A Prospective Multicenter Trial to Evaluate Urinary Metabolomics for Non-invasive Detection of Renal Allograft Rejection (PARASOL): Study Protocol and Patient Recruitment.

Background: In an earlier monocentric study, we have developed a novel non-invasive test system for the prediction of renal allograft rejection, based on the detection of a specific urine metabolite constellation. To further validate our results in a large real-world patient cohort, we designed a multicentric observational prospective study (PARASOL) including six independent European transplant centers. This article describes the study protocol and characteristics of recruited better patients as subjects. Methods: Within the PARASOL study, urine samples were taken from renal transplant recipients when kidney biopsies were performed. According to the Banff classification, urine samples were assigned to a case group (renal allograft rejection), a control group (normal renal histology), or an additional group (kidney damage other than rejection). Results: Between June 2017 and March 2020, 972 transplant recipients were included in the trial (1,230 urine samples and matched biopsies, respectively). Overall, 237 samples (19.3%) were assigned to the case group, 541 (44.0%) to the control group, and 452 (36.7%) samples to the additional group. About 65.9% were obtained from male patients, the mean age of transplant recipients participating in the study was 53.7 ± 13.8 years. The most frequently used immunosuppressive drugs were tacrolimus (92.8%), mycophenolate mofetil (88.0%), and steroids (79.3%). Antihypertensives and antidiabetics were used in 88.0 and 27.4% of the patients, respectively. Approximately 20.9% of patients showed the presence of circulating donor-specific anti-HLA IgG antibodies at time of biopsy. Most of the samples (51.1%) were collected within the first 6 months after transplantation, 48.0% were protocol biopsies, followed by event-driven (43.6%), and follow-up biopsies (8.5%). Over time the proportion of biopsies classified into the categories Banff 4 (T-cell-mediated rejection [TCMR]) and Banff 1 (normal tissue) decreased whereas Banff 2 (antibody-mediated rejection [ABMR]) and Banff 5I (mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy) increased to 84.2 and 74.5%, respectively, after 4 years post transplantation. Patients with rejection showed worse kidney function than patients without rejection. Conclusion: The clinical characteristics of subjects recruited indicate a patient cohort typical for routine renal transplantation all over Europe. A typical shift from T-cellular early rejections episodes to later antibody mediated allograft damage over time after renal transplantation further strengthens the usefulness of our cohort for the evaluation of novel biomarkers for allograft damage.

Nephrostomy in early posttransplantation period in patients with nonfunctional graft and nondilated collecting system.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to determine whether renal function can be restored by early nephrostomy in patients who fail to develop renal function immediately after transplantation. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2010, we have performed external/internal nephrostomy in 13 patients during the early posttransplant period. The reason for the procedure was graft nonfunction with oliguria/anuria in the presence of normal renal perfusion, absence of signs of rejection, and/or renal collecting system dilation. The nephrostomy was created under ultrasound/fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Nephrostomy was technically successful in all cases. On days 1-3 following nephrostomy creation, 10 of 13 patients showed an increase in diuresis and subsequent graft function development. Once the obstruction had been removed, the graft remained functional for months up to years posttransplantation. Three patients failed to respond to nephrostomy. There were no nephrostomy-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our study documents that, in patients who failed to develop graft function posttransplant for unknown reasons, nephrostomy may result in graft function development.

[Kidney transplantation at the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine]. / Transplantace ledviny v IKEM.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation represents the method of choice of end stage renal disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: The program of kidney transplantation was established in 1966 in our centre. In recent years, roughly 200 patients have undergone kidney transplantation annually, and 20-30 of them have received a graft from the living donor. Triple immunosuppressive regimen based on tacrolimus, MMF and steroids is given to majority of patients, in a case of high rejection risk; patients have received the induction protocols with polyclonal or monoclonal antilymphocyte globulins. Acute rejection is not a frequent finding in recent years and has occurred in 15% of cases in the first 3 months, the use of induction immunosuppression has decreased the rejection risk. Valgancyclovir has been used as prophylactic agent to prevent and treat cytomegalovirus infection. The usage of this strategy reduced the incidence of CMV infection below 10%. Kidney transplant recipients suffer from similar comorbidities as other renal patients in the long term, as cardiovascular complications, infections and malignancies. Anemia is a frequent complication in patients with graft dysfunction and erythropoesis stimulating agents have been used in its therapy. The median kidney graft survival is 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation is associated with better long-term results when compared with dialysis therapy and thus this method should be offered to all of suitable end stage renal disease patients.