FX06 to rescue SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Vascular leakage is a major feature of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FX06, a drug under development that stabilizes interendothelial cell junctions, at reducing vascular leakage during SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blinded, randomized trial included adults with COVID-19-associated ARDS who had received invasive mechanical ventilation for < 5 days and were randomized to receive either intravenous FX06 (400 mg/d, for 5 days) or its vehicle as placebo. The primary endpoint was the lowering-from day 1 to day 7-of the transpulmonary thermodilution-derived extravascular lung-water index (EVLWi). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were randomized to receive FX06 and 24 the placebo. Although EVLWi was elevated at baseline (median [IQR] 15.6 mL/kg [13.5; 18.5]), its declines from day 1 to day 7 were comparable for FX06 recipients and controls (respectively, - 1.9 [- 3.3; - 0.5] vs. - 0.8 [- 5.5; - 1.1] mL/kg; estimated effect - 0.8 [- 3.1; + 2.4], p = 0.51). Cardiac indexes, pulmonary vascular permeability indexes, and fluid balances were also comparable, as were PaO2/FiO2 ratios and durations of mechanical ventilation. Adverse event rates were similar for the 2 groups, although more FX06 recipients developed ventilator-associated pneumonia (16/25 (64%) vs. 6/24 (24%), p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this unique-dosing-regimen study, FX06 did not lower SARS-CoV-2-induced pulmonary vascular leakage. Future investigations will need to evaluate its efficacy at earlier times during the disease or using other regimens. Trial registration NCT04618042. Registered 5 November 2020.

Role of serial routine microbiologic culture results in the initial management of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Results of routine microbiologic cultures of specimens obtained before the onset of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients might help to identify the causative microorganisms and thus to select effective initial antimicrobial therapy. To test this hypothesis, we prospectively studied 125 consecutive VAP episodes for which the causative microorganisms were determined using bronchoscopic techniques. Upon entry into the study, each patient's hospital chart was reviewed and culture results of all previously obtained microbiologic specimens were recorded (mean number +/- SD per patient, 45 +/- 38). A total of 220 microorganisms were cultured at significant concentrations (> or = 10(3)/10(4) colony-forming units [cfu]/ml) from bronchoscopic specimens and considered responsible for pneumonia. Of these 220 organisms, only 73 (33%) were recovered before VAP onset, sometimes from multiple sites in the same patient but mainly from prior respiratory secretion cultures (n = 53). Also previously isolated were 342 organisms that were not responsible for VAP, making prospective identifications of the true pathogens difficult. Among the 102 episodes for which prior respiratory secretion culture results had been obtained (mean time before VAP onset, 8 +/- 9 d), all the organisms ultimately responsible for pneumonia were previously recovered from only 36 (35%) of these specimens. Based on these data, the contribution of routine microbiologic specimens in guiding initial antimicrobial therapy decisions for patients with suspected VAP appears limited.