Arthroscopic Posterosuperior Cuff Muscle Advancement with Linked-Double Row Repair: Yes, I'll Have My Cake and Eat It Too!

The goal of massive, retracted rotator cuff repair surgery is structural healing that produces pain relief and strength restoration. Healing is difficult to achieve in patients with large, retracted, chronic, and fatty degenerated tears. High repair tension has previously been shown to be a risk factor for clinically and structurally failed repairs. Repair tension can be decreased by arthroscopic mobilization of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle bellies (AMA) from their scapular origins with subsequent lateralization of the muscle-tendon units toward the repair site. Linked-double row repair of the tendons after AMA has been shown to improve the outcomes of repairs in high-risk rotator cuff repairs. Surgeons should consider adding AMA to their intraoperative armamentarium for use in retracted cuff tears where traditional techniques fail to achieve a low-tension repair state.

Subacromial Surgery for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.

The irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear describes a tear of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon that is massive, contracted, and immobile in both the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions. Patients with an intact subscapularis and preserved forward elevation are challenging to treat because there is not a consensus treatment algorithm. For low-demand, elderly patients, several subacromial surgical options are available that can provide pain relief without the risks or burden of rehabilitation posed by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or a complex soft-tissue reconstruction (e.g., superior capsular reconstruction, tendon transfer, bridging grafts). Debridement, more specifically the "smooth-and-move" procedure, offers a reliable outcome with documented improvements in pain and function at long-term follow-up. Similarly, the biodegradable subacromial balloon spacer (InSpace; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) has been shown to significantly improve pain and function in patients who are not responsive to nonoperative treatment. Disease progression with these options is possible, with a small percentage of patients progressing to rotator cuff arthropathy. Biologic tuberoplasty and bursal acromial reconstruction are conceptually similar to the balloon spacer but instead use biologic grafts to prevent bone-to-bone contact between the humeral head and the acromion. Although there is no single gold standard treatment, the variety of surgical techniques allows patients and surgeons to effectively manage these challenging situations.

Glenoid augmentation for subcritical bone loss: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Anterior shoulder instability can be debilitating for young, active individuals, and increasing magnitudes of glenoid bone loss (GBL) predisposes patients to recurrent instability and increases the likelihood of failure of soft-tissue only repairs. It is widely accepted that GBL >25% should be treated with a glenoid bone grafting procedure. However, consensus is lacking on the optimal management in the setting of subcritical GBL, typically classified as >13.5%. This article reviews the pathoanatomy relevant to anterior shoulder instability and subcritical GBL, while highlighting existing evidence regarding open augmentation procedures in comparison to other treatment options for this subpopulation. Methods: A narrative review of the current literature was conducted focusing on subcritical GBL in anterior glenoid stabilization procedures, including review of forward citation and reference lists of selected articles. Key Content and Findings: Computed tomography (CT) is the modality of choice for obtaining precise measurements of subcritical GBL, defined as <13.5%, using the best-fit circle method. There is debate surrounding the optimal surgical management of subcritical GBL. Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) remains the predominate surgery performed for primary anterior shoulder instability, while glenoid augmentation and open Bankart repair continue to be used sparingly in the United States. Historically, the Latarjet procedure was considered for substantial glenoid defects, but the illumination of subcritical GBL has expanded its indications. Arthroscopic, soft tissue-only repairs with the addition of remplissage, has been shown to have similar 2-year outcomes to the Latarjet in patients with >15% GBL, which has been limited in the study of subcritical GBL. Additionally, utilization of distal tibial allograft and local autograft is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, again, with limited prospective studies in the subcritical GBL population. Conclusions: There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment approach to recurrent shoulder instability in the setting of subcritical GBL. Conversely, there is a growing agreement that isolated ABR is likely inadequate and subcritical GBL should prompt consideration of a more robust operation. To this end, interest in glenoid bone augmentation continues to grow as a reliable technique for recreating the native architecture and restoring glenohumeral stability are developed.

Arthroscopic Management of Arthrofibrosis After Hemiarthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture Dislocation.

Poor functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures are common, yet revision surgery is relatively rare. Arthroscopic treatment for postoperative stiffness can be considered in the setting of functional limits to glenohumeral range of motion impacting activities of daily living after adequate conservative treatment with physical therapy and in the setting of healed, well-positioned tuberosities and humeral components. This Technical Note illustrates a stepwise approach to an arthroscopic lysis of adhesions and capsular release for the treatment of arthrofibrosis of the shoulder. The advantages of this technique include an alternative approach to entering the glenohumeral joint under direct subacromial visualization and a 2-posterior portal approach to the inferior and anteroinferior capsule, which can be challenging to achieve in the setting of severe postsurgical arthrofibrosis.

Documented Contact Allergy Impacts Risk for Surgical Adhesive-Associated Contact Dermatitis after Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to report on the incidence and risk factors for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in patients who received Prineo after total shoulder arthroplasty (SA). Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted to investigate patients who experienced ACD after having SA by a single surgeon during a defined period when Prineo was routinely used as an adjunct to wound closure. Known risk factors for ACD (e.g., history of contact dermatitis, smoking) were analyzed for association development of Prineo-associated ACD using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: From June 2019 through July 2021, 236 consecutive patients were identified as having Prineo applied after SA. Nine cases of Prineo-ACD (3.8%) were documented, whereas 227 patients were unaffected. In all 9 affected patients, the complication was identified and treated without compromising the outcome of the SA. Previous allergy to medical adhesives was a statistically significant risk factor for Prineo-associated ACD in this series (P = .01). The odds of having Prineo-associated ACD among those with adhesive or contact allergy was 38.5 times that of their nonallergic counterparts in a multivariate model. Conclusions: Prineo adhesive ACD had an incidence of 3.8% in this study, and a history of adhesive or contact allergy was highly associated with its development. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control study.

Compliance with Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measure System Data Collection Is 51% Two-years After Shoulder Arthroscopy.

Objective: To determine patient compliance in completing electronic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following arthroscopic shoulder surgery and identify risk factors for noncompliance. Methods: A retrospective review of compliance data was performed for patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery by a single surgeon in a private practice setting from June 2017 to June 2019. All patients were enrolled in Surgical Outcomes System (Arthrex) as a part of routine clinical care, and outcome reporting was integrated into our practice electronic medical record. Patient compliance with PROMs was calculated at preoperative, three-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up time points. Compliance was defined as a complete patient response to each assigned outcome module in the database over time. Logistic regression for compliance at the one-year timepoint was performed to assess for factors associated with survey compliance. Results: Compliance with PROMs was highest preoperatively (91.1%) and decreased at each subsequent time point. The largest decrease in compliance with PROMs occurred between the preoperative and 3-month follow-up time points. Compliance was 58% at 1 year and 51% at 2 years after surgery. Overall, 36% of patients were compliant at all individual time points. There were no significant predictors of compliance with regard to age, sex, race, ethnicity, or procedure. Conclusions: Patient compliance with PROMs decreased over time with the lowest percentage of patients completing electronic surveys at the traditional 2-year follow-up for shoulder arthroscopy. In this study, basic demographic factors were not predictive of patient compliance with PROMs. Clinical Relevance: PROMs are commonly collected after arthroscopic shoulder surgery; however, low patient compliance may affect their utility in research and clinical practice.

Prospective 1-Year Outcomes Are Maintained at Short-Term Final Follow-Up After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Augmentation of Complete Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) augmentation of complete, massive rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: A retrospective study of dermal allograft SCR-augmented RCRs performed by a single surgeon from June 2016 through December 2017 was performed with the following inclusion criteria: massive rotator cuff tear amenable to complete repair but with poor-quality native rotator cuff tissue. Radiographic follow-up was performed at 1 year, and clinical follow-up was performed at both 1 year and a minimum 2 years after surgery. Clinical follow-up included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale score for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value score, active forward elevation, and external rotation. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were assessed for muscle quality using the Goutallier classification, and graft and cuff integrity was assessed according to the Sugaya classification. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 24 patients at 1 year and by 18 (75%) at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes were improved compared with preoperative data and were maintained at minimum 2-year follow-up, with median American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores of 42.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 30.8-58.7) versus 93.9 (IQR, 82.4-100) (P < .001); median Subjective Shoulder Value scores of 30 (IQR, 20-50) versus 90 (IQR, 86.2-97.2) (P < .001); and median visual analog scale pain scores of 5.5 (IQR, 1-9) versus 0 (IQR, 0-0.8) (P = .001). Evaluation of graft and tendon healing on postoperative MRI revealed poor interobserver agreement and showed 10 completely healed grafts (42%), 9 partially healed grafts (38%), and 5 completely disrupted grafts (21%), with 42% of supraspinatus tendons and 54% of infraspinatus tendons healed. CONCLUSIONS: SCR with dermal allograft augmentation of complete RCR with poor-quality tissue shows very good clinical outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. Poor interobserver agreement regarding postoperative graft and rotator cuff integrity by MRI was found. The healing rate for the SCR grafts was 79%. The rates of healing of the native supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons were 42% and 54%, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Distal biceps tendon repair: cost analysis of single- versus double-incision techniques in an ambulatory surgery center.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the cost differences for single- versus double-incision distal biceps repair at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) given that similar clinical outcomes have been reported between these methods. Methods: A retrospective review of financial and medical records was completed for patients who underwent distal biceps tendon repair over a three-year period at a single private orthopedic practice. Variables analyzed include the cost to the ASC of operative time and the cost of differential surgical supplies, specifically implants and disposable supplies. Results: A total of 10 surgeons performed 104 repairs. Nine surgeons performed repairs through a single incision with use of cortical button or suture anchor fixation, and one surgeon performed transosseous suture fixation through a double-incision approach. The median tourniquet time and procedure length were 31 (interquartile range [IQR] 27-40) and 44 (IQR 39-54) minutes for single-incision repairs and 68 minutes (IQR 61-75) and 110 minutes (IQR 103-113) for double-incision repairs which were significantly different across groups (P < .001, P < .001). The total surgical cost (operative time, implants, and disposables) for single-incision repairs was a median of $758 (IQR 732-803) compared with $606 (IQR 567-629) for double-incision repairs (P < .001). However, the procedure cost with implants (not including disposables) was not significantly different for single- (median [Mdn] = $500 [IQR 475-552]) and double-incision repairs (Mdn $552 [IQR 514-564]) (P = .14) although the procedure cost with disposables (not including implant costs) favored single-incision repairs (Mdn = $478 [IQR 452-523]) over double-incision repairs (Mdn = $606 [IQR 567-629]) (P < .001). Conclusion: In a single surgery center, single-incision distal biceps repairs utilizing an implant were performed more expeditiously than double-incision repairs with a transosseous technique but incurred greater surgical costs. Differences in surgical time cost between the two approaches could be consequential for ASCs and other stakeholders.

Bone Block Augmentation of the Posterior Glenoid for Recurrent Posterior Shoulder Instability Is Associated With High Rates of Clinical Failure: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To determine whether posterior glenoid bone block augmentation performed for the treatment of recurrent posterior shoulder instability succeeds in restoring stability and is associated with rates of complications or clinical failures comparable to other glenoid bone augmentation procedures. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was performed. Level of evidence studies I to IV pertaining to posterior bone block augmentation reporting on outcomes or complications were included. The search was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Screening of titles, abstracts, and manuscripts with application of inclusion and exclusion criteria yielded 17 full-text articles reporting on 269 shoulders undergoing bone block augmentation. Surgical technique varied between studies with regard to graft type (iliac crest, 13 studies; scapular spine, 2; acromion, 1; distal tibia allograft, 1), graft positioning (medial to 1.5 cm lateral to glenoid surface, equatorial to subequatorial), and open versus arthroscopic technique (open, 10 studies; arthroscopic, 4; both, 3). Four of the 8 studies with pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) showed significant improvements in these outcomes at final follow-up. The postoperative outcomes ranged from 60 to 90 for Rowe scores (n = 7 studies) and 79 to 90 for Walch-Duplay scores (n = 7 studies). Complications were commonly encountered, with high rates of recurrent instability (0% to 73%) and revision procedures (0% to 67%) across different studies. CONCLUSION: Posterior bone block augmentation for recurrent posterior shoulder instability does not reliably yield substantial improvements in PROs, and complications are frequently observed. The substantial heterogeneity across studies and the small number of patients precludes any substantive judgements as to the superiority of one surgical technique over another. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Histologic case series of human acellular dermal matrix in superior capsule reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allografts are commonly used in the surgical treatment of complex and irreparable rotator cuff tears. Multiple studies report that superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using ADM has resulted in short-term clinical success as assessed via radiographic and patient-reported outcomes. However, limited information is available regarding the biologic fate of these grafts in human subjects. This case series describes histologic results from 8 patients who had reoperations, during which the previously implanted ADMs were removed. These explanted ADMs were subjected to histologic analysis with the hypothesis that they would have evidence of recellularization, revascularization, and active remodeling. METHODS: Eight patients, 38-82 years old, underwent reoperation 6-38 months after undergoing SCR. ADM explants were voluntarily shipped to the manufacturer for histologic analysis. Each graft's structure and composition were qualitatively evaluated by 1 or more of the following histologic stains: hematoxylin and eosin, safranin O, and Russell-Movat pentachrome. Pan-muscle actin staining also assessed the level of neovascularization, potential myoblast or myocyte infiltration, and muscle tissue development in the graft, and was analyzed to determine the proportion of graft that had been recellularized in situ. RESULTS: Grafts showed varying levels of gross and microscopic incorporation with the host. An uneven, but high, overall degree of recellularization, revascularization, and active remodeling was observed. The degree of remodeling correlated with implant duration. These results are consistent with successful biologic reconstruction of the superior shoulder capsule. CONCLUSIONS: The present histologic analysis suggests that ADMs used in SCR undergo active recellularization, revascularization, and remodeling as early as 6 months after implantation, and that graft recellularization positively correlates with duration of implantation. These results represent a significant advancement in our knowledge regarding biologic incorporation of ADMs used in SCR.

Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Although the effect of 3-dimensional (3D) planning for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) on component positioning and patient outcomes has been increasingly studied, the effect of 3D planning on surgeon decision making has not been well studied. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a database containing TSA cases for which the glenoid component was planned with a commercially available 3D computed tomography software program (Virtual Implant Positioning; Arthrex, Inc.) from 2016 to 2019. A total of 6483 cases planned by 417 surgeons were included. The glenoid version (Vtech) and inclination (Itech) of the Virtual Implant Positioning technician plan as well as the surgeon's final plan for version (Vsurg) and inclination (Isurg) were extracted. When the version and/or inclination of the surgeon plan matched that of the technician, that variable was defined as "accepted." The rates of acceptance of Vtech and Itech were calculated and analyzed for association with implant type, native version and inclination, and running case count. A subgroup analysis of high-volume users (n > 30 cases) was analyzed to determine if any of the variables independently was associated with surgeon acceptance. RESULTS: There was a very high rate of matching of version (66%), inclination (72%), or both (55%) and a low rate (18%) where neither parameter of the glenoid plan matched that of the technician. In univariate analysis, as the case count and retroversion increased the rate of accepting of version dropped noticeably (70%-50% and 47%, respectively [ P< .0001]). The rate of accepting the plan for inclination did not vary much as case count changed. In the multivariate analysis, 23 of 56 high-volume surgeons had at least 1 independent factor associated with accepting the technician-planned glenoid version, and 5 surgeons had 2 independent factors. In the multivariate analysis of matching glenoid inclination, 27 of 56 high-volume surgeons had at least 1 independent factor associated with accepting the technician-planned glenoid version, and 9 surgeons had 2 or more independent factors. CONCLUSIONS: In a large database of TSAs with 3D-planned glenoids, there were high rates of cases with surgeon agreement with an initial plan provided by an industry technician: 66% in version, 72% in inclination, 55% for both version and inclination. Surgeon acceptance of the initial plan decreased as pathoanatomy increased and case count increased. Shoulder surgeons should be aware that an initial 3D preoperative plan provided by industry represents a potential source of cognitive bias in shoulder arthroplasty planning.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction for the Operatively Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear: Clinical Outcomes Are Maintained 2 Years After Surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) after 2-year minimum follow-up and to compare the results with those seen in a previously studied group of patients at 1 year postoperatively. METHODS: The retrospective study period was October 2014 through September 2016. Inclusion criteria were arthroscopic dermal allograft SCR performed for operatively irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear with intact or repairable subscapularis tendon, failure of nonoperative treatment, and clinical follow-up at 1 and minimum 2 years postoperatively. Patients lost to follow-up or undergoing revision of the SCR were excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome measure was American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (mean, [95% confidence interval], P value). Secondary outcomes included visual analog pain rating (0-10), subjective shoulder value, and active forward elevation and external rotation (degrees). Radiographic analysis included acromiohumeral interval (millimeters) and graft integrity 1-year postoperation. Complications and reoperations were reviewed from the medical record. RESULTS: Forty-one patients met inclusion criteria at mean 34 months postoperatively, and 8 were excluded. ASES score improved from 52 (46-57) preoperative to 90 (87-92; P < .0001) and 89 (86-92; P < .0001) at 1-year postoperation and at final follow-up without diminishing in the interim (P = .9). All secondary clinical outcomes improved from preoperative to final follow-up. Subjective shoulder value diminished 5% between 1 year and final follow-up (P = .03), whereas active external rotation improved 11° during this time (P = .02). In total, 85% of grafts were fully healed, with acromiohumeral interval improved from 7 (6-8) mm to 8 mm (7-9; P = .04). There were 2 (5%) revisions and 6 (14%) failures to reach the minimally clinically important improvement in ASES score: a 19% rate of unsatisfactory outcomes. There was an additional 1 reoperation (2%) and 1 (2%) medical complication. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic joint preservation surgery for massive, operatively irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with dermal allograft SCR and associated procedures results in improved clinical outcomes that are durable between 1 and minimum 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV retrospective case series.

The Histology of a Healed Superior Capsular Reconstruction Dermal Allograft: A Case Report.

Acellular human dermal allograft commonly is used in the surgical treatment of complex rotator cuff tears, but little information is known about the biological fate of these grafts in human subjects. In this case report, the authors describe a patient who presented with a radiographically healed acellular human dermal allograft superior capsular reconstruction but had humeral head avascular necrosis. The healed superior capsular reconstruction, including graft-bone interfaces, was explanted after 7 months and sent for histologic analysis. A successful biological reconstruction of the superior capsule was found. The graft demonstrated gross and microscopic incorporation with the host, including a tendon-like structure, aligned collagen fibers, fibroblast-like cells, and no clear graft-host distinction. Cellular infiltration ranged from 5% to 14% (central graft) to 65% to 92% (sutured attachment points). Neovascularization and active graft remodeling were confirmed histologically. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, case report.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in 2019: Linked, Double Row Repair for Achieving Higher Healing Rates and Optimal Clinical Outcomes.

The primary aim of rotator cuff repair surgery is to restore the musculotendinous units by creating a complete, tension-free repair construct that optimizes conditions for tendon-to-bone healing. There are many factors outside the control of the surgeon that are capable of affecting the healing process; however, there are also a number of important technical considerations that the surgeon can control, including familiarity with methods to deal with immobile tissues and techniques to perform novel repair constructs. It is clear that linked double row repairs are more likely to heal, and healed rotator cuff repairs best restore shoulder strength, improve patients' satisfaction, and maximize functional outcomes.

Editorial Commentary: Safety in Anteromedial Elbow Portal Placement? Go North!

Since iatrogenic injury to surrounding structures is more likely in the elbow than in the other major joints, many studies have examined the relationship of elbow arthroscopy portals to the at-risk anatomy. In accessing the anterior compartment of the elbow from the medial side, the brachial artery and median, ulnar, and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves are at risk. Factors that improve the safety of this approach include the use of a proximal versus distal anteromedial portal, a distended versus and nondistended joint, and a flexed versus extended elbow position, all of which result in an approximate margin of safety of 2 cm from the deep at-risk structures.

Hill-Sachs Lesion Classification by the Glenoid Track Paradigm in Shoulder Instability: Poor Agreement Between 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic and Arthroscopic Methods.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of agreement between preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomographic (3D-CT) and intraoperative arthroscopic classification of Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) according to the glenoid track (GT) paradigm. METHODS: Records for patients treated surgically for anterior shoulder instability from a single surgeon's practice from August 2013 until March 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were presence of an HSL, < 25% glenoid bone loss, bilateral 3D-CT, and arthroscopically recorded bone loss measurements. Records for patients with chronic dislocations or prior operations were excluded. Calculations by 3D-CT and arthroscopy were performed as follows: Hill-Sachs interval (HSI) was the distance from rotator cuff insertion to medial edge of the HSL; GT was 83% of the normal glenoid width minus any glenoid defect; on-track was HSI less than GT; off-track was HSI greater than GT. RESULTS: Sixteen shoulders with HSL status determined as on- or off-track demonstrated agreement between the 2 methods in 10 of 16 cases (63%, Cohen's κ = 0.16). All 6 cases with disagreement were calculated as on-track by 3D-CT and off-track by arthroscopic measurement. The GT was larger as determined by 3D-CT measurement (22 ± 1 mm [21-24]) compared with arthroscopy (18 ± 1 mm [17-20], P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative 3D-CT showed slight agreement compared with intraoperative arthroscopic measurements in classifying HSL as on-track versus off-track in the GT paradigm; larger GT size by 3D-CT versus arthroscopy accounted for all discrepancies. Determination of off-track status based on preoperative 3D-CT versus determination with the arthroscopic method would result in fewer HSLs treated with remplissage if the GT treatment paradigm were followed. Surgeons using the GT paradigm to determine treatment of HSL by remplissage should recognize the potential for discordance between arthroscopic and radiographic measurements.

Polyethylene Liner and Femoral Head Exchange in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Factors Associated with Long-Term Success and Failure.

BACKGROUND: Polyethylene (PE) liner and femoral head exchange is commonly used to treat periprosthetic osteolysis associated with PE wear after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study was to determine long-term implant survivorship, risk factors for mechanical failure, clinical outcomes, and complications following PE liner and head exchange. METHODS: We identified 116 hips in 110 patients treated with PE liner and head exchange from 1993 to 2004. There were 64 women (58%) in the series, the mean age at revision surgery was 58 years, and the mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 2 to 23 years). Radiographic review determined the location and size of osteolytic defects before the revision surgery. Implant survivorship was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to determine factors that were predictive of failure. RESULTS: Implant survivorship free of repeat revision for any cause was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86% to 96%) at 5 years, 81% (95% CI = 74% to 90%) at 10 years, and 69% (95% CI = 55% to 84%) at 15 years. Reasons for repeat revision included aseptic acetabular loosening in 5 hips (4%) and subsequent wear of conventional PE with osteolysis in 5 hips (4%). No patient who underwent revision with highly cross-linked PE subsequently had a repeat revision due to wear. The absolute risk of acetabular component loosening was 23% for patients with osteolysis in 3 zones, 40% for those with osteolysis involving more than half the cup circumference, and 21% for those with osteolytic defects of >600 mm. The mean Harris hip score improved from 77 before the PE liner and head exchange to 87 after it (p < 0.001). The most common complication was dislocation, which occurred in 19 hips (16%). CONCLUSIONS: PE liner and head exchange provides acceptable long-term implant survivorship with good clinical outcomes. Complications are not uncommon, and steps should be taken to mitigate hip instability. Acetabular revision may be considered when in situ components have a poor track record or are malpositioned, or when preoperative radiographs demonstrate large osteolytic defects threatening cup fixation. Use of highly cross-linked PE at revision was protective against subsequent PE wear and osteolysis, although this did not reach significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: How to Avoid Retear.

A healed rotator cuff repair results in a superior outcome for the patient compared with a non-healed repair. The surgeon can maximize the chance of a healed repair by knowing the end-point of each key step in the repair process and adhering to a few core principles. First, the rotator cuff tear pattern (e.g. crescent, L-tear, reverse L-tear, U-tear) must be recognized, starting with careful assessment of preoperative MRI but concluding with the arthroscopic assessment of tear edge mobility. Second, a low-tension, anatomic, and mechanically robust repair construct (e.g. linked, double row; load-sharing rip stop; margin convergence to bone) must be determined based on the tear pattern. Increasingly, surgeons are recognizing the importance of the superior capsule of the shoulder, which can appear as a separate pathoanatomic structure in a delaminated rotator cuff tear and require independent suturing in the repair construct. Third, the biological healing capacity of the repair site must be optimized by using meticulous preparation of the greater tuberosity bone, including removal of soft tissue remnants, light burring, and creation of bone vents. Finally, avoid aggressive early rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair respecting that tendon to bone healing is unlikely to occur before 12 weeks postoperatively. Sling immobilization and judicious use of early passive motion should be used for the first 6 weeks, with passive shoulder range of motion performed during weeks 6-12 postoperatively. Rotator cuff strengthening, and active overhead use of the arm should be delayed until at least 12 weeks after surgery to minimize the risk of retear.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Reverses Profound Pseudoparalysis in Patients With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears and Minimal or No Glenohumeral Arthritis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the rate and magnitude of return of active forward elevation (aFE) of the arm for patients with severe preoperative elevation dysfunction (less than 45° of aFE and termed profound pseudoparalysis) and massive, irreparable (or partially reparable) rotator cuff tears without arthritis treated with arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). METHODS: The period for this retrospective study was October 2014 to October 2016. Inclusion criteria included patients treated arthroscopically for an incompletely reparable massive rotator cuff tear (2 tendons fully torn or tear dimension > 5 cm), preoperative aFE of less than 45° (profound pseudoparalysis) with full passive elevation, an intact or reparable subscapularis tendon, radiographic classification Hamada 0-3, and 12-month clinical follow-up. The primary outcome measure was aFE (degrees) at 1 year postoperative. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale pain rating (0-10), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, subjective shoulder value, and active external rotation. Graft integrity and Goutallier grade of supraspinatus and infraspinatus at 1 year postoperative were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. Nine of 10 patients (90%) regained active overhead use of the arm after SCR with preoperative aFE (mean ± standard error of the mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]) 27° ± 2° [95% CI, 24°-30°] improving to postoperative aFE 159° ± 15° [95% CI, 130°-187°; P < .0001]. All secondary outcome measures were also improved at 1 year postoperative (visual analog scale, 4.6 ± 0.8 to 0.5 ± 0.2; P = .001; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 52 ± 6 to 89 ± 3; P = .0002; subjective shoulder value, 36 ± 3 to 91 ± 1; P < .0001; active external rotation, 24° ± 7° to 43° ± 8°; P = .002), and 7 of 10 SCR grafts were fully healed by MRI. No complications or reoperations occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Profound pseudoparalysis of the shoulder (active elevation less than 45°) in massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears without arthritis was reversed in 90% of patients after arthroscopic SCR. Reverse shoulder replacement has been proposed to be the only reliable surgical option in this patient group, but SCR appears to be a valid joint-preserving option for improving function with a low rate of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.