Biomechanical characteristics of transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses during gait: A review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Osseointegration (OI) is an emerging technique that allows a direct connection between the bone and a titanium metal implant, allowing the direct attachment of bone-anchored prostheses (BAP) to address the problems associated with socket prostheses. This review article aims to compare the biomechanical features of gait when using a transfemoral BAP in comparison to healthy gait, and in comparison to the gait of traditional transfemoral socket prosthesis users. METHODS: A computer-based literature search of electronic databases since inception (ranging from 1967 to 2004 depending on the database) to June 14, 2022, identified peer-reviewed articles focusing on the temporal-spatial, kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography data related to transfemoral BAP gait. Eight articles were included that focused on these biomechanical features of gait in adults with BAP and were compared with socket prosthesis users or healthy gait. RESULTS: Compared with healthy participants, prosthesis users after OI surgery have slower speed and cadence, lower symmetry, longer duration of swing phase, increased pelvic and trunk motion, more hip extension, larger moments on the intact limb, and lower forces on the prosthetic side. Compared with transfemoral socket prosthesis gait, BAP gait shows faster cadence and longer duration of support phase. There are limited and inconsistent data on changes in trunk, pelvic, and hip motion with OI. CONCLUSION: Based on this review, transfemoral BAP improve spatial-temporal parameters closer to normal gait when compared to socket gait, but there are persisting deficits compared with healthy gait. Additional studies are needed to confirm the changes in kinematics and kinetics when walking with a BAP.

Surgical treatments for postamputation pain: study protocol for an international, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Painful conditions such as residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP) can manifest after amputation. The mechanisms underlying such postamputation pains are diverse and should be addressed accordingly. Different surgical treatment methods have shown potential for alleviating RLP due to neuroma formation - commonly known as neuroma pain - and to a lesser degree PLP. Two reconstructive surgical interventions, namely targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI), are gaining popularity in postamputation pain treatment with promising results. However, these two methods have not been directly compared in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Here, we present a study protocol for an international, double-blind, RCT to assess the effectiveness of TMR, RPNI, and a non-reconstructive procedure called neuroma transposition (active control) in alleviating RLP, neuroma pain, and PLP. METHODS: One hundred ten upper and lower limb amputees suffering from RLP will be recruited and assigned randomly to one of the surgical interventions (TMR, RPNI, or neuroma transposition) in an equal allocation ratio. Complete evaluations will be performed during a baseline period prior to the surgical intervention, and follow-ups will be conducted in short term (1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery) and in long term (2 and 4 years post-surgery). After the 12-month follow-up, the study will be unblinded for the evaluator and the participants. If the participant is unsatisfied with the outcome of the treatment at that time, further treatment including one of the other procedures will be discussed in consultation with the clinical investigator at that site. DISCUSSION: A double-blind RCT is necessary for the establishment of evidence-based procedures, hence the motivation for this work. In addition, studies on pain are challenging due to the subjectivity of the experience and the lack of objective evaluation methods. Here, we mitigate this problem by including different pain evaluation methods known to have clinical relevance. We plan to analyse the primary variable, mean change in NRS (0-10) between baseline and the 12-month follow-up, using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach to minimise bias and keep the advantage of randomisation. The secondary outcomes will be analysed on both ITT and per-protocol (PP). An adherence protocol (PP population) analysis will be used for estimating a more realistic effect of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincialTrials.gov NCT05009394.

Differences in angular kinematics when using thigh, implant, or medial knee markers in osseointegrated transfemoral prosthetic gait.

BACKGROUND: The Helen Hayes anatomical model is commonly used in clinical gait analysis with standard medial/lateral knee and thigh markers. METHODS: To quantify soft-tissue artifacts associated with the thigh marker following osseointegration surgery, we added an "implant marker" on the implant extending from the femur, with the objective of identifying the differences in the angular kinematics when using the standard versus implant marker. One female adult with an osseointegrated transfemoral prosthesis walked overground for three trials, and common kinematic measures were calculated from motion capture data. FINDINGS: The results indicated that, when using the thigh marker, a peak of knee varus occurred during the swing phase on the prosthetic side, which is unusual during gait and not feasible for hinge joint prostheses. When using the implant marker, knee varus/valgus was closer to normative. Using the thigh marker, the results showed an internal hip rotation at the start of stance and during the mid and terminal swing phases. In contrast, external hip rotation occurred in both stance and swing phases using the implant marker. Moreover, when selecting the medial knee marker instead of the thigh marker, the angular kinematics and range of motion of knee varus/valgus and hip rotation were comparable to those for the implant marker. INTERPRETATION: This finding suggests that when studying osseointegration gait, using an implant marker will result in more accurate femoral and knee joint motion than using the thigh marker. Changing the selection of markers can reduce the errors of knee varus/valgus and hip kinematics in osseointegrated transfemoral prosthetic gait.

Predicting Upper Quadrant Musculoskeletal Injuries in the Military: A Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify characteristics and movement-based tests that predict upper quadrant musculoskeletal injury (UQI) in military personnel over a 12-month follow-up. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study of military members (n = 494; 91.9% male) was conducted. Baseline predictors associated with UQI were gathered through surveys and movement-based tests. Survey data included demographic information, injury history, and biosocial factors. Movement-based tests include the following: Y Balance Tests (YBT), Functional Movement Screen, Selective Functional Movement Assessment lumbar multisegmental mobility, modified-modified Schober, side bridge, ankle mobility, modified Sorensen, and passive lumbar extension. Self-reported UQI was collected through monthly online surveys, and 87% completed the follow-up. Univariate associations were determined between potential predictors and UQI. A forward, stepwise logistic regression model was used to identify the best combination of predictors for UQI. RESULTS: Twenty-seven had UQI. Univariate associations existed with three demographic (smoking, >1 previous UQI, baseline upper quadrant function ≤90%), three pain-related (Selective Functional Movement Assessment rotation, side bridge, hurdle step), and six movement-based variables (YBT upper quarter (UQ) superolateral worst score ≤57.75 cm, YBT-UQ composite worst score ≤81.1%, failed shoulder clearance, Sorenson <72.14 s, in-line lunge total score <15, and in-line lunge asymmetry >1). Smoking, baseline upper quadrant function ≤90%, and YBT-UQ composite score ≤81.1% predicted UQI in the logistic regression while controlling for age and sex. Presenting two or more predictors resulted in good specificity (85.6%; odds ratio, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-10.8), and at least one predictor resulted in 81.5% sensitivity (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.7). CONCLUSIONS: A modifiable movement-based test (YBT-UQ), perceived upper limb function, and smoking predicted UQI. A specific (two or more) and sensitive (at least one predictor) model could identify persons at higher risk.

Reflections on recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration of injured service members and veterans from a bio-psychosocial-spiritual perspective

Medical interventions regarding trauma resuscitation have increased survivorship to levels not previously attained. Multiple examples from recent conflicts illustrate the potential return to high-level function of severely injured service members following medical and rehabilitative interventions. This review addresses the goals of rehabilitation, distills hard-won lessons of the last decade of military trauma and rehabilitation, and recommends the use of a bio-psychosocial-spiritual approach to care that can be applied at all tiers of the health care system. Questions on enabling participation in meaningful life activities include the following: Why do some patients do well and others do not? What elements contribute to positive outcomes? What factors relate to suboptimal results? Lessons learned revolve around the importance of considering the physical, psychosocial and spiritual aspects of a person's well-being; empowering patients by fostering self-efficacy; and helping patients find meaning in life events and set high-level goals. A bio-psychosocial-spiritual model from the rehabilitation medicine literature ­ the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement ­ is proposed as a guide to the provision of person-centred care and the maximization of a person's functioning posttrauma.

Les interventions médicales de réanimation en traumatologie ont porté les taux de survie à des niveaux encore inégalé. Plusieurs exemples tirés de conflits récents illustrent le retour potentiel à un degré fonctionnel élevé après des interventions médicales et de réadaptation chez des membres des forces armées grièvement blessés. La présente revue expose les objectifs de la réadaptation, résume les dures leçons tirées de la dernière décennie en traumatologie et réadaptation dans le monde militaire et recommande l'utilisation d'une approche de soins bio- et psychosociospirituelle qui peut être appliquée à tous les échelons du système de soins de santé. Les questions concernant la capacité d'un retour à des activités signifiantes incluent : Pourquoi les patients n'obtiennent-ils pas tous les mêmes résultats? Quels éléments contribuent à des résultats positifs? Quels facteurs sont en lien avec des résultats optimaux? Les leçons apprises font ressortir l'importance de tenir compte des dimensions physique, psychosociale et spirituelle des personnes pour assurer leur bien-être, de les rendre autonomes en favorisant une plus grande auto-efficacité et de les aider à trouver du sens dans les événements de la vie et à se fixer des objectifs ambitieux. Un modèle bio- et psychosociospirituel tiré de la littérature en médecine de réadaptation ­ le Modèle canadien de rendement occupationnel et de participation ­ est proposé comme guide pour la prestation de soins centrés sur la personne et la maximisation de son fonctionnement après un traumatisme.

Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function.

This case study report demonstrates the use of motion analysis with a modification of the Box and Blocks test. The goal was to quantify observed improvements in compensatory movements and simultaneous control in a subject using different prostheses before and after targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) surgery. This is a single case study with data collection using a body-powered prosthesis pre-TMR surgery and 6 mo postfitting with a TMR myoelectric prosthesis. The Box and Blocks test was modified for cyclical motion within a motion capture laboratory. With the TMR myoelectric prosthesis, the subject was able to simultaneously activate the hand and elbow. Task performance was slower, but there was improved elbow flexion and less trunk compensatory motion than with the body-powered prosthesis. There are several limitations to the case study because there is no direct comparison of myoelectric performance before and after TMR surgery; however, the current report presents a potential method to quantify quality of motion and compensatory movements of prosthetic users. With further study, this test procedure has the potential to be a useful outcome measure for future standardized assessments of upper-limb prosthetic function.