Subspecialty and Training Preferences for U.S. Neurosurgery Faculty with International Training.

BACKGROUND: Academic neurosurgeons with international medical training play a large role in the U.S. neurosurgical workforce. We aimed to compare U.S.-trained neurosurgeons with internationally trained neurosurgeons to reveal differences in subspecialty preferences and training opportunities abroad. METHODS: We identified 1671 neurosurgeons from 115 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited neurosurgical residency programs. Data on demographics, institution characteristics, and chosen subspecialty were collected, and faculty were divided based on location of training. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression compared faculty characteristics between training locations. RESULTS: Compared with the U.S. medical school + U.S. residency group, the international medical graduate + U.S. residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base and vascular neurosurgery and complete a fellowship in the United States or internationally (P < 0.05). The international medical graduate + international residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base neurosurgery, more likely to complete an international fellowship, and less likely to practice general neurosurgery (P < 0.05). Neurosurgeons in pediatrics, radiosurgery, and vascular subspecialties were more likely to receive fellowship training in any location (P < 0.05). Additionally, functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete fellowships internationally, spinal neurosurgeons were less likely to pursue international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons were more likely to have dual fellowship training in both the United States and abroad (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: International medical training affected subspecialty choice and fellowship training. Internationally trained neurosurgeons more often specialized in oncology and vascular neurosurgery. Functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete international fellowships, spine neurosurgeons were less likely to complete international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons more often had both U.S. and international fellowships.

Neuromonitoring Correlates of Expertise Level in Surgical Performers: A Systematic Review.

Surgical expertise does not have a clear definition and is often culturally associated with power, authority, prestige, and case number rather than more objective proxies of excellence. Multiple models of expertise progression have been proposed including the Dreyfus model, however, they all currently require subjective evaluation of skill. Recently, efforts have been made to improve the ways in which surgical excellence is measured and expertise is defined using artificial intelligence, video recordings, and accelerometers. However, these aforementioned methods of assessment are still subjective or indirect proxies of expertise, thus uncovering the neural mechanisms that differentiate expert surgeons from trainees may enhance the objectivity of surgical expertise validation. In fact, some researchers have already suggested that their neural imaging-based expertise classification methods outperform currently used methods of surgical skill certification such as the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) scores. Such imaging biomarkers would not only help better identify the highest performing surgeons, but could also improve residency programs by providing more objective, evidence-based feedback and developmental milestones for those in training and perhaps act as a marker of surgical potential in medical students. Despite the potential advantages of using neural imaging in the assessment of surgical expertise, this field of research remains in its infancy. This systematic review identifies studies that have applied neuromonitoring in assessing surgical skill across levels of expertise. The goals of this review are to identify (1) the strongest neural indicators of surgical expertise, (2) the limitations of the current literature on this subject, (3) the most sensible future directions for further study. We found substantial evidence that surgical expertise can be delineated by differential activation and connectivity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) across multiple task and neuroimaging modalities. Specifically, novices tend to have greater PFC activation than experts under standard conditions in bimanual and decision-making tasks. However, under high temporal demand tasks, experts had increased PFC activation whereas novices had decreased PFC activation. Common limitations uncovered in this review were that task difficulty was often insufficient to delineate between residents and attending. Moreover, attending level involvement was also low in multiple studies which may also have contributed to this issue. Most studies did not analyze the ability of their neuromonitoring findings to accurately classify subjects by level of expertise. Finally, the predominance of fNIRS as the neuromonitoring modality limits our ability to uncover the neural correlates of surgical expertise in non-cortical brain regions. Future studies should first strive to address these limitations. In the longer term, longitudinal within-subjects design over the course of a residency or even a career will also advance the field. Although logistically arduous, such studies would likely be most beneficial in demonstrating effects of increasing surgical expertise on regional brain activation and inter-region connectivity.

Seasonal Effects on Surgical Site Infections Following Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating seasonality as a risk factor for surgical site infections (SSIs) after spine surgery show mixed results. This study used national data to analyze seasonal effects on spine surgery SSIs. METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data (2011-2018) were queried for posterior cervical fusions (PCFs), cervical laminoplasties, posterior lumbar fusions (PLFs), lumbar laminectomies, and deformity surgeries. Patients aged >89 and procedures for tumors, fractures, infections, and nonelective indications were excluded. Patients were divided into warm (admitted April-September) and cold (admitted October-March) seasonal groups. End points were SSIs and reoperations for wound débridement/drainage. Stratified analyses were performed by surgery type and pre-versus postdischarge infections. RESULTS: Overall (N = 208,291), SSIs were more likely in the warm season (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.23, P < 0.0001) and for PCFs (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.80, P = 0.011), PLFs (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.28, P = 0.006), and lumbar laminectomies (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25, P = 0.014). Postdischarge infections were also more likely in the warm season overall (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23, P < 0.0001) and for PCFs (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.73, P = 0.041), PLFs (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.27, P = 0.014), and lumbar laminectomies (OR 1.15, CI 1.04-1.27, P = 0.007). In-hospital infections were more likely during the warm season only for PCFs (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.06-6.10, P = 0.037). Reoperations for infection were more likely during the warm season for PLFs (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08-1.54, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: PCF, PLF, and lumbar laminectomy performed during the warm season had significantly higher odds of SSI, especially postdischarge SSIs. Reoperation rates for wound management were significantly increased during the warm season for PLFs. Identifying seasonal causes merits further investigation and may influence surgeon scheduling and expectations.

Minimally Invasive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Techniques: A Review.

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) continues to have high morbidity and mortality. Improving ICH outcomes likely requires rapid removal of blood from the parenchyma and restraining edema formation while also limiting further neuronal damage due to the surgical intervention. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches promise to provide these benefits and have become alluring options for management of ICH. This review describes six MIS techniques for ICH evacuation including craniopuncture, stereotactic aspiration with thrombolysis, endoport-mediated evacuation, endoscope-assisted evacuation, adjunctive aspiration devices, and the surgiscope. The efficacy of each modality is discussed based on current literature. The largest clinical trials have yet to demonstrate definitive effects of MIS intervention on mortality and functional outcomes for ICH. Thus, there is a significant need for further innovation for ICH treatment. Multiple ongoing trials promise to better clarify the potential of the newer, non-thrombolytic MIS techniques.

Utility of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Degenerative Spine Surgery Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: As spine surgery becomes increasingly common in the elderly, frailty has been used to risk stratify these patients. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a novel method of assessing frailty using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. However, HFRS utility has not been evaluated in spinal surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of HFRS in predicting adverse outcomes of surgical spine patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective spine surgery at a single institution from 2008 to 2016 were reviewed, and those undergoing surgery for tumors, traumas, and infections were excluded. The HFRS was calculated for each patient, and rates of adverse events were calculated for low, medium, and high frailty cohorts. Predictive ability of the HFRS in a model containing other relevant variables for various outcomes was also calculated. RESULTS: Intensive care unit (ICU) stays were more prevalent in high HFRS patients (66%) than medium (31%) or low (7%) HFRS patients. Similar results were found for nonhome discharges and 30-d readmission rates. Logistic regressions showed HFRS improved the accuracy of predicting ICU stays (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87), nonhome discharges (AUC = 0.84), and total complications (AUC = 0.84). HFRS was less effective at improving predictions of 30-d readmission rates (AUC = 0.65) and emergency department visits (AUC = 0.60). CONCLUSION: HFRS is a better predictor of length of stay (LOS), ICU stays, and nonhome discharges than readmission and may improve on modified frailty index in predicting LOS. Since ICU stays and nonhome discharges are the main drivers of cost variability in spine surgery, HFRS may be a valuable tool for cost prediction in this specialty.