Cutibacterium recovered from deep specimens at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty samples has increased biofilm-forming capacity and hemolytic activity compared with Cutibacterium skin isolates from normal subjects.

BACKGROUND: Biofilm formation and hemolytic activity are factors that may correlate with the virulence of Cutibacterium. We sought to compare the prevalence of these potential markers of pathogenicity between Cutibacterium recovered from deep specimens obtained at the time of surgical revision for failed shoulder arthroplasty and Cutibacterium recovered from skin samples from normal subjects. METHODS: We compared 42 deep-tissue or explant isolates with 43 control Cutibacterium samples obtained from skin isolates from normal subjects. Subtyping information was available for all isolates. Biofilm-forming capacity was measured by inoculating a normalized amount of each isolate onto a 96-well plate. Planktonic bacteria were removed, the remaining adherent bacteria were stained with crystal violet, the crystal violet was re-solubilized in ethyl alcohol, and biofilm-forming capacity was quantitated by optical density (OD). Hemolytic activity was measured by plating a normalized amount of isolate onto agar plates. The area of the colony and the surrounding area of blood lysis were measured and reported as minimal, moderate, or severe hemolysis. RESULTS: Biofilm-forming capacity was significantly higher in the tissue and explant samples compared with the control skin samples (OD of 0.34 ± 0.30 for deep tissue vs. 0.20 ± 0.28 for skin, P = .002). Hemolytic activity was also significantly higher in the tissue and explant samples than in the control skin samples (P < .0001). Samples with hemolytic activity had significantly higher biofilm-forming capacity compared with samples without hemolytic activity (OD of 0.27 ± 0.29 vs. 0.12 ± 0.15, P = .015). No difference in biofilm-forming capacity or hemolytic activity was found between subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Cutibacterium obtained from deep specimens at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty has higher biofilm-forming capacity and hemolytic activity than Cutibacterium recovered from the skin of normal subjects. These data add support for the view that Cutibacterium harvested from deep tissues may have clinically significant virulence characteristics. The lack of correlation between these clinically relevant phenotypes and subtypes indicates that additional study is needed to identify genotypic markers that better correlate with biofilm and hemolytic activity.

Cutibacterium acnes Isolates from Deep Tissue Specimens Retrieved during Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: Similar Colony Morphology Does Not Indicate Clonality.

Cutibacterium acnes is the most common bacterium associated with periprosthetic shoulder infections. Sequencing of C. acnes has been proposed as a potential rapid diagnostic tool and a method of determining subtypes associated with pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance patterns. When multiple deep samples from the same surgery are culture positive for the same species and the isolates show the same culture phenotype, it is typically assumed that these isolates are clonal. However, it is well-known that C. acnes is not clonal on the skin of most individuals. We hypothesized that the C. acnes bacteria recovered at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty would often represent more than one subtype, and we tested this hypothesis in this work. For patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty, multiple samples from the surgical field were taken. For those patients with multiple samples that were culture positive for C. acnes, isolates from each sample were subjected to full genome sequencing. Of 11 patients, 5 (45%) had different subtypes of C. acnes within the deep tissues even though the colony morphology was similar. One patient had four subtypes in the deep tissues, while four patients had two different subtypes. Up to four different subtypes of C. acnes were observed in the deep tissues of a single patient. Clonality of C. acnes isolates from deep specimens from a potential periprosthetic shoulder infection cannot be assumed. Sequence-based characterization of virulence and antibiotic resistance may require testing of multiple deep specimens.