Architect i2000 SR has improved turnaround time for infectious disease serology testing over Vitros ECiQ.

BACKGROUND: Vitros ECiQ and Architect i2000 SR are two automated instruments used to detect serology biomarkers of hepatitis A, B and C viruses, and HIV infections. We compared performance of the Architect to the Vitro EciQ after implementation at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to compare patient samples tested on the Vitros ECiQ or Architect for hepatitis and HIV serological assays. The positivity rate, frequency of equivocal results, turnaround times (TAT), and hands-on time (HOT) were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the positivity rate between the two instruments, with the exception of two assays. An increase in equivocal results was observed for the Architect (0.2% vs 0.5%). Notably, the TAT for the Architect i2000 was shorter for all except one assay (31.6 vs 33.7 hours) and demonstrated improved workflow. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, both instruments performed comparably. Architect had shorter TAT over Vitros.

False-Positive Results for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy has been a major advancement in cancer therapeutics. Reprogramming of T cells is achieved by using gammaretroviral or lentiviral vectors, which may interfere with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT). Here, we describe three clinical scenarios in which CAR T cell immunotherapy interfered with HIV-1 testing, including (i) routine infectious disease screening prior to stem cell transplantation in a 16-year-old female with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, post CAR T cell treatment; (ii) routine infectious disease screening prior to second CAR T cell collection in a 65-year-old male with diffuse large B cell lymphoma who failed initial CAR T cell treatment; and (iii) routine infectious risk assessment following an occupational health exposure from a 58-year-old male with multiple myeloma, who received CAR T cell treatment. In each case, patients initially tested negative by the "fourth-generation" HIV-1 screening enzyme immunoassay (targeting the p24 antigen and anti-HIV-1 antibodies), but positive by the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test v2.0 (targeting gag and the long terminal repeat [LTR]). These samples subsequently retested negative using the Abbott m2000 RealTime HIV-1 assay, which targets the integrase gene. These results indicated that cross-reactions between lentiviral vectors and LTR genomes targeted in the HIV-1 NAAT caused the HIV-1 NAAT false-positive results.