Clinical Predictors of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation vs Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Extremely and Very Low Birth Weight Neonates.

PURPOSE: Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are distinct disease processes associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Initial treatment, laparotomy (LP) versus peritoneal drainage (PD), is disease specific however it can be difficult to distinguish these diagnoses preoperatively. We investigated clinical characteristics associated with each diagnosis and constructed a scoring algorithm for accurate preoperative diagnosis. METHODS: A cohort of extreme and very low birth weight (<1500 g) neonates surgically treated for SIP or NEC between 07/2004-09/2022 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics included gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), feeding history, physical exam, and laboratory/radiological findings. Intraoperative diagnosis was used to determine SIP vs NEC. Pre-drain diagnosis was used for patients treated with PD only. RESULTS: 338 neonates were managed for SIP (n = 269, 79.6%) vs NEC (n = 69, 20.4%). PD was definitive treatment in 146 (43.2%) patients and 75 (22.2%) patients were treated with upfront LP. Characteristics associated with SIP included younger GA, younger age at initial laparotomy or drainage (ALD), and history of trophic or no feeds. Multivariate logistic regression determined pneumatosis, abdominal wall erythema, higher ALD and history of feeds to be highly predictive of NEC. A 0-8-point scale was designed based on these characteristics with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.819 (95% CI 0.756-0.882) for the diagnosis of NEC. A threshold score of 1.5 had a 95.2% specificity for NEC. CONCLUSION: Utilizing clinical characteristics associated with SIP & NEC we developed a scoring system designed to assist surgeons accurately distinguish SIP vs NEC in neonates. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Chart Review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Contrasting pediatric specialty provider opinion between contextualized and structured radiology reports.

BACKGROUND: Structured reporting (SR) replaced narrative (free text) reporting and utilizes templated headings and subheadings with findings typically based on the anatomy included in the examination. Its use has been widely advocated by radiology and non-radiology organizations as the new reporting standard. There are, however, shortcomings to SR, such as templated text not addressing a specific clinical indication. Contextual reporting (CR) fills this gap. CR is a type of SR which is tailored to a narrow clinical indication by including pertinent positive and negative findings for that specific clinical entity. OBJECTIVE: This study assesses provider preferences for CR as compared to SR in the pediatric practice environment using a survey methodology. METHODS & MATERIALS: Surveys with examples of SR and CR reports were sent electronically to two groups. One group was focused on neurological diseases and included pediatric specialists in neurosurgery, neurology, ENT, ED, and ophthalmology (190 people), referred to as the pediatric neuroimaging group. The pediatric neuroimaging group survey contained examples of CR and SR reports of an orbital CT for orbital cellulitis and a head CT for stroke. The other group was focused on gastrointestinal diseases, and included pediatric specialists in gastroenterology, general surgery, and the ED (159 people), referred to as the pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) imaging group. The pediatric GI imaging group survey contained example reports of an abdominal CT for appendicitis and an MRI enterography for Crohn's disease. Surveys utilizing a 5-point Likert scale were analyzed via Fischer's exact test with a p-value deemed statistically significant at less than 0.05. RESULTS: 349 individuals were contacted to participate in the survey. There were 81 (23 %, 81/349) survey respondents; 41 (22 %, 41/190) from the neuro group, and 40 (25 %, 40/159) from the GI group. 56 % (45/81) of all respondents preferred CR reports over traditional SR reports, while 29 % (23/81) did not. Most respondents (59 %, 48/81) indicated that CR reports are easier to interpret than traditional SR reports. Respondents from the pediatric neuroimaging group favored CR reports to a lesser degree (44 %, 36/81) compared to respondents from the pediatric GI imaging group (68 %, 55/81). CONCLUSIONS: We learned from this survey that it would be beneficial to be very intentional about selecting clinical indications where CR would be most valued rather than trying to develop CR for any specific clinical indication. The study results indicate it is reasonable to continue further efforts at exploring the utility of contextualized reports.

Management of complex pediatric and adolescent liver trauma: adult vs pediatric level 1 trauma centers.

PURPOSE: Management of high-grade pediatric and adolescent liver trauma can be complex. Studies suggest that variation exists at adult (ATC) vs pediatric trauma centers (PTC); however, there is limited granular comparative data. We sought to describe and compare the management and outcomes of complex pediatric and adolescent liver trauma between a level 1 ATC and two PTCs in a large metropolitan city. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric and adolescent (age < 21 years) patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Grade 4 and 5 liver injuries managed at an ATC and PTCs between 2016 and 2022 was performed. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were obtained at the ATC and PTCs. Primary outcomes included rates of operative management and use of interventional radiology (IR). Secondary outcomes included packed red blood cell (pRBC) utilization, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients were identified, seventy-five at the ATC and sixty-nine at the PTC. The cohort was predominantly black (65.5%) males (63.5%). Six injuries (8.7%) at the PTC and forty-five (60%) injuries at the ATC were penetrating trauma. Comparing only blunt trauma, ATC patients had higher Injury Severity Score (median 37 vs 26) and ages (20 years vs 9 years). ATC patients were more likely to undergo operative management (26.7% vs 11.0%, p = 0.016) and utilized IR more (51.9% vs 4.8%, p < 0.001) compared to the PTC. The patients managed at the ATC required higher rates of pRBC transfusions though not statistically significant (p = 0.06). There were no differences in mortality, ICU, or hospital LOS. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective review of high-grade pediatric and adolescent liver trauma demonstrated higher rates of IR and operating room use at the ATC compared to the PTC in the setting of higher Injury Severity Score and age. While the PTC successfully managed > 95% of Grade 4/5 liver injuries non-operatively, prospective data are needed to determine the optimal algorithm for management in the older adolescent population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Validation of a screening panel for pediatric metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease using metabolomics.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as NAFLD, is the most common liver disease in children. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, although more efficient screening methods are needed. We previously developed a novel NAFLD screening panel in youth using machine learning applied to high-resolution metabolomics and clinical phenotype data. Our objective was to validate this panel in a separate cohort, which consisted of a combined cross-sectional sample of 161 children with stored frozen samples (75% male, 12.8±2.6 years of age, body mass index 31.0±7.0 kg/m2, 81% with MASLD, 58% Hispanic race/ethnicity). METHODS: Clinical data were collected from all children, and high-resolution metabolomics was performed using their fasting serum samples. MASLD was assessed by MRI-proton density fat fraction or liver biopsy and cardiometabolic factors. Our previously developed panel included waist circumference, triglycerides, whole-body insulin sensitivity index, 3 amino acids, 2 phospholipids, dihydrothymine, and 2 unknowns. To improve feasibility, a simplified version without the unknowns was utilized in the present study. Since the panel was modified, the data were split into training (67%) and test (33%) sets to assess the validity of the panel. RESULTS: Our present highest-performing modified model, with 4 clinical variables and 8 metabolomics features, achieved an AUROC of 0.92, 95% sensitivity, and 80% specificity for detecting MASLD in the test set. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, this panel has promising potential for use as a screening tool for MASLD in youth.

Engineering Improved CAR T Cell Products with A Multi-Cytokine Particle Platform for Hematologic and Solid Tumors.

Despite the remarkable clinical efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in hematological malignancies, only a subset of patients achieves a durable complete response (dCR). DCR has been correlated with CAR T cell products enriched with T cells memory phenotypes. Therefore, reagents that consistently promote memory phenotypes during the manufacturing of CAR T cells have the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes. A novel modular multi-cytokine particle (MCP) platform is developed that combines the signals necessary for activation, costimulation, and cytokine support into a single "all-in-one" stimulation reagent for CAR T cell manufacturing. This platform allows for the assembly and screening of compositionally diverse MCP libraries to identify formulations tailored to promote specific phenotypes with a high degree of flexibility. The approach is leveraged to identify unique MCP formulations that manufacture CAR T cell products from diffuse large B cell patients   with increased proportions of memory-like phenotypes MCP-manufactured CAR T cells demonstrate superior anti-tumor efficacy in mouse models of lymphoma and ovarian cancer through enhanced persistence. These findings serve as a proof-of-principle of the powerful utility of the MCP platform to identify "all-in-one" stimulation reagents that can improve the effectiveness of cell therapy products through optimal manufacturing.

Contingent Mother's Voice Intervention Targeting Feeding in Hospitalized Infants with Critical Congenital Heart Defects.

Infants with critical congenital heart defects (CCHD) are at high risk for feeding challenges and neurodevelopmental delays; however, few interventions promoting the neurodevelopmental progression of feeding have been studied with this population. Contingent mother's voice has been successfully used as positive reinforcement for non-nutritive suck (NNS) in studies with preterm infants, leading to improved weight gain and more rapid cessation of tube feedings; however, this type of intervention has not been studied in infants with CCHD. This study aimed to determine whether an NNS-training protocol using the mother's voice as positive reinforcement and validated in preterm infants could improve oral feeding outcomes in hospitalized infants with CCHD undergoing cardiac surgical procedures. Infants were randomized to receive the contingent mother's voice intervention before or after cardiac surgery, with a control comparison group receiving passive exposure to the mother's voice after surgery. There were no significant differences in discharge weight, PO intake, length of stay, time to full feeds, or feeding status at 1-month post-discharge between infants who received contingent mother's voice compared to those who did not. There were significant differences in PO intake and time to full feeds following surgery based on infants' pre-enrollment PO status and severity of illness. At 1-month post-discharge, parents of infants in the intervention group expressed a higher rate of positive feelings and fewer concerns regarding their infant's feeding compared to parents of infants in the control group. While the current protocol of 5 sessions was not associated with improved feeding outcomes in infants with CCHD, it empowered parents to contribute to their infant's care and demonstrated the feasibility of using the mother's voice as positive reinforcement for infants with CCHD. Further study of timing, intensity, and duration of interventions leveraging the mother's voice in this population is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03035552.

Efforts to adjust for confounding by neighborhood using complex survey data.

In social epidemiology, one often considers neighborhood or contextual effects on health outcomes, in addition to effects of individual exposures. This paper is concerned with the estimation of an individual exposure effect in the presence of confounding by neighborhood effects, motivated by an analysis of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. In the analysis, we operationalize neighborhood as the secondary sampling unit of the survey, which consists of small groups of neighboring census blocks. Thus the neighborhoods are sampled with unequal probabilities, as are individuals within neighborhoods. We develop and compare several approaches for the analysis of the effect of dichotomized individual-level education on the receipt of adequate mammography screening. In the analysis, neighborhood effects are likely to confound the individual effects, due to such factors as differential availability of health services and differential neighborhood culture. The approaches can be grouped into three broad classes: ordinary logistic regression for survey data, with either no effect or a fixed effect for each cluster; conditional logistic regression extended for survey data; and generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) regression for survey data. Standard use of GLMMs with small clusters fails to adjust for confounding by cluster (e.g. neighborhood); this motivated us to develop an adaptation. We use theory, simulation, and analyses of the NHIS data to compare and contrast all of these methods. One conclusion is that all of the methods perform poorly when the sampling bias is strong; more research and new methods are clearly needed.