A pharmacokinetic framework describing antibiotic adsorption to cardiopulmonary bypass devices.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can alter pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and the drug may adsorb to the CPB device, altering exposure. Cefazolin is a beta-lactam antibiotic used for antimicrobial prophylaxis during cardiac surgery supported by CPB. Adsorption of cefazolin could result in therapeutic failure. An ex vivo study was undertaken using CPB devices primed and then dosed with cefazolin and samples were obtained over 1 hour of recirculation. Twelve experimental runs were conducted using different CPB device sizes (neonate, infant, child, and adult), device coatings (Xcoating™, Rheoparin®, PH.I.S.I.O), and priming solutions. The time course of saturable binding, using Bmax (binding capacity), Kd (dissociation constant), and T2off (half-time of dissociation), described cefazolin adsorption. Bmax estimates for the device sizes were neonate 40.0 mg (95% CI 24.3, 67.4), infant 48.6 mg (95% CI 5.97, 80.2), child 77.8 mg (95% CI 54.9, 103), and adult 196 mg (95% CI 191, 199). The Xcoating™ Kd estimate was 139 mg/L (95% CI 27.0, 283) and the T2off estimate was 98.4 min (95% CI 66.8, 129). The Rheoparin® and PH.I.S.I.O coatings had similar binding parameters with Kd and T2off estimates of 0.169 mg/L (95% CI 0.01, 1.99) and 4.94 min (95% CI 0.17, 59.4). The Bmax was small (< 10%) relative to a typical total patient dose during cardiac surgery supported by CPB. A dose adjustment for cefazolin based solely on drug adsorption is not required. This framework could be extended to other PK studies involving CPB.

Time-Varying Clearance in Milrinone Pharmacokinetics from Premature Neonates to Adolescents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Milrinone is an inotrope and vasodilator used for prophylaxis or treatment of low cardiac output syndrome after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). It is renally eliminated and has an acceptable therapeutic range of 100-300 µg/L, but weight-based dosing alone is associated with poor target attainment. We aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for milrinone from premature neonates to adolescents, and to evaluate how age, renal function and recovery from CPB may impact dose selection. METHODS: Fifty paediatric patients (aged 4 days to 16 years) were studied after undergoing cardiac surgery supported by CPB. Data from 29 premature neonates (23-28 weeks' postmenstrual age) treated for prophylaxis of low systemic blood flow were available for a pooled pharmacokinetic analysis. Population parameters were estimated using non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM 7.5.1). RESULTS: There were 369 milrinone measurements available for analysis. A one-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination was used to describe milrinone disposition. Population parameters were clearance 17.8 L/70 kg [95% CI 15.8-19.9] and volume 20.4 L/h/70 kg [95% CI 17.8-22.1]. Covariates included size, postmenstrual age and renal function for clearance, and size and postnatal age for volume. Milrinone clearance is reduced by 39.5% [95% CI 24.0-53.7] immediately after bypass, and recovers to baseline clearance with a half-time of 12.0 h [95% CI 9.7-15.2]. Milrinone volume was 2.07 [95% CI 1.87-2.27] times greater at birth than the population standard and decreased over the first days of life with a half-time of 0.977 days [95% CI 0.833-1.12]. CONCLUSION: Milrinone is predominately renally eliminated and so renal function is an important covariate describing variability in clearance. Increasing clearance over time likely reflects increasing cardiac output and renal perfusion due to milrinone and return to baseline following CPB.

A Randomized Trial Comparing Standard of Care to Bayesian Warfarin Dose Individualization.

The quality of warfarin treatment may be improved if management is guided by the use of models based upon pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic theory. A prospective, two-armed, single-blind, randomized controlled trial compared management aided by a web-based dose calculator (NextDose) with standard clinical care. Participants were 240 adults receiving warfarin therapy following cardiac surgery, followed up until the first outpatient appointment at least 3 months after warfarin initiation. We compared the percentage of time spent in the international normalized ratio acceptable range (%TIR) during the first 28 days following warfarin initiation, and %TIR and count of bleeding events over the entire follow-up period. Two hundred thirty-four participants were followed up to day 28 (NextDose: 116 and standard of care: 118), and 228 participants (114 per arm) were followed up to the final study visit. Median %TIR tended to be higher for participants receiving NextDose guided warfarin management during the first 28 days (63 vs. 56%, P = 0.13) and over the entire follow-up period (74 vs. 71%, P = 0.04). The hazard of clinically relevant minor bleeding events was lower for participants in the NextDose arm (hazard ratio: 0.21, P = 0.041). In NextDose, there were 89.3% of proposed doses accepted by prescribers. NextDose guided dose management in cardiac surgery patients requiring warfarin was associated with an increase in %TIR across the full follow-up period and fewer hemorrhagic events. A theory-based, pharmacologically guided approach facilitates higher quality warfarin anticoagulation. An important practical benefit is a reduced requirement for clinical experience of warfarin management.

A non-opioid analgesic implant for sustained post-operative intraperitoneal delivery of lidocaine, characterized using an ovine model.

Appropriate management of post-operative pain is an ongoing challenge in surgical practice. At present, systemic opioid administration is routinely used for analgesia in the post-operative setting. However, due to significant adverse effects and potential for misuse, there is a perceived need for the development of alternative, opioid-sparing treatment modalities. Continuous infusion of local anesthetic into the peritoneum after major abdominal surgery reduces pain and opioid consumption, and enhances recovery from surgery. Here we describe a non-opioid, poly(ethylene-co-vinyl-acetate) intraperitoneal implant for the sustained delivery of local anesthetic following major abdominal surgery. A radio-opaque core had the required mechanical strength to facilitate placement and removal procedures. This core was enclosed by an outer shell containing an evenly dispersed local anesthetic, lidocaine. Sustained release of lidocaine was observed in an ovine model over days and the movement modelled between peritoneal fluid and circulating plasma. While desirably high levels of lidocaine were achieved in the peritoneal space these were several orders of magnitude higher than blood levels, which remained well below toxic levels. A pharmacokinetic model is presented that incorporates in vitro release data to describe lidocaine concentrations in both peritoneal and plasma compartments, predicting similar release to that suggested by lidocaine concentrations remaining in the device after 3 and 7 days in situ. Histological analysis revealed similar inflammatory responses following implantation of the co-extruded implant and a commercially used silicone drain after three days. This non-opioid analgesic implant provides sustained release of lidocaine in an ovine model and is suitable for moving onto first in human trials.

Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) are increasingly used as endpoints in surgical trials. PROs need to be consistently measured and reported to accurately evaluate surgical care. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a commonly performed procedure which may be evaluated by PROs. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and consistency of PRO measurement and reporting after LC. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for prospective studies reporting PROs of LC, between 2013 and 2016. Data on the measurement and reporting of PROs were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 281 studies were evaluated. Forty-five unique multi-item questionnaires were identified, most of which were used in single studies (n = 35). One hundred and ten unique rating scales were used to assess 358 PROs. The visual analogue scale was used to assess 24 different PROs, 17 of which were only reported in single studies. Details about the type of rating scale used were not given for 72 scales. Three hundred and twenty-three PROs were reported in 162 studies without details given about the scale or questionnaire used to evaluate them. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation was identified in the choice of PROs reported after LC, and in how they were measured. PRO measurement for LC is focused on short-term outcomes, such as post-operative pain, rather than longer-term outcomes. Consideration should be given towards the development of a core outcome set for LC which incorporates PROs.

Improving the quality of administration of the Surgical Safety Checklist: a mixed methods study in New Zealand hospitals.

While the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (the Checklist) can improve patient outcomes, variable administration can erode benefits. We sought to understand and improve how operating room (OR) staff use the Checklist. Our specific aims were to: determine if OR staff can discriminate between good and poor quality of Checklist administration using a validated audit tool (WHOBARS); to determine reliability and accuracy of WHOBARS self-ratings; determine the influence of demographic variables on ratings and explore OR staff attitudes to Checklist administration. DESIGN: Mixed methods study using WHOBARS ratings of surgical cases by OR staff and two independent observers, thematic analysis of staff interviews. PARTICIPANTS: OR staff in three New Zealand hospitals. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reliability of WHOBARS for self-audit; staff attitudes to Checklist administration. RESULTS: Analysis of scores (243 participants, 2 observers, 59 cases) supported tool reliability, with 87% of WHOBARS score variance attributable to differences in Checklist administration between cases. Self-ratings were significantly higher than observer ratings, with some differences between professional groups but error variance from all raters was less than 10%. Key interview themes (33 interviewees) were: Team culture and embedding the Checklist, Information transfer and obstacles, Raising concerns and 'A tick-box exercise'. Interviewees felt the Checklist could promote teamwork and a safety culture, particularly enabling speaking up. Senior staff were of key importance in setting the appropriate tone. CONCLUSIONS: The WHOBARS tool could be useful for self-audit and quality improvement as OR staff can reliably discriminate between good and poor Checklist administration. OR staff self-ratings were lenient compared with external observers suggesting the value of external audit for benchmarking. Small differences between ratings from professional groups underpin the value of including all members of the team in scoring. We identified factors explaining staff perceptions of the Checklist that should inform quality improvement interventions.

Acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and tramadol analgesic interactions after adenotonsillectomy.

BACKGROUND: The impact of tramadol in children given acetaminophen-ibuprofen combination therapy is uncertain in acute pediatric pain management. A model describing the interaction between these three drugs would be useful to understand the role of supplemental analgesic therapy. METHODS: Children undergoing tonsillectomy were given oral paracetamol and ibuprofen perioperatively. Blood was taken for paracetamol and ibuprofen drug assay on up to six occasions over 6 h after the initial dose. Tramadol was administered by caregivers for unacceptable postoperative pain. Pain was measured using the Parent's Postoperative Pain Measurement rating two hourly on the first postoperative day. A first-order absorption, one-compartment linear model with first-order elimination was used to describe acetaminophen and ibuprofen disposition. Analgesia was described using an EMAX model extended for three drugs, assuming additive effects. Curve fitting was performed using nonlinear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Pharmacodynamic parameter estimates, expressed using fractional Hill equation, were maximum effect (EMAX ) 0.65 (95%CI 0.54, 0.74), the concentration of acetaminophen associated with 50% of the maximal drug effect (C50,ACET ) 7.06 (95%CI 7.03, 7.72) mg/L, and the ibuprofen C50 (C50,IBU ) 3.95 (95%CI 2.57, 7.53) mg/L. The Hill coefficient was 1.48 (95%CI 0.92, 2.62) and an interaction term was fixed at zero (additivity). The half-time (t1/2 keo) for equilibration between the plasma and effect site was 0.34 hour (95%CI 0.23, 1.98) for acetaminophen and 1.04 hour (95%CI 0.75, 1.77) for ibuprofen. Tramadol had a C50,TRAM of 0.07 (95%CI 0.048, 1.07) mg/L with a t1/2 keo,TRAM 1.78 hour (95%CI 1.06, 1.96). CONCLUSION: Ibuprofen has an EC50 for analgesia in children similar to that of adults (3.95 mg/L; 95%CI 2.57-7.53, vs 5-10 mg/L adults). The maximum effect from combination therapy (ie, 65% reduction in pain score) achieves satisfactory analgesia with commonly used doses but increased dose adds little additional benefit. The addition of tramadol to this analgesic mixture prolongs analgesia duration.

Reporting of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Consistent measurement and reporting of outcomes, including adequately defined complications, is important for the evaluation of surgical care and the appraisal of new surgical techniques. The range of complications reported after LC has not been evaluated. This study aimed to identify the range of complications currently reported for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), and the adequacy of their definitions. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for prospective studies reporting clinical outcomes of LC, between 2013 and 2016. RESULTS: In total 233 studies were included, reporting 967 complications, of which 204 (21%) were defined. One hundred and twenty-two studies (52%) did not provide definitions for any of the complications reported. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was the most commonly reported complication, reported in 135 (58%) studies, followed by bile leak in 89 (38%) and bile duct injury in 75 (32%). Mortality was reported in 89 studies (38%). CONCLUSION: Considerable variation was identified between studies in the choice of measures used to evaluate the complications of LC, and in their definitions. A standardised set of core outcomes of LC should be developed for use in clinical trials and in evaluating the performance of surgical units.

Retesting the Hypothesis of a Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial in a Simulation Environment to Validate Anesthesia Simulation in Error Research (the VASER Study).

BACKGROUND: Simulation has been used to investigate clinical questions in anesthesia, surgery, and related disciplines, but there are few data demonstrating that results apply to clinical settings. We asked "would results of a simulation-based study justify the same principal conclusions as those of a larger clinical study?" METHODS: We compared results from a randomized controlled trial in a simulated environment involving 80 cases at three centers with those from a randomized controlled trial in a clinical environment involving 1,075 cases. In both studies, we compared conventional methods of anesthetic management with the use of a multimodal system (SAFERsleep; Safer Sleep LLC, Nashville, Tennessee) designed to reduce drug administration errors. Forty anesthesiologists each managed two simulated scenarios randomized to conventional methods or the new system. We compared the rate of error in drug administration or recording for the new system versus conventional methods in this simulated randomized controlled trial with that in the clinical randomized controlled trial (primary endpoint). Six experts were asked to indicate a clinically relevant effect size. RESULTS: In this simulated randomized controlled trial, mean (95% CI) rates of error per 100 administrations for the new system versus conventional groups were 6.0 (3.8 to 8.3) versus 11.6 (9.3 to 13.8; P = 0.001) compared with 9.1 (6.9 to 11.4) versus 11.6 (9.3 to 13.9) in the clinical randomized controlled trial (P = 0.045). A 10 to 30% change was considered clinically relevant. The mean (95% CI) difference in effect size was 27.0% (-7.6 to 61.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our simulated randomized controlled trial justified the same primary conclusion as those of our larger clinical randomized controlled trial, but not a finding of equivalence in effect size.

Oral morphine dosing predictions based on single dose in healthy children undergoing surgery.

BACKGROUND: Oral morphine has been proposed as an effective and safe alternative to codeine for after-discharge pain in children following surgery but there are few data guiding an optimum safe oral dose. AIMS: The aim of this study was to characterize the absorption pharmacokinetics of enteral morphine in order to simulate time-concentration profiles in children given common oral morphine dose regimens. METHODS: Children (2-6 years, n = 34) undergoing elective surgery and requiring opioid analgesia were randomized to receive preoperative oral morphine (100 mcg·kg-1 , 200 mcg·kg-1 , 300 mcg·kg-1 ). Blood sampling for morphine assay was performed at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 min. Morphine serum concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using nonlinear mixed effects models. Current data were pooled with published time-concentration profiles from children (n = 1059, age 23 weeks postmenstrual age - 3 years) administered intravenous morphine, to determine oral bioavailability (F), absorption lag time (TLAG ), and absorption half-time (TABS ). These parameter estimates were used to predict concentrations in children given oral morphine (100, 200, 300, 400, 500 mcg·kg-1 ) at different dosing intervals (3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 h). RESULTS: The oral morphine formulation had F 0.298 (CV 36.5%), TLAG 0.45 (CV 63.6%) h and TABS 0.71 (CV 55%) h. A single-dose morphine 100 mcg·kg-1 achieved a mean CMAX 10 mcg·l-1 . Repeat 4-hourly dosing achieved mean steady-state concentration 13-18 mcg·l-1 ; concentrations associated with good analgesia after intravenous administration. Serum concentration variability was large ranging from 5 to 55 mcg·l-1 at steady state. CONCLUSIONS: Oral morphine 200 mcg·kg-1 then 100 mcg·kg-1 4 h or 150 mcg·kg-1 6 h achieves mean concentrations associated with analgesia. There was high serum concentration variability suggesting that respiration may be compromised in some children given these doses.

Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effectiveness of intravenous parecoxib for tonsillectomy ± adenoidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Few pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data exist for COX-2 selective inhibitors in children. We wished to characterize the PKPD of parecoxib and its active metabolite, valdecoxib, in this population. METHODS: Children (n = 59) were randomized to parecoxib 0.25 mg·kg-1 , 1 mg·kg-1 , and 2 mg·kg-1 during tonsillectomy ± adenoidectomy. Samples (4-6 per child) were obtained from indwelling cannula over 6 h. A second group of inpatient children (n = 15) given 1 mg·kg-1 contributed PK data from 6 to 24 h. Pain scores and rescue medication for the first group were recorded postoperatively for up to 24 h. PK data were pooled with those (10 samples/24 h) from a published study of children (n = 38) who underwent surgery. A three-compartment parent and one-compartment metabolite model with first-order elimination was used to describe data using nonlinear mixed effects models. An EMAX model described the relationship between dose and rescue morphine equivalents during recovery. RESULTS: Parecoxib PK parameter estimates were CLPARECOXIB 19.1 L·h-1 ·70 kg-1 , V1PARECOXIB 4.2 L·70 kg-1 , Q2PARECOXIB 6.29 L·h-1 ·70 kg-1 , V2PARECOXIB 130 L·70 kg-1 , Q3PARECOXIB 6.02 L·h-1 ·70 kg-1 , and V3PARECOXIB 2.03 L·70 kg-1 . We assumed all parecoxib was metabolized to valdecoxib with CLVALDECOXIB 9.53 L·h-1 ·70 kg-1 and VVALDECOXIB 51 L·70 kg-1 . There was no maturation of clearance over the age span studied. There were no differences in pain scores between groups on waking, discharge, 12 h, or 24 h. There were no differences in analgesia consumption over 24 h between groups for tramadol, fentanyl, and morphine rescue use. Fentanyl and morphine consumption, expressed as morphine equivalents (0.13 mg·kg-1 ) in the 0.25 mg·kg-1 group, was greater than that observed in the 1 or 2 mg·kg-1 groups (0.095 mg·kg-1 ) in PACU. CONCLUSIONS: Parecoxib 0.9 mg·kg-1 in a 2-year-old, 0.75 mg·kg-1 in a 7-year-old, and 0.65 mg·kg-1 in a 12-year-old child achieves dose equivalence of 40 mg in a standard 70 kg person. Clearance maturation may occur in infants younger than the current cohort. Parecoxib doses above 1 mg·kg-1 add no additional analgesia.

Improved compliance with the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist is associated with reduced surgical specimen labelling errors.

AIMS: A new approach to administering the surgical safety checklist (SSC) at our institution using wall-mounted charts for each SSC domain coupled with migrated leadership among operating room (OR) sub-teams, led to improved compliance with the Sign Out domain. Since surgical specimens are reviewed at Sign Out, we aimed to quantify any related change in surgical specimen labelling errors. METHODS: Prospectively maintained error logs for surgical specimens sent to pathology were examined for the six months before and after introduction of the new SSC administration paradigm. We recorded errors made in the labelling or completion of the specimen pot and on the specimen laboratory request form. Total error rates were calculated from the number of errors divided by total number of specimens. Rates from the two periods were compared using a chi square test. RESULTS: There were 19 errors in 4,760 specimens (rate 3.99/1,000) and eight errors in 5,065 specimens (rate 1.58/1,000) before and after the change in SSC administration paradigm (P=0.0225). CONCLUSIONS: Improved compliance with administering the Sign Out domain of the SSC can reduce surgical specimen errors. This finding provides further evidence that OR teams should optimise compliance with the SSC.

Refining Target-Controlled Infusion: An Assessment of Pharmacodynamic Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol and Remifentanil Using a Response Surface Model of Their Combined Effects on Bispectral Index.

BACKGROUND: Propofol and remifentanil are commonly combined for total IV anesthesia. The pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and drug interactions of the combination are well understood, but the use of a combined PK and PD model to control target-controlled infusion pumps has not been investigated. In this study, we prospectively tested the accuracy of a PD target-controlled infusion algorithm for propofol and remifentanil using a response surface model of their combined effects on Bispectral Index (BIS). METHODS: Effect-site, target-controlled infusions of propofol and remifentanil were given using an algorithm based on standard PK models linked to a PD response surface model of their combined effects on BIS. The combination of a targeted BIS value and adjustable ratio of propofol to remifentanil was used to adjust infusion rates. The standard model performance measures of median performance error (bias) and median absolute performance error (inaccuracy), expressed as percentages, were used to assess accuracy of the infusions in a convenience sample of 50 adult patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. The influence of age and weight on the performance of the model was also assessed. RESULTS: Patients had a mean (range) age of 48 (19-73) years, weight of 80 (45-169) kg, and body mass index of 28 (19-45) kg/m. The overall model had a bias of 8% (SD 24%) and inaccuracy of 25% (SD 13%). Performance was least accurate during the early induction phase of anesthesia. There was no significant bias in BIS predictions with increasing age (P = 0.44) or weight (P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm performed adequately in a clinical setting. The algorithm could be further refined, and assessment of its accuracy and utility in comparison to current clinical practice for giving IV anesthesia is warranted.

Postoperative analgesia using diclofenac and acetaminophen in children.

BACKGROUND: Diclofenac dosing in children for analgesia is currently extrapolated from adult data. Oral diclofenac 1.0 mg·kg(-1) is recommended for children aged 1-12 years. Analgesic effect from combination diclofenac/acetaminophen is unknown. METHODS: Children (n = 151) undergoing tonsillectomy (c. 1995) were randomized to receive acetaminophen elixir 40 mg·kg(-1) before surgery and 20 mg·kg(-1) rectally at the end of surgery with diclofenac suspension 0.1 mg·kg(-1) , 0.5 mg·kg(-1) , or 2.0 mg·kg(-1) before surgery or placebo. A further 93 children were randomized to receive diclofenac 0.1 mg·kg(-1) , 0.5 mg·kg(-1) , or 2.0 mg·kg(-1) only. Postoperative pain was assessed (visual analogue score, VAS 0-10) at half-hourly intervals from waking until discharge. Data were pooled with those from a further 222 children and 30 adults. One-compartment models with first-order absorption and elimination described the pharmacokinetics of both medicines. Combined drug effects were described using a modified EMAX model with an interaction term. An interval-censored model described the hazard of study dropout. RESULTS: Analgesia onset had an equilibration half-time of 0.496 h for acetaminophen and 0.23 h for diclofenac. The maximum effect (EMAX ) was 4.9. The concentration resulting in 50% of EMAX (C50 ) was 1.23 mg·l(-1) for diclofenac and 13.3 mg·l(-1) for acetaminophen. A peak placebo effect of 6.8 occurred at 4 h. Drug effects were additive. The hazard of dropping out was related to pain (hazard ratio of 1.35 per unit change in pain). Diclofenac 1.0 mg·kg(-1) with acetaminophen 15 mg·kg(-1) achieves equivalent analgesia to acetaminophen 30 mg·kg(-1) . CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy can be used to achieve similar analgesia with lower doses of both drugs.

Compliance and quality in administration of a Surgical Safety Checklist in a tertiary New Zealand hospital.

AIM: Recent studies have demonstrated a reduction in perioperative complications if a surgical safety checklist is utilised. In our institution an adaptation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist is administered in 3 "domains": on arrival of the patient in the operating room (Sign In); before surgical incision (Time Out) and before the patients leaves the operating room (Sign Out). Since incomplete administration or staff disengagement could diminish any safety benefit we evaluated administration of this checklist. METHOD: 100 adult surgical cases were observed. Compliance with administration of the Sign In, Time Out, and Sign Out domains and their component checklist items was recorded. The timing of the checklist administration, and engagement of operating room teams were also assessed. RESULTS: The rate (per 100 cases) of the checklist domain administration was: 99 for Sign In; 94 for Time Out; and 2 for Sign Out. The mean (range) checklist item compliance was 56% (27-100%) for Sign In, 69% (33-100%) for Time Out, and 40% for Sign Out. Checklist items related to patient identity and surgical procedure were administered in 100% of Sign In administrations. Timing of the checklist administration was appropriate in over 80% of cases. Engagement by theatre teams was frequently incomplete. CONCLUSION: The Sign Out domain was almost always omitted, which may increase the risk of important omissions in postoperative care. Most other aspects of checklist administration could also be improved. This will require strong leadership from senior clinicians in all relevant teams.