Awake Craniotomy for Astrocytoma in the Left Frontal Lobe Using Augmented Reality Superimposing Tumor and White Matter Tracts: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Augmented reality (AR) is expected to serve as an assistive intraoperative technology in neurosurgery.1 Awake craniotomy (AC) for gliomas benefits the extent of resection, survival, and postoperative neurofunctional outcomes.2 In AC, it is critical to understand the cortical and subcortical anatomy.3 We describe the use of AR superimposing tumor and deep white matter tracts in AC. A 29-year-old right-handed woman presented to a local hospital after an episode of generalized convulsions. MRI of the head revealed a widely spreading tumor in the left middle frontal gyrus. After a left frontal craniotomy while the patient was asleep, AR was used to indicate the tumor boundary with subcortical fibers including the corticospinal tract, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, and cingulate fasciculus. We performed AR-assisted removal of the tumor on the surface of the middle frontal gyrus. On subcortical stimulation (SCS) of the frontal aslant tract and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, the patient stopped naming objects in the picture-naming test, while SCS of the left cingulate gyrus caused the patient to mistake colors in the Stroop test. The subcortical fibers identified by AR coincided with the sites of symptom elicitation by SCS. We eventually removed a large part of the tumor. Postoperative MRI confirmed 96.2% resection. The patient was discharged without any new neurological deficits. AC with AR is useful for resection of gliomas in the dominant hemisphere. The patient consented to the procedure and to the publication of her image. The ethics committee of our hospital does not require approval for case reports.

Unilateral abnormality of initial motor-evoked potential in the upper limb detected during lumbar spine surgery: a case report.

BACKGROUND: We present a case with abnormal findings of initial motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the left upper limb after prone positioning during lumbar spine surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old man with bilateral lower extremity numbness without a history of preexisting motor weakness underwent L3-5 spinal fenestration. Initial MEP monitoring after prone positioning revealed markedly prolonged latency and lower amplitude in the left abductor pollicis brevis (APB). Because the left upper limb somatosensory-evoked potentials had normal values, a position-related impending peripheral nerve injury located between the neck and the forearm was excluded. Postoperative examination revealed that MEP abnormality in the left APB was caused by carpal tunnel syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal initial MEP from the upper limb was unexpectedly detected after prone positioning during lumbar spine surgery. The condition was caused by preexisting carpal tunnel syndrome.

Which patients do we need to consider augmentation of muscle active potentials regarding transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials monitoring before spine surgery?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) are the current trend and are important in preventing intraoperative neurological deficits. Post-tetanic Tc-MEPs (p-MEP) can augment the amplitudes of compound muscle active potentials (CMAPs), especially in the case of insufficient conventional Tc-MEPs (c-MEP). PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate pre- and intraoperative factors necessitating p-MEP monitoring and to examine changes in the success rates of baseline Tc-MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation in patients with such factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients (n=184) who underwent spinal surgery with Tc-MEP monitoring in our department between August 2020 and July 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES: Manual muscle testing (MMT) scores were calculated to identify patients with preoperative motor deficits. c-MEP and p-MEP amplitudes were recorded from the defined muscles. METHODS: We compared preoperative and intraoperative factors between the c-MEP and p-MEP groups (study 1). In cases where the factors were identified, we investigated the success rate of the baseline MEP measurement of each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation (study 2). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients were included. Of those, 87 showed sufficient CMAPs with c-MEP. Meanwhile, 70 needed p-MEP because of insufficient CMAPs. In univariate analysis, cervical/thoracic surgery (p<.001), preoperative MMT 3 or below (p=.009), shorter duration of illness (p=.037), previous cerebrovascular disease (p=.014), and dialysis (p=.031) were significantly associated with p-MEP group. Preoperative MMT 3 or below was the only factor requiring p-MEP (odds ratio, 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-8.73, p=.014) in multivariate analysis. In the p-MEP group, 24 patients had preoperative motor deficits; 16 patients with complete data were included in the analysis (study 2). The success rates of MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation of the entire lower-extremity muscles were 42.7 and 57.3%, respectively (p<.001). The success rates for each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation were abductor pollicis brevis: 81.3% and 96.9%, tibialis anterior: 34.4% and 50.0%, gastrocnemius: 25% and 40.6%, and abductor hallucis: 68.8% and 81.3%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in success rates for any of the muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with preoperative MMT 3 or below highly needed p-MEP. The success rate of baseline MEP monitoring increased with tetanic stimulation, even in patients with preoperative motor deficits. We believe that p-MEP monitoring can result in reliable CMAP recording, especially in cases of preoperative motor deficits with MMT scores of 3 or below.

Utility of desflurane as an anesthetic in motor-evoked potentials in spine surgery and the facilitating effect in tetanic stimulation of bilateral median nerves.

Although desflurane is a safe and controllable inhalation anesthetic used in spinal surgery, to our knowledge, there have been no reports of successful motor-evoked potential (MEP) recordings under general anesthesia with desflurane alone. A high desflurane concentration may reduce the risk of intraoperative awareness but can also reduce the success of MEP recording. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reliability of MEP monitoring and investigate whether tetanic stimulation can augment MEP amplitude under general anesthesia with high-concentration desflurane during spinal surgery. We prospectively evaluated 46 patients who were scheduled to undergo lumbar surgery at a single center between 2018 and 2020. Anesthesia was maintained with an end-tidal concentration of 4% desflurane and remifentanil. Compound muscle action potentials were recorded bilaterally from the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and quadriceps. For post-tetanic MEPs (p-MEPs), tetanic stimulation was applied to the median nerves (p-MEPm) and tibial nerves (p-MEPt) separately before transcranial stimulation. The average success rates for conventional MEP (c-MEP), p-MEPm, and p-MEPt were 77.9%, 80%, and 79.3%, respectively. The p-MEPm amplitudes were significantly higher than the c-MEP amplitudes in all muscles (P < 0.05), whereas the p-MEPt amplitudes were not significantly different from the c-MEP amplitudes. The MEP recording success rates for the gastrocnemius and quadriceps were inadequate. However, bilateral median nerve tetanic stimulation can effectively augment MEPs safely under general anesthesia with high-concentration desflurane in patients who undergo spinal surgery.

Motor-evoked potential monitoring from urinary sphincter muscle during pediatric untethering surgery: a case series.

PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary dysfunction following untethering surgery for spinal lipoma is devastating. To assess urinary function, we invented a pediatric urinary catheter equipped with electrodes for the direct transurethral recording of myogenic potential from the external urethral sphincter (EUS). This paper presents two cases in which urinary function was monitored intraoperatively by recording of motor-evoked potential (MEP) from EUS during untethering surgery in children. METHODS: Two children (aged 2 and 6 years) were included in this study. One patient had no preoperative neurological dysfunction, while the other had frequent urination and urinary incontinence. A pair of surface electrodes was attached to a silicone rubber urethral catheter (6 or 8 Fr; diameter, 2 or 2.6 mm). The MEP from the EUS was recorded to assess the function of the centrifugal tract from the motor cortex to the pudendal nerve. RESULTS: Baseline MEP waveforms from the EUS were successfully recorded with latency and amplitude of 39.5 ms and 66 µV in patient 1 and 39.0 ms and 113 µV in patient 2, respectively. A significant decrease in amplitude was not observed during surgery in the two cases. No new urinary dysfunction and complications associated with the urinary catheter-equipped electrodes developed postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Using an electrode-equipped urinary catheter, monitoring of MEP from the EUS could be applicable during untethering surgery in pediatric patients.

Resection of brachial plexus schwannomas while monitoring transcranial motor evoked potentials: report of two cases.

A schwannoma is a benign nerve sheath tumor treated by enucleation, which carries the risk of intraoperative nerve injury that is observed after awakening. Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring has been established as an effective method to predict and prevent intraoperative neurological complications during brain and spinal surgery. However, there have been few reports on its application in head and neck surgeries. We performed enucleation to relieve the symptoms due to schwannomas in the neck of two women, aged 25 years and 70 years. Both women presented with a left cervical mass, paresthesia of the left upper limb, and a Tinel-like sign without muscle weakness. TcMEPs were recorded before beginning surgery, during surgery, and immediately before completing surgery. The dissecting lines were decided using the stimulator attached to the dissecting instrument, which helped warn the surgeon regarding risky areas. Histopathological examinations confirmed the diagnosis of schwannoma. There was no significant difference in the pre- and postoperative TcMEP recordings, and no postoperative motor deficits were identified. Intraoperative TcMEP monitoring is expected to be useful in preventing operative complications while treating head and neck schwannomas.

Intraoperative Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring During Head and Neck Surgeries: A Case of Cervical Vagus Nerve Schwannoma With Laryngeal Paralysis.

Intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring can effectively prevent neurological complications by enabling the evaluation of neurological deficits in all pathways from the motor cortex to the periphery. However, studies regarding its applicability in head and neck surgery are insufficient. This case report discusses a patient who was intraoperatively diagnosed with a right cervical vagus nerve schwannoma previously at another hospital. The patient then developed right laryngeal paralysis after the surgery without neuromonitoring. No significant recovery of the paralysis was observed, and after eight months of being referred to our institution, the patient opted for surgical retreatment following tumor growth and accompanying symptoms such as cervical swelling and discomfort. The patient was examined to evaluate the nerve damage in his previous surgery TcMEP monitoring as well as direct stimulation (DS). The right vagus nerve (RVN) showed no response on TcMEP monitoring throughout the surgery despite a significant response to DS at the tumor site. These findings suggest that the RVN had been damaged medial to the tumor site, and the damage occurred because of traction and ischemia during the previous surgery. Thus, contrary to our belief, medial nerve damage may be present even when local and peripheral nerve preservation is observed through peripheral neuromonitoring. This suggests that DS alone during neuromonitoring in head and neck surgery is insufficient. A multimodal evaluation approach, including TcMEP monitoring, is effective in not only preventing neurological complications but also in evaluating neurological deficits in all pathways from the motor cortex to the periphery.

Retrospective observational study of the effects of residual neuromuscular blockade and sugammadex on motor-evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery in Japan.

Given neuromuscular blockade (NMB) can affect the amplitude and detection success rate of motor-evoked potentials (MEP), sugammadex may be administered intraoperatively. We evaluated the factors affecting the degree of residual NMB (i.e., the train-of-four [TOF] ratio) and the relationship between TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate in Japanese patients undergoing spine surgery. This single-center retrospective observational study included adults who underwent spine surgery under propofol/remifentanil anesthesia, received rocuronium for intubation, and underwent myogenic MEP monitoring after transcranial stimulation. TOF ratios were assessed using electromyography. Sugammadex was administered after finishing the MEP setting and the TOF ratio was ≤0.7. To identify factors affecting the TOF ratio, TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate were simultaneously measured after finishing the MEP setting; to compare the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery between sugammadex and spontaneous recovery groups, multivariable analyses were performed. Of 373 cases analyzed, sugammadex was administered to 221 (59.2%) cases. Age, blood pressure, hepatic impairment, and rocuronium dose were the main factors affecting the TOF ratio. Patients with higher TOF ratios (≥0.75) had higher MEP detection success rates. The time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery was significantly shorter in patients administered sugammadex versus patients without sugammadex (P < .0001). The MEP detection success rate was higher in patients with a TOF ratio of ≥0.75. Sugammadex shortened the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery.

Transurethral electrical stimulation for intraoperative bulbocavernosus reflex monitoring during spine surgery in females.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring is more difficult in females than in males. This study was designed to compare the feasibility of transurethral electrical stimulation BCR (tu-BCR) monitoring with that of conventional BCR (c-BCR) monitoring during spine surgery in females. METHODS: Twenty-four females were included. For stimulation in c-BCR monitoring, a pair of surface electrodes was placed on the genitals (cathode/anode: clitoris/adjacent labium). For stimulation in tu-BCR monitoring, a urethral catheter attached to a pair of electrodes was inserted into the urethra. BCRs were recorded from the external anal sphincter after a single train of four stimulation pulses. RESULTS: There was no postoperative urinary tract injury associated with urethral catheter insertion for tu-BCR. Tu-BCR monitoring had a significantly higher success rate of baseline recording than c-BCR monitoring (87.5% vs 66.7%, respectively, p = 0.028). The specificities of tu-BCR and c-BCR monitoring were 100% and 87.2%, respectively. The sensitivity was not calculated because no patients had postoperative urinary or bowel dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that tu-BCR monitoring improved the success rate of baseline recording and specificity during spine surgery in females. SIGNIFICANCE: Tu-BCR monitoring was more reliable than c-BCR monitoring during spine surgery in females.

Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve augments motor evoked potentials by re-exciting spinal anterior horn cells.

Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve, immediately prior to conducting transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (TES-MEP), increases MEP amplitudes in both innervated and uninnervated muscles by the stimulated peripheral nerve; this is known as the remote augmentation of MEPs. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying the remote augmentation of MEPs remain unclear. Although one hypothesis was that remote augmentation of MEPs results from increased motoneuronal excitability at the spinal cord level, the effect of spinal anterior horn cells has not yet been investigated. We aimed to investigate the effect of tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve on spinal cord anterior horn cells by analyzing the F-wave. We included 34 patients who underwent elective spinal surgeries and compared the changes in F-waves and TES-MEPs pre- and post-tetanic stimulation of the median nerve. F-wave analyses were recorded by stimulating the median and tibial nerves. TES-MEPs and F-wave analyses were compared between baseline and post-tetanic stimulation time periods using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. A significant augmentation of MEPs, independent of the level corresponding to the median nerve, was demonstrated. Furthermore, F-wave persistence was significantly increased not only in the median nerve but also in the tibial nerve after tetanic stimulation of the median nerve. The increased F-wave persistence indicates an increase of re-excited motor units in spinal anterior horn cells. These results confirm the hypothesis that tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve may cause remote augmentation of MEPs, primarily by increasing the excitability of the anterior horn cells.

Tetanic stimulation of the pudendal nerve prior to transcranial electrical stimulation augments the amplitude of motor evoked potentials during pediatric neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: Reportedly, tetanic stimulation prior to transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) facilitates elicitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by a mechanism involving increased corticomotoneuronal excitability in response to somatosensory input. However, the posttetanic MEP following stimulation of a pure sensory nerve has never been reported. Furthermore, no previous reports have described posttetanic MEPs in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of posttetanic MEPs in pediatric neurosurgery patients and to compare the effects on posttetanic MEP after tetanic stimulation of the sensory branch of the pudendal nerve versus the standard median and tibial nerves, which contain a mixture of sensory and motor fibers. METHODS: In 31 consecutive pediatric patients with a mean age of 6.0 ± 5.1 years who underwent lumbosacral surgery, MEPs were elicited by TES without tetanic stimulation (conventional MEPs [c-MEPs]) and following tetanic stimulation of the unilateral median and tibial nerves (mt-MEPs) and the sensory branch of the pudendal nerve (p-MEP). Compound muscle action potentials were elicited from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), gastrocnemius (Gc), tibialis anterior (TA), and adductor hallucis (AH) muscles. The success rate of monitoring each MEP and the increases in the ratios of mt-MEP and p-MEP to c-MEP were investigated. RESULTS: The success rate of monitoring p-MEPs was higher than those of mt-MEPs and c-MEPs (87.5%, 72.6%, and 63.3%, respectively; p < 0.01, adjusted by Bonferroni correction). The mean increase in the ratio of p-MEP to c-MEP for all muscles was significantly higher than that of mt-MEP to c-MEP (3.64 ± 4.03 vs 1.98 ± 2.23, p < 0.01). Subanalysis of individual muscles demonstrated significant differences in the increases in the ratios between p-MEP and mt-MEP in the APB bilaterally, as well as ipsilateral Gc, contralateral TA, and bilateral AH muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Tetanic stimulation prior to TES can augment the amplitude of MEPs during pediatric neurosurgery, the effect being larger with pudendal nerve stimulation than tetanic stimulation of the unilateral median and tibial nerves. TES elicitation of p-MEPs might be useful in pediatric patients in whom it is difficult to elicit c-MEPs.

Ocular blood flow by laser speckle flowgraphy to detect cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy.

Laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) is a noninvasive technique that can measure relative blood flow velocity in the optic fundus contributed by the ophthalmic artery, the main first branch originating from the internal carotid artery (ICA). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of ocular blood flow measurement by LSFG to detect ischemic stress due to carotid clamping during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Nineteen patients undergoing CEA with ocular blood flow measurement by LSFG and intraoperative monitoring (IOM) were prospectively enrolled between August 2016 and March 2019. The mean blur rate (MBR) of ocular blood flow by LSFG, representing relative blood flow of the branch of the retinal artery originating from the optic nerve head, was compared between before and after carotid clamping during CEA. The correlation between the reduction ratio of MBR and the regional saturation oxygen (rSO2) index by near infrared spectroscopy was investigated. Ocular blood flow measurement by LSFG could not be performed in one patient with a severe cataract. In the other 18 patients, LSFG could be performed in all 106 sessions during surgery. The MBR reduction ratio between before and after carotid clamping ranged from - 12 to 100%. The MBR reduction ratio was positively correlated with the rSO2 index (r = 0.694, 95% confidence interval: 0.336-0.877, p = 0.001). The MBR reduction ratio of ocular blood flow by LSFG after carotid clamping was significantly correlated with the rSO2 index. The ocular blood flow by LSFG could be considered an adjunct modality for evaluating cerebral ischemic tolerance during CEA.

Cautionary findings for motor evoked potential monitoring in intracranial aneurysm surgery after a single administration of rocuronium to facilitate tracheal intubation.

Administration of rocuronium to facilitate intubation has traditionally been regarded as acceptable for intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring because of sufficiently rapid spontaneous neuromuscular blockade recovery. We hypothesized that residual neuromuscular blockade, in an amount that could hinder optimal neuromonitoring in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm clipping, was still present at dural opening. We sought to identify how often this was occurring and to identify factors which may contribute to prolonged blockade. Records of 97 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Rocuronium was administered to facilitate intubation with no additional neuromuscular blockade given. Prolonged spontaneous recovery time to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.75 after rocuronium administration was defined as 120 min, which was approximately when dural opening and the setting of baseline MEPs were occurring. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors related to prolonged spontaneous recovery time. Prolonged spontaneous recovery time to a TOF ratio of 0.75 was observed in 44.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis showed that only the dosage of rocuronium based on ideal body weight had a positive correlation with prolonged spontaneous recovery time (P = 0.01). There was no significant association between dosage of rocuronium based on total body weight, age, sex, or body temperature and prolonged recovery time. This study demonstrates that the duration of relaxation for MEP monitoring purposes is well-beyond the routinely recognized clinical duration of rocuronium. Residual neuromuscular blockade could result in lower amplitude MEP signals and/or lead to higher required MEP stimulus intensities which can both compromise monitoring sensitivity.

Somatosensory evoked potential loss due to intraoperative pulse lavage during spine surgery: case report and review of signal change management.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) includes various neurophysiologic tests which assess the functional integrity of the central and peripheral nervous systems during surgical procedures which place these structures at risk for iatrogenic injury. The rational for using IONM is to provide timely feedback of changes in neural function to enable the reversal of such insult before the development of irreversible neural injury. There are various causes of intraoperative loss of neuromonitoring signals and it is important to systematically rule out all possible causes quickly and thoroughly in order to target the cause of signal loss, correct it and take measures to prevent the same in the future. One such rare cause, is targeted and pressurized cold (room temperature) irrigation of the surgical site, which may induce irritation and vasospasm leading to ischemia of the affected portion of the spinal cord, hence leading to signal changes. We present this case to stress the importance of having knowledgeable members of the team who are well acquainted with all aspects of monitoring in close proximity to the operating room, so as to minimize troubleshooting time. Furthermore, we suggest the use of warm (body temperature) saline during irrigation to the surgical site, especially when using pressurized irrigation systems.

A practical guide for anesthetic management during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.

Postoperative motor dysfunction can develop after spinal surgery, neurosurgery and aortic surgery, in which there is a risk of injury of motor pathway. In order to prevent such devastating complication, intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP) has been conducted. However, to prevent postoperative motor dysfunction, proper understanding of MEP monitoring and proper anesthetic managements are required. Especially, a variety of anesthetics and neuromuscular blocking agent are known to attenuate MEP responses. In addition to the selection of anesthetic regime to record the baseline and control MEP, the measures to keep the level of hypnosis and muscular relaxation at constant are crucial to detect the changes of MEP responses after the surgical manipulation. Once the changes of MEP are observed based on the institutional alarm criteria, multidisciplinary team members should share the results of MEP monitoring and respond to check the status of monitoring and recover the possible motor nerve injury. Prevention of MEP-related adverse effects is also important to be considered. The Working Group of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) developed this practical guide aimed to help ensure safe and successful surgery through appropriate anesthetic management during intraoperative MEP monitoring.

Feasibility of adjunct facial motor evoked potential monitoring to reduce the number of false-positive results during cervical spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: False-positive intraoperative muscle motor evoked potential (mMEP) monitoring results due to systemic effects of anesthetics and physiological changes continue to be a challenging issue. Although control MEPs recorded from the unaffected side are useful for identifying a true-positive signal, there are no muscles on the upper or lower extremities to induce control MEPs in cervical spine surgery. Therefore, this study was conducted to clarify if additional MEPs derived from facial muscles can feasibly serve as controls to reduce false-positive mMEP monitoring results in cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent cervical spine surgery at the authors' institution who did not experience postoperative neurological deterioration were retrospectively studied. mMEPs were induced with transcranial supramaximal stimulation. Facial MEPs (fMEPs) were subsequently induced with suprathreshold stimulation. The mMEP and subsequently recorded fMEP waveforms were paired during each moment during surgery. The initial pair was regarded as the baseline. A significant decline in mMEP and fMEP amplitude was defined as > 80% and > 50% decline compared with baseline, respectively. All mMEP alarms were considered false positives. Based on 2 different alarm criteria, either mMEP alone or both mMEP and fMEP, rates of false-positive mMEP monitoring results were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included in this study, corresponding to 102 pairs of mMEPs and fMEPs. This included 23 initial and 79 subsequent pairs. Based on the alarm criterion of mMEP alone, 17 false-positive results (21.5%) were observed. Based on the alarm criterion of both mMEP and fMEP, 5 false-positive results (6.3%) were observed, which was significantly different compared to mMEP alone (difference 15.2%; 95% CI 7.2%-23.1%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: fMEPs might be used as controls to reduce false-positive mMEP monitoring results in cervical spine surgery.

Muscle-evoked Potentials After Electrical Stimulation to the Brain in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery are Less Affected by Anesthetic Fade With Constant-voltage Stimulation Than With Constant-current Stimulation.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, within-subject study was conducted. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the influence of anesthetic fade under maximum stimulation conditions between constant-current and constant-voltage stimulation techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The monitoring of muscle-evoked potentials after electrical stimulation to the brain [Br(E)-MSEP)] is useful for assessing the integrity of spinal cord motor tracts during major spine surgery. Nonetheless, Br(E)-MSEP responses are known to deteriorate over the duration of surgeries performed under general anesthesia. This phenomenon is known as anesthetic fade. METHODS: We recruited 117 patients undergoing various spinal surgeries from the cervical to the lumbar level. We excluded 29 cases with insufficient data. The decrease rate of the Br(E)-MSEP amplitude for each muscle was examined. Br(E)-MSEP monitoring with constant-current and constant-voltage stimulations at the C3 and C4 electrode positions was applied. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were bilaterally recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, deltoid, abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and quadriceps muscles. We defined the decrease rate as follows: (initial CMAPs-final CMAPs)/initial CMAPs × 100. Differences in the decrease rate were evaluated between stimulators, limbs (upper vs. lower), and operative time group (lowest quartile vs. highest quartile). RESULTS: The overall decrease rate (across all muscles) increased as the operative time increased, and the rate was higher in the lower limbs than in the upper limbs. In addition, the overall decrease rate was lower with constant-voltage stimulation than with constant-current stimulation. Furthermore, the decrease rate for constant-current stimulation was significantly higher than that for constant-voltage stimulation, regardless of the operative time. CONCLUSION: The CMAP waveform with constant-voltage stimulation is less susceptible to anesthetic fade than that with constant-current stimulation, even during long surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Intraoperative feasibility of bulbocavernosus reflex monitoring during untethering surgery in infants and children.

Bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring is used to assess the integrity of urinary and bowel function. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of BCR monitoring during untethering surgery in infants and children to predict postoperative urinary and bowel dysfunction. The records of 22 patients ranging from 4 days to 10 years old (mean 2.7 ± 3.3 years) were reviewed. Anesthesia was maintained by propofol or sevoflurane/opioid without neuromuscular blockade. BCR waveforms induced by electrical stimulation (20-40 mA, train-of-four pulses with 500 Hz) to the penis or clitoris were recorded from bilateral external anal sphincters. To assess the sensitivity and specificity of BCR monitoring, we investigated the association between a significant continuous decrease in BCR amplitude at the end of surgery and postoperative urinary and bowel dysfunction after surgery. Reproducible baseline BCR waveforms were successfully recorded in 20 of 22 patients (90.9%). A significant continuous decrease in BCR amplitude was observed in 8 patients. The results of intraoperative BCR monitoring included three true-positives, twelve true-negatives, five false-positives, and zero false-negatives. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of BCR monitoring used to predict postoperative urinary and bowel dysfunction were 100 and 70.6%, respectively. BCR monitoring during untethering surgery in infants and children under general anesthesia was found to be a feasible method to prevent postoperative urinary and bowel dysfunction.

Association Between Optic Nerve Head Blood Flow Measured Using Laser Speckle Flowgraphy and Radial Arterial Pressure During Aortic Arch Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the association between ocular blood flow measured using laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) and radial arterial pressure during aortic arch surgery. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: A single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 24 patients undergoing aortic arch surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (SCP). INTERVENTIONS: Measurement of optic nerve head blood flow using LSFG and radial arterial pressure via a catheter in the radial artery METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: Antegrade SCP was managed with 24℃ and 40-to-60 mmHg at the right radial artery, which usually corresponds to a flow rate of 10 mL/kg/min. Optic nerve head blood flow using LSFG and radial arterial blood pressure were evaluated simultaneously at the right side and recorded at the following 4 points: after the induction of anesthesia (phase 1), after the beginning of CPB (phase 2), after the beginning of antegrade SCP (phase 3), and after cessation of CPB (phase 4). A moderate positive correlation between %change of mean blur rate in the optic nerve head measured using LSFG and %change of radial mean arterial pressure was identified (r = 0.604, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the bias (mean difference) was -1.2% (95% limits of agreement -47.4% to 45.0%), indicating good agreement between %changes of the values recorded using the 2 measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative monitoring of optic nerve head blood flow using LSFG can be used as an additional cerebral perfusion parameter during aortic arch surgery with CPB using antegrade SCP.

Post-tetanic transcranial motor evoked potentials augment the amplitude of compound muscle action potentials recorded from innervated and non-innervated muscles.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transcranial electrical stimulation used to produce motor evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) and subsequent compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recording is widely used to monitor motor function during surgery when there is risk of damaging the spinal cord. Nonetheless, some muscles do not produce CMAP amplitudes sufficient for intraoperative monitoring. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the utility of tetanic stimulation at single and multiple peripheral nerve sites for augmenting CMAP amplitudes recorded from innervated and non-innervated muscles. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective study was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study sample comprised 24 patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent decompression surgery at our department between November 2005 and March 2007. OUTCOME MEASURES: Compound muscle action potential amplitude was a physiological measure. METHODS: We used two patterns of tetanic peripheral nerve stimulation for each patient. The first pattern consisted of tetanic stimulation of the left tibial nerve only (Pattern 1), and the second pattern consisted of tetanic stimulation of the bilateral median nerves and left tibial nerve (Pattern 2). RESULTS: Compound muscle action potential amplitudes from all muscles were augmented by both tetanic stimulation patterns compared with conventional TES-MEP recording; however, Pattern 2 elicited the greatest augmentation of CMAP amplitudes, especially for CMAPs recorded from the bilateral abductor pollicis brevis muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Although tetanic stimulation of a single peripheral nerve increased CMAP amplitudes recorded from both innervated and non-innervated muscles, CMAP amplitudes were best augmented when the corresponding nerve received tetanic stimulation. Additionally, tetanic stimulation of multiple nerves rather than a single nerve appears to provide better augmentation.