from a Single Donor: Insights from a 5-Year Follow-Up.

SUMMARY: This report provides a 5-year follow-up on the first reported simultaneous scalp, calvarium, kidney, and pancreas transplant. The previously published case report represented both the first composite calvarial-scalp transplant and combination of a vascularized composite allotransplantation with double organ transplantation. Over the ensuing 5 years, the patient underwent a single episode of acute scalp rejection successfully managed with intravenous Solu-Medrol, one resection of a basal cell carcinoma on the native scalp, hardware removal, and bony contouring. In addition, the patient developed seizures secondary to delayed, postirradiation cerebral necrosis requiring craniotomy and resection. His seizures were ultimately controlled. Currently, more than 5 years after his multiorgan transplant, the patient continues to have excellent allograft function and a very satisfactory aesthetic outcome, demonstrating that in certain cases, combined vascularized composite allotransplantation with solid organ transplantation can be performed safely without compromising the solid organ transplantation.

Free Fibula Flap for Extremity Oncologic Defects: Factors Influencing Union and Functional Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes after vascularized bone flap (VBF) reconstruction of oncologic bony extremity defects. A secondary goal was to compare union rates based on various insetting methods, including onlay, intermedullary, and intercalary. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients who received an extremity reconstruction with a fibula flap after oncologic resection between 2001 and 2019. RESULTS: The authors identified a total of 60 fibular VBFs in 55 patients (67% lower extremity, 33% upper extremity). The overall union rate was 91.7% (55 of 60). For lower extremity reconstructions, the mean time to full weightbearing was 16 months (range, 4 to 44 months). Fibula VBFs were onlay in 65% of cases, intercalary in 23%, and intramedullary in 12%. Forty-three percent of patients required a reoperation as a result of a surgical complication. Immediate femur reconstruction subgroup analysis demonstrated that onlay fibula flap orientation was associated with a significantly increased risk for any complication (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 28.7; P = 0.03) as well as an increased risk for requiring conversion to endoprostheses because of nonunion (OR, 12.1; 90% CI, 1.03 to 143.5; P = 0.03) compared with intramedullary placement. CONCLUSIONS: The free vascularized fibula flap is a reliable option for functional reconstruction of any long bone extremity defect, but complications in these complex procedures are not uncommon. In patients with immediate femur reconstructions, intramedullary fibula placement was associated with significantly lower complication and lower metallic implant conversion rates and a trend toward a more rapid early union compared with onlay VBF. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Reconstruction of Forequarter and Extended Forequarter Amputations: Indications and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Forequarter amputations (FQAs) and extended forequarter amputations (EFQAs) are rare procedures with high morbidity that often require significant soft-tissue or bony reconstruction. The authors describe the largest series of oncologic FQAs and EFQAs to date with associated reconstructive and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed data from all patients who underwent FQA or EFQA at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 2008, to January 1, 2019. Surgical outcomes, survival, and local recurrence rates were summarized and compared. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, including 14 with EFQAs. Most patients (53%) were male; the median age was 58 years (range, 2 to 74). The most common tumor type was sarcoma (79%), and the most common presentation was recurrent (34%). Nineteen patients (40%) had distant metastases. The median defect size was 351 cm 2 ; flap reconstruction was required in 30 patients (64%). Eight patients (17%) experienced immediate complications and 12 (26%) experienced delayed complications. The median overall survival (OS) time was 21 months and the 5-year OS rate was 28.1%. OS and disease-free survival were superior in the EFQA group (69.8% versus 11.6%, P = 0.017; 58.9% versus 9.8%, P = 0.014, respectively). Metastasis at presentation was the most important predictor of survival on multivariate analysis (OR, 3.98; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EFQA had better OS and disease-free survival than did patients with FQA, owing to a lower incidence of metastatic disease. This study suggests a benefit to more aggressive resection and reconstruction when disease is locally confined. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

The Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Complications of Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning has been increasingly used for surgical outcome prediction, yet applications in head and neck reconstruction are not well-described. In this study, we developed and evaluated the performance of ML algorithms in predicting postoperative complications in head and neck free-flap reconstruction. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of patients who underwent microvascular head and neck reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018. Data were used to develop and evaluate nine supervised ML algorithms in predicting overall complications, major recipient-site complication, and total flap loss. RESULTS: We identified 4000 patients who met inclusion criteria. Overall, 33.7% of patients experienced a complication, 26.5% experienced a major recipient-site complication, and 1.7% suffered total flap loss. The k-nearest neighbors algorithm demonstrated the best overall performance for predicting any complication (AUROC = 0.61, sensitivity = 0.60). Regularized regression had the best performance for predicting major recipient-site complications (AUROC = 0.68, sensitivity = 0.66), and decision trees were the best predictors of total flap loss (AUROC = 0.66, sensitivity = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: ML accurately identified patients at risk of experiencing postsurgical complications, including total flap loss. Predictions from ML models may provide insight in the perioperative setting and facilitate shared decision making.

Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction After Oncologic Resection: 14-Year Experience at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes studies for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in the setting of previous oncologic extirpation are lacking. We sought to evaluate long-term outcomes of AWR using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) after extirpative resection, compare them to primary herniorrhaphy, and report the rates and predictors of postoperative complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent AWR after oncologic resection from March 2005 to June 2019 at a tertiary cancer center. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence (HR). Secondary outcomes included surgical site occurrences (SSOs), surgical site infection (SSIs), length of hospital stay (LOS), reoperation, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: Of 720 consecutive patients who underwent AWR during the study period, 194 (26.9%) underwent AWR following resection of abdominal wall tumors. In adjusted analyses, patients who had AWR after extirpative resection were more likely to have longer LOS (ß, 2.57; 95%CI, 1.27 to 3.86, p < 0.001) than those with primary herniorrhaphy, but the risk of HR, SSO, SSI, 30-day readmission, and reoperation did not differ significantly. In the extirpative cohort, obesity (Hazard ratio, 6.48; p = 0.003), and bridged repair (Hazard ratio, 3.50; p = 0.004) were predictors of HR. Radiotherapy (OR, 2.23; p = 0.017) and diabetes mellites (OR, 3.70; p = 0.005) were predictors of SSOs. Defect width (OR, 2.30; p < 0.001) and mesh length (OR, 3.32; p = 0.046) were predictors of SSIs. Concomitant intra-abdominal surgery for active disease was not associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: AWR with ADM following extirpative resection demonstrated outcomes comparable with primary herniorrhaphy. Preoperative risk assessment and optimization are imperative for improving outcomes.

Treatment of multiple limb lymphedema with combined supermicrosurgical techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphedema surgery including lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) are effective treatments for lymphedema; however, treating multiple limbs in a single operation using both approaches has not been described. We hypothesize multiple limb lymphedema can be treated effectively in one operation. PATIENT AND METHODS: Retrospective review of seven patients undergoing extreme lymphedema surgery (mean age: 53.2 years; range: 33-66 years) with an average BMI of 34.8 kg/m2 (range: 17.6-53.6 kg/m2 ). Two patients developed bilateral upper extremity (UE) lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment, three had bilateral lower extremity (LE) lymphedema, and two suffered from lymphedema of all four extremities due to breast cancer treatment. RESULTS: One patient with bilateral UE lymphedema was treated with bilateral inguinal node transfers with LVA and the other with combined bilateral DIEP flaps and inguinal node transfers with LVA. Three patients had bilateral LE lymphedema: two were treated with split omental/gastroepiploic nodes, and one underwent simultaneous supraclavicular and submental node transfers. LVAs were performed in one leg in each patient. Two patients with four-limb lymphedema underwent bilateral inguinal node transfers with DIEP flaps and bilateral LE LVA. In total, there were eight UE and 10 LE treated. Average follow-up was 15.8 months (range: 12.6-28.4 months), all patients reported subjective improvement in symptoms, were able to decrease use of compression garments and pumps, and no patients developed cellulitis. CONCLUSION: Patients suffering from lymphedema of multiple extremities can be treated safely and effectively combining both LVA and VLNT in a single operation.

Post-operative Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Following Facial Reconstruction With Fibula Free Flaps.

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE: Assess outcomes of pediatric facial reconstruction with fibula free flaps. OBJECTIVES: Free flap reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects in pediatric patients is rare. Post-operative complications, donor site morbidity, impact on craniofacial growth, and oro-dental rehabilitation are unknown. Our study assesses the outcomes of pediatric maxillofacial reconstruction with composite fibula free flaps. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review from 2000 to 2020 on pediatric patients undergoing maxillomandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients underwent 89 surgeries; 5 maxillary and 84 mandibular defects. Median age: 12 years. Defects were acquired following resection of sarcoma/carcinoma 44% or benign tumors 50%. 73% of cases had immediate free flap reconstruction. Closing osteotomies were reported in 74%; 1 in 40%, 2 in 27%, and more than 2 in 6.7%. Hardware was used in 98% and removed in 25%. 9.2% demonstrated long-term hardware exposure, greater than 3 months following reconstruction. Short-term complications: wound infection 6.7%, flap salvage/failure 2.2%, fistula 1.1%, and compromised craniofacial growth: 23%. Two patients developed trismus. Long-term fibula donor site complications: hypertrophic scarring: 3.4%, dysesthesia: 1.1%, and long-term gait abnormality: 1.1%. Dental rehabilitation was performed in 33%. Post-operative speech outcomes showed 94% with fully intelligible speech. CONCLUSION: Pediatric maxillary and mandible defects repaired with fibula free flaps demonstrated complication rates comparable to the adult free flap population. Long-term follow-up did not demonstrate adverse outcomes for craniofacial growth. Hardware for flap retention was utilized and remained in place with minimal exposure. Post-operative gait abnormality is rare. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:302-306, 2023.