Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Outcomes and Perioperative Factors Associated with Posterior Cervical Fusion.

Introduction: While there is anecdotal evidence that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic altered perioperative decision-making in patients requiring posterior cervical fusion (PCF), a national-level analysis to examine the significance of this hypothesis has not yet been conducted. This study aimed to determine the potential differences in perioperative variables and surgical outcomes of PCF performed before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Adults who underwent PCF were identified in the 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 (intrapandemic) NSQIP datasets. Differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. On the other hand, differences in operative time and relative value units (RVUs) were estimated using quantile regression. Furthermore, the odds ratios (OR) for length of stay (LOS) were estimated using negative binomial regression. Secondary outcomes included rates of nonhome discharge and outpatient surgery. Results: A total of 3,444 patients were included in this study (50.7% from 2020). Readmission, reoperation, morbidity, operative time, and RVUs per minute were similar between cohorts (p>0.05). The LOS (OR 1.086, p<0.001) and RVUs-per-case (coefficient +0.360, p=0.037) were significantly greater in 2020 compared to 2019. Operation year 2020 was also associated with lower rates of nonhome discharge (22.3% vs. 25.8%, p=0.017) and higher rates of outpatient surgery (4.8% vs. 3.0%, p=0.006). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a 28% decreased odds of nonhome discharge following PCF and a 72% increased odds of PCF being performed in an outpatient setting were observed. The readmission, reoperation, and morbidity rates remained unchanged during this period. This is notable given that patients in the 2020 group were more frail. This suggests that patients were shifted to outpatient centers possibly to make up for potentially reduced case volume, highlighting the potential to evaluate rehabilitation-discharge criteria. Further research should evaluate these findings in more detail and on a regional basis.

The Fundamentals and Applications of Wearable Sensor Devices in Sports Medicine: A Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: To (1) characterize the various forms of wearable sensor devices (WSDs) and (2) review the peer-reviewed literature of applied wearable technology within sports medicine. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE databases, from inception through 2023, was conducted to identify eligible studies using WSDs within sports medicine. Data extraction was performed of study demographics and sensor specifications. Included studies were categorized by application: athletic training, rehabilitation, and research. RESULTS: In total, 43 studies met criteria for inclusion in this review. Forms of WSDs include pedometers, accelerometers, encoders (consisting of magnetometers and gyroscopes), force sensors, global positioning system trackers, and inertial measurement units. Outcome metrics include step counts; gait, limb motion, and angular positioning; foot and skin pressure; change of direction and inclination, including analysis of both body parts and athletes on a field; displacement and velocity of body segments and joints; heart rate; plethysmography; sport-specific kinematics; range of motion, symmetry, and alignment; head impact; sleep; throwing biomechanics; and kinetic and spatiotemporal running metrics. WSDs are used in athletic training to assess sport-specific biomechanics and workload with a goal of injury prevention and training optimization, as well as for rehabilitation monitoring and research such as for risk predicting and aiding diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: WSDs enable real-time monitoring of human performance across a variety of implementations and settings, allowing collection of metrics otherwise not achievable. WSDs are powerful tools with multiple applications within athletic training, patient rehabilitation, and orthopaedic and sports medicine research. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Wearable technology may represent the missing link to quantitatively addressing return to play and previous performance. WSDs are commercially available and portable adjuncts that allow clinicians, trainers, and individual athletes to monitor biomechanical parameters, workload, and recovery status to better contextualize personalized training, injury risk, and rehabilitation.

Single Long-Incision Minimally Invasive Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine differences in outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery using a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) approach versus single and triple-incision minimally invasive surgery (MIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MIS increased in popularity as surgeons' focus moved towards soft tissue preservation, but it carries technical demands and increased surgical time compared with PSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgeries performed from 2016 to 2020 were included. Cohorts were formed based on surgical approach: PSF versus single long-incision MIS (SLIM) versus traditional MIS [3-incision MIS (3MIS)]. There were a total of 7 subanalyses. Demographic, radiographic, and perioperative data were collected for the 3 groups. Kruskal-Wallis and χ 2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-two patients met our inclusion criteria, 294 PSF, 179 3MIS, and 59 SLIM.Estimated blood loss (mL) ( P < 0.00001) and length of stay (LOS) ( P < 0.00001) was significantly higher in PSF than in SLIM and 3MIS. Surgical time was significantly higher in 3MIS than in PSF and SLIM ( P = 0.0012).Patients who underwent PSF had significantly lower postoperative T5 to T12 kyphosis ( P < 0.00001) and percentage kyphosis change ( P < 0.00001). Morphine equivalence was significantly higher in the PSF group during total hospital stay ( P = 0.0042).Patients who underwent SLIM and 3MIS were more likely to return to noncontact ( P = 0.0096) and contact sports ( P = 0.0095) within 6 months and reported lower pain scores ( P < 0.001) at 6 months postoperation. CONCLUSION: SLIM has a similar operative time to PSF and is technically similar to PSF while maintaining the surgical and postoperative outcome advantages of 3MIS.

The Risk of Lymphedema After Breast Cancer Surgery Should Not Restrict Necessary Hand Surgery Interventions.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of lymphedema onset or exacerbation in patients undergoing upper extremity interventions, both nonoperative and operative, after breast cancer surgery. METHODS: The study inclusion criteria were the following: (1) prior history of breast cancer surgery or lymphedema from the cancer; (2) upper extremity intervention, ipsilateral to the breast cancer side; and (3) follow-up of at least 1 month. Patients were evaluated for demographic information, type of breast cancer procedure and hand intervention, number of lymph nodes dissected, preexisting lymphedema, exacerbation of lymphedema, and new-onset lymphedema. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients undergoing 385 hand interventions (300 injections, 85 surgeries) were reviewed. Median follow-up was 31 months (range: 1-110). Nineteen patients had preexisting lymphedema ipsilateral to the hand procedure and none experienced an exacerbation of their lymphedema. Three patients developed new-onset lymphedema ipsilateral to their hand intervention at an average follow-up of 30 months (range: 4-67). One patient had a single injection and developed lymphedema over 5 years later. One had 2 injections in the same hand on the same date and developed lymphedema 3 months later. The third patient had 2 injections in the right hand, 1 injection and 1 surgery in the left hand, and developed either lymphedema or swelling due to rheumatoid arthritis in the right hand 1 year after the injections. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have undergone breast cancer surgery can safely undergo upper extremity intervention with low risk of lymphedema exacerbation or onset.

Does a dedicated "Scoliosis Team" and surgical standardization improve outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery and is it reproducible?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine if standardization improves adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery outcomes and whether it is transferrable between institutions. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of AIS patients operated between 2009 and 2021 at two institutions (IA and IB). Each institution consisted of a non-standardized (NST) and standardized group (ST). In 2015, surgeons changed institutions (IA- > IB). Reproducibility was determined between institutions. Median and interquartile ranges (IQR), Kruskal-Wallis, and χ2 tests were used. RESULTS: 500 consecutive AIS patients were included. Age (p = 0.06), body mass index (p = 0.74), preoperative Cobb angle (p = 0.53), and levels fused (p = 0.94) were similar between institutions. IA-ST and IB-ST had lower blood loss (p < 0.001) and shorter surgical time (p < 0.001). IB-ST had significantly shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001) and transfusion rate (p = 0.007) than IB-NST. Standardized protocols in IB-ST reduced costs by 18.7%, significantly lowering hospital costs from $74,794.05 in IB-NST to $60,778.60 for IB-ST (p < 0.001). Annual analysis of surgical time revealed while implementation of standardized protocols decreased operative time within IA, when surgeons transitioned to IB, and upon standardization, IB operative time values decreased once again, and continued to decrease annually. Additions to standardized protocol in IB temporarily affected the operative time, before stabilizing. CONCLUSION: Surgeon-led standardized AIS approach and streamlined surgical steps improve outcomes and efficiency, is transferrable between institutions, and adjusts to additional protocol changes.

Navigated versus conventional pediatric spinal deformity surgery: Navigation independently predicts reoperation and infectious complications.

Context: Literature on treating pediatric spinal deformity with navigation is limited, particularly using large nationally represented cohorts. Further, the comparison of single-institution data to national-level database outcomes is also lacking. Aim: (1) To compare navigated versus conventional posterior pediatric deformity surgery based on 30-day outcomes and perioperative factors using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and (2) to compare the outcomes of the NSQIP navigated group to those of fluoroscopy-only and navigated cases from a single-institution. Settings and Design: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects and Methods: Pediatric patients who underwent posterior deformity surgery with and without navigation were included. Primary outcomes were 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and complications. The second part of this study included AIS patients < 18 years old at a single institution between 2015 and 2019. Operative time, length of stay, transfusion rate, and complication rate were compared between single-institution and NSQIP groups. Statistical Analysis Used: Univariate analyses with independent t-test and Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used. Multivariate analyses through the application of binary logistic regression models. Results: Part I of the study included 16,950 patients, with navigation utilized in 356 patients (2.1%). In multivariate analysis, navigation predicted reoperation, deep wound infection, and sepsis. After controlling for operative year, navigation no longer predicted reoperation. In Part II of the study, 288 single institution AIS patients were matched to 326 navigation patients from the NSQIP database. Operative time and transfusion rate were significantly higher for the NSQIP group. Conclusions: On a national scale, navigation predicted increased odds of reoperation and infectious-related events and yielded greater median relative value units (RVUs) per case but had longer operating room (OR) time and fewer RVUs-per-minute. After controlling for operative year, RVUs-per-minute and reoperation rates were similar between groups. The NSQIP navigated surgery group was associated with significantly higher operative time and transfusion rates compared to the single-institution groups.

Effect of Pedicle Screw Size on Surgical Outcomes Following Surgery for 412 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Review. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine differences in surgical and post-operative outcomes in AIS patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery using standard or large pedicle screw size. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Use of pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformity correction surgery is considered safe and effective. Still, the small size of the pedicle and the complex 3D anatomy of the thoracic spine makes screw placement challenging, with improper pedicle screw fixation leading to catastrophic complications including injuries to nerve roots, spinal cord, and major vessels. Thus, insertion of larger diameter screw sizes has raised concerns amongst surgeons, especially in the pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: AIS patients undergoing PSF between 2013 and 2019 were included. Demographic, radiographic, and operative outcomes collected. Patients in the large screw size group (GpI) received 6.5 mm diameter screw sizes at all levels while standard screw size group (GpII) received 5.0 to 5.5 mm diameter screw sizes at all levels. Kruskall-Wallis and Fisher's exact test performed for continuous and categorical variables respectively.Subanalyses included (1) screw accuracy in patients with available CT scans, (2) stratified analysis of large- and standard-screw patients with ≥60% flexibility rate, (3) stratified analysis of large- and standard-screw patients with <60% flexibility rate, and (4) matched analysis of large- and standard-screw patients by surgeon and year of surgery. RESULTS: GpI patients experienced significantly higher overall curve correction ( P <0.001), with 87.6% experiencing at least one grade reduction of apical vertebral rotation from preoperative to postoperative visit( P =0.008).Patients with larger screws displayed higher postoperative kyphosis. No patient experienced medial breaching. CONCLUSION: Large screw sizes have similar safety profiles to standard screws without negatively impacting surgical and perioperative outcomes in AIS patients undergoing PSF. Additionally, coronal, sagittal, and rotational correction is superior for larger-diameter screws in AIS patients.

Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE: Navigation has been increasingly used to treat degenerative disease, with positive radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events and reoperations, despite increased operative time. However, short-term analysis on treating adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with navigation is limited, particularly using large nationally represented cohorts. This is the first large-scale database study to compare 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and value-per-operative time for navigated and conventional ASD surgery. METHODS: Adults were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Multivariate regression was used to compare outcomes between navigated and conventional surgery and to control for predictors and baseline differences. RESULTS: 3190 ASD patients were included. Navigated and conventional patients were similar. Navigated cases had greater operative time (405 vs 320 min) and mean RVUs per case (81.3 vs 69.7), and had more supplementary pelvic fixations (26.1 vs 13.4%) and osteotomies (50.3 vs 27.7%) (P <.001).In univariate analysis, navigation had greater reoperation (9.9 vs 5.2%, P = .011), morbidity (57.8 vs 46.8%, P = .007), and transfusion (52.2 vs 41.8%, P = .010) rates. Readmission was similar (11.9 vs 8.4%). In multivariate analysis, navigation predicted reoperation (OR = 1.792, P = .048), but no longer predicted morbidity or transfusion. Most reoperations were infectious and hardware-related. CONCLUSIONS: Despite controlling for patient-related and procedural factors, navigation independently predicted a 79% increased odds of reoperation but did not predict morbidity or transfusion. Readmission was similar between groups. This is explained, in part, by greater operative time and transfusion, which are risk factors for infection. Reoperation most frequently occurred for wound- and hardware-related reasons, suggesting navigation carries an increased risk of infectious-related events beyond increased operative time.

What is a better value for your time? Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty.

Introduction: Compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), the motion preservation of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) provides an attractive alternative with similar short-term results. However, there is a paucity of the economics of performing CDA over ACDF. Study Design: This was retrospective study. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate relative-value-units (RVUs), operative time, and RVUs-per-minute between single-level ACDF and CDA. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity. Methods: Adults who underwent ACDF or CDA in 2011-2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database datasets. Multivariate quantile regression was utilized. Results: There were 26,595 patients (2024 CDA). ACDF patients were older, more likely to be female, discharged to inpatient rehabilitation, and have a history of obesity, smoking, diabetes, steroid use, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists-class ≥3. ACDF had greater median RVUs-per-case (41.2 vs. 24.1) and RVUs-per-minute (0.36 vs. 0.27), despite greater operative-time (109 min vs. 92 min) (P < 0.001). ACDF predicted a 16.9 unit increase in median RVUs per case (P < 0.001, confidence interval [CI]95: 16.3-17.5), an 8.81 min increase in median operative time per case (P < 0.001, CI95: 5.69-11.9), and 0.119 unit increase in median RVUs-per-minute (P < 0.001, CI95: 0.108-0.130). ACDF was associated with greater unadjusted rates of readmission (3.2% vs. 1.4%) morbidity (2.3% vs. 1.1%) (P < 0.001), but similar rates of reoperation (1.3% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.080). After adjusting for significant patient-related and procedural factors, readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.695, P = 0.130, CI95: 0.434-1.113) and morbidity (OR = 1.102, P = 0.688, CI95: 0.685-1.773) was similar between ACDF and CDA. Conclusions: Median RVUs-per-minute increased by 0.119 points for ACDF over CDA, or $257.7/h for each additional-hour of surgery. Adjusted 30-day outcomes were similar between procedures. Reimbursement for CDA does not appear to be in line with ACDF and may be a barrier to widespread usage.

The Volume-Cost Relationship: How Does Surgical Volume Affect Cost and Value in AIS Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare distribution of hospital and operating room charges and outcomes during posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients by high-volume (HV) and standard-volume (SV) surgeons at one institution and examine potential cost savings. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Increased surgical volume has been associated with improved perioperative outcomes after spinal deformity correction. However, there is a lack of information on how this may affect hospital costs. METHODS: Retrospective study of AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion between 2013 and 2019. Demographic, x-ray, chart review and hospital costs were collected and compared between HV surgeons (≥50 AIS cases/y) and SV surgeons (<50/y). Comparative analyses were computed using Wilcoxon rank-sum, Kruskal-Wallis, and the Fisher exact tests. Average values with corresponding minimum-maximum rages were reported. RESULTS: A total of 407 patients (HV: 232, SV: 175) operated by 4 surgeons (1 HV, 3 SV). Radiographic parameters were similar between the groups. HV surgeons had significantly lower estimated blood loss (385.3 vs. 655.6 mL, P <0.001), fewer intraoperative transfusions (10.8% vs. 25.1%, P <0.001), shorter surgery time (221.6 vs. 324.9 min, P <0.001), and lower radiation from intraoperative fluoroscopy (4.4 vs. 6.4 mGy, P <0.001). HV patients had a significantly lower length of stay (4.3 vs. 5.3, P <0.001) and complication rate (0.4% vs. 4%, P =0.04).HV surgeons had significantly lower total costs ($61,716.24 vs. $72,745.93, P <0.001). This included lower transfusion costs ( P <0.001), operative time costs ( P <0.001), screw costs ( P <0.001), hospital stay costs ( P <0.001), and costs associated with 30-day emergency department returns ( P <0.001). CONCLUSION: HV surgeons had significantly lower operative times, lower estimated blood loss and transfusion rates and lower perioperative complications requiring readmission or return to emergency department resulting in lower health care costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Ambulatory Neuromuscular Scoliosis Patients Have Superior Perioperative Results Than Nonambulatory Neuromuscular Scoliosis Patients and Can Approach Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Outcomes After Posterior Spinal Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify differences in perioperative outcomes between ambulatory patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (ANMS) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) following spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: NMS patients have severe curves with more comorbidities and procedural complexity. These patients require extensive fusion levels, increased blood loss, and suffer increased periop complications. However, NMS patients have a variable severity spectrum, including ambulation status. METHODS: Chart and radiographic review of NMS and AIS patients undergoing PSF from 2005 to 2018. NNMS included NMS patients who were completely dependent (GMFCS IV-V). ANMS consisted of community ambulators without significant reliance on wheeled assistive devices (GMFCS I-III). Subanalysis matched by age, sex, levels fused and preoperative Cobb angle was conducted as well. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum, Kruskal-Wallis, χ2, and Fisher exact tests were performed. RESULTS: There were 120 patients in the NNMS group, 54 in ANMS and 158 in the AIS group. EBL was significantly lower for ANMS and AIS patients (P < 0.001). Complications within 30 days were similar between ANMS and AIS (P = 1.0), but significantly higher for NNMS (P < 0.001). Two (1.3%) AIS patients, (1.7%) nonambulatory NMS patients, and one (1.9%) ANMS patient required revision surgery (P = 1.0). However, all NMS patients had increased fusion levels, fixation points, and surgery time (P < 0.05). NNMS had significantly longer ICU (P < 0.001), hospital stay (P < 0.001), intraoperative transfusions (P < 0.001), and fewer patients extubated in the OR (P < 0.001) than ANMS and AIS patients. In the subanalysis, ANMS had similar radiographic measurements, EBL, transfusion, surgery time, extubation rate, and complication rate (P > 0.05) to AIS. CONCLUSION: Our data show radiographic outcomes, infections, revisions, and overall complications for ANMS were similar to the AIS population. This suggests that NMS patients who ambulate primarily without assistance can expect surgical outcomes comparable to AIS patients with further room for improvement in length of ICU and hospital stay.Level of Evidence: 4.

Scoliosis Surgery Normalizes Cardiac Function in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective chart review with minimum 2-year follow up. OBJECTIVE: To determine incidence of pulmonary hypertension in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients and to determine the effect of scoliosis surgery on pulmonary hypertension. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can increase right atrial and ventricular pressures secondary to restrictive lung disease. Pulmonary hypertension leading to cor pulmonale is the most feared outcome, however mild pulmonary hypertension in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients has been reported. No study has previously examined changes in the improvement of right heart function following scoliosis surgery. METHODS: Cobb angle, 2D-echo signs of structural heart disease, aortic root dimensions, tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity (TRV), pulmonary function tests (PFTs), arterial blood gas (ABG), and patient demographics reviewed. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) estimated using Bernoulli equation (4[TRV]2) and right atrial pressure. RVSP ≥36 mmHg is a surrogate marker for pulmonary hypertension. All echocardiograms were read by board certified Pediatric Cardiologists. Logistic regression used to assess for differences in TRV between groups. RESULTS: Mean preoperative RVSP was significantly elevated in AIS patients (26.9 ±â€Š0.49; P < 0.001) compared with controls (17.25 + 0.88). Only 47 (21%) Group 1 patients had elevated preoperative TRV (≥2.8 m/s) versus none in Group 2 (P < 0.001). Additionally, logistic regression showed AIS patients have odds ratio of 3.29 for elevated TRV (P = 0.007)-an indirect measure of pulmonary hypertension. In all Group 3 patients, the cardiac function normalized postoperatively (mean TRV = 2.09 + 0.23; P < 0.001). No association found between Cobb angle, aortic root parameters, or pulmonary function tests. CONCLUSION: This study found 13.9% of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had elevated TRV while controls had no TRV abnormalities. Additionally, RVSP measurements demonstrated mild pulmonary hypertension in AIS patients. These abnormal values normalized postoperatively, indicating the benefits of scoliosis surgery on cardiac function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Level of Evidence: 3.

Effects of Fellowship Training on Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques and Outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to examine differences in pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between surgeons with either pediatric or sports medicine fellowship training. Patients were divided into two groups, those performed by either a pediatric or sports medicine fellowship-trained surgeon. One hundred and forty-one patients were identified: 91 (64.5%) by pediatric trained surgeons and 50 (35.4%) by sports medicine trained surgeons. Patients that had ACLR by a pediatric trained surgeon were younger (p = 0.02), had larger body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.027), and more likely to have government assisted insurance (p = 0.006). Pediatric trained surgeons had longer procedure time (p < 0.001), used smaller graft sizes (p = 0.016), used soft tissue grafts (p < 0.001) and used button fixation at both the femur and tibia (p < 0.001). There were no differences regarding meniscus surgery, surgical technique (transphyseal versus physeal sparing), arthrofibrosis, graft failure, and intraoperative complications (p > 0.05). This study shows favorable and comparable results after ACLRs with either pediatric or sports medicine fellowship training. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(3):161-165, 2021).

Minimally Invasive Versus Standard Surgery in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Comparative Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To compare minimally invasive scoliosis surgery (MIS) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in a large group of patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MIS, has been shown to have benefits over standard PSF in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: Radiographic, clinical, and operative review of a multi-institutional prospective database from 2013 to 2018. MIS patients with minimum 2-year XR follow up were compared with open PSF technique patients. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty five patients were included; 192 MIS and 293 PSF. Preoperative Cobb (P = 0.231) and kyphosis were similar (P = 0.501). Cobb correction was comparable (P = 0.46), however percent improvement in thoracic kyphosis was significantly higher in MIS (P < 0.001). MIS had significantly lower blood loss (P < 0.001), transfusions (P < 0.001), fixation points (P < 0.001), opioid consumption (P = 0.001), and hospital stay (P < 0.001). Operative time was shorter (P = 0.001) and 30-day complications rate was similar (P = 0.81). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study comparing the surgical outcomes of MIS and PSF. MIS patients benefit from increased kyphosis, fewer transfusion, lower opioid consumption, and shorter hospital stay with similar Cobb correction. Increased postoperative kyphosis is likely from muscle sparing dissection in MIS.Level of Evidence: 3.

Screw Malposition: Are There Long-term Repercussions to Malposition of Pedicle Screws?

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Pedicle screws have long been part of the continued advancements in spine surgery. Despite the many techniques that have been devised for their safe placement, malposition of screws continues to occur. Studies have evaluated the possible safe limits of screw malposition, and have given some insight on anatomic variation in spinal deformity. Review of the literature reveals several cases of deleterious long-term sequelae of malpositioned screws. DISCUSSION: With the current experience, proposed recommendations are provided to detect and avoid the potential long-term sequelae. Though the literature has helped to define possible concerning screws, there are no good studies predicting long-term risk. CONCLUSION: Improvements in technology and techniques, advancements in intraoperative confirmation and postoperative surveillance, studies that assist risk stratification, and expert consensus evaluations will help guide surgeons in their decision for addressing misplaced screws.

Are All Hardware Removals Equal?

The objective of this study is to report operative time and associated complications of six types of implants and to determine if surgeons are adequately compensated. Hardware removals were analyzed from 2014-2019. Implants were flexible nails, intramedullary rigid nails, long plates, screw(s), single guided-growth plates, and multiple guided-growth plates. Patient demographics, operative time, blood loss, complications, and relative value units (RVU)/min were collected. RVU/min was used to maximize rate. In total, 392 patients were analyzed. Long plate removals took significantly longer than screw removal, therefore RVU/min was significantly lower (p < 0.001). Long plate removals also took significantly longer, and RVU/min was significantly lower compared to guided-growth plate removal (p < 0.001). Intramedullary nails took significantly longer compared to flexible nails, nearly double the RVU/min (p = 0.02). The results from this study indicate that the RVU/ minute for these six different types of implant removals are not equal. Surgeons can use this data to set up their schedule to ensure maximum utilization. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(1):020-023, 2021).

Surgeon volume affects short- and long-term surgical outcomes in idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) Inpatient Database. OBJECTIVE: To identify the differences in short- and long-term complications, following long-segment pediatric spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis surgery, between surgeons with low versus high annual surgical volume. Spinal deformity surgery is complex and requires significant training and repetition to master. Surgeon and hospital volume have been shown to correlate with outcomes following cervical and lumbar spine surgery. However, there is limited literature regarding the impact of surgeon volume on long-term outcomes following pediatric idiopathic spinal deformity correction. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the SPARCS inpatient database from 2004 to 2013 of pediatric patients who underwent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Surgeons were stratified into high (> 15 cases/year)- and low (≤ 15 cases/year)-volume cohorts by aggregating all cases completed over the study period until 50% of the total cases were captured above and below an average case per-year threshold. This threshold occurred at 15 cases/year. Short-term and long-term readmission and medical/surgical complications were collected. Multivariate logistic regression models assessed the risk of short- and long-term complications between cohorts. RESULTS: 3910 pediatric patients underwent a primary arthrodesis from a total of 223 surgeons. More high-volume surgeons operated at academic teaching hospitals (p < 0.001), used a combined AP surgical approach (p < 0.001), and fewer utilized rhBMP (p < 0.001). High-volume surgeons had shorter lengths of stay (p < 0.001). Low-volume surgeons had increased odds of inpatient surgical complications (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.00-2.45). Low-volume surgeons had increased odds of revision at 5 and 10 years (5 years. OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05-2.31; 10 years. OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.09-2.31). Low-volume surgeons had increased odds of implant malfunction at 10 years (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.15-2.86). CONCLUSIONS: High-volume surgeons had decreased odds of short- and long-term complications compared to low volume when performing primary spinal arthrodesis in idiopathic scoliosis. Low-volume surgeons experienced significantly greater odds of inpatient surgical complications, as well as increased risk of revision during long-term follow-up with a significantly increased risk of implant malfunction at 10 years post-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Back-to-Back Surgeries in AIS Patients Can be Performed Safely Without Compromising Radiographic or Perioperative Outcomes: A 10-year Review.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether back-to-back scoliosis surgeries can be performed safely without compromising outcomes and the reproducibility of the practice between institutions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: During the summer, spinal surgeons will often book multiple cases in one day. The complexity and demands of spinal fusion surgery call into question the safety. Change of operating room staff including anesthesiologists, nurses, and neurologists may introduce new risks. METHODS: From 2009 to 2018, index AIS surgeries were included. In Groups 1, 2, and 3, surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. In Group 4, they were performed by other institutional surgeons. Group 1: first surgery of the day, Group 2: second surgery of the day, Group 3: only surgery of the day, Group 4: only surgery of the day by different institutional surgeon. Additional analysis was done to determine reproducibility after a surgeon was moved from Institution 1 to Institution 2. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-seven AIS patients were analyzed. Group 1 patients had similar radiographic outcomes compared with Group 2 (P > 0.05). Surgical time was similar (P = 0.51), but significantly more levels fused (P = 0.01). Compared with Group 3, Group 2 had a smaller preoperative Cobb (P = 0.02), shorter surgeries (P < 0.001), and length of stay (P = 0.04) but similar complication rate (P = 1). Compared with Group 4, Group 2 had smaller preoperative Cobb (P < 0.001), shorter surgery, and lower complication rate (P = 0.03). When determining reproducibility, institution 2 patients had significantly less blood loss, shorter surgeries, and shorter lengths of stay (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although long and involved, back-to-back AIS surgeries do not compromise radiographic or perioperative outcomes. Changes in operating team do not appear to impact safety, efficiency, or outcomes. This study also found that the practice is reproducible between institutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

The Screw-Aorta Dilemma: Changing Patient Position in Computed Tomography Scan Is Critical in Documenting Aortic Mobility.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To determine if obtaining a prone computed tomography (CT)-scan can better delineate a questionable screw-aorta relationship. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw misplacement rate is reported between 6% and 15%. Studies looking at misplacements on a per patient basis show up to 14% of patients have screws at risk (impinging vital structures). A screw abutting the aorta is a management challenge and often requires vascular surgery intervention. However, CT scans routinely done in supine position may overestimate screw-aorta relationship. Change in patient position may allow the aorta to roll away and, in most cases, reveal an uncompromised aorta. This will allow safe removal of pedicle screws without any vascular intervention. METHODS: One hundred eleven spinal deformity patients who underwent Posterior spinal fusion from 2004 to 2009 were evaluated. Patients with concerning screw-aorta relationship underwent additional prone CT scan. Mobility of the aorta was determined and distance was compared using prone and supine CT scans. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred ninety five screws were reviewed, 36 screws in 18 patients were in proximity to the aorta. Fourteen screws (nine patients) appeared to be impinging the aorta. On prone CT, 13 out of the 14 instances the aorta moved away from the screw. The average distance at the screw level was 13.6 ±â€Š4.8 mm in supine position and 8.9 ±â€Š5.4 mm in prone position (P = 0.001). In one instance the relationship was unchanged on prone CT. No screw was noted to violate the lumen or distort the aorta. CONCLUSION: Supine CT scan alone is not entirely accurate in determining screw-aorta relationship. Prone-CT scan provides additional information for better delineation. This additional diagnostic step can change the treatment option by limiting the need for vascular intervention. When in doubt, the additional use of an arteriogram can allow for improved visualization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.