Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 211(1): 70-5, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26122361

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is feasible in patients greater than or equal to 80 years, little is known about the potential strain on resource utilization. METHODS: Outcomes and inpatient charges were compared across age cohorts (I: ≤70, II: 71 to 79, III: ≥80 years) in 99 patients who underwent PD (2005 to 2013) at our institution. The generalized linear modeling approach was used to estimate the impact of age. RESULTS: Perioperative complications were equivalent among cohorts. Increasing age was associated with intensive care unit use, increased length of stay (LOS), and the likelihood of discharge to a skilled facility. After controlling for covariates, hospital charges were significantly higher in Cohort III (P = .006) and Cohort II (P = .035) when compared with Cohort I. However, hospital charges between Cohorts II and III were equivalent (P = .374). Complications (P = .005) and LOS (P < .001) were associated with higher hospital charges. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age was associated with increased intensive care unit, LOS, and discharge to skilled facilities. However, octogenarians had equivalent PD charges and outcome measures when compared with septuagenarians and future studies should validate these findings in larger national studies.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/economia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/economia , District of Columbia , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Surgery ; 156(2): 379-84, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24680859

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We compared outcomes and postpancreatectomy quality of life (QOL) in paired cohorts of patients undergoing conventional open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) or laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (LAPD). METHODS: Comparative analysis of QOL was performed in a matched cohort of 53 patients after OPD or LAPD between 2010 and 2013. The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey and the Karnofsky score were used. RESULTS: Physical component score, mental component score, and Karnofsky scores were calculated at multiple time points for OPD (n = 25) and LAPD (n = 28). Operative times, complications, and readmission rates were equivalent. Time to starting adjuvant therapy trended toward clinical importance in LAPD (61 vs 110 days, P = .0878). Duration of stay was less in LAPD (7.10 vs 9.44 days, P = .02). LAPD had a superior QOL centered on functional status compared with OPD (physical component score 49.09 vs 38.4, P = .04; Karnofsky 92.22 vs 66.92%, P = .003). These statistical differences were not observed beyond 6 months. CONCLUSION: LAPD provided a more favorable QOL within the first 6 months and shorter length of stay compared with conventional OPD. LAPD may serve as an alternative operative therapy to potentially minimize delays in receipt of and enhance tolerability of adjuvant therapies.


Assuntos
Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Duodenais/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Laparoscopia/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA