RESUMO
Navigating planned and emergent leave during medical practice is very confusing to most physicians. This is especially challenging to the trauma and acute care surgeon, whose practice is unique due to overnight in-hospital call, alternating coverage of different services, and trauma center's staffing challenges. This is further compounded by a surgical culture that promotes the image of a 'tough' surgeon and forgoing one's personal needs on behalf of patients and colleagues. Frequently, surgeons find themselves having to make a choice at the crossroads of personal and family needs with work obligations: to leave or not to leave. Often, surgeons prioritize their professional commitment over personal wellness and family support. Extensive research has been conducted on the topic of maternity leave and inequality towards female surgeons, primarily focused on trainees. The value of paternity leave has been increasingly recognized recently. Consequently, significant policy changes have been implemented to support trainees. Practicing surgeon, however, often lack such policy support, and thus may default to local culture or contractual agreement. A panel session at the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma 2022 annual meeting was held to discuss the current status of planned or unanticipated leave for practicing surgeons. Experiences, perspectives, and propositions for change were discussed, and are presented here.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: During gestation, laparoscopic procedures, if needed, are generally considered most ideal within the second trimester. There are less reports of successful laparoscopic procedures in the third trimester of pregnancy due to performance hesitancy with concerns of preterm labor and/or other complications. While it is rare for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to be performed within the third trimester, it should not be delayed if needed, and excellent outcomes can be achieved with proper port placement and procedure. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 22-year-old female thirty-two weeks and six days into gestation who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram after presenting with acute-on-chronic cholecystitis. The procedure was without complications, and both the patient and fetus remained stable following surgery, and were discharged on postoperative day 2. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The long-established belief is laparoscopic procedures should ideally be attempted in the second trimester to decrease the risk of preterm labor or spontaneous abortion in obstetric patients. Per SAGES guidelines, when clearly indicated, laparoscopic cholecystectomy should not be avoided in any trimester. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the relative safety of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the third trimester of pregnancy with emphasis on standard technique and proper port placement based on uterus size.