National Profile of the ACGME Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 within General Surgery: A Seven-Year National Study from 2014 to 2021.

PURPOSE: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced General Surgery Milestones 1.0 in 2014 and Milestones 2.0 in 2020 as steps toward competency-based training. Analysis will inform residency programs on curriculum development, assessment, feedback, and faculty development. This study describes the distributions and trends for Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 ratings and proportion of residents not achieving the level 4.0 graduation target. METHODS: A deidentified dataset of milestone ratings for all ACGME-accredited General Surgery residency programs in the United States was used. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported for milestone ratings at each PGY level. Percentages of PGY-5s receiving final year ratings of less than 4.0 were calculated. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare 1.0 and 2.0 median ratings. Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to compare median ratings across time periods and PGY levels. Chi-squared tests were used to compare the proportion of level 4.0 nonachievement under both systems. RESULTS: Milestones 1.0 data consisted of 13,866 residents and Milestones 2.0 data consisted of 7,633 residents. For 1.0 and 2.0, all competency domain median ratings were higher for subsequent years of training. Milestones 2.0 had significantly higher median ratings at all PGY levels for all competency domains except Medical Knowledge. Percentages of PGY-5 residents not achieving the graduation target in Milestones 1.0 ranged from 27% to 42% and in 2.0 from 5% to 13%. For Milestones 1.0, all subcompetencies showed an increased number of residents achieving the graduation target from 2014 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: This study of General Surgery Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 data uncovered significant increases in average ratings and significantly fewer residents not achieving the graduation target under the 2.0 system. We hypothesize that these findings may be related more to rating bias given the change in rating scales, rather than a true increase in resident ability.

Finding my people: Effects of student identity and vulnerability to Stereotype Threat on sense of belonging in surgery.

BACKGROUND: Diversity in surgery lags behind the medical student population. We documented first-year medical students' vulnerability to stereotype threat (VST) and its impact on a sense of belonging in surgery. METHODS: All first-year medical students at a single academic institution were surveyed. Demographics, VST, anticipated clerkship experience, and sense of belonging were assessed. RESULTS: 44% of students were vulnerable to ST in upcoming clerkships, with the majority worried about surgical clerkships. More student from races/ethnicities underrepresented in medicine (URM; 74%) and sexual minorities (62%) were vulnerable than white (30%) and heterosexual (38%) students respectively (p = 0.001 and p = 0.017). Knowing a surgeon with a shared identity would enhance belonging for most students (84%). VST was higher for those who do not anticipate working with (p < 0.001) or do not know a surgeon (p = 0.0001) who shares their identity. CONCLUSION: VST significantly influences a student's sense of belonging in surgery. More research is needed to promote inclusivity in surgery.

Passing the Scalpel: Lessons on retirement planning from retired academic surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Almost half of practicing surgeons in the United States are currently older than 55, but guidelines on how to prepare for retirement are limited. We sought to identify possible facilitators for, and obstacles to, surgeons' preparations for retirement. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with clinically inactive academic surgeons. Emergent themes were identified via a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: We interviewed 12 surgeons (83% male; median age 75 years). Major barriers to retirement from surgery included uncertainty about when to retire, limited identity outside of surgery, and perception of retirement as strictly individual/private. Facilitators of a successful retirement identified by the participants included early career financial planning, awareness of career trajectory, development of post-surgery goals, and utilization of collective knowledge. CONCLUSION: There are numerous barriers encountered by surgeons seeking to transition from clinical practice to retirement that could be overcome by dedicated departmental and institutional efforts.

Eyes of the Beholders: First-year medical students' perceptions of surgeons and the field of surgery.

BACKGROUND: Medical students have negative perceptions of surgery prior to their clerkships. To explore possible explanations, we examined the association between these perceptions, individual identity and vulnerability to stereotype threat (ST). METHODS: All first-year medical students at a single school received an electronic survey which assessed identity groups, vulnerability to ST and perceptions of surgeons/surgery. Multi-method analyses examined these associations. RESULTS: Women held more negative than positive views about the field of surgery (p = 0.007) but not surgeons. Students vulnerable to ST had negative views about both surgeons (p < 0.0001) and surgery (p = 0.007). They were also less interested in pursuing a surgical career compared to non-vulnerable students (56% vs. 80% p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: For some students, negative views of surgeons and surgery appear to be associated with individual identity and ST. Future research should aim to confirm these findings and identify strategies to develop positive perceptions for these populations.

Applying a novel cost-evaluation framework to assess video-based neurosurgery education.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of comparative effectiveness uses different metrics to ensure that a new treatment is both effective and economical. However, there is a lack of financial frameworks to estimate the costs of introducing new technologies in medical and surgical education. METHODS: After conducting a literature review, we created and applied a framework ('REC') for the evaluation of three recent neurosurgery video modules aimed at medical students at Harvard Medical School. RESULTS: The most expensive component of these video-based education (VBE) modules was time cost. This cost was highly variable depending on the level of clinical seniority of the individuals involved in the video production process. CONCLUSION: Application of the REC framework to the three modules showed highly variable time and monetary cost differences between the modules. Usage of the REC framework will enable educators to institute effective planning, efficiently use resources, and clearly define a minimal viable education product to achieve desired learning outcomes.

YouTube is the Most Frequently Used Educational Video Source for Surgical Preparation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical preparation methods of medical students, residents, and faculty with special attention to video usage. DESIGN: Following Institutional Review Board approval, anonymous surveys were distributed to participants. Information collected included demographics and surgical preparation methods, focusing on video usage. Participants were questioned regarding frequency and helpfulness of videos, video sources used, and preferred methods between videos, reading, and peer consultation. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS. SETTING: Surveys were distributed to participants in the Department of Surgery at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, a tertiary care center in Iowa City, Iowa. PARTICIPANTS: Survey participants included fourth-year medical students pursuing general surgery, general surgery residents, and faculty surgeons in the Department of Surgery. A total of 86 surveys were distributed, and 78 surveys were completed. This included 42 learners (33 residents, 9 fourth-year medical students) and 36 faculty. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 91%; 90% of respondents reported using videos for surgical preparation (learners = 95%, faculty = 83%, p = NS). Regarding surgical preparation methods overall, most learners and faculty selected reading (90% versus 78%, p = NS), and fewer respondents reported preferring videos (64% versus 44%, p = NS). Faculty more often use peer consultation (31% versus 50%, p < 0.02). Among respondents who use videos (N = 70), the most used source was YouTube (86%). Learners and faculty use different video sources. Learners use YouTube and Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE) Portal more than faculty (YouTube: 95% versus 73%, p < 0.02; SCORE: 25% versus 7%, p < 0.05). Faculty more often use society web pages and commercial videos (society: 67% versus 38%, p < 0.03; commercial: 27% versus 5%, p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents reported using videos to prepare for surgery. YouTube was the preferred source. Posting surgical videos to YouTube may allow for maximal access to learners who are preparing for surgical cases.