The use of aortic balloon occlusion in traumatic shock: first report from the ABO trauma registry.

PURPOSE: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a technique for temporary stabilization of patients with non-compressible torso hemorrhage. This technique has been increasingly used worldwide during the past decade. Despite the good outcomes of translational studies, clinical studies are divided. The aim of this multicenter-international study was to capture REBOA-specific data and outcomes. METHODS: REBOA practicing centers were invited to join this online register, which was established in September 2014. REBOA cases were reported, both retrospective and prospective. Demographics, injury patterns, hemodynamic variables, REBOA-specific data, complications and 30-days mortality were reported. RESULTS: Ninety-six cases from 6 different countries were reported between 2011 and 2016. Mean age was 52 ± 22 years and 88% of the cases were blunt trauma with a median injury severity score (ISS) of 41 (IQR 29-50). In the majority of the cases, Zone I REBOA was used. Median systolic blood pressure before balloon inflation was 60 mmHg (IQR 40-80), which increased to 100 mmHg (IQR 80-128) after inflation. Continuous occlusion was applied in 52% of the patients, and 48% received non-continuous occlusion. Occlusion time longer than 60 min was reported as 38 and 14% in the non-continuous and continuous groups, respectively. Complications, such as extremity compartment syndrome (n = 3), were only noted in the continuous occlusion group. The 30-day mortality for non-continuous REBOA was 48%, and 64% for continuous occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: This observational multicenter study presents results regarding continuous and non-continuous REBOA with favorable outcomes. However, further prospective studies are needed to be able to draw conclusions on morbidity and mortality.

High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of suspected brain infarction.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent technological advances in MR instrumentation allow acquisition of whole-brain diffusion-weighted MR scans to be obtained with b values greater than 1,000. Our purpose was to determine whether high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging improved contrast and detection of signal changes in acute and chronic brain infarction. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the MR scans of 30 subjects with a history of possible brain infarction on a 1.5-T MR imager with 40 mT/meter gradients (slew rate 150 T/m/s) by use of the following single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR sequences: 1) 7,999/ 71.4/1 (TR/TE/excitations, b = 1,000; 2) 999/ 88.1/3, b = 2,500; and 3) 7,999/ 92.1/4, b = 3,000. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was performed in three orthogonal directions during all sequences. All subjects were scanned with fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) (10,006/145/2,200/1 [TR/TE/TI/excitations]) and fast spin-echo T2-weighted (3,650/95/3 [TR/TE/excitations], echo train length, 8). The diagnosis of brain infarction was established by clinical criteria. RESULTS: Twenty women and 10 men with a mean age of 67.7 years were enrolled in the study. One subject was excluded owing to poor image quality. Twelve of 29 subjects had a clinical diagnosis of acute infarction. All 12 had lesions that were hyperintense on diffusion-weighted images at all three b values; five were cortical and seven subcortical. There was increased contrast of all lesions on high-b-value scans (b = 2,500 and 3,000). Lesions that were hypointense on diffusion-weighted images were identified and evaluated at the three different b values. At b = 1,000, there were 19 hypointense lesions, whereas at b = 2,500 and 3,000 there were 48 and 55 lesions, respectively. On FLAIR and T2-weighted images, these low-signal lesions were predominantly chronic, subcortical, ischemic lesions and lacunar infarcts, but four chronic cortical infarcts, one porencephalic cyst, and one primary brain tumor were also found. Low-signal lesions were also noted to have increased contrast on high-b-value diffusion-weighted scans. CONCLUSION: High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging (b = 2,500 or b = 3,000) had no impact on diagnosis of acute infarction. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging (b = 2,500) combined with diffusion-weighted MR imaging at b = 1,000 improves tissue characterization by increasing the spectrum of observed imaging abnormalities in patients with suspected brain infarction.