Tracheobronchoplasty for severe tracheobronchomalacia: a case-series of patients with acute and chronic critical comorbidities.

OBJECTIVES: There are little data within the literature regarding tracheobronchoplasty in the setting of the acute and chronically ill, morbidly obese or ventilator-dependent patients with tracheobronchomalacia. Short- and long-term outcomes are studied. METHODS: The series represents 12 tracheobronchomalacia patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status scores of 3-5. Candidacy was based on bronchoscopic findings during spontaneous respirations with >90% collapse of the trachea and both mainstem bronchi. We used dynamic computed tomography scan as an adjunct in those not mechanically ventilated. Our operative approach was a complete portal robotic approach for those outpatients (wheelchair dependent) and right thoracotomy for those who were already mechanically ventilated with 100% fraction of inspired oxygen with high pressure. Extracorporeal support was used in 2 patients. RESULTS: Patients who underwent robotic repair were discharged without complications. Two patients who were critically ill and required extracorporeal support for their surgeries were separated from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on postoperative day 2. Three patients died at the follow-up. In 1 patient, the prolene mesh migrated into trachea and caused obstruction of the trachea and required removal with endobronchial techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The repair of tracheobronchomalacia in patients with multiple comorbidities and with severe life-threatening problems in or outside the intensive care unit may have improvement due to the ability to wean from positive pressure ventilation. Surgical technique and the utilization of mesh support in tracheobronchoplasty operations may need to be debated due to duration of the surgery in patients with severe comorbidities.

Early Valve Surgery for Endocarditis After Acute Embolic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Patients with active endocarditis often suffer acute stroke, with increased risk for hemorrhagic conversion at the time of valve repair or replacement. Controversy persists about timing of operative intervention. METHODS: An institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database of all patients with endocarditis was reviewed for patients undergoing valve surgery (2016-2024). Electronic medical records were reviewed for detailed stroke information and longitudinal follow-up. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival curves evaluated outcomes and survival. RESULTS: Operations for acute active infective endocarditis were performed in 656 patients. Preoperative stroke occurred in 98 patients (14.9%); 86 strokes (87.8%) were embolic, and 16 patients (18.6%) had microhemorrhagic and 12 (12.2%) had hemorrhagic strokes. Median time between preoperative stroke diagnosis and surgery was 5.5 days. The overall incidence of postoperative stroke was 2.1% (14 of 656), with no statistically significant difference in postoperative stroke between patients with vs without preoperative stroke (n = 4 of 98 [4.1%] vs n = 10 of 558 [1.8%]; P = .148). However, the proportion of patients with postoperative hemorrhagic strokes was higher in the preoperative stroke group (3.1% vs 0.5%, P = .016). Finally, of patients with preoperative stroke, early surgery ≤72 hours (n= 38 [38.8%]) was not associated with increased stroke (2.6% vs 5.0%, P = .564). CONCLUSIONS: These contemporary data highlight the feasibility of an early valve surgery strategy for acute endocarditis in the setting of acute stroke, with noninferior postoperative stroke risk.

Concomitant Surgical Ablation in Paroxysmal vs Persistent Atrial Fibrillation During Mitral Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite prospective randomized evidence supporting concomitant treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) during mitral valve (MV) surgery, variation in surgical management of AF remains. We assessed longitudinal outcomes after surgical treatment of persistent or paroxysmal AF during MV surgery in Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: All Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of AF undergoing MV surgery (2018-2020) were evaluated. Patients were stratified by no AF treatment, left atrial appendage obliteration (LAAO) alone, or surgical ablation and LAAO (SA+LAAO). Doubly robust risk adjustment and subgroup analysis by persistent or paroxysmal AF were performed. RESULTS: A total of 7517 patients with preoperative AF underwent MV surgery (32.1% no AF treatment, 23.1% LAAO alone, 44.7% SA+LAAO). After doubly robust risk adjustment, AF treatment with SA+LAAO or LAAO alone were associated with lower 3-year readmission for stroke or bleeding. However, SA+LAAO was associated with reduced 3-year mortality and readmission for AF or heart failure compared with no AF treatment or LAAO alone. Compared with no AF treatment or LAAO alone, SA+LAAO was associated with lower composite end point of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.75) or death (hazard ratio, 0.83) at 3 years. Subgroup analysis identified similar longitudinal benefits of SA+LAAO in patients with persistent or paroxysmal AF. CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with AF undergoing MV surgery, SA+LAAO was associated with improved longitudinal outcomes compared with LAAO alone or no AF treatment in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. These contemporary real-world data further clarify the benefit of SA+LAAO during MV surgery across all types of AF.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus Document on the Management of Pleural Drains After Pulmonary Lobectomy: Expert Consensus Document.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Workforce on Evidence-Based Surgery provides this document on management of pleural drains after pulmonary lobectomy. The goal of this consensus document is to provide guidance regarding pleural drains in 5 specific areas: (1) choice of drain, including size, type, and number; (2) management, including use of suction vs water seal and criteria for removal; (3) imaging recommendations, including the use of daily and postpull chest roentgenograms; (4) use of digital drainage systems; and (5) management of prolonged air leak. To formulate the consensus statements, a task force of 15 general thoracic surgeons was invited to review the existing literature on this topic. Consensus was obtained using a modified Delphi method consisting of 2 rounds of voting until 75% agreement on the statements was reached. A total of 13 consensus statements are provided to encourage standardization and stimulate additional research in this important area.

Mortality index is more accurate than volume in predicting outcome and failure to rescue in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing robotic right upper lobectomy.

Background: Surgical volume is known to influence failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a complication. Robotic lung surgery continues to expand and there is variability in outcomes among hospitals. We sought to estimate the contribution of hospital-based factors on outcomes and FTR following robotic right upper lobectomy (RRUL). Methods: Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all patients age ≥65 years with a diagnosis of lung cancer who underwent RRUL between January 2018 and December 2020. We excluded patients who had undergone segmentectomy, sublobar, wedge, or bronchoplastic resection; had metastatic or nonmalignant disease; or had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Primary outcomes included FTR rate, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, conversion to open surgery, complications, and costs. We analyzed hospitals by tertiles of volume and Medicare Mortality Index (MMI). Defined as the institutional number of deaths per number of survivors, MMI is a marker of overall hospital performance and quality. Propensity score models were adjusted for confounding using goodness of fit. Results: Data for 4317 patients who underwent robotic right upper lobectomy were analyzed. Hospitals were categorized by volume of cases (low, <9; medium, 9-20; high, >20) and MMI (low, <0.04; medium, 0.04-0.13; high, >0.13). After propensity score balancing, patients from tertiles of lowest volume and highest MMI had higher costs ($34,222 vs $30,316; P = .006), as well as higher mortality (odds ratio, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.67-28.2; P < .001). Compared to high-volume centers, low-volume centers had higher rates of conversion to open surgery, respiratory failure, hemorrhagic anemia, and death; longer LOS; and greater cost (P < .001 for all). The C-statistic for volume as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.6, and the FTR was 0.8. Hospitals in the highest tertile of MMI had the highest rates of conversion to open surgery (P = .01), pneumothorax (P = .02), and respiratory failure (P < .001). They also had the highest mortality and rate of readmission, longest LOS, and greatest costs (P < .001 for all) and the shortest survival (P < .001). The C-statistic for MMI as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.8, and FTR was 0.9. Conclusions: The MMI incorporates hospital-based factors in the adjudication of outcomes and is a more sensitive predictor of FTR rates than volume alone. Combining MMI and volume may provide a metric that can guide quality improvement and cost-effectiveness measures in hospitals seeking to implement robotic lung surgery programs.

Intersection of Race, Rurality, and Income in Defining Access to Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Race is a potent influencer of health care access. Geography and income may exert equal or greater influence on patient outcomes. We sought to define the intersection of race, rurality, and income and their influence on access to minimally invasive lung surgery in Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were used to evaluate patients with lung cancer who underwent right upper lobectomy, by open, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) between 2018 and 2020. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, was used to define diagnoses and procedures. We excluded sublobar, segmental, wedge, bronchoplasty, or reoperative patients with nonmalignant or metastatic disease or a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Risk adjustment was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity scores with generalized linear models and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 13,404 patients, 4291 open (32.1%), 4317 RATS (32.2%), and 4796 VATS (35.8%). Black/urban patients had significantly higher RATS and VATS rates (P < .001), longer long-term survival (P = .007), fewer open resections (P < .001), and lower overall mortality (P = .007). Low-income Black/urban patients had higher RATS (P = .002), VATS (P < .001), longer long-term survival (P = .005), fewer open resections (P < .001), and lower overall mortality compared with rural White patients (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Rural White populations living close to the federal poverty line may suffer a burden of disparity traditionally observed among poor Black people. This suggests a need for health policies that extend services to impoverished, rural areas to mitigate social determinants of health.

Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: Recent approval of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients at low surgical risk has resulted in a rapid real-world expansion of TAVR in patients not otherwise examined in recent low-risk trials. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus TAVR in low-risk Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Using the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims database, we evaluated all beneficiaries undergoing isolated SAVR (n = 33,210) or TAVR (n = 77,885) (2018-2020). International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes were used to define variables and frailty was defined by the validated Kim index. Doubly robust risk adjustment was performed with inverse probability weighting and multilevel regression models, as well as competing-risk time to event analysis. A low-risk cohort was identified to simulate recent low-risk trials. RESULTS: A total of 15,749 low-risk patients (8144 SAVR and 7605 TAVR) were identified. Comparison was performed with doubly robust risk adjustment accounting for all factors. TAVR was associated with lower perioperative stroke (odds ratio, 0.62; P < .001) and hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.16; P < .001) compared with SAVR. However, risk-adjusted longitudinal analysis demonstrated TAVR was associated with higher late risk of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.65; P < .001), readmission for valve reintervention (hazard ratio, 1.88; P < .001), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.54; P < .001) compared with SAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Among low-risk Medicare beneficiaries younger than age 75 years undergoing isolated AVR, SAVR was associated with higher index morbidity and mortality but improved 3-year risk-adjusted stroke, valve reintervention, and survival compared with TAVR.

Atrial Fibrillation Management During Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Societal guidelines support atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment during surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Recently, many patients with AF at low to intermediate risk are managed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Therefore, we evaluated longitudinal outcomes in these populations. METHODS: The United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database was evaluated for all beneficiaries with AF undergoing TAVR or SAVR with/without AF treatment (2018-2020). Treatment of AF included concomitant left atrial appendage obliteration, with/without surgical ablation, or endovascular appendage occlusion and/or catheter ablation at any time. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes defined procedures with doubly robust risk adjustment across each group. RESULTS: A total of 24,902 patients were evaluated (17,453 TAVR; 7,449 SAVR). Of patients undergoing SAVR, 3176 (42.6%) underwent AF treatment (SAVR+AF). Only 656 TAVR patients (4.5%) received AF treatment. Comparing well-balanced SAVR+AF vs SAVR vs TAVR, there were no differences in the in-hospital incidence of renal failure, bleeding, or stroke, but increased pacemaker requirement (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; P < .0001) and vascular injury (OR, 9.09; P < .0001) were noted in TAVR and higher hospital mortality (OR, 4.02; P < .0001) in SAVR+AF. SAVR+AF was associated with lower readmission for stroke compared with SAVR alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; P = .029) and TAVR (HR, 0.68; P < .0001) and with improved survival vs TAVR (HR, 0.79; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with AF requiring aortic valve replacement, SAVR+AF was associated with improved longitudinal survival and freedom from stroke compared with TAVR. SAVR+AF treatment should be considered first-line therapy for patients with AF requiring aortic valve replacement.

Volume Alone Does Not Predict Quality Outcomes in Hospitals Performing Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Lower institutional volume has been associated with inferior pediatric cardiac surgery outcomes. This study explored the variation in mortality rates among low-, mid-, and high-volume hospitals performing pediatric cardiac surgery in the United States. METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database was explored for the years 2016 and 2019. Hospitals performing only off-bypass coarctation and ventricular septal defect repair were omitted. The hospitals were divided into 3 groups by their annual case volume. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to obtain risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates. RESULTS: A total of 25,749 operations performed by 235 hospitals were included in the study. The risk-adjusted mortality rate for the entire sample was 1.9%. There were 140 hospitals in the low-volume group, 64 hospitals in the mid-volume group, and 31 in the high-volume group. All groups had low-mortality (mortality <1.9%) and high-mortality (mortality >1.9%) hospitals. Among low-volume hospitals, 53% were low-mortality (n = 74) and 47% were high-mortality (n = 66) hospitals. Among mid-volume hospitals, 58% were low-mortality (n = 37) and 42% were high-mortality (n = 27) hospitals. Among high-volume hospitals, 68% were low-mortality (n = 21) and 32% were high-mortality (n = 10) hospitals. There was no statistically significant difference in risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality when comparing low-, mid-, and high-volume centers for 7 Society of Thoracic Surgeons benchmark procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This national, real-world, risk-adjusted volume outcome analysis highlights that volume alone may not be the sole arbiter to predict quality of pediatric cardiac surgery outcomes. Using case volume alone as a surrogate for quality may unfairly asperse high-performing, low-volume programs.

Concomitant Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Societal guidelines support concomitant management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To assess real-world adoption and outcomes, this study evaluated Medicare beneficiaries with AF who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with surgical ablation (SA) or left atrial appendage obliteration (LAAO) or both procedures in combination (SA + LAAO). METHODS: The US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services inpatient claims database identified all patients with AF who underwent isolated CABG from 2018 to 2020. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases-10th revision procedure codes defined covariates for doubly robust risk adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 19,524 patients with preoperative AF who underwent isolated CABG were stratified by SA + LAAO (3475 patients; 17.8%), LAAO only (4541 patients; 23.3%), or no AF treatment (11,508 patients; 58.9%). After doubly robust risk adjustment, longitudinal analysis highlighted that concomitant AF treatment with SA + LAAO (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P = .049) or LAAO alone (HR, 0.75; P = . 031) was associated with a significant reduction in readmission for stroke at 3 years compared with no AF treatment. Furthermore, SA + LAAO (HR, 0.86; P = .016) but not LAAO alone (HR, 0.97; P = .573) was associated with improved survival compared with no AF treatment. Finally, SA + LAAO was associated with a superior composite outcome of freedom from stroke or death at 3 years compared with LAAO alone (HR, 0.86;, P = .033) or no AF treatment (HR, 0.81; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with AF who underwent isolated CABG, concomitant AF treatment was associated with reduced 3-year readmission for stroke. SA + LAAO was associated with superior reduction in stroke or death at 3 years compared with LAAO alone or no AF treatment.

The relationship between body mass index and mortality is not linear in patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal support.

OBJECTIVE: Morbid obesity may influence candidacy for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VVECMO) support. Indeed, body mass index (BMI) >40 is considered to be a relative contraindication due to increased mortality observed in patients with BMI above this value. There is scant evidence to characterize this relationship beyond speculating about the technical challenges of cannulation and difficulty in optimizing flows. We examined a national cohort to evaluate the influence of BMI on mortality in patients requiring VVECMO for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis on National COVID Cohort Collaborative data evaluating 1,033,229 patients with BMI ≤60 from 31 US hospital systems diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome virus coronavirus 2 infection from September 2019 to August 2022. We performed univariate and multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analysis on data pertaining to those who required VVECMO support during their hospitalization. A subgroup risk-adjusted analysis comparing ECMO mortality in patients with BMI 40 to 60 with the 25th, 50th, and 75th BMI percentile was performed. Outcomes of interest included BMI, age, comorbidity score, body surface area, and ventilation days. RESULTS: A total of 774 adult patients required VVECMO. Of these, 542 were men, median age was 47 years, mean adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index was 1, and median BMI was 33. Overall mortality was 47.8%. There was a nonsignificant overall difference in mortality across hospitals (SD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0-0.57). After mixed multivariable logistic regression analysis, advanced age (P < .0001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = .009) were each associated with increased mortality. Neither gender (P = .14) nor duration on mechanical ventilation (P = .39) was associated with increased mortality. An increase in BMI from 25th to 75th percentile was not associated with a difference in mortality (P = .28). In our multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, there exists a nonlinear relationship between BMI and mortality. Between BMI of 25 and 32, patients experienced an increase in mortality. However, between BMI of 32 and 37, the adjusted mortality in these patients subsequently decreased. Our subgroup analysis comparing BMIs 40 to 60 with the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of BMI found no significant difference in ECMO mortality between BMI values of 40 and 60 with the 25th, 50th, 75th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: Advancing age and higher CCI are each associated with increased risk for mortality in patients requiring VVECMO. A nonlinear relationship exists between mortality and BMI and those between 32 and 37 have lower odds of mortality than those between BMI 25 and 32. This nonlinear pattern suggests a need for further adjudication of the contraindications associated with VVECMO, particularly those based solely on BMI.

Anesthetic Management of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND The anesthetic management of patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) requires special deliberation. Previous literature has suggested that patients with CMT may have increased sensitivity to non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents, and hyperkalemia associated with the administration of succinylcholine has been reported. The potential risk of malignant hyperthermia and underlying cardiopulmonary abnormalities, such as pre-existing arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, or respiratory muscle weakness, must also be considered in patients with CMT. CASE REPORT We describe a case of a patient with a history of CMT and multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Careful consideration was given to the anesthetic plan, which consisted of thorough pre- and perioperative evaluation of cardiac function, total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil infusions, the use of a non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent, and utilization of a malignant hyperthermia protocol with avoidance of volatile anesthetics to decrease the possible risk of malignant hyperthermia. Following a 3-vessel CABG, no anesthetic or surgical complications were noted and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 6 after an uneventful hospital course. CONCLUSIONS Exacerbation of underlying cardiac and pulmonary abnormalities associated with the pathophysiology of CMT, as well as patient response to neuromuscular blocking and volatile agents, should be of concern for the anesthesiologist when anesthetizing a patient with CMT. Therefore, CMT patients undergoing surgery require special consideration of their anesthetic management plan in order to ensure patient safety and optimize perioperative outcomes.

Contemporary Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Interpretation of recent alterations to the guideline priority of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multivessel disease contests historical data and practice. To reevaluate contemporary outcomes, a large contemporary analysis was conducted comparing CABG with multivessel PCI among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: The United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database was evaluated all beneficiaries with acute coronary syndrome undergoing isolated CABG or multivessel PCI (2018-2020). Risk adjustment was performed using multilevel regression analysis, Cox proportional hazards time to event models, and inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity scores. RESULTS: A total of 104,127 beneficiaries were identified undergoing CABG (n = 51,389) or multivessel PCI (n = 52,738). Before risk adjustment, compared with PCI, CABG patients were associated with younger age (72.9 vs 75.2 years, P < .001), higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (5.0 vs 4.2, P < .001), more diabetes (48.5% vs 42.2%, P < .001), higher cost ($54,154 vs $33,484, P < .001), and longer length of stay (11.9 vs 5.8 days, P < .001). After inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score adjustment, compared with PCI, CABG was associated with lower hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.74; P < .001), fewer hospital readmissions at 3 years (odds ratio, 0.85; P < .001), fewer coronary reinterventions (hazard ratio, 0.37; P < .001), and improved 3-year survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary real-world data from Medicare patients with multivessel disease reveal that CABG outcomes were superior to PCI, providing important longitudinal data to guide patient care and policy development.

Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with improved survival compared with appendage obliteration alone: An analysis of 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: Societal guidelines support the concomitant surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Recent evidence has highlighted the stroke reduction of left atrial appendage obliteration with or without surgical ablation in similar populations. To inform clinical decision-making, we evaluated real-world outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery by comparing no atrial fibrillation management with left atrial appendage obliteration alone versus surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration. METHODS: By using the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or mitral/aortic/tricuspid valve repair or replacement between January 2018 and December 2020. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision procedure codes were used to define variables. Risk adjustment was performed with regression analysis using inverse probability weighting of propensity scores and Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses stratified patients by primary operation and paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: A total of 103,382 patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation were stratified by surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration (10,437; 10.1%), left atrial appendage obliteration alone (12,901; 12.5%), or no atrial fibrillation management (80,044; 77.4%). Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (21,076; 20.4%) received the highest proportion of surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration (4661 19.4%) and left atrial appendage obliteration alone (3%724%; 15.4%) versus no atrial fibrillation management (15,688; 65.2%). Likewise, patients undergoing open atrial operations (mitral/tricuspid; 17,204; 16.6%) had higher proportions of atrial fibrillation treatment (surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration 5267 30.6%; left atrial appendage obliteration alone 4259 24.8%; no atrial fibrillation management 7678 44.6%). After robust risk adjustment, surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration was independently associated with reduced 3-year mortality compared with no atrial fibrillation treatment (hazard ratio, 0.68, P < .001) and left atrial appendage obliteration alone (hazard ratio, 0.90, P < .001). Compared with no atrial fibrillation treatment, readmissions for embolic stroke were lower with both surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration (hazard ratio, 0.77, P = .009) and left atrial appendage obliteration alone (hazard ratio, 0.73, P < .001). Reduction in 3-year composite mortality or stroke after surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration was superior to left atrial appendage alone (hazard ratio, 0.90, P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery, the surgical management of atrial fibrillation was associated with lower 3-year mortality and readmission for stroke, with surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration being associated with higher survival compared with left atrial appendage obliteration alone.