Zoledronic acid preserves bone mineral density in premenopausal women who develop ovarian failure due to adjuvant chemotherapy: final results from CALGB trial 79809.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure (CIOF) is a frequent side-effect of adjuvant chemotherapy that results in rapid bone loss. We hypothesised that zoledronic acid (ZA), a third-generation amino bisphosphonate, would prevent bone loss in premenopausal women who developed CIOF. METHODS: Women (439) were randomised to intravenous (i.v.) ZA 4 mg every 3 months for 2 years starting within 1-3 months after randomization (arm A) or 1 year after randomization (arm B, controls). CIOF was prospectively defined as ≥ 3 months of amenorrhoea, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ≥ 30 MIU/ml and non-pregnant at 1 year. The primary end-point was the percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine (LS) from baseline to 12 months in the ZA and in control groups in women who developed CIOF; the secondary end-point was BMD in LS at 3 years in all randomised women. FINDINGS: One hundred and fifty (56%) met the definition of CIOF at 1 year. Overall, grade 3 toxicities of ZA were fatigue (1%) arthralgias (21%) and pain (84%). The median percent change (interquartile range, IQR) at 1 year was +1.2% (-0.5% to +2.8%) and -6.7% (-9.7% to -2.9%) p<0.001 and at 3 years was +1.0% (-1.6% to +5.2%) and -0.5% (-3.7% to +3.2%) p=0.019 in arms A and B, respectively. INTERPRETATION: ZA every 3 months is well tolerated and prevents rapid bone loss in premenopausal women that develop CIOF. Giving ZA with rather than 1 year after the start of adjuvant chemotherapy is the preferred sequence to prevent bone loss.

Phase II study of docetaxel, estramustine, and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a final report of CALGB 9780. Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

PURPOSE: To investigate the combination of docetaxel, estramustine (EM), and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Combinations of EM with other antimitotic agents such as docetaxel are synergistic in vitro and show significant clinical activity in patients with HRPC. We studied intravenous administration of docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), oral estramustine, and low-dose daily hydrocortisone in men with HRPC who demonstrated progression after initial hormone therapy. RESULTS: Of the 47 men enrolled onto this multicenter cooperative group study, 46 were assessable for response and/or toxicity. In the 24 patients with measurable disease, there were three complete and nine partial responses for a measurable disease response rate of 50% (12 of 24 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27% to 73%). In the 44 patients in whom pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was elevated, 30 (68%) had a 50% or greater decrease, and 25 (57%) had a 75% or greater decrease in PSA. The combined measurable disease and biochemical response rate in all 46 assessable patients was 54% (three complete responses, 22 partial responses, 95% CI, 37% to 71%). The predominant toxicity was neutropenia, with 26% of patients having grade 3 and 30% having grade 4 granulocytopenia; there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Other common but mild adverse effects included malaise/fatigue, peripheral edema, and hyperglycemia. The incidence of thromboembolic events during therapy was 9%. With a median follow-up of 17 months, the median survival was 20 months. The median time to disease progression was 8 months for all patients, and 10 months for those with measurable disease. CONCLUSION: This therapy is efficacious and moderately well tolerated in HRPC and should be compared in a phase III trial with mitoxantrone and prednisone.

A phase II study of docetaxel (Taxotere), estramustine, and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: preliminary results of cancer and leukemia group B Trial 9780.

Combinations of estramustine with other antimitotic agents, such as docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA), are synergistic in vitro and show significant clinical activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). We have studied intravenous docetaxel 70 mg/m2, oral estramustine, and low-dose daily hydrocortisone in men with HRPC who demonstrated progression after initial hormone therapy. Of the 47 men who were enrolled, 40 are evaluable for response and/or toxicity. One patient (3%) has had a complete response and eight (20%) have had a partial response, yielding a total objective response rate of 23%. Of 39 patients with elevated pretreatment prostate-specific antigen levels who have had at least one posttreatment prostate-specific antigen measurement, 27 (69%) have had > or =50% decreases and 21 (54%) have had > or =75% decreases in prostate-specific antigen levels. Toxicity is modest but manageable. This therapy is efficacious and well tolerated in HRPC and should be compared in phase III trials with other drugs active in HRPC, such as mitoxantrone and hydrocortisone.

Hydrocortisone with or without mitoxantrone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: results of the cancer and leukemia group B 9182 study.

PURPOSE: Approximately 40,000 men die each year of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The results of treatment with chemotherapy have been disappointing to date, with no trials demonstrating a benefit with respect to survival duration. Corticosteroids and mitoxantrone each have been shown to be active agents in this disease. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate an advantage of mitoxantrone and hydrocortisone (M+H) over hydrocortisone alone with respect to survival duration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-two patients with HRPC were randomized to receive either M+H or hydrocortisone alone. Patients were monitored for survival, time to disease progression, time to treatment failure, response, and quality-of-life (QOL) parameters. RESULTS: Treatment in both arms was well tolerated. Although there was a delay in time to treatment failure and disease progression in favor of M+H over hydrocortisone alone, there was no difference in overall survival (12.3 months for M+H v 12.6 months for hydrocortisone alone). There was an indication that QOL was better with M+H, in particular with respect to pain control. CONCLUSION: M+H generated more frequent responses and a delay in both time to treatment failure and disease progression compared with hydrocortisone alone. In addition, there was a possible benefit of M+H with respect to pain control over hydrocortisone alone. No improvement in survival was observed. Although M+H could be viewed as a palliative option for patients with HRPC, new drugs and novel strategies are needed to improve survival for this disease.

Utility of produce ratios to track fruit and vegetable consumption in a rural community, church-based 5 A Day intervention project.

Previous research suggests that grocery store characteristics may be useful in evaluating community-based dietary interventions. We undertook a study to determine whether produce ratios (ratios of produce sales to total grocery sales) were a useful indicator of fruit and vegetable (F & V) consumption in a church-based, community intervention trial that promoted 5 A Day guidelines within 10 rural counties of North Carolina. Produce ratios were collected from stores identified by participants in the Black Churches United for Better Health Project. Baseline and study period data for 21 stores in intervention counties and 18 stores in nonintervention counties were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Produce ratios were significantly associated with seasonality (p < 0.0001), but no differences were seen between the two groups of stores. These findings do not support data from individual telephone surveys, which showed significant differences in F & V consumption between participants in the two groups. Our inability to detect differences at the store level may have been due to 1) the incapacity of produce ratios to capture F & V purchases that were juice, frozen, or canned products; 2) shifts in procuring F & Vs from grocery stores to other sources (i.e., gleaning and produce cooperatives); 3) the modest proportion of shoppers that received the full intervention dose; and 4) a general lack of power to detect differences at the store level. Therefore, although produce ratios did not serve as a valid measure for this project, if their limitations are recognized and compensated for, they may have applicability for future investigations that monitor F & V consumption.

Phase I clinical study of fish oil fatty acid capsules for patients with cancer cachexia: cancer and leukemia group B study 9473.

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of fish oil fatty acid capsules containing omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters. Twenty-two patients with neoplastic disease not amenable to curative therapy who had lost 2% of body weight over a previous 1 month time period were given an escalating dose of fish oil fatty acids. The maximum tolerated dose was found to be 0.3 g/kg per day of this preparation. This means that a 70-kg patient can generally tolerate up to 21 1-g capsules/day containing 13.1 g of eicosapentaenoic acid + docosahexaenoic acid, the two major omega-3 fatty acids. Dose-limiting toxicity was gastrointestinal, mainly diarrhea, and a poorly described toxicity designated as "unable to tolerate in esophagus or stomach." A patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia taking the fish oil provided an unusual opportunity to perform a detailed biochemical study of the effect of fish oil capsules on the lipids of malignant cells at several sequential time points in treatment. Studies of the malignant lymphocytes, serum, and whole blood of this one patient revealed an increase in eicosapentaenoic acid, the major component of the fish oil capsules, during fish oil capsule treatment. This study provides a scientific basis for the selection of omega-3 fatty acid doses for future studies in cancer. The maximum tolerated dose found is considerably higher than anticipated from published studies of many human diseases. The observation of a modification of the lipids of leukemic cells, serum, and blood in a patient with chronic leukemia provides a biochemical basis for a possible effect of fish oil supplements on cancer cachexia and tumor growth.

Artificial neural network model of survival in patients treated with irradiation with and without concurrent chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to investigate the feasibility of predicting survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) with an artificial neural network (ANN), and to compare ANN performance with conventional models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were analyzed from a Phase III trial in which patients with locally advanced SCCHN received hyperfractionated irradiation with or without concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Of the 116 randomized patients, 95 who had 2-year follow-up and all required data were evaluated. ANN and logistic regression (LR) models were constructed to predict 2-year total survival using round-robin cross-validation. A modified staging model was also examined. RESULTS: The best LR model used tumor size, nodal stage, and race to predict survival. The best ANN used nodal stage, tumor size, stage, and resectability, and hemoglobin. Treatment type did not predict 2-year survival and was not included in either model. Using the respective best feature sets, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) for the ANN was 0.78 +/- 0.05, showing more accurate overall performance than LR (Az = 0.67 +/- 0.05, p = 0.07). At 70% sensitivity, the ANN was 72% specific, while LR was 54% specific (p = 0.08). At 70% specificity, the ANN was 72% sensitive, while LR was 54% sensitive (p = 0.07). When both models used the five predictive variables best for an ANN, Az for LR decreased [Az = 0.61 +/- 0.06, p < 0.01 (ANN)]. The models performed equivalently when using the three variables best for LR. The best ANN also compared favorably with staging [Az = 0.60 +/- 0.07, p = 0.02 (ANN)]. CONCLUSIONS: An ANN modeled 2-year survival in this data set more accurately than LR or staging models and employed predictive variables that could not be used by LR. Further work is planned to confirm these results on larger patient samples, examining longer follow-up to incorporate treatment type into the model.

Hyperfractionated irradiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy is often the primary treatment for advanced head and neck cancer, but the rates of locoregional recurrence are high and survival is poor. We investigated whether hyperfractionated irradiation plus concurrent chemotherapy (combined treatment) is superior to hyperfractionated irradiation alone. METHODS: Patients with advanced head and neck cancer who were treated only with hyperfractionated irradiation received 125 cGy twice daily, for a total of 7500 cGy. Patients in the combined-treatment group received 125 cGy twice daily, for a total of 7000 cGy, and five days of treatment with 12 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area per day and 600 mg of fluorouracil per square meter per day during weeks 1 and 6 of irradiation. Two cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil were given to most patients after the completion of radiotherapy. RESULTS: Of 122 patients who underwent randomization, 116 were included in the analysis. Most patients in both treatment groups had unresectable disease. The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 19 to 86). At three years the rate of overall survival was 55 percent in the combined-therapy group and 34 percent in the hyperfractionation group (P=0.07). The relapse-free survival rate was higher in the combined-treatment group (61 percent vs. 41 percent, P=0.08). The rate of locoregional control of disease at three years was 70 percent in the combined-treatment group and 44 percent in the hyperfractionation group (P=0.01). Confluent mucositis developed in 77 percent and 75 percent of the two groups, respectively. Severe complications occurred in three patients in the hyperfractionation group and five patients in the combined-treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment for advanced head and neck cancer is more efficacious and not more toxic than hyperfractionated irradiation alone.

Reduced rates of metabolism and decreased physical activity in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Weight gain, a common side effect among breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, may decrease quality of life and impair survival. Weight gain during treatment is a well-known problem and has been studied by many investigators. However, few controlled studies have been conducted to determine reasons to explain this apparent energy imbalance. An exploratory study was undertaken to quantitate potential changes in energy intake and specific components of energy expenditure in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. The research hypothesis was that a reduction in resting metabolic rate (RMR) would be observed during the period in which women received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty premenopausal patients with stage I or II breast cancer and receiving cyclophosphamide+doxorubicin+5-fluorouracil; cyclophosphamide +methotrexate+5-fluorouracil+/-doxorubicin; doxorubicin +cyclophosphamide+/-leucovorin; or methotrexate+5-fluorouracil +leucovorin chemotherapy were recruited. RMR, diet-induced thermogenesis, energy intake, physical activity, and body composition were assessed before the initiation and throughout the course of therapy. Complete data on 18 subjects suggest that RMR decreased significantly from baseline to midtreatment (P = 0.02) and rebounded to levels similar to those at baseline on completion of chemotherapy. Overall, levels of physical activity and energy intake also decreased significantly during treatment compared with baseline levels (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03, respectively). These findings suggest that chemotherapy provokes many significant changes in body composition and metabolic requirements. Additional research in this area will provide valuable insight into creating optimal interventions to curb weight gain in women with breast cancer.

Proliferative index determination in prostatic carcinoma tissue: is there any additional prognostic value greater than that of Gleason score, ploidy and pathological stage?

PURPOSE: The proliferative index was evaluated as an additional prognostic variable in 244 radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with prostate cancer. This study was done on the grounds that this variable has shown some promise as a prognostic tool in some other carcinomas, for example breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proliferative index was evaluated in 244 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized disease between January 1988 and August 1994. Proliferative index was determined using the Ki-67 antibody on fresh frozen tissue and MIB-1 on paraffin embedded tissues. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on a proliferative index of less than 1 (185) or 1 or greater (59). Of the patients 49 (20%) had biochemical failure (median 23 months to progressive prostate specific antigen elevation of 0.5 ng./ml. or more). Those whose treatment failed were also divided into 2 groups according to proliferative index: 32 of 185 (18%) with an index of less than 1 and 17 of 59 (27%) with an index of 1 or more. Gleason score and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy status were also evaluated in all patients and compared in multivariate regression analysis. Operative specimens were categorized as organ confined, specimen confined or margin positive. RESULTS: The distribution according to margin status in the 2 groups (proliferative index less than 1 and 1 or more) was 40 versus 60% for organ confined, 67 versus 33% for specimen confined and 72 versus 28% for margin positive disease, respectively. The distribution of time to treatment failure in the 2 groups was not markedly different: 7.2 versus 9.4 months for margin positive, 10 versus 14.5 months for specimen confined and 8.5 versus 12 months for organ confined cancer, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, although deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy seemed to correlate with more advanced disease, only Gleason sum and pathological T stage reached statistical significance when evaluated against time to treatment failure. A high proliferative index added little above the more traditional prognostic indicators of Gleason score, pathological stage and ploidy. Therefore, we question the value of proliferative index as a prognostic indicator using the aforementioned methodology in prostate cancer.

Postoperative prostate-specific antigen as a prognostic indicator in patients with margin-positive prostate cancer, undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To identify a population of patients within the group with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy who would benefit in terms of improved local control of disease by the administration of adjuvant radiation therapy to the prostate bed. METHODS: Postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values were evaluated in 45 patients with margin-positive (MP) disease who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy within 6 months of surgery. All patients were clinically T1-2 MO, and pNO. A cutoff of 0.5 ng/mL or less was used as the level below which PSA was considered undetectable. The mean follow-up time from date of radiation was 33 months. RESULTS: In 30 of 45 (67%) patients, PSA levels did drop to undetectable levels postoperatively. In 15 of 45 (33%) patients postoperative PSA levels did not drop to undetectable levels. In the group with detectable postoperative PSA, 12 of 15 (80%) failed adjuvant radiotherapy as determined by a progressive increase in PSA levels in a mean time of 0.95 years (range, 4 months to 2.02 years; median, 0.92 years). When postoperative PSA reached undetectable levels, only 10 of 30 (33%) failed treatment, with a mean time to failure of 2.1 years (range, 4 months to 7.8 years; median, 3.31 years). CONCLUSIONS: The data would suggest that patients who are MP, but attain an undetectable PSA level postoperatively accompanied by a progressive delayed increase in PSA, probably represent a group with local disease recurrence in the prostate fossa, whereas patients whose PSA levels are detectable postoperatively may represent a group with microscopic metastatic disease or a combination of local recurrence and distant disease or large volume local persistent disease. It is in the group of patients in whom the postoperative PSA decreased to undetectable levels that adjuvant radiotherapy may be effective in controlling local progression of prostate cancer through improved local control, as indicated by a durable decrease in PSA values to undetectable levels in roughly two thirds of these patients. Longer follow-up of these patients will be required to determine whether this improved local control will translate into improved survival.

Effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells (regramostim), Escherichia coli (molgramostim) and yeast (sargramostim) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy.

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) were collected without prior association with chemotherapy but after the administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-GM, regramostim), Escherichia coli (E. coli-GM, molgramostim), or yeast (Yeast-GM, sargramostim) and used in conjunction with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy in 69 patients with breast cancer or melanoma. The mean peripheral white blood cell (WBC) counts increased by 2.2 to 2.7-fold after regramostim, 4.5 to 7.3-fold after molgramostim and 4.3-fold after sargramostim. All patients underwent three leukaphereses. The mean (+/- standard error) total nucleated pheresed cells per kg x 10(8) were 4.15 +/- 0.56, 15.10 +/- 1.77 and 7.24 +/- 1.00 for patients receiving regramostim, molgramostim or sargramostim respectively. The mean (+/- standard error) granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units per kg x 10(4) mobilized into the PB were 8.75 +/- 3.63, 71.03 +/- 17.85, and 65.11 +/- 18.74 for patients receiving regramostim, molgramostim, or sargramostim respectively. The total mean (+/- standard error) CD34+ cells per kg x 10(7) collected by three leukaphereses were 3.28 +/- 1.62, 1.34 +/- 0.51 and 2.57 +/- 1.93, for patients receiving regramostim, molgramostim or sargramostim respectively. The use of either molgramostim- or sargramostim-primed PBPCs led to complete elimination of absolute leukopenia with a WBC count under 100/mm3 in 64% and 77% of patients treated, respectively. Patients receiving molgramostim-primed PBPCs required fewer red blood cells transfusions than patients receiving regramostim-primed PBPCs (p = 0.0062). Our data indicate that PBPCs collected without prior association with chemotherapy but after either molgramostim or sargramostim with autologous bone marrow support and GM-CSF shorten the hematopoietic recovery after myeloablative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer or melanoma.

Effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells (regramostim), Escherichia coli (molgramostim) and yeast (sargramostim) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy.

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) were collected without prior association with chemotherapy but after the administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-GM, regramostim), Escherichia coli (E. coli-GM, molgramostim), or yeast (Yeast-GM, sargramostim) and used in conjunction with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy in 69 patients with breast cancer or melanoma. The mean peripheral white blood cell (WBC) counts increased by 2.2 to 2.7-fold after regramostim, 4.5 to 7.3-fold after molgramostim and 4.3-fold after sargramostim. All patients underwent three leukaphereses. The mean (+/- standard error) total nucleated pheresed cells per kg x 10(8) were 4.15 +/- 0.56, 15.10 +/- 1.77 and 7.24 +/- 1.00 for patients receiving regramostim, molgramostim or sargramostim respectively. The mean (+/- standard error) granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units per kg x 10(4) mobilized into the PB were 8.75 +/- 3.63, 71.03 +/- 17.85, and 65.11 +/- 18.74 for patients receiving regramostim, molgramostim, or sargramostim respectively. The total mean (+/- standard error) CD34+ cells per kg x 10(7) collected by three leukaphereses were 3.28 +/- 1.62, 1.34 +/- 0.51 and 2.57 +/- 1.93, for patients receiving regramostim, molgramostim or sargramostim respectively. The use of either molgramostim- or sargramostim-primed PBPCs led to complete elimination of absolute leukopenia with a WBC count under 100/mm3 in 64% and 77% of patients treated, respectively. Patients receiving molgramostim-primed PBPCs required fewer red blood cells transfusions than patients receiving regramostim-primed PBPCs (p = 0.0062). Our data indicate that PBPCs collected without prior association with chemotherapy but after either molgramostim or sargramostim with autologous bone marrow support and GM-CSF shorten the hematopoietic recovery after myeloablative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer or melanoma.

Comparison of a novel assay for breast cancer mucin to CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen.

PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of an automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) for breast cancer mucin (IMx BCM; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) to that of CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for detecting and monitoring breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IMxBCM was compared to assays of CA15-3 and CEA in 630 serum specimens from healthy women, and from women with breast cancer, other malignancies, benign breast conditions, or other benign diseases. RESULTS: Analysis of the log-transforms for the three markers in all specimens showed a high correlation of IMxBCM with CA15-3 (r = .78), but not with CEA (r = .25). Based on a receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC)-curve analysis for any given specificity, IMxBCM was found to be a more sensitive marker than either CA15-3 or CEA for distinguishing 105 women with advanced or metastatic breast cancer from 89 healthy women (P = .003 and P = .04, respectively), from 98 women with benign breast conditions (P = .02 and P = .002), or from 191 women with benign diseases (P = .03 and P less than .0001). At 95% specificity, the sensitivities of IMxBCM, CA15-3, and CEA for detecting advanced or metastatic breast cancer were 69%, 51%, and 30%, respectively. Serial serum samples (n = 177) were analyzed in 20 additional metastatic breast cancer patients with measurable disease. Serial IMxBCM levels corresponded with the clinical course of disease in 80%, CA15-3 in 65%, and CEA in 60% of the 20 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Increased sensitivity of IMxBCM, despite a high correlation with CA15-3, suggests that IMxBCM and CA15-3 may recognize distinct epitopes on the same molecule. Although further research is indicated, IMxBCM may provide a promising marker in the clinical management of breast cancer patients.