Contemporary trends in the incidence and timing of spinal metastases: A population-based study.

Background: Spinal metastases are a significant complication of advanced cancer. In this study, we assess temporal trends in the incidence and timing of spinal metastases and examine underlying patient demographics and primary cancer associations. Methods: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, health data from 2007 to 2019 in Ontario, Canada were analyzed (n = 37, 375 patients identified with spine metastases). Primary outcomes were annual incidence of spinal metastasis, and time to metastasis after primary diagnosis. Results: The age-standardized incidence of spinal metastases increased from 229 to 302 cases per million over the 13-year study period. The average annual percent change (AAPC) in incidence was 2.2% (95% CI: 1.4% to 3.0%) with patients aged ≥85 years demonstrating the largest increase (AAPC 5.2%; 95% CI: 2.3% to 8.3%). Lung cancer had the greatest annual incidence, while prostate cancer had the greatest increase in annual incidence (AAPC 6.5; 95% CI: 4.1% to 9.0%). Lung cancer patients were found to have the highest risk of spine metastasis with 10.3% (95% CI: 10.1% to 10.5%) of patients being diagnosed at 10 years. Gastrointestinal cancer patients were found to have the lowest risk of spine metastasis with 1.0% (95% CI: 0.9% to 1.0%) of patients being diagnosed at 10 years. Conclusions: The incidence of spinal metastases has increased in recent years, particularly among older patients. The incidence and timing vary substantially among different primary cancer types. These findings contribute to the understanding of disease trends and emphasize a growing population of patients who require subspecialty care.

Quantifying the Association Between Surgical Spine Approach and Tracheostomy Timing After Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent evidence suggests earlier tracheostomy is associated with fewer complications in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). This study aims to evaluate the influence of spine surgical approach on the association between tracheostomy timing and in-hospital adverse events treating patients with complete cervical SCI. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed using Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from 2017 to 2020. All patients with acute complete (American Spinal Injury Association-A) cervical SCI who underwent tracheostomy and spine surgery were included. Tracheostomy timing was dichotomized to early (within 1 week after surgery) and delayed (more than 1 week after surgery). Primary outcome was the occurrence of major in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes included occurrences of immobility-related complications, surgical-site infection, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and time on mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: The study included 1592 patients across 358 trauma centers. Mean time to tracheostomy from surgery was 8.6 days. A total of 495 patients underwent anterior approach, 670 underwent posterior approach, and 427 underwent combined anterior and posterior approach. Patients who underwent anterior approach were significantly more likely to have delayed tracheostomy compared with posterior approach (53% vs 40%, P < .001). Early tracheotomy significantly reduced major in-hospital complications (odds ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.84) and immobility complications (odds ratio = 0.78, 95% CI 0.6-1.0). Those undergoing early tracheostomy spent 6.0 (95% CI -8.47 to -3.43) fewer days in hospital, 5.7 (95% CI -7.8 to -3.7) fewer days in the intensive care unit, and 5.9 (95% CI -8.2 to -3.7) fewer days ventilated. Surgical approach had no significant negative effect on the association between tracheostomy timing and the outcomes of interest. CONCLUSION: Earlier tracheostomy for patients with cervical SCI is associated with reduced complications, length of stay, and ventilation time. This relationship appears independent of the surgical approach. These findings emphasize that tracheostomy need not be delayed because of the SCI treatment approach.

Vision Transformer-based Decision Support for Neurosurgical Intervention in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: Automated Surgical Intervention Support Tool.

Purpose To develop an automated triage tool to predict neurosurgical intervention for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Materials and Methods A provincial trauma registry was reviewed to retrospectively identify patients with TBI from 2005 to 2022 treated at a specialized Canadian trauma center. Model training, validation, and testing were performed using head CT scans with binary reference standard patient-level labels corresponding to whether the patient received neurosurgical intervention. Performance and accuracy of the model, the Automated Surgical Intervention Support Tool for TBI (ASIST-TBI), were also assessed using a held-out consecutive test set of all patients with TBI presenting to the center between March 2021 and September 2022. Results Head CT scans from 2806 patients with TBI (mean age, 57 years ± 22 [SD]; 1955 [70%] men) were acquired between 2005 and 2021 and used for training, validation, and testing. Consecutive scans from an additional 612 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 22; 443 [72%] men) were used to assess the performance of ASIST-TBI. There was accurate prediction of neurosurgical intervention with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94), accuracy of 87% (491 of 562), sensitivity of 87% (196 of 225), and specificity of 88% (295 of 337) on the test dataset. Performance on the held-out test dataset remained robust with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.91), accuracy of 84% (517 of 612), sensitivity of 85% (199 of 235), and specificity of 84% (318 of 377). Conclusion A novel deep learning model was developed that could accurately predict the requirement for neurosurgical intervention using acute TBI CT scans. Keywords: CT, Brain/Brain Stem, Surgery, Trauma, Prognosis, Classification, Application Domain, Traumatic Brain Injury, Triage, Machine Learning, Decision Support Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024 See also commentary by Haller in this issue.

Earlier Tracheostomy Reduces Complications in Complete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Real-World Practice: Analysis of a Multicenter Cohort of 2001 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is believed that early tracheostomy in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) may lessen the risk of developing complications and reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and critical care stay. This study aims to assess whether early tracheostomy is beneficial in patients with traumatic cervical SCI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2018. Adult patients with a diagnosis of acute complete (ASIA A) traumatic cervical SCI who underwent surgery and tracheostomy were included. Patients were stratified into those receiving early (at or before 7 days) and delayed tracheostomy. Propensity score matching was used to assess the association between delayed tracheostomy and the risk of in-hospital adverse events. Risk-adjusted variability in tracheostomy timing across trauma centers was investigated using mixed-effects regression. RESULTS: The study included 2001 patients from 374 North American trauma centers. The median time to tracheostomy was 9.2 days (IQR: 6.1-13.1 days), with 654 patients (32.7%) undergoing early tracheostomy. After matching, the odds of a major complication were significantly lower for early tracheostomy patients (OR: .90; 95% CI: .88-.98). Patients were also significantly less likely to experience an immobility-related complication (OR: .90; 95% CI: .88-.98). Patients in the early group spent 8.2 fewer days in the critical care unit (95% CI: -10.2 to -6.61) and 6.7 fewer days ventilated (95% CI: -9.44 to -5.23). There was significant variability in tracheostomy timeliness between trauma centers with a median odds ratio of 12.2 (95% CI: 9.7-13.7), which was not explained by case-mix and hospital-level characteristics. CONCLUSION: A 7-day threshold to implement tracheostomy seems to be associated with reduced in-hospital complications, time in the critical care unit, and time on mechanical ventilation.

Multicenter retrospective cohort study of the association between surgery for odontoid fractures in the elderly and in-hospital outcomes.

Odontoid fractures are increasingly prevalent in older adults and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Optimal management remains controversial. Our study aims to investigate the association between surgical management of odontoid fractures and in-hospital mortality in a multi-center geriatric cohort. We identified patients 65 years or older with C2 odontoid fractures from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. The primary study outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications and hospital length of stay. Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare outcomes between operative and non-operative cohorts. Among the 13,218 eligible patients, 1100 (8.3%) were treated surgically. The risk of in-hospital mortality did not differ between surgical and non-surgical groups, after patient and hospital-level adjustment (OR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.55-1.60). The risks of major complications and immobility-related complications were higher in the operative cohort (adjusted OR: 2.12, 95%CI: 1.53-2.94; and OR: 2.24, 95%CI: 1.38-3.63, respectively). Patients undergoing surgery had extended in-hospital length of stay compared to the non-operative group (9 days, IQR: 6-12 days vs. 4 days, IQR: 3-7 days). These findings were supported by secondary analyses that considered between-center differences in rates of surgery. Among geriatric patients with odontoid fractures surgical management was associated with similar in-hospital mortality, but higher in-hospital complication rates compared to non-operative management. Surgical management of geriatric patients with odontoid fractures requires careful patient selection and consideration of pre-existing comorbidities.

Analysis of recovery trajectories in degenerative cervical myelopathy to facilitate improved patient counseling and individualized treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: There is a need to better understand and predict postsurgical outcomes for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) patients, particularly to support treatment decisions for patients with mild DCM. The goal of this study was to identify and predict outcome trajectories for DCM patients up to 2 years postsurgery. METHODS: The authors analyzed two North American multicenter prospective DCM studies (n = 757). Functional recovery and physical health component quality of life were assessed in DCM patients at baseline, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score and Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-36, respectively. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify recovery trajectories for mild, moderate, and severe DCM. Prediction models for recovery trajectories were developed and validated in bootstrap resamples. RESULTS: Two recovery trajectories were identified for the functional and physical components of quality of life: good recovery and marginal recovery. Depending on outcome and myelopathy severity, one-half to three-fourths of the study patients followed the good recovery trajectory characterized by improvement in mJOA and PCS scores over time. The remaining one-half to one-fourth of patients followed the marginal recovery trajectory, experiencing little improvement and, in certain cases, worsening postoperatively. The prediction model for mild DCM had an area under the curve of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.80), with preoperative neck pain, smoking, and posterior surgical approach noted as dominant predictors of marginal recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Surgically treated DCM patients follow distinct recovery trajectories in the first 2 years postoperatively. While most patients experience substantial improvement, a significant minority experience little improvement or worsening. The ability to predict DCM patient recovery trajectories in the preoperative setting facilitates the formulation of individualized treatment recommendations for patients with mild symptoms.