The association of resilience with self-care and quality of life in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study.

AIM: To investigate the association of resilience with self-care and quality of life in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data were collected between February and May 2021. Self-care was measured with the self-care of chronic illness inventory, quality of life was measured with the clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire and resilience was measured with the resilience evaluation scale. Possible confounders were included (sex, age, smoking, time since diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, educational level, social support and pulmonary function). Multiple regression analysis was performed among the determinants, confounders and both outcomes. RESULTS: Participants scored fairly well on resilience (mean 22.5). Self-care scored reasonably well (mean maintenance 65.9, mean monitoring 70.9, mean management 59.9 and mean confidence 71.5). Quality of life scored mediocre (mean 2.6). The results of the linear multiple regression were resilience, which is associated with self-care confidence and quality of life when adjusted for possible confounders. This means people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with higher resilience have better self-care confidence and higher quality of life. The outcome contributes to strengthening nursing care and further developing nurses' knowledge. The results can contribute to increasing awareness for healthcare professionals that resilience can potentially increase self-care and quality of life.

Upper Airway Stimulation in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Long-Term Surgical Success, Respiratory Outcomes, and Patient Experience

Abstract Introduction Upper airway stimulation (UAS) with electric activation of the hypo-glossal nerve has emerged as a promising treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Objective To retrospectively analyze objective and subjective outcome measures after long-term follow-up in obstructive sleep apnea patients receiving upper airway stimulation. Methods An observational retrospective single-center cohort study including a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea receiving upper airway stimulation. Results Twenty-five patients were included. The total median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) significantly decreased from 37.4 to 8.7 events per hour at the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). The surgical success rate was 96%. Adverse events were reported by 28% of the patients. Conclusion Upper airway stimulation is an effective and safe treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure or intolerance. However, it is possible that the existing in and exclusion criteria for UAS therapy in the Netherlands have positively influenced our results.