Early Post-Operative Events After Urethroplasty in Obese Patients: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Series.

OBJECTIVE: To compare early urethroplasty outcomes in non-obese, obese and morbidly obese patients undergoing urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease. The impact of obesity on outcomes is poorly understood but will be increasingly important as obesity continues to rise. METHODS: Patients underwent urethroplasty at one of the 5 institutions between January 2016 and December 2020. Obese (BMI 30-39.9, n = 72) and morbidly obese (BMI >40, n = 49) patients were compared to normal weight (BMI <25, n = 29) and overweight (BMI 25-29.9, n = 51) patients. Demographics, comorbidities, and stricture characteristics were collected. Outcomes including complications, recurrence, and secondary interventions were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and one patients (Mean BMI 34.1, Range 18.4-65.2) with mean age 52.2 years (SD=17.2) were analyzed. Median follow-up time was 3.71 months. Obese patients were younger (P = .008), had more anterior (P <.001), iatrogenic and LS-associated strictures (P = .036). Sixty-day complication rate was 26.3% with no differences between cohorts (P = .788). Around 9.5% of patients had extravasation at catheter removal, 18.9% reported stricture recurrence, and 7.4% required additional interventions. Obese patients had greater estimated blood loss (P = .001) and length of stay (P = .001). On multivariate analysis, smoking associated with contrast leak (OR 7.176, 95% CI 1.13-45.5) but not recurrence or need for intervention (P = .155, .927). CONCLUSION: Obese patients in our cohort had more anterior, iatrogenic, and LS-related strictures. However, obesity is not associated with complications, contrast leak, secondary interventions, or recurrence. Obese had higher blood loss and length of stay. Urethroplasty is safe and effective in obese patients.

Impact of vision impairment on discharge destination for patients with hip fracture.

Introduction: Vision impairment (VI) due to low vision or blindness is a major sensory health problem affecting quality of life and contributing to increased risk of falls and hip fractures (HF). Up to 60% of patients with hip fracture have VI, and VI increases further susceptibility to falls due to mobility challenges after HF. We sought to determine if VI affects discharge destination for patients with HF. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 2015 Inpatient Medicare claims was performed and VI, blindness/low vision), HF and HF surgery were identified using ICD-9, and ICD-10 codes. Patients who sustained a HF with a diagnosis of VI were categorized as HF + VI. The outcome measure was discharge destination of home, skilled nursing facility (SNF), long-term care facility (LTCF) or other. Results: During the one-year ascertainment of inpatient claims, there were 10,336 total HF patients, 66.82% female, 91.21% non-Hispanic white with mean (standard deviation) age 82.3 (8.2) years. There was an age-related increase in diagnosis of VI with 1.49% (29/1941) of patients aged 65-74, 1.76% (63/3574) of patients aged 75-84, and 2.07% (100/4821) of patients aged 85 and older. The prevalence of VI increased with age, representing 1.5% (29/1941) of adults aged 65-74, 1.8% (63/3574) of adults aged 75-84, and 2.1% (100/4821) of adults aged 85 and older. The age-related increase in VI was not significant (P = 0.235). Patients with HF were most commonly discharged to a SNF (64.46%), followed by 'Other' (25.70%), home (7.15%), and LTCF (2.67%). VI was not associated with discharge destination. Male gender, Black race, systemic complications, and late postoperative discharge significantly predicted discharge to LTCF with odds ratios (95%CI) 1.42 (1.07-1.89), 1.90 (1.13-3.18), 2.27 (1.66-3.10), and 1.73 (1.25-2.39) respectively. Conclusions: The co-morbid presence of VI was not associated with altered discharge destinations to home, skilled nursing facility, LTCF or other setting.

Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: practice patterns in North America.

BACKGROUND: The addition of radiation therapy (RT) to surgery in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial. We examined practice patterns in the use of RT for patients with RPS over time in a large, national cohort. METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017) who underwent resection of RPS were included. Trends over time for proportions were calculated using contingency tables with Cochran-Armitage Trend test. RESULTS: Of 7,485 patients who underwent resection, 1,821 (24.3%) received RT (adjuvant: 59.9%, neoadjuvant: 40.1%). The use of RT decreased annually by < 1% (p = 0.0178). There was an average annual increase of neoadjuvant RT by 13% compared to an average annual decrease of adjuvant RT by 6% (p < 0.0001). Treatment at high-volume centers (OR 14.795, p < 0.0001) and tumor > 10 cm (OR 2.009, p = 0.001) were associated with neoadjuvant RT. In contrast liposarcomas (OR 0.574, p = 0.001) were associated with adjuvant RT. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with surgery alone versus surgery and RT (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: In the United States, the use of RT for RPS has decreased over time, with a shift towards neoadjuvant RT. However, a large percentage of patients are still receiving adjuvant RT and this mostly occurs at low-volume hospitals.

The effect of frailty and age on outcomes in elective paraesophageal hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: Paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) is a safe and effective operation. Previous studies have described risk factors for poor peri-operative outcomes such as emergent operations or advanced patient age, and pre-operative frailty is a known risk factor in other major surgery. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to determine if markers of frailty were predictive of poor peri-operative outcomes in elective paraesophageal hernia repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective PEHR between 1/2011 and 6/2022 at a single university-based institution were identified. Patient demographics, modified frailty index (mFI), and post-operative outcomes were recorded. A composite peri-operative morbidity outcome indicating the incidence of any of the following: prolonged length of stay (≥ 3 days), increased discharge level of care, and 30-day complications or readmissions was utilized for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Of 547 patients who underwent elective PEHR, the mean age was 66.0 ± 12.3, and 77.1% (n = 422) were female. Median length of stay was 1 [IQR 1, 2]. ASA was 3-4 in 65.8% (n = 360) of patients. The composite outcome occurred in 32.4% (n = 177) of patients. On multivariate analysis, increasing age (OR 1.021, p = 0.02), high frailty (OR 2.02, p < 0.01), ASA 3-4 (OR 1.544, p = 0.05), and redo-PEHR (OR 1.72, p = 0.02) were each independently associated with the incidence of the composite outcome. On a regression of age for the composite outcome, a cutoff point of increased risk is identified at age 72 years old (OR 2.25, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: High frailty and age over 72 years old each independently confer double the odds of a composite morbidity outcome that includes prolonged post-operative stay, peri-operative complications, the need for a higher level of care after elective paraesophageal hernia repair, and 30-day readmission. This provides additional information to counsel patients pre-operatively, as well as a potential opportunity for targeted pre-habilitation.

Thoracic retransplantation: Does time to retransplantation matter?

OBJECTIVE: For some individuals, chronic allograft failure is best treated with retransplantation. We sought to determine if time to retransplantation impacts short- and long-term outcomes for heart or lung retransplant recipients with a time to retransplantation more than 1 year. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network STAR file was queried for all adult, first-time heart (June 1, 2006, to September 30, 2020) and lung (May 1, 2005, to September 30, 2020) retransplantations with a time to retransplantation of at least 1 year. Patients were grouped according to the tertile of time to retransplantation (tertile 1: 1-7.7 years, tertile 2: 7.7-14.7 years, tertile 3: 14.7+ years; lung: tertile 1: 1-2.8 years, tertile 2: 2.8-5.6 years, tertile 3: 5.6+ years). The primary outcome was survival after retransplantation. Comparative statistics identified differences in groups, and Kaplan-Meier methods and a Cox proportional hazard model were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: After selection, 908 heart and 871 lung retransplants were identified. Among heart retransplant recipients, tertile 1 was associated with male sex, smoking history, higher listing status, and increased mechanical support pretransplant. Tertile 3 had the highest rate of concomitant kidney transplant; however, the incidence of morbidity and in-hospital mortality was similar among the groups. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses revealed no survival difference among all groups. Regarding lung retransplant recipients, tertile 1 was associated with increased lung allocation score, pretransplant hospitalization, and mechanical support. Unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses revealed decreased survival in tertile 1. CONCLUSIONS: Time to retransplant does not appear to affect heart recipients with a time to retransplantation of more than 1 year; however, shorter time to retransplantation for prior lung recipients is associated with decreased survival. Potential lung retransplant candidates with a time to retransplantation of less than 2.8 years should be carefully evaluated before retransplantation.

Donor and Recipient Hepatitis C Status Does Not Affect Rejection in Thoracic Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have expanded the donor pool for heart and lung transplantation, but concerns have arisen about rejection. We examined the incidence of rejection after heart and lung transplantation in recipients of HCV-positive donors as well as HCV-positive recipients. METHODS: Adults undergoing heart and lung transplantation from March 31, 2015 to December 31, 2019 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Transplantation and Procurement Network Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file. Patients were stratified as donor-recipient HCV negative, donor positive, and recipient positive. Comparative statistics and a multilevel logistic regression model were used. RESULTS: Meeting the criteria were 10 624 heart transplant recipients. Donor-positive recipients were significantly associated with older age, blood group O, and shorter waitlist time. No significant differences existed with regards to treatment for rejection in the first year (negative, 19.5%; donor positive, 22.3%; recipient positive, 19.5%; P = .45) or other outcomes. On regression analysis HCV status was not associated with treated rejection; however center variability was significantly associated with treated rejection (median odds ratio, 2.18). Similarly, 9917 lung transplant recipients were identified. Donor-positive recipients were more commonly White and had obstructive disease and lower lung allocation scores. Both unadjusted (negative, 22.1%; donor positive, 23.0%; recipient positive, 18.6%; P = .43) and adjusted analyses failed to demonstrate a significant association between HCV status and treatment for rejection, whereas center variability remained significantly associated with treatment for rejection (median odds ratio, 2.41). CONCLUSIONS: Use of HCV donors has expanded the donor pool for heart and lung transplantation. HCV donor status was not associated with treatment for rejection in the first year, but center variability played a role in the incidence and treatment of rejection.

Surgical resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being used before surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Given the importance of completing multimodal therapy, the aim of this study was to characterize surgical resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy as well as the reasons for, and long-term prognostic impact of, not undergoing resection. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials and high-quality retrospective studies since 2010 was performed to calculate pooled resection rates using a generalized random-effects model for potentially resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Median survival times were calculated using random-effects models for patients who did and did not undergo resection. RESULTS: In 125 studies that met the inclusion criteria, neoadjuvant therapy consisted of chemotherapy (36.8 per cent), chemoradiation (15.2 per cent), or chemotherapy and radiation (48.0 per cent). Among 11 713 patients, the pooled resection rates were 77.4 (95 per cent c.i. 71.3 to 82.5), 60.6 (54.8 to 66.1), and 22.2 (16.7 to 29.0) per cent for potentially resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer respectively. The most common reasons for not undergoing resection were distant progression for resectable and borderline resectable cancers, and local unresectability for locally advanced disease. Among 42 studies with survival data available, achieving surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival for patients with potentially resectable (median 38.5 versus 13.3 months), borderline resectable (32.3 versus 13.9 months), and locally advanced (30.0 versus 14.6 months) pancreatic cancer (P < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: Although rates of surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy vary based on anatomical stage, surgery is associated with improved survival for all patients with localized pancreatic cancer. These pooled resection and survival rates may inform patient-provider decision-making and serve as important benchmarks for future prospective trials.

Quality of Care for Gallstone Pancreatitis-the Impact of the Acute Care Surgery Model and Hospital-Level Operative Resources.

BACKGROUND: Index cholecystectomy is the standard of care for gallstone pancreatitis. Hospital-level operative resources and implementation of an acute care surgery (ACS) model may impact the ability to perform index cholecystectomy. We aimed to determine the influence of structure and process measures related to operating room access on achieving index cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis. METHODS: In 2015, we surveyed 2811 US hospitals on ACS practices, including infrastructure for operative access. A total of 1690 hospitals (60%) responded. We anonymously linked survey data to 2015 State Inpatient Databases from 17 states using American Hospital Association identifiers. We identified patients ≥ 18 years who were admitted with gallstone pancreatitis. Patients transferred from another facility were excluded. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses, clustered by hospital and adjusted for patient factors, were performed to examine multiple structure and process variables related to achieving an index cholecystectomy rate of ≥ 75% (high performers). RESULTS: Over the study period, 5656 patients were admitted with gallstone pancreatitis and 70% had an index cholecystectomy. High-performing hospitals achieved an index cholecystectomy rate of 84.1% compared to 58.5% at low-performing hospitals. On multivariable regression analysis, only teaching vs. non-teaching hospital (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.11-7.70) and access to dedicated, daytime operative resources (i.e., block time) vs. no/little access (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.11-3.37) were associated with high-performing hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Access to dedicated, daytime operative resources is associated with high quality of care for gallstone pancreatitis. Health systems should consider the addition of dedicated, daytime operative resources for acute care surgery service lines to improve patient care.

Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Despite three million adults in the United States (US) being admitted annually for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, we lack an understanding of the barriers to round-the-clock EGS care. Our objective was to measure gaps in round-the-clock EGS care. METHODS: From August 2015 to December 2015, we surveyed all US-based, adult acute care general hospitals that have an emergency room and ≥1 operating room and provide EGS care, utilizing paper and electronic methods. Surgeons or chief medical officers were queried regarding EGS practices. RESULTS: Of 2,811 hospitals, 1,634 (58.1%) responded; 279 (17.1%) were unable to always provide round-the-clock EGS care. Rural location, smaller bed size, and non-teaching status were associated with lack of round-the-clock care. Inconsistent surgeon coverage was the primary reason for lacking round-the-clock EGS care (n=162; 58.1%). However, lack of a tiered system for booking emergency cases, no anesthesia availability overnight, and no stipend for EGS call were also associated with the inability to provide round-the-clock EGS care. DISCUSSION: We found significant gaps in access to EGS care, often attributable to workforce deficiencies.

In-house intensivist presence does not affect mortality in select emergency general surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the relationship between availability of round-the-clock (RTC) in-house intensivists and patient outcomes in people who underwent surgery for a life-threatening emergency general surgery (LT-EGS) disease such as necrotizing soft-tissue infection, ischemic enteritis, perforated viscus, and toxic colitis. METHODS: Data on hospital-level critical care structures and processes from a 2015 survey of 2,811 US hospitals were linked to patient-level data from 17 State Inpatient Databases. Patients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis code for an LT-EGS disease of interest and underwent surgery on date of admission were included in analyses. RESULTS: We identified 3,620 unique LT-EGS admissions at 368 hospitals. At 66% (n = 243) of hospitals, 83.5% (n = 3,021) of patients were treated at hospitals with RTC intensivist-led care. These facilities were more likely to have in-house respiratory therapists and protocols to ensure availability of blood products or adherence to Surviving Sepsis Guidelines. When accounting for other key factors including overnight surgeon availability, perioperative staffing, and annual emergency general surgery case volume, not having a protocol to ensure adherence to Surviving Sepsis Guidelines (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.94) was associated with increased odds of mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that focused treatment of sepsis along with surgical source control, rather than RTC intensivist presence, is key feature of optimizing EGS patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level III.

Importance of Radiologists in Optimizing Outcomes for Older Americans with Acute Abdomen.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with acute abdominal pain often undergo a computed tomography (CT) scan as part of their diagnostic workup. We investigated the relationship between availability, timeliness, and interpretation of CT imaging and outcomes for life-threatening intra-abdominal diseases or "acute abdomen," in older Americans. METHODS: Data from a 2015 national survey of 2811 hospitals regarding emergency general surgery structures and processes (60.1% overall response, n = 1690) were linked to 2015 Medicare inpatient claims data. We identified beneficiaries aged ≥65 admitted emergently with a confirmatory acute abdomen diagnosis code and operative intervention on the same calendar date. Multivariable regression models adjusted for significant covariates determined odds of complications and mortality based on CT resources. RESULTS: We identified 9125 patients with acute abdomen treated at 1253 hospitals, of which 78% had ≥64-slice CT scanners and 85% had 24/7 CT technicians. Overnight CT reads were provided by in-house radiologists at 14% of hospitals and by teleradiologists at 66%. Patients were predominantly 65-74 y old (43%), white (88%), females (60%), and with ≥3 comorbidities (67%) and 8.6% died. STAT radiology reads by a board-certified radiologist rarely/never available in 2 h was associated with increased odds of systemic complication and mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.6 [1.3-5.4] and 2.3 [1.1-4.8], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Delays obtaining results are associated with adverse outcomes in older patients with acute abdomen. This may be due to delays in surgical consultation and time to source control while waiting for imaging results. Processes to ensure timely interpretation of CT scans in patients with abdominal pain may improve outcomes in high-risk patients.

Hospital Location and Socioeconomic Disadvantage of Emergency General Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients are more socioeconomically vulnerable than elective counterparts. We hypothesized that a hospital's neighborhood disadvantage is associated with vulnerability of its EGS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Area deprivation index (ADI), a neighborhood-level measure of disadvantage, and key characteristics of 724 hospitals in 14 states were linked to patient-level data in State Inpatient Databases. Hospital and EGS patient characteristics were compared across hospital ADI quartiles (least disadvantaged [ADI 1-25] "affluent," minimally disadvantaged [ADI 26-50] "min-da", moderately disadvantaged [ADI 51-75] "mod-da", and most disadvantaged [ADI 76-100] "impoverished") using chi2 tests and multivariable regression. RESULTS: Higher disadvantage hospitals are more often nonteaching (affluent = 38.9%, min-da = 53.5%, mod-da = 72.1%, and impoverished = 67.6%), nonaffiliated with medical schools (50%, 72.4%, 81.8%, and 78.8%), and in rural areas (3.3%, 9.2%, 31.2%, and 27.9%). EGS patients at higher disadvantage hospitals are more likely to be older (43.9%, 48.6%, 49.1%, and 46.6%), have >3 comorbidities (17.0%, 19.0%, 18.4%, and 19.3%), live in low-income areas (21.4%, 23.6%, 32.2%, and 42.5%), and experience complications (23.2%, 23.7%, 24.0%, and 25.2%). Rates of uninsurance/underinsurance were highest at affluent and impoverished hospitals (18.0, 16.4%, 17.7%, and 19.2%). Higher disadvantage hospitals serve fewer minorities (32.6%, 21.3%, 20.7%, and 24.0%), except in rural areas (2.9%, 6.7%, 6.5%, and 15.5%). In multivariable analyses, the impoverished hospital ADI quartile did not predict odds of serving as a safety-net or predominantly minority-serving hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals in impoverished areas disproportionately serve underserved EGS patient populations but are less likely to have robust resources for EGS care or train future EGS surgeons. These findings have implications for measures to improve equity in EGS outcomes.

Re-examining "Never Letting the Sun Rise or Set on a Bowel Obstruction" in the Era of Acute Care Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) no longer mandates urgent surgical evaluation raising the question of the role of operating room (OR) access on SBO outcomes. METHODS: Data from our 2015 survey on emergency general surgery (EGS) practices, including queries on OR availability and surgical staffing, were anonymously linked to adult SBO patient data from 17 Statewide Inpatient Databases (SIDs). Univariate and multivariable associations between OR access and timing of operation, complications, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality were measured. RESULTS: Of 32,422 SBO patients, 83% were treated non-operatively. Operative patients were older (median 66 vs 65 years), had more comorbidities (53% vs 46% with ≥ 3), and experienced more systemic complications (36% vs 23%), higher mortality (2.8% vs 1.4%), and longer LOS (median 10 vs 4 days). Patients had lower odds of operation if treated at hospitals lacking processes to tier urgent cases (aOR 0.90, 95% CI [0.83-0.99]) and defer elective cases (aOR 0.87 [0.80-0.94]). Patients had higher odds of operation if treated at hospitals with surgeons sometimes (aOR 1.14 [1.04-1.26]) or rarely/never (aOR 1.16 [1.06-1.26]) covering EGS at more than one location compared to always. Odds of systemic complication (OR 2.0 [1.6-2.4]), operative complication (OR 1.5 [1.2-1.8]), and mortality were increased for very late versus early operation (OR 2.6 [1.7-4.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Although few patients with SBO require emergency surgery, we identified EGS structures and processes that are important for providing timely and appropriate intervention for patients whose SBO remains unresolved and requires surgery.

Identifying the fundamental structures and processes of care contributing to emergency general surgery quality using a mixed-methods Donabedian approach.

BACKGROUND: Acute Care Surgery (ACS) was developed as a structured, team-based approach to providing round-the-clock emergency general surgery (EGS) care for adult patients needing treatment for diseases such as cholecystitis, gastrointestinal perforation, and necrotizing fasciitis. Lacking any prior evidence on optimizing outcomes for EGS patients, current implementation of ACS models has been idiosyncratic. We sought to use a Donabedian approach to elucidate potential EGS structures and processes that might be associated with improved outcomes as an initial step in designing the optimal model of ACS care for EGS patients. METHODS: We developed and implemented a national survey of hospital-level EGS structures and processes by surveying surgeons or chief medical officers regarding hospital-level structures and processes that directly or indirectly impacted EGS care delivery in 2015. These responses were then anonymously linked to 2015 data from the American Hospital Association (AHA) annual survey, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review claims (MedPAR), 17 State Inpatient Databases (SIDs) using AHA unique identifiers (AHAID). This allowed us to combine hospital-level data, as reported in our survey or to the AHA, to patient-level data in an effort to further examine the role of EGS structures and processes on EGS outcomes. We describe the multi-step, iterative process utilizing the Donabedian framework for quality measurement that serves as a foundation for later work in this project. RESULTS: Hospitals that responded to the survey were primarily non-governmental and located in urban settings. A plurality of respondent hospitals had fewer than 100 inpatient beds. A minority of the hospitals had medical school affiliations. DISCUSSION: Our results will enable us to develop a measure of preparedness for delivering EGS care in the US, provide guidance for regionalized care models for EGS care, tiering of ACS programs based on the robustness of their EGS structures and processes and the quality of their outcomes, and formulate triage guidelines based on patient risk factors and severity of EGS disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our work provides a template for team science applicable to research efforts combining primary data collection (i.e., that derived from our survey) with existing national data sources (i.e., SIDs and MedPAR).

The association between self-declared acute care surgery services and critical care resources: Results from a national survey.

PURPOSE: We examined differences in critical care structures and processes between hospitals with Acute Care Surgery (ACS) versus general surgeon on call (GSOC) models for emergency general surgery (EGS) care. METHODS: 2811 EGS-capable hospitals were surveyed to examine structures and processes including critical care domains and ACS implementation. Differences between ACS and GSOC hospitals were compared using appropriate tests of association and logistic regression models. RESULTS: 272/1497 hospitals eligible for analysis (18.2%) reported they use an ACS model. EGS patients at ACS hospitals were more likely to be admitted to a combined trauma/surgical ICU or a dedicated surgical ICU. GSOC hospitals had lower adjusted odds of having 24-h ICU coverage, in-house intensivists or respiratory therapists, and 4/6 critical-care protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care delivery is a key component of EGS care. While harnessing of critical care structures and processes varies across hospitals that have implemented ACS, overall ACS models of care appear to have more robust critical care practices.

Role of interprofessional teams in emergency general surgery patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In response to duty hour restrictions, hospitals expanded residency programs and added advanced practice providers. We sought to determine if type of clinical support was associated with emergency general surgery outcomes. METHODS: As part of our 2015 survey of acute care hospitals, we asked hospitals whether residents and advanced practice providers participate in emergency general surgery care. Data from responding hospitals were linked to patient data (≥18 years old admitted with an emergency general surgery diagnosis) from 17 State Inpatient Databases using American Hospital Association identifiers. Analyses compared emergency general surgery patient and hospital characteristics based on type of providers assisting emergency general surgery surgeons (none, only advanced practice providers, only residents, or both). Multivariable analysis determined if presence of advanced practice providers and/or residents was associated with type of management, mortality, or complications. RESULTS: Eighty-three hospitals and 49,271 unique emergency general surgery admissions were included. Hospitals without residents and advanced practice providers were most likely to manage patients operatively. However, hospitals with residents (alone or with advanced practice providers) had reduced odds of systemic complication compared with hospitals without clinical support (adjusted odds ratio 0.77 [95% confidence interval 0.60-0.98] and adjusted odds ratio 0.77 [95% confidence interval 0.62-0.95], respectively), while hospitals with only residents had the lowest odds of operative complication. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the positive effect residents (alone or partnering with advanced practice providers) can have on emergency general surgery patient outcomes.

Does chest wall Organ Injury Scale (OIS) or Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) predict outcomes? An analysis of 16,000 consecutive rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Chest wall injuries have serious clinical consequences. It is presumed a higher severity of injury correlates with worse outcomes. The 2 most common chest wall injury severity scores, the Organ Injury Scale and the Abbreviated Injury Scale, are based on expert opinion with unknown clinical endpoints. Our aim was to determine if either the Organ Injury Scale or the Abbreviated Injury Scale are associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: A single institution, 4-year retrospective study of all patients with rib or sternal fractures was conducted. All patients were assessed for both Organ Injury Scale and Abbreviated Injury Scale scores. Outcomes assessed included mortality, complications, tracheostomy, and readmissions. Receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve were calculated to measure discriminatory accuracy of scoring systems for outcomes in chest wall injury. RESULTS: Overall, 3,033 patients presented with a total of 16,055 rib fractures. The median chest wall scores were 2 for Organ Injury Scale and 3 for Abbreviated Injury Scale. Abbreviated Injury Scale scores for the same patients were greater than the Organ Injury Scale in 48.7%, equivalent in 46.7%, and lower in 4.6%. The receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve for in-hospital outcomes were weakly predictive for the Organ Injury Scale over the Abbreviated Injury Scale. The receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve for readmissions were very weakly predictive for the Abbreviated Injury Scale over the Organ Injury Scale. CONCLUSION: There is a very weak association between chest wall Organ Injury Scale score and in-hospital outcomes. The Abbreviated Injury Scale score outperformed the Organ Injury Scale, only being weakly predictive of readmission. Chest wall injury scoring systems may need revision for future outcomes-based research and practice improvements.

Mortality From Burns Sustained on Home Oxygen Therapy Exceeds Predicted Mortality.

The Boston Criteria and the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index are two widely accepted models for predicting mortality in burn patients. We aimed to elucidate whether these models are able to predict the risk of mortality in patients who sustain burns while smoking on home oxygen given their clinical fragility. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 48 patients admitted to our burn center from November 2013 to September 2017 who sustained a burn while smoking on home oxygen. Yearlong mortality was the primary outcome of the investigation; secondary outcomes included discharge to facility, length of stay, and need for tracheostomy. We calculated the expected mortality rate for each patient based on Boston Criteria and Abbreviated Burn Severity Index and compared the mortality rate observed in our cohort. Patients in our cohort suffered a 54% mortality rate within a year of injury, compared to a 23.5% mortality predicted by Boston Criteria, which was found to be statistically significant by chi-square analysis (P < .05). Abbreviated Burn Severity Index predicted mortality was 19.7%. While the absolute value of the difference in mortality was greater, this was not significant on chi-square analysis due to sample size. Our secondary outcomes revealed 42% discharge to facility, the average length of stay of 6.2 days, and 6.25% required tracheostomy. Patients whose burns are attributable to smoking on home oxygen may have an increased risk of mortality than prognostication models would suggest. This bears significant clinical impact, particularly regarding family and provider decision making in pursuing aggressive management.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) versus surgery first (SF) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial. A random-effects meta-analysis of only prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NT versus SF for potentially resectable (PR) or borderline resectable (BR) PDAC was performed. Among six RCTs including 850 patients, 411 (48.3%) received NT and 439 (51.6%) SF. In all included trials, NT was gemcitabine-based: four using chemoradiation and two chemotherapy alone. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, NT resulted in improved overall survival (OS) compared to SF (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.86). This effect was independent of anatomic classification (PR: hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91; BR: HR 0.51 95% CI 0.28-0.93) or NT type (chemoradiation: HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.98; chemotherapy alone: HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.87). Overall resection rate was similar (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.04, I2 = 39.0%) but NT increased the likelihood of a margin-negative (R0) resection (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.93, I2 = 0%) and having negative lymph nodes (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.47-2.91, I2 = 12.3%). In this meta-analysis of prospective RCTs, NT significantly improved OS in an intention-to-treat fashion, compared with SF for localized PDAC. Randomized controlled trials using contemporary multi-agent chemotherapy will be needed to confirm these findings and to define the optimal NT regimen.

Loss of Community-Dwelling Status Among Survivors of High-Acuity Emergency General Surgery Disease.

OBJECTIVES: To examine loss of community-dwelling status 9 months after hospitalization for high-acuity emergency general surgery (HA-EGS) disease among older Americans. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of claims data. SETTING: US communities with Medicare beneficiaries. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries age 65 years or older hospitalized urgently/emergently between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2015, with a principal diagnosis representing potential life or organ threat (necrotizing soft tissue infections, hernias with gangrene, ischemic enteritis, perforated viscus, toxic colitis or gastroenteritis, peritonitis, intra-abdominal hemorrhage) and an operation of interest on hospital days 1 or 2 (N = 3319). MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics (age, race, and sex), comorbidities, principal diagnosis, complications, and index hospitalization disposition (died; discharged to skilled nursing facility [SNF], long-term acute care [LTAC], rehabilitation, hospice, home (with or without services), or acute care hospital; other) were measured. Survivors of index hospitalization were followed until December 31, 2015, on mortality and community-dwelling status (SNF/LTAC vs not). Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier plots, and χ2 tests were used to describe and compare the cohort based on disposition. A multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, complications, and discharge disposition, determined independent predictors of loss of community-dwelling status at 9 months. RESULTS: A total of 2922 (88%) survived index hospitalization. Likelihood of discharge to home decreased with increasing age, baseline comorbidities, and in-hospital complications. Overall, 418 (14.3%) HA-EGS survivors died during the follow-up period. Among those alive at 9 months, 10.3% were no longer community dwelling. Initial discharge disposition to any location other than home and three or more surgical complications during index hospitalization were independent predictors of residing in a SNF/LTAC 9 months after surviving HA-EGS. CONCLUSION: Older Americans, known to prioritize living in the community, will experience substantial loss of independence due to HA-EGS. Long-term expectations after surviving HA-EGS must be framed from the perspective of the outcomes that older patients value the most. Further research is needed to examine the quality-of-life burden of EGS survivorship prospectively. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2289-2297, 2019.