EUS-guided gastroenterostomy with a lumen apposing self-expandable metallic stent relieves gastric outlet obstruction - a Scandinavian case series.

BACKGROUND: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with lumen-apposing metallic stents (LAMS) in patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has proven to be an alternative to luminal stenting in the duodenum and surgical gastroenterostomy. In severely ill patients, the method can provide improved quality of life (QoL) and symptom relief by restoration of the luminal passage of fluid and nutrients to the small intestine. AIM: To assess the technical and clinical success and safety of EUS-GE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A dual center retrospective case series of 33 consecutive patients with GOO due to malignant (n = 28) or non-malignant conditions (n = 5). The patients were treated with EUS-GE using cautery enhanced LAMS. Procedures were performed guided by EUS and fluoroscopy in general anesthesia or conscious sedation. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients. The median procedure time was 71 min and the median hospital stay was three days. Thirty (91%) patients were able to resume oral nutrition after the procedure. Ten patients (30%) experienced adverse events (AEs), including migration of the stent, bleeding, and infection. Four patients had fatal AEs (12%). All stent-related AEs were handled endoscopically. Five patients (15%) needed re-intervention. The median survival time for patients with malignant obstruction was 8.5 weeks (0.5-76), and 13 patients with obstructing malignancies lived 12 weeks or longer. CONCLUSION: EUS-GE is a minimally invasive and efficient method for restoration of the gastrointestinal passage and may improve palliative care for patients with GOO. The method has potential hazards and should only be offered in expert centers that regularly perform the procedure.

Navigated retrograde endoscopic myotomy (REM) for the treatment of therapy-resistant achalasia.

BACKGROUND: In achalasia, muscle spasm may involve the proximal esophagus. When the muscle spasm is located in the proximal esophagus, conventional per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may not be sufficient to relieve symptoms. In this paper, we describe retrograde endoscopic myotomy (REM) as a novel approach to perform myotomy of the proximal esophagus, with the application of a navigation tool for anatomical guidance during REM. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and safety of REM and usefulness of the navigation during REM. METHOD: A 42-year-old male with type III achalasia who was treated with laparoscopic myotomy with fundoplication, multiple pneumatic balloon dilations, Botox injections and anterior POEM of the middle and distal esophagus without symptomatic effect. Repeated high-resolution- manometry (HRM) revealed occluding contractions of high amplitude around and above the aortic arch. A probe-based real-time electromagnetic navigation platform was used to facilitate real-time anatomical orientation and to evaluate myotomy position and length during REM. RESULTS: The navigation system aided in identifying the major structures of the mediastinum, and position and length of the myotomy. Twelve weeks after REM, the Eckardt score fell from seven at baseline seven to two. We also observed improvement with reduction of the pressure at the level of previous spasms in the proximal esophagus from 124 mmHg to 8 mmHg on HRM. CONCLUSION: REM makes the proximal esophagus accessible for endoscopic myotomy. Potential indication for REM is motility disorders in the proximal esophagus and therapy failure after POEM.

EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part V - EUS-Guided Therapeutic Interventions (short version).

The fifth section of the Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS) of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) assesses the evidence for all the categories of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment reported to date. Celiac plexus neurolysis and block, vascular intervention, drainage of fluid collections, drainage of biliary and pancreatic ducts, and experimental tumor ablation techniques are discussed. For each topic, all current evidence has been extensively analyzed and summarized into major recommendations for reader consultation (short version; the long version is published online).

EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV - EUS-guided interventions: General Aspects and EUS-guided Sampling (Short Version).

The fourth part of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound describes general aspects of endoscopic ultrasound-guided diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and assesses the evidence for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling. Endoscopic ultrasound combines the most advanced high-resolution ultrasound imaging of lesions within the wall and in the vicinity of the gastrointestinal tract and safe and effective fine needle-based tissue acquisition from these lesions. The guideline addresses the indications, contraindications, techniques, adverse events, training and clinical impact of EUS-guided sampling. Advantages and drawbacks are weighed in comparison with image-guided percutaneous biopsy. Based on the most current evidence, clinical practice recommendations are given for crucial preconditions and steps of EUS-guided sampling as well as for safe performance. Additionally, the guideline deals with the principles and reliability of cytopathological reporting in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling (short version; the long version is published online).

Differentiation of Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Mesenteric Lymph Nodes by Strain Elastography in Surgical Specimens.

PURPOSE: To investigate if strain elastography could differentiate between metastatic and non-metastatic mesenteric lymph nodes ex-vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 90 mesenteric lymph nodes were examined shortly after resection from 25 patients including 17 patients with colorectal cancer and 8 patients with Crohn's disease. Ultrasound-based strain elastography was performed with a linear probe. Tissue hardness in lymph nodes was assessed using visual scales and measuring the strain ratio. B-mode characteristics were also recorded. Pathological diagnosis with grading of fibrosis served as the reference standard. RESULTS: 20 lymph nodes were metastatic and 70 lymph nodes were non-metastatic. The strain ratios of metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes were significantly different (1.83 vs. 1.42, p = 0.021). The VAS scale (0 - 100) for tissue hardness gave higher mean values for metastatic than non-metastatic nodes, but the difference was not significant (65.5 vs. 55.0, p = 0.055). There was no difference between lymph nodes in Crohn's and non-metastatic cancer specimens. The metastatic lymph nodes were significantly more fibrotic than the non-metastatic lymph nodes by the ordinal fibrosis score (0 - 3). In an ROC analysis, quantitative strain imaging was not superior to the measurement of the short-axis diameter of lymph nodes in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic mesenteric lymph nodes ex-vivo. CONCLUSION: Strain elastography is correlated to fibrosis in lymph nodes and a significant difference was observed on a group level using the strain ratio. Due to measurement overlap, individual mesenteric lymph nodes could not be identified accurately as metastatic or not in this ex-vivo model by strain imaging alone.

EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part V.

The fifth section of the Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS) of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) assesses the evidence for all the categories of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment reported to date. Celiac plexus neurolysis and block, vascular intervention, drainage of fluid collections, drainage of biliary and pancreatic ducts, and experimental tumor ablation techniques are discussed. For each topic, all current evidence has been extensively analyzed and summarized into major recommendations for reader consultation in clinical practice (long version).

EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV - EUS-guided Interventions: General aspects and EUS-guided sampling (Long Version).

The fourth part of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound describes general aspects of endoscopic ultrasound-guided diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and assesses the evidence for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling. Endoscopic ultrasound combines the most advanced high-resolution ultrasound imaging of lesions within the wall and in the vicinity of the gastrointestinal tract and safe and effective fine needle based tissue acquisition from these lesions. The guideline addresses the indications, contraindications, techniques, adverse events, training and clinical impact of EUS-guided sampling. Advantages and drawbacks are weighed in comparison with image-guided percutaneous biopsy. Based on the most current evidence, clinical practice recommendations are given for crucial preconditions and steps of EUS-guided sampling as well as for safe performance. Additionally, the guideline deals with the principles and reliability of cytopathological reporting in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling (long version).

EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (Short Version).

This is the first part of the Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) and covers all general aspects of ultrasound-guided procedures (short version; the long version is published online).

Strain Elastography Evaluation of Rectal Tumors: Inter- and Intraobserver Reproducibility.

PURPOSE: Elastography is a promising method for the identification and differentiation of malignant tissue in several organ systems. The primary aim was to evaluate the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of endorectal strain elastography differentiation of adenomas and adenocarcinomas. The secondary aim was to compare the performance of strain elastography to endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive inclusion of 95 ERUS examinations and 110 elastography video loops with ERUS overlay mode. Video loops were randomized and evaluated by eight observers on two separate occasions. Observers were blinded to all clinical information except the circumferential location of the tumor. A continuous visual analog scale (VAS) and a categorical scale (W-score) were used for elastography evaluation. ERUS loops were T-staged according to the TNM classification system. Histopathological evaluation of surgical resection specimen was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Strain elastography visual evaluation yielded intraobserver variability from 0.86 to 0.97 and interobserver variability of 0.99. VAS strain elastography differentiation of adenomas (pT0) and adenocarcinomas (pT1 - 4) yielded sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of 0.94, 0.71, 0.89, 0.92 and 0.78, respectively. The corresponding ERUS values were 0.83, 0.64, 0.79, 0.88 and 0.54, respectively. CONCLUSION: Visual evaluation of elastography loops is highly reproducible in an offline setting with blinded observers, and correlates significantly with pT-stages. Strain elastography performs better than ERUS and might consequently improve staging.

Endorectal ultrasonography, strain elastography and MRI differentiation of rectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas.

AIM: Strain elastography is a method for recording tissue hardness. Strain in different areas may be compared using strain ratio (SR). The aims of this study were to validate a previously proposed SR cut-off value of 1.25 for differentiating adenocarcinomas from adenomas and to compare the performance of endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS), strain elastography and MRI in the same patients. METHOD: A prospective evaluation of 120 consecutive patients with rectal neoplasia, using a predetermined elastography strain ratio cut-off value, was performed to differentiate adenomas from adenocarcinomas. ERUS and MRI were performed according to standard routine at Haukeland University Hospital, defining T0 as adenomas and T1-T4 as adenocarcinomas. Subsequent histopathology was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Histopathological evaluation revealed 21 adenomas and 99 adenocarcinomas. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (with 95% CI) were as follows: ERUS: 0.96 (0.90-0.99), 0.62 (0.40-0.80) and 0.90 (0.83-0.94); elastography SR: 0.96 (0.90-0.99), 0.86 (0.66-0.96) and 0.94 (0.88-0.97); and MRI: 0.99 (0.94-1.00), 0.07 (0.00-0.31) and 0.87 (0.80-0.93). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the elastography SR assessment accurately differentiates sessile adenomas from adenocarcinomas. SR assessment has a superior ability to differentiate adenomas and adenocarcinomas when compared with ERUS and MRI. MRI examination seems unable to recognize adenomas and should be interpreted with care when early-stage rectal neoplasia is suspected.

Combined endorectal ultrasonography and strain elastography for the staging of early rectal cancer.

AIM: Strain elastography is a novel approach to rectal tumour evaluation. The primary aim of this study was to correlate elastography to pT stages of rectal tumours and to assess the ability of the method to differentiate rectal adenomas (pT0) from early rectal cancer (pT1-2). Secondary aims were to compare elastography with endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) and to propose a combined strain elastography and ERUS staging algorithm. METHOD: In all, 120 consecutive patients with a suspected rectal tumour were examined in this staging study. Patients receiving surgery without neoadjuvant radiotherapy were included (n = 59). All patients were examined with ERUS and elastography. Treatment decisions were made by multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment, without considering the strain elastography examination. RESULTS: Histopathology identified 21 adenomas, 13 pT1, 9 pT2, 15 pT3 and one pT4. Mean elastography strain ratios were predictive of T stage (P = 0.01). Differentiation of adenomas from early rectal cancer (pT1-2) had sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 0.82, 0.86 and 0.84 for elastography and 0.82, 0.62 and 0.72 for ERUS. A combined staging algorithm was developed to identify tumours eligible for local resection. Based on MDT evaluation 32% of tumours later identified as pT0 or pT1 were treated with total mesorectal excision, even though a local excision might have sufficed. Combined ERUS and elastography evaluation would have significantly reduced this number to 9% (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Elastography may improve the staging of adenomas and early rectal cancer compared with ERUS alone. Combined ERUS and elastography assessment is likely to further improve the selection of patients for local resection.

Strain assessment in surgically resected inflammatory and neoplastic bowel lesions.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether ultrasound-based strain imaging can discriminate between colorectal adenocarcinomas and stenotic Crohn's lesions in newly resected surgical specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Resected surgical specimens from 27 patients electively operated for colorectal tumors or stenotic lesions from Crohn's disease were prospectively examined with ultrasonography using a Hitachi HV 900 US scanner with real-time elastography (RTE). Three different methods were applied to assess tissue strain: A four-level categorical visual classification, a continuous visual analog scale (VAS, 0 - 100) and a strain ratio (SR) measurement between the lesion and surrounding reference tissue. The imaged sections were marked and subsequently examined by a pathologist. Results from RTE were evaluated according to diagnosis, degree of fibrosis, inflammatory parameters, tumor stage and grade. RESULTS: 16 sections from Crohn's lesions, 18 sections from adenocarcinomas and 4 sections from adenomas were examined. Both adenocarcinomas and Crohn's lesions were found to be harder than the surrounding tissue, but they could not be discriminated from each other by any of the strain imaging evaluation methods. All adenocarcinomas had significantly higher strain ratios than adenomas. The categorical classification differentiated poorly between Crohn's lesions, adenocarcinomas and adenomas. Categorical evaluation and VAS score showed fair interobserver agreement. SR measurements provided semi-quantitative strain data and added improved information about elasticity properties, despite substantial intra-observer variation. CONCLUSION: Sonoelastography with SR measurements and visual evaluation of strain differences could not differentiate stenotic Crohn's lesions from adenocarcinomas in resected bowel specimens. A small number of adenomas were found to be significantly softer than adenocarcinomas using the same evaluation methods. The tumor stage or grade did not have a significant impact on the elastography results.

EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications.

The clinical part of these Guidelines and Recommendations produced under the auspices of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology EFSUMB assesses the clinically used applications of all forms of elastography, stressing the evidence from meta-analyses and giving practical advice for their uses and interpretation. Diffuse liver disease forms the largest section, reflecting the wide experience with transient and shear wave elastography . Then follow the breast, thyroid, gastro-intestinal tract, endoscopic elastography, the prostate and the musculo-skeletal system using strain and shear wave elastography as appropriate. The document is intended to form a reference and to guide clinical users in a practical way.

EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology.

The technical part of these Guidelines and Recommendations, produced under the auspices of EFSUMB, provides an introduction to the physical principles and technology on which all forms of current commercially available ultrasound elastography are based. A difference in shear modulus is the common underlying physical mechanism that provides tissue contrast in all elastograms. The relationship between the alternative technologies is considered in terms of the method used to take advantage of this. The practical advantages and disadvantages associated with each of the techniques are described, and guidance is provided on optimisation of scanning technique, image display, image interpretation and some of the known image artefacts.

Endorectal elastography in the evaluation of rectal tumours.

AIM: Real-time elastography visualizes tissue compliance using an ultrasound platform. Elastography has been used, particularly in the breast, to characterize indeterminate lesions on B-mode imaging as either benign or malignant. The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of routine endorectal elastography to evaluate rectal neoplasia. The secondary aim was to correlate elastography data with histopathological end-points. METHOD: Sixty-nine patients referred to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Colorectal Surgery at Haukeland University Hospital for the evaluation of rectal tumours were included in this prospective cohort study. All patients underwent digital rectal examination, rigid rectoscopy with biopsy, endorectal ultrasonography and endorectal elastography. In each case a strain ratio was calculated, comparing the tumour tissue with adjacent reference tissue that appeared normal on ultrasound scanning. RESULTS: Histopathologically there were 23 adenomas and 45 adenocarcinomas. One patient died before surgical treatment. Adequate elastography images were obtained in 66/69 (96%) patients. Optimal discrimination of malignant and benign lesions was obtained using a strain ratio cut-off value of 1.25 (sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.96; and accuracy, 0.94). CONCLUSION: Endorectal elastography can be performed as an integral part of the clinical evaluation of rectal tumours and has good patient compliance. The method is a promising modality for the discrimination between adenocarcinoma and adenoma of the rectum.