Is Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Superior to Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Postoperative Radiologic Outcomes of Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spinal surgery (ESS) are both well-established surgical techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis; however, there is limited literature comparing the efficacy of the two techniques with respect to radiologic decompression data. METHODS: In this review, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were systematically searched from inception until July 2022 for studies that reported the radiologic outcomes of endoscopic and minimally invasive approaches for decompressive spinal surgery, namely, the spinal canal area, neural foraminal area, and neural foraminal heights. RESULTS: Of the 378 articles initially retrieved using MeSH and keyword search, 9 studies reporting preoperative and postoperative spinal areas and foraminal areas and heights were finally included in our review. Of the total 581 patients, 391 (67.30%) underwent MISS and 190 (32.70%) underwent ESS. The weighted mean difference between the spinal canal diameter in pre- and postoperative conditions was 56.64 ± 7.11 and 79.52 ± 21.31 mm2 in the MISS and ESS groups, respectively. ESS was also associated with a higher mean difference in the foraminal area postoperatively (72 ± 1 vs. 35.81 ± 11.3 mm2 in the MISS and ESS groups, respectively), but it was comparable to MISS in terms of the foraminal height (0.32 ± 0.037 vs. 0.29 ± 0.03 cm in the MISS and endoscopic groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MISS, ESS was associated with improved radiologic parameters, including spinal canal area and neural foraminal area in the lumbar spinal segments. Both techniques led to the same endpoint of neural decompression when starting with a more severe compression. However, the present data do not allow the correlation of the radiographic results with the related clinical outcomes.

Towards Personalization of Planning Target Volume Margins Fitted to the Abdominal Adiposity in Localized Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Definitive or Adjuvant/Salvage Radiotherapy: Suggestive Data from an ExacTrac vs. CBCT Comparison.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to assess whether the patient's abdominal adiposity affects the performance of the Exactrac imaging system compared to the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based setup, which was used as the reference positioning for the image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) delivery to patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The daily positionings of patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive or adjuvant/salvage radiotherapy (RT) were analyzed. The abdominal fat areas and pelvic incidence angle were determined on the CT simulation for each patient. A couple of ExacTrac images and a CBCT were acquired daily to verify the patient setup. We recorded every daily set of the three residual translational errors detected on the CBCT after the ExacTrac-based setup. These sets were clustered within three different thresholds (0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, and 0.3 mm), for each of which the influence of adipose tissues on Exactrac accuracy was assessed as the percentage of sub-threshold displacements as the fat parameters varied. A full bladder and empty rectum preparation protocol was adopted as much as possible. RESULTS: From the assessment of 1,770 daily positionings in 55 patients (38 definitive RT, 17 adjuvant/salvage RT), a good agreement between ExacTrac and CBCT could be inferred, which was quite robust against slight variations in the bladder and rectal filling, and the presence or not of the prostate. The percentages of above-threshold corrections increased with increasing abdominal fat, which therefore seemed to reduce the ExacTrac accuracy. This might be influenced by any intrafraction prostate displacement, likely induced by abdominal respiratory movements, and are more pronounced among overweight men. CONCLUSION: Our results promote the CBCT use over ExacTrac for IGRT of overweight patients with localized prostate cancer, while calling for attention to the probable need for personalization of planning target volume margins depending on the patient's body habitus.

Considerations on surgery invasiveness and response and toxicity patterns in classic palliative radiotherapy for acrometastases of the hand: a hint for a potential role of stereotactic body radiation therapy? A case report and literature review.

Background: The rarity of hand acrometastases hampers the consensus-building for their optimal management among the involved oncology professionals. In the current literature, demolitive surgery overcomes the use of palliative radiotherapy, which proved to be ineffective in more than 30% of cases treated with classic palliative dose schemes, carrying also a not negligible radiation-related adverse event rate. Against this background, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could emerge as a well-balanced therapeutic option. Case summary: Here we describe the methods and outcomes of a SBRT treatment of a painful and function-limiting hand acrometastasis in a patient with a history of stage IIIB lung adenocarcinoma. We delivered a total dose of 30 Gy in five daily fractions to a soft-tissue metastasis abutting the fifth metacarpal bone through the SBRT protocol generally used for intracranial treatments. A few weeks later, the patient reported a clinical complete response with acrometastasis and pain disappearance, function recovery, and no significant toxicity. The acrometastasis was the first sign of an atypical cancer progression. Conclusions: SBRT for hand acrometastases is feasible and might have the best therapeutic profile among the currently available treatment options for this rare clinical scenario. Larger investigations are needed to confirm the present single-case experience.

Introducing Radiotherapy in Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma Patients with Limited Progression on Avelumab: An Effective Step against Primary and Secondary Immune Resistance?

PURPOSE: To investigate the ability of radiotherapy (RT) to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and to report treatment-related toxicities among oligoprogressive metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) patients on avelumab. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data on mMCC patients who underwent radiotherapy for limited progression on avelumab. Patients were categorized as primary or secondary immune refractory depending on the time of onset of resistance to immunotherapy (at the first or subsequent follow-up visits after avelumab initiation). Pre- and post-RT PFS were calculated. Overall survival (OS) from the first progression treated with RT was also reported. Radiological responses and toxicities were evaluated according to the irRECIST criteria and RTOG scoring system, respectively. RESULTS: Eight patients, including five females, with a median age of 75 years, met our inclusion criteria. The median gross tumor and clinical target volumes at first progression on avelumab were 29.85 cc and 236.7 cc, respectively. The treatment sites included lymph node, skin, brain, and spine metastases. Four patients received more than one course of RT. Most patients were treated with palliative radiation doses (mainly 30 Gy in 3 Gy/day fractions). Two patients were treated with stereotactic RT. Five/eight patients were primary immune refractory. The objective response rate at the first post-RT assessment was 75%, whereas no local failure was reported. The median pre-RT PFS was 3 months. The pre-RT PFS was 37.5% at 6 months and 12.5% at 1 year. The median post-RT PFS was not reached. The post-RT PFS was 60% at 6 months and 1 year. The post-RT OS was 85.7% at 1 year and 64.3% at 2 years. No relevant treatment-related toxicity was observed. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months, 6/8 patients are still alive and continuing on avelumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adding radiotherapy to mMCC patients with limited progression on avelumab seems to be safe and effective in prolonging the successful use of immunotherapy, regardless of the type of immune refractoriness.

Detection of "Incidentalomas" on Brain and Body 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET Scans: A Retrospective Study and Case Illustration.

BACKGROUND/AIM: One of the main limitations of standard imaging modalities is microscopic tumor extension, which is often difficult to detect on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computer tomography (CT) in the early stages of the tumor. (68)Ga-DOTA(0)-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT) has shown efficacy in detecting lesions previously undiagnosed by neuroimaging modalities, such as MRI or CT, and has enabled the detection of multiple benign tumors (like multiple meningiomas in a patient presenting with a single lesion on MRI) or additional secondary metastatic locations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from the Cannizzaro Hospital on brain and body 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT "incidentalomas", defined as tumors missed on CT or MRI scans, but detected on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scans. "Incidentalomas" were classified into "brain" and "body" groups based on their location. The standardized uptake values (SUVs) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients with "incidentalomas" documented on the 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT were identified: 18 patients with 25 brain lesions and 43 patients with 85 body lesions. The mean SUV at baseline was 9.01±7.66 in the brain group and 14.8±14.63 in the body group. CONCLUSION: We present the first series on brain and body "incidentalomas" detected on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Whole-body 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT may be considered in selected patients with brain tumors with high expression of somatostatin receptors to assist radiosurgical or surgical planning and, simultaneously, provide accurate follow-up with early detection of potential metastases.