Sarcopenia and adipose tissue evaluation by artificial intelligence predicts the overall survival after TAVI.

Sarcopenia is a serious systemic disease that reduces overall survival. TAVI is selectively performed in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are not indicated for open cardiac surgery due to severe polymorbidity. Artificial intelligence-assisted body composition assessment from available CT scans appears to be a simple tool to stratify these patients into low and high risk based on future estimates of all-cause mortality. Within our study, the segmentation of preprocedural CT scans at the level of the lumbar third vertebra in patients undergoing TAVI was performed using a neural network (AutoMATiCA). The obtained parameters (area and density of skeletal muscles and intramuscular, visceral, and subcutaneous adipose tissue) were analyzed using Cox univariate and multivariable models for continuous and categorical variables to assess the relation of selected variables with all-cause mortality. 866 patients were included (median(interquartile range)): age 79.7 (74.9-83.3) years; BMI 28.9 (25.9-32.6) kg/m2. Survival analysis was performed on all automatically obtained parameters of muscle and fat density and area. Skeletal muscle index (SMI in cm2/m2), visceral (VAT in HU) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT in HU) density predicted the all-cause mortality in patients after TAVI expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI): SMI HR 0.986, 95% CI (0.975-0.996); VAT 1.015 (1.002-1.028) and SAT 1.014 (1.004-1.023), all p < 0.05. Automatic body composition assessment can estimate higher all-cause mortality risk in patients after TAVI, which may be useful in preoperative clinical reasoning and stratification of patients.

Real-time measurement of ICD lead motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy of ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Here we aimed to evaluate the respiratory and cardiac-induced motion of a ICD lead used as surrogate in the heart during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Data provides insight regarding motion and motion variations during treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the log files of surrogate motion during SBRT of ventricular tachycardia performed in 20 patients. Evaluated parameters included the ICD lead motion amplitudes; intrafraction amplitude variability; correlation error between the ICD lead and external markers; and margin expansion in the superior-inferior (SI), latero-lateral (LL), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions to cover 90% or 95% of all amplitudes. RESULTS: In the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively, the mean motion amplitudes were 5.0 ± 2.6, 3.4. ± 1.9, and 3.1 ± 1.6 mm. The mean intrafraction amplitude variability was 2.6 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 1.3, and 1.6 ± 0.8 mm in the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. The margins required to cover 95% of ICD lead motion amplitudes were 9.5, 6.7, and 5.5 mm in the SI, LL, and AP directions, respectively. The mean correlation error was 2.2 ± 0.9 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Data from online tracking indicated motion irregularities and correlation errors, necessitating an increased CTV-PTV margin of 3 mm. In 35% of cases, the motion variability exceeded 3 mm in one or more directions. We recommend verifying the correlation between CTV and surrogate individually for every patient, especially for targets with posterobasal localization where we observed the highest difference between the lead and CTV motion.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

AIMS: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for ventricular tachycardias (VTs) could be an option after failed catheter ablation. In this study, we analysed the long-term efficacy and toxicity of SBRT applied as a bail-out procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with structural heart disease and unsuccessful catheter ablations for VTs underwent SBRT. The planning target volume (PTV) was accurately delineated using exported 3D electroanatomical maps with the delineated critical part of re-entry circuits. This was defined by detailed electroanatomic mapping and by pacing manoeuvres during the procedure. Using the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead as a surrogate contrast marker for respiratory movement compensation, 25 Gy was delivered to the PTV using CyberKnife. We evaluated occurrences of sustained VT, electrical storm, antitachycardia pacing, and shock; time to death; and radiation-induced events. From 2014 until March 2017, 10 patients underwent radiosurgical ablation (mean PTV, 22.15 mL; treatment duration, 68 min). After radiosurgery, four patients experienced nausea and one patient presented gradual progression of mitral regurgitation. During the follow-up (median 28 months), VT burden was reduced by 87.5% compared with baseline (P = 0.012) and three patients suffered non-arrhythmic deaths. After the blanking period, VT recurred in eight of 10 patients. The mean time to first antitachycardia pacing and shock were 6.5 and 21 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy appears to show long-term safety and effectiveness for VT ablation in structural heart disease inaccessible to catheter ablation. We report one possible radiation-related toxicity and promising overall survival, warranting evaluation in a prospective multicentre clinical trial.