Influence of Polygenic Background on the Clinical Presentation of Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is among the most common genetic conditions worldwide that affects ≈ 1 in 300 individuals. FH is characterized by increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), but there is a wide spectrum of severity within the FH population. This variability in expression is incompletely explained by known risk factors. We hypothesized that genome-wide genetic influences, as represented by polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for cardiometabolic traits, would influence the phenotypic severity of FH. METHODS: We studied individuals with clinically diagnosed FH (n=1123) from the FH Canada National Registry, as well as individuals with genetically identified FH from the UK Biobank (n=723). For all individuals, we used genome-wide gene array data to calculate PRSs for CAD, LDL-C, lipoprotein(a), and other cardiometabolic traits. We compared the distribution of PRSs in individuals with clinically diagnosed FH, genetically diagnosed FH, and non-FH controls and examined the association of the PRSs with the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: Individuals with clinically diagnosed FH had higher levels of LDL-C, and the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was higher in individuals with clinically diagnosed compared with genetically identified FH. Individuals with clinically diagnosed FH displayed enrichment for higher PRSs for CAD, LDL-C, and lipoprotein(a) but not for other cardiometabolic risk factors. The CAD PRS was associated with a risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among individuals with an FH-causing genetic variant. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic background, as expressed by genome-wide PRSs for CAD, LDL-C, and lipoprotein(a), influences the phenotypic severity of FH, expanding our understanding of the determinants that contribute to the variable expressivity of FH. A PRS for CAD may aid in risk prediction among individuals with FH.

Evolocumab Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Pooled Data From Three Open-Label Studies.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) have an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and difficulty meeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated pooled safety and efficacy data from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH treated with the PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) monoclonal antibody inhibitor evolocumab. METHODS: Patients with HoFH aged 10 to 17 years received treatment with open-label evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously monthly or biweekly in the TAUSSIG, RAMAN, or HAUSER-OLE clinical studies. All patients received background statins with or without ezetimibe. Study duration ranged from 12 to 260 weeks. The primary end point was treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years. Efficacy end points were changes from baseline to week 12 in lipids and PCSK9. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients in the pooled analysis, 69.2% were males, median age was 13.0 years, and 79.5% (31/39) had genotyped HoFH with LDLR pathogenic variants. Overall, median exposure to evolocumab was 18.2 (Q1, Q3: 3.0, 18.5) months. Treatment-emergent adverse events with an exposure-adjusted patient incidence rate of ≥5% were upper respiratory tract infection (6.6%), influenza (5.2%), and acne (5.0%) per 100 patient-years. Exposure-adjusted patient incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events was 13.3% per 100 patient-years. Excluding 4 patients receiving lipoprotein apheresis, week 12 median percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was -2.9% (Q1, Q3: -21.7, 1.5); however, 42.9% (15/35) of patients achieved ≥15% reduction in LDL-C from baseline. Residual LDLR (LDL receptor) activity was not associated with a reduction in LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled data analysis from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH, evolocumab was well tolerated, with no new safety signals reported. These safety findings are consistent with findings from previous studies of evolocumab. Patients showed marked variability in LDL-C reduction. Results from this pooled analysis support guidelines suggesting a trial of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy regardless of estimated residual LDLR function. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01624142, NCT03403374, and NCT02624869.

Sex differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare, autosomal semi-dominant lipid metabolism disorder characterized by extremely high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and premature cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study was to investigate sex-differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with HoFH. METHODS: We examined clinical characteristics, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and cardiovascular events using descriptive statistics of patients in the Canadian HoFH registry. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. Sex differences between continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's Exact test, respectively. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients (27 (56%) female). The median age at diagnosis in females was 14.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 9.0-30.0) and in males was 8.0 (IQR 2.0-23.0) (p = 0.07). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between both sexes. The median baseline LDL-C was 12.7 mmol/L (10.0-18.3) in females and 15.3 (10.5-20.0) in males (p = 0.51). Follow up LDL-C levels were 7.6 mmol/L (IQR 4.8-11.0) in females and 6.3 (IQR 4.6-7.5) in males (p = 0.1). Most patients were taking 3 or more LLTs, with comparable proportions in both sexes (p = 0.26). Apheresis was similar in both sexes, 14 (51.8%) vs. 10 (47.6%) (p = 0.2). Over a mean of 10 years of follow-up, MACE occurred in 3 females (11.1%) and 4 males (19.1%) (p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Lipid levels and treatment were similar between sexes. MACE occurred in similar proportions between sexes, indicating that HoFH offsets the inherently lower cardiovascular risk in pre-menopausal females. Further investigation into sex-differences in HoFH in larger sample sizes is warranted.

Recommendations for statin management in primary prevention: disparities among international risk scores.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Statin recommendations in primary prevention depend upon risk algorithms. Moreover, with intermediate risk, risk enhancers and de-enhancers are advocated to aid decisions. The aim of this study was to compare algorithms used in North America and Europe for the identification of patients warranting statin or consideration of risk enhancers and de-enhancers. METHODS: A simulated population (n = 7680) equal in males and females, with/without smoking, aged 45-70 years, total cholesterol 3.5-7.0 mmol/L, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 0.6-2.2 mmol/L, and systolic blood pressure 100-170 mmHg, was evaluated. High, intermediate, and low risks were determined using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE), four versions of Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) algorithm (0-1000 Agatston Units). RESULTS: Concordance for the three levels of risk varied from 19% to 85%. Both sexes might be considered to have low, intermediate, or high risk depending on the algorithm applied, even with the same burden of risk factors. Only SCORE2 (High Risk and Very High Risk versions) identified equal proportions of males and females with high risk. Excluding MESA, the proportion with moderate risk was 25% (SCORE2, Very High Risk Region), 32% (FRS), 39% (PCE), and 45% (SCORE2, Low Risk Region). CONCLUSION: Risk algorithms differ substantially in their estimation of risk, recommendations for statin treatment, and use of ancillary testing, even in identical patients. These results highlight the limitations of currently used risk-based approaches for addressing lipid-specific risk in primary prevention.

Increased FH-Risk-Score and Diabetes Are Cardiovascular Risk Equivalents in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic condition causing premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). It is well established that patients with FH should be treated with statin therapy. However, there exists discordance concerning low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering goals in the management of these patients between different guidelines worldwide. The objective was to compare the 10-year ASCVD risk of different subgroups of patients with and without FH including those with diabetes or a history of ASCVD and patients with FH within different FH-Risk-Score categories. METHODS: This multinational observational study used data from 3 different prospective cohorts. A total of 3383 FH and 6917 non-FH controls matched for age and sex were included (104 363 person-years of follow-up). The 10-year incident ASCVD risk was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, whereas the relative risk was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: FH patients with a high (score >20%) FH-Risk-Score (hazard ratio, 8.45 [95% CI, 6.69-10.67]; P<0.0001), FH patients with diabetes (hazard ratio, 7.67 [95% CI, 4.82-12.21]; P<0.0001), and non-FH patients with ASCVD (hazard ratio, 6.78 [95% CI, 5.45-8.42]; P<0.0001) had a significantly higher incident ASCVD risk over 10 years than the reference group (non-FH without ASCVD or diabetes). The observed 10-year risks in these groups were 32.1%, 30.8%, 30.0%, and 5.1%, respectively. The 10-year ASCVD risk associated with both FH and ASCVD was extremely high (observed risk of 50.7%; hazard ratio, 14.53 [95% CI, 12.14-17.38]; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly suggests that the observed risk of FH patients with diabetes, history of ASCVD, and FH-Risk-Score >20% is as high or higher than non-FH individuals with a history of ASCVD. More aggressive management should be recommended for these patients.

International Atherosclerosis Society guidance for implementing best practice in the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia.

This contemporary, international, evidence-informed guidance aims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) across different countries. FH, a family of monogenic defects in the hepatic LDL clearance pathway, is a preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease and death. Worldwide, 35 million people have FH, but most remain undiagnosed or undertreated. Current FH care is guided by a useful and diverse group of evidence-based guidelines, with some primarily directed at cholesterol management and some that are country-specific. However, none of these guidelines provides a comprehensive overview of FH care that includes both the lifelong components of clinical practice and strategies for implementation. Therefore, a group of international experts systematically developed this guidance to compile clinical strategies from existing evidence-based guidelines for the detection (screening, diagnosis, genetic testing and counselling) and management (risk stratification, treatment of adults or children with heterozygous or homozygous FH, therapy during pregnancy and use of apheresis) of patients with FH, update evidence-informed clinical recommendations, and develop and integrate consensus-based implementation strategies at the patient, provider and health-care system levels, with the aim of maximizing the potential benefit for at-risk patients and their families worldwide.

Awareness Among Primary Care Physicians in Canada of Guideline Recommendations for Lowering LDL-Cholesterol in High-Risk Patients.

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) risk management for high-risk patients is often provided by primary care physicians (PCPs). We surveyed Canadian PCPs regarding their awareness and implementation of the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) lipid guideline recommendations for patients following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and those with diabetes but without CV disease. Methods: A committee of PCPs and specialists with lipid expertise, including some 2021 CCS lipid guideline coauthors, designed a survey to probe PCP awareness and practice patterns regarding CV risk management. From a national database, a total of 250 PCPs completed the survey between January and April 2022. Results: Almost all PCPs (97.2%) concurred that a post-ACS patient should be seen by their PCP within 4 weeks of hospital discharge (81.2% said within 2 weeks). Almost half (44.4%) responded that discharge summaries provided inadequate information, and 41.6% felt that lipid management post-ACS was the responsibility primarily of specialists. A total of 58.4% articulated that they face challenges when seeing a post-ACS patient, related to inadequate discharge information, complexities of polypharmacy and duration of therapies, and managing statin intolerance. A total of 63.2% and 43.6% correctly identified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) intensification thresholds of 1.8 mmol/L in post-ACS patients, and 2.0 mmol/L in diabetes patients, respectively, and 81.2% incorrectly thought that proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors were indicated for patients with diabetes but without CV disease. Conclusions: One year following publication of the 2021 CCS lipid guidelines, our survey reveals knowledge gaps among responding PCPs regarding intensification thresholds and treatment options for patients post-ACS, or those with diabetes. Innovative and effective knowledge-translation programs to address these gaps are desirable.

Contexte: La prise en charge du risque cardiovasculaire (CV) chez les patients à risque élevé est souvent réalisée par les médecins en soins primaires (MSP). Nous avons donc sondé les MSP canadiens quant à leur connaissance des lignes directrices 2021 de la Société cardiovasculaire du Canada (SCC) sur les lipides et leur mise en œuvre auprès des patients ayant subi un syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) et auprès des patients atteints de diabète qui ne présentent pas de maladie CV. Méthodologie: Un comité de MSP et de spécialistes ayant une expertise sur la question des lipides, y compris certains coauteurs des lignes directrices 2021 de la SCC sur les lipides, a conçu un sondage pour évaluer la connaissance des mesures de prise en charge du risque CV et les habitudes de pratique des MSP en la matière. Au total, 250 MSP provenant d'une banque de données nationale ont rempli le sondage entre janvier et avril 2022. Résultats: Presque tous les MSP (97,2 %) étaient d'accord pour dire que les patients ayant subi un SCA devraient avoir une consultation avec leur MSP dans les quatre semaines suivant leur congé de l'hôpital (81,2 % ont dit deux semaines). Près de la moitié des répondants (44,4 %) ont indiqué que le sommaire d'hospitalisation fournit une information inadéquate, et 41,6 % estimaient que la gestion des lipides après un SCA relevait des spécialistes. Au total, 58,4 % des répondants ont mentionné rencontrer des difficultés lors de la consultation avec un patient après une SCA, surtout quant à l'information inadéquate contenue dans le sommaire d'hospitalisation, aux complexités de la polypharmacie, à la durée des traitements et à l'intolérance aux statines. De plus, 63,2 % et 43,6 % des répondants ont correctement indiqué les seuils d'intensification du traitement pour le cholestérol à lipoprotéines de basse densité (LDL), soit 1,8 mmol/l chez les patients après un SCA et 2,0 mmol/l chez les patients diabétiques, respectivement. Par ailleurs, 81,2 % des répondants croyaient à tort que les inhibiteurs de la proprotéine convertase subtilisine/kexine de type 9 (PCSK9) étaient indiqués pour les patients diabétiques ne présentant pas de maladie CV. Conclusions: Un an après la publication des lignes directrices 2021 de la SCC sur les lipides, notre sondage montre des lacunes dans les connaissances des MSP quant aux seuils d'intensification du traitement et aux options de traitement pour les patients ayant subi un SCA ou atteints de diabète. Des programmes novateurs et efficaces de transmission du savoir sont souhaitables pour combler ces lacunes.

2023 Update on European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Statement on Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: new treatments and clinical guidance.

This 2023 statement updates clinical guidance for homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH), explains the genetic complexity, and provides pragmatic recommendations to address inequities in HoFH care worldwide. Key strengths include updated criteria for the clinical diagnosis of HoFH and the recommendation to prioritize phenotypic features over genotype. Thus, a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >10 mmol/L (>400 mg/dL) is suggestive of HoFH and warrants further evaluation. The statement also provides state-of-the art discussion and guidance to clinicians for interpreting the results of genetic testing and for family planning and pregnancy. Therapeutic decisions are based on the LDL-C level. Combination LDL-C-lowering therapy-both pharmacologic intervention and lipoprotein apheresis (LA)-is foundational. Addition of novel, efficacious therapies (i.e. inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, followed by evinacumab and/or lomitapide) offers potential to attain LDL-C goal or reduce the need for LA. To improve HoFH care around the world, the statement recommends the creation of national screening programmes, education to improve awareness, and management guidelines that account for the local realities of care, including access to specialist centres, treatments, and cost. This updated statement provides guidance that is crucial to early diagnosis, better care, and improved cardiovascular health for patients with HoFH worldwide.

Metabolic syndrome predicts cardiovascular risk and mortality in familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: The association between familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is well established. Several risk factors other than the cumulative low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) have been shown to modulate the severity of the phenotype in these patients. However, the effect of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) on ASCVD risk in FH remains to be determined. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to study the association between the presence of MetS and the incidence of different ASCVD endpoints and all-cause mortality. METHODS: This prospective follow up study used data from 5 independent FH cohorts from Europe and North America. We analysed data of 2401 adult heterozygous FH without history of a prior ASCVD event (21,139 person-years of follow-up). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association between MetS and the incidence of the different endpoints. RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was 14% in the study population. The presence of MetS was a significant predictor of incident 10-year ASCVD after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.34-3.19), as well as of 10-year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (HR 4.59, 95% CI 2.27-9.30), 10-year myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 4.29, 95% CI 1.91-9.63), and 30-year all-cause mortality (HR 4.87, 95% CI 1.99-11.89). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggests that FH patients with MetS, have an increased cardiovascular risk that is independent from LDL-C and other traditional risk factors. Future studies are required to determine the most appropriate strategy to reduce the cardiovascular burden associated with MetS in this population.

Genetic Identification of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia by Long-Read Sequencing Among Patients With Clinically Diagnosed Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by extremely elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and accelerated atherosclerosis. Accurate identification of patients with HoFH is essential as they may be eligible for specialized treatments. We hypothesized that a subset of patients with clinically diagnosed heterozygous FH (HeFH) may in fact have HoFH, and this could be identified by genetic diagnosis. METHODS: We recruited patients with a clinical diagnosis of HeFH based on a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score ≥6 and no secondary cause of hypercholesterolemia. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), and low-density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 (LDLRAP1) genes, followed by long-read sequencing of the LDLR gene in patients with >1 pathogenic LDLR variant. We examined lipid levels and cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Among 705 patients with clinically diagnosed HeFH, we identified a single pathogenic variant in 300 (42.6%) and >1 pathogenic variant in the LDLR gene in 11 patients (1.6%). We established a genetic diagnosis of HoFH in 6 (0.9%) patients (3 true homozygotes and 3 compound heterozygotes). The mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and prevalence of premature cardiovascular disease of patients with genetically identified HoFH was significantly higher than patients with HeFH. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with clinically diagnosed HeFH, genetic testing including long-read sequencing revealed that 0.9% had HoFH. These patients tended to have a more severe clinical phenotype. Genetic testing of patients with clinical FH may identify patients with HoFH that had eluded clinical diagnosis.

Genetic determinants of pancreatitis: relevance in severe hypertriglyceridemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Not all patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia develop acute pancreatitis. We surveyed recent literature on inter-individual genetic variation in susceptibility to pancreatitis. RECENT FINDINGS: Genetic determinants of pancreatitis include: rare Mendelian disorders caused by highly penetrant pathogenic variants in genes involved in trypsinogen activation; uncommon susceptibility variants in genes involved in trypsinogen activation, protein misfolding as well as calcium metabolism and cystic fibrosis, that have variable penetrance and show a range of odds ratios for pancreatitis; and common polymorphisms in many of the same genes that have only a small effect on risk. The role of these genetic variants in modulating pancreatitis risk in hypertriglyceridemia is unclear. However, among genetic determinants of plasma triglycerides, those predisposing to more severe hypertriglyceridemia associated with chylomicronemia appear to have higher pancreatitis risk. SUMMARY: Currently, among patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia, the most consistent predictor of pancreatitis risk is the triglyceride level. Furthermore, pancreatitis risk appears to be modulated by a higher genetic burden of factors associated with greater magnitude of triglyceride elevation. The role of common and rare genetic determinants of pancreatitis itself in this metabolic context is unclear.

Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Canada: An Observational Study.

Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disease characterized by very high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Untreated patients present with extensive xanthomas and premature atherosclerosis. Lipid-lowering therapy is highly efficacious and has dramatically increased life expectancy of patients with HoFH. Objectives: The aim of the study was to obtain a comprehensive registry of HoFH in Canada, known to have several founder effect regions, and describe the clinical characteristics and cardiovascular outcomes of this population over time. Methods: Clinical and genetic data on patients with HoFH were collected via a standardized questionnaire sent to academic sites participating in the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Canada network. Results: A total of 48 patients with HoFH were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 12 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-24) and untreated LDL-C levels were 15.0 mmol/L (IQR: 10.5-18.6 mmol/L; 580 mg/dL IQR: 404-717 mg/dL). At last follow-up visit, median age was 40 years (IQR: 26-54 years). Treated LDL-C levels were 6.75 mmol/L (IQR: 4.73-9.51 mmol/L; 261 mg/dL IQR: 183-368 mg/dL) with 95.5% of patients on statins, 88.6% on ezetimibe, 34.1% on proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, 27.3% on lomitapide, 13.6% on evinacumab, and 56.8% were treated with low-density lipoprotein apheresis or plasmapheresis. Deaths were reported in 7 (14.5%) and major adverse cardiovascular events were observed in 14.6% of patients with the average onset at 30 years (IQR: 20-36 years). Aortic stenosis was reported in one-half the patients (47.9%) and 10 (20.8%) underwent aortic valve replacement. Conclusions: This HoFH patient registry in Canada will provide important new health-related knowledge about the phenotypic manifestations and determinants of cardiovascular risk in this population, allowing for closer examination of quality of life and burden to the health care system.

Effect of the LDL receptor mutation type on incident major adverse cardiovascular events in familial hypercholesterolaemia.

AIMS: Patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to extremely high circulating LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations. Our objective was to study the effect of the type of LDL receptor (LDLR) mutation on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a multinational prospective cohort study, which included patients with heterozygous FH aged 18-65 years, without a prior history of CVD, and carrying a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in the LDLR gene. A total of 2131 patients (20 535person-years of follow-up) were included in the study, including 1234 subjects carrying a defective mutation in the LDLR and 897 subjects carrying a null mutation. During the follow-up, a first MACE occurred in 79 cases (6%) in the defective group and in 111 cases (12%) in the null group. The mean baseline LDL-C concentration was 17% higher in the null group than in the defective group (7.90 vs. 6.73 mmoL/L, P < 0.0001). In a Cox regression model corrected for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, the presence of a null mutation was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.09 (1.44-3.05), P = 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Carriers of a null mutation have an independent ∼2-fold increased risk of incident MACE compared with patients carrying a defective mutation. This study highlights the importance of genetic screening in FH in order to improve patient care.

The Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Dyslipidemia in Children and Adolescents: A Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association Clinical Practice Update.

Atherosclerosis begins in youth and is directly linked with the presence and severity of cardiovascular risk factors, including dyslipidemia. Thus, the timely identification and management of dyslipidemia in childhood might slow atherosclerotic progression and decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood. This is particularly true for children with genetic disorders resulting in marked dyslipidemia, including familial hypercholesterolemia, which remains frequently undiagnosed. Universal and cascade screening strategies can effectively identify cases of pediatric dyslipidemia. In the clinical evaluation of children with dyslipidemia, evaluating for secondary causes of dyslipidemia, including medications and systemic disorders is essential. The first line therapy generally centres around lifestyle modifications, with dietary changes specific to the dyslipidemia phenotype. Indications for medication depend on the severity of dyslipidemia and an individualized assessment of cardiovascular risk. Despite an expanding evidence base supporting the detection and timely management of pediatric dyslipidemia, numerous knowledge gaps remain, including a sufficient evidence base to support more widespread screening, thresholds for initiation of pharmacotherapy, and treatment targets. Further studies on the most appropriate age for statin initiation and long-term safety studies of statin use in youth are also required. The most pressing matter, however, is the development of knowledge translation strategies to improve the screening and detection of lipid disorders in Canadian youth.

Sortilin enhances secretion of apolipoprotein(a) through effects on apolipoprotein B secretion and promotes uptake of lipoprotein(a).

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent, causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Lp(a) is formed in or on hepatocytes from successive noncovalent and covalent interactions between apo(a) and apoB, although the subcellular location of these interactions and the nature of the apoB-containing particle involved remain unclear. Sortilin, encoded by the SORT1 gene, modulates apoB secretion and LDL clearance. We used a HepG2 cell model to study the secretion kinetics of apo(a) and apoB. Overexpression of sortilin increased apo(a) secretion, while siRNA-mediated knockdown of sortilin expression correspondingly decreased apo(a) secretion. Sortilin binds LDL but not apo(a) or Lp(a), indicating that its effect on apo(a) secretion is likely indirect. Indeed, the effect was dependent on the ability of apo(a) to interact noncovalently with apoB. Overexpression of sortilin enhanced internalization of Lp(a), but not apo(a), by HepG2 cells, although neither sortilin knockdown in these cells or Sort1 deficiency in mice impacted Lp(a) uptake. We found several missense mutations in SORT1 in patients with extremely high Lp(a) levels; sortilin containing some of these mutations was more effective at promoting apo(a) secretion than WT sortilin, though no differences were found with respect to Lp(a) internalization. Our observations suggest that sortilin could play a role in determining plasma Lp(a) levels and corroborate in vivo human kinetic studies which imply that secretion of apo(a) and apoB are coupled, likely within the hepatocyte.

Rationale and design of two trials assessing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of inclisiran in adolescents with homozygous and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia.

BACKGROUND: Inclisiran is a small interfering RNA molecule that reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. This subcutaneous, twice-yearly administered agent has been shown to effectively and safely lower LDL-C in adult patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, adults at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, as well as in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. With the current, limited treatment options available to reach treatment goals in children with severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, or statin intolerance, inclisiran could be a valuable new therapeutic option. OBJECTIVES: The objective of these ongoing studies is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of inclisiran in adolescents diagnosed with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (ORION-13) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (ORION-16). STUDY DESIGN: ORION-13 and ORION-16 are both two-part (1-year double-blind inclisiran vs. placebo/1 year open-label inclisiran) multicentre trials including adolescents aged 12 to <18 years diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolaemia. ORION-13 will include ∼12 participants diagnosed with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and ORION-16 will include ∼150 participants diagnosed with heterozygous familial hypercholesteroleamia. The primary endpoint is the percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 330. Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints include changes in other lipid parameters and treatment-emergent adverse events as well as laboratory parameters and vital signs. Exploratory endpoints include individual responsiveness of the participants and change in LDL-C according to the type of underlying causal mutation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT04659863 (ORION-13) and NCT04652726 (ORION-16).

A Case Series Assessing the Effects of Lomitapide on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Adult Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in a Real-World Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is characterised by extremely elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and results from multiple mutations in genes affecting the LDL receptor pathway. Patients are at risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and premature death. Lomitapide is a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor developed to treat HoFH, but cardiovascular outcome data are lacking. METHODS: We evaluated detailed data from five HoFH patients and one patient with heterozygous FH (HeFH) and a very severe phenotype. We also analysed confirmatory data from a further 8 HoFH cases. In total, we analysed data from patients in seven global centres in six countries who were all treated with lomitapide with long-term follow-up. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) imaging was recorded on an ad hoc basis to monitor ASCVD in HoFH. RESULTS: Lomitapide resulted in marked decreases in LDL-C of 56.8-93.9% [77.7-93.9% in the 6 initial cases (mean nadir 64.8 ± 30.1 mg/dL); 56.8-86.0% in the 8 confirmatory cases (mean nadir 131.4 ± 38.2 mg/dL)]. CIMT regressed in 50% of cases (mean follow-up 5.0 ± 3.1 years in initial six cases, and 4.4 ± 1.4 years in confirmatory cases). In the remaining patients, CIMT showed little further change. In patients where assessments of plaque area were available, regression or stabilisation in CIMT was accompanied by clinically significant regression of plaque area. CONCLUSIONS: Lomitapide reduces LDL-C levels in patients with HoFH and severe LDL-C phenotypes, and results in stabilisation and/or regression of CIMT, which is an established marker of ASCVD risk. Additional data are needed to determine if this confers a survival benefit in these very high-risk patients.