Pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock: A multicentre analysis of clinical profiles, management and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: There is still uncertainty about the management of patients with pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock (PICS). This study aims to investigate the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of patients with PICS. METHODS: We collected, retrospectively, the data of 18 patients without previously known pheochromocytoma admitted to 8 European hospitals with a diagnosis of PICS. RESULTS: Among the 18 patients with a median age of 50 years (Q1-Q3: 40-61), 50% were men. The main clinical features at presentation were pulmonary congestion (83%) and cyclic fluctuation of hypertension peaks and hypotension (72%). Echocardiography showed a median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25% (Q1-Q3: 15-33.5) with an atypical- Takotsubo (TTS) pattern in 50%. Inotropes/vasopressors were started in all patients and temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) was required in 11 (61%) patients. All patients underwent surgical removal of the pheochromocytoma; 4 patients (22%) were operated on while under t-MCS. The median LVEF was estimated at 55% at discharge. Only one patient required heart transplantation (5.5%), and all patients were alive at a median follow-up of 679 days. CONCLUSIONS: PICS should be suspected in case of a CS with severe cyclic blood pressure fluctuation and rapid hemodynamic deterioration, associated with increased inflammatory markers or in case of TTS progressing to CS, particularly if an atypical TTS echocardiographic pattern is revealed. T-MCS should be considered in the most severe cases. The main challenge is to stabilize the patient, with medical therapy or with t-MCS, since it remains a reversible cause of CS with a low mortality rate.

Does extracorporeal life support influence outcome after surgical management of post infarct ventricular septal rupture? A monocenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is an uncommon but life-threatening complication of acute myocardial infarction. Extra corporeal life support (ECLS) use in the preoperative setting allows hemodynamic stabilization for a delayed surgery. We aimed to assess the role of ECLS in the preoperative period of post infarction VSR surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients operated for VSR between January 2007 and August 2019. We assessed baseline characteristics, pre and post-operative clinical status and the use of ECLS in the peri-operative period. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included. Mean age was 69.8 years. In-hospital mortality was 48.7%. Survivors and non-survivor patients had similar characteristics except for lower postoperative ejection fraction (32% vs. 42%, P=0.02) and more acute renal failure (71.4% vs. 10%, P=0.0005) in the non-survivor group. Patients who received ECLS preoperatively were younger (72 vs. 65, P=0.02) and had more preoperative invasive ventilation (16% vs. 50%, P=0.04). Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB, 140 min vs. 75 min, P=0.0008) and cross clamping times (94 min vs. 52 min, P=0.0026) were significantly higher in the ECLS group. There were more bleeding complications in the ECMO group (45.4% vs. 0%, P=0.0019) and more need for reintervention (63.3% vs. 13%, P=0.015). There was no difference in mortality between the two groups. There was no difference in postoperative characteristics between urgent and delayed surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, post-operative ECLS use was associated with more bleeding complications and need for reintervention. Although mortality was similar, bleeding complications remain a major limitation for the systematic use of ECLS in the post-operative period.

Prevalence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of COVID-19-Associated Acute Myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocarditis (AM) is thought to be a rare cardiovascular complication of COVID-19, although minimal data are available beyond case reports. We aim to report the prevalence, baseline characteristics, in-hospital management, and outcomes for patients with COVID-19-associated AM on the basis of a retrospective cohort from 23 hospitals in the United States and Europe. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with suspected AM from 56 963 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were evaluated between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2021. Inclusion criteria were hospitalization for COVID-19 and a diagnosis of AM on the basis of endomyocardial biopsy or increased troponin level plus typical signs of AM on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. We identified 97 patients with possible AM, and among them, 54 patients with definite/probable AM supported by endomyocardial biopsy in 17 (31.5%) patients or magnetic resonance imaging in 50 (92.6%). We analyzed patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes among all COVID-19-associated AM. RESULTS: AM prevalence among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was 2.4 per 1000 hospitalizations considering definite/probable and 4.1 per 1000 considering also possible AM. The median age of definite/probable cases was 38 years, and 38.9% were female. On admission, chest pain and dyspnea were the most frequent symptoms (55.5% and 53.7%, respectively). Thirty-one cases (57.4%) occurred in the absence of COVID-19-associated pneumonia. Twenty-one (38.9%) had a fulminant presentation requiring inotropic support or temporary mechanical circulatory support. The composite of in-hospital mortality or temporary mechanical circulatory support occurred in 20.4%. At 120 days, estimated mortality was 6.6%, 15.1% in patients with associated pneumonia versus 0% in patients without pneumonia (P=0.044). During hospitalization, left ventricular ejection fraction, assessed by echocardiography, improved from a median of 40% on admission to 55% at discharge (n=47; P<0.0001) similarly in patients with or without pneumonia. Corticosteroids were frequently administered (55.5%). CONCLUSIONS: AM occurrence is estimated between 2.4 and 4.1 out of 1000 patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The majority of AM occurs in the absence of pneumonia and is often complicated by hemodynamic instability. AM is a rare complication in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, with an outcome that differs on the basis of the presence of concomitant pneumonia.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for drug intoxications: A single center, 14-year experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Acute cardiovascular failure remains a leading cause of death in severe poisonings. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been increasingly used as a rescue therapeutic option for those cases refractory to optimal conventional treatment. We sought to evaluate the outcomes after VA-ECMO used for drug intoxications in a single-center experience. METHODS: We performed an observational analysis of our prospective institutional database. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Between January 2007 and December 2020, 32 patients (mean age: 45.4 ± 15.8 years; 62.5% female) received VA-ECMO for drug intoxication-induced refractory cardiogenic shock (n = 25) or cardiac arrest (n = 7). Seven (21.8%) patients developed lower limb ischemia during VA-ECMO support. Twenty-six (81.2%) patients were successfully weaned after a mean VA-ECMO support of 2.9 ± 1.3 days. One (3.1%) patient died after VA-ECMO weaning for multiorgan failure and survival to hospital discharge was 78.1% (n = 25). In-hospital survivors were discharged from hospital with a good neurological status. Survival to hospital discharge was not statistically different according to sex (male = 75.0% vs. female = 80.0%; p = .535), type of intoxication (single drug = 81.8% vs. multiple drugs = 76.1%; p = .544) and location of VA-ECMO implantation (within our center = 75% vs. peripheral hospital using our Mobile Unit of Mechanical Circulatory Support = 100%; p = .352). Survival to hospital discharge was significantly lower in patients receiving VA-ECMO during on-going cardiopulmonary resuscitation (42.8% vs. 88.0%; p = .026). CONCLUSIONS: VA-ECMO appears to be a feasible therapeutic option with a satisfactory survival rate and acceptable complications rate in poisonings complicated by refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest.

Ventricular septal rupture: insights into an old disease.

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a serious complication of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and surgery is the reference treatment. We aimed at describing trends in management and mortality during the last four decades and reporting mortality predictors in these patients. We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients sustaining a VSR from 1981 to 2020. We screened 274 patients and included 265 for analysis. The number of patients decreased over the years: 80, 88, 56, and 50 in each 10-year time span. In-hospital mortality decreased significantly since 1990 (logrank 0.007). The median age was 72.0 years IQR [66-78] and 188 patients (70.9%) were operated on. IABP was used more routinely (p < 0.0001). In-hospital mortality was assessed at 66.8% (177 patients) and main predictors of death were a time from MI to surgery < 8 days HR 2.7 IC95% [1.9-3.8] p < 0.0001, a Killip class > 2 HR 2.5 IC [1.9-3.4] p < 0.0001 and Euroscore 2 > 20 HR 2.4 IC [1.8-3.2] p < 0.0001. A "time from MI to surgery" of 8 days offers the best ability to discriminate between patients with or without mortality. The ability of "Euroscore 2 and Killip" to detect the patients most likely to wait 8 days for surgery was at 0.81 [0.73-0.89] p < 0.0001. Mortality remains high over the years. Euroscore 2, Killip class, and time from MI to surgery are the main mortality predictors. Patients with a Killip < 3 and a Euroscore < 20 should be monitored at least 8 days since MI before being referred to surgery.