Gene therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration by subretinal delivery of RGX-314: a phase 1/2a dose-escalation study.

BACKGROUND: Frequent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) injections reduce the risk of rapid and severe vision loss in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD); however, due to undertreatment, many patients lose vision over time. New treatments that provide sustained suppression of VEGF-A are needed. RGX-314 (currently known as ABBV-RGX-314) is an adeno-associated virus serotype 8 vector that expresses an anti-VEGF-A antigen-binding fragment, which provides potential for continuous VEGF-A suppression after a single subretinal injection. We report results on the safety and efficacy of subretinal injection of RGX-314 in patients with nAMD. METHODS: For this open-label, multiple-cohort, multicentre, phase 1/2a, dose-escalation study conducted at eight sites in the USA, we enrolled participants with nAMD aged 50-89 years who had previously been treated with anti-VEGF injections into five cohorts (with five different doses of RGX-314). To be eligible, participants had to have macular neovascularisation secondary to nAMD with subretinal or intraretinal fluid in the centre subfield, be pseudophakic (after cataract removal), and have a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the study eye between 20/63 and 20/400 for the first participant in each cohort and between 20/40 and 20/400 for others. Subretinal injection of RGX-314 was done without a pre-bleb by a wet-laboratory-trained vitreoretinal surgeon. Cohort 1 received 3 × 109 genome copies per eye, cohort 2 received 1 × 1010, and cohort 3 received 6 × 1010. Two additional dose cohorts (cohort 4: 1·6 × 1011; cohort 5: 2·5 × 1011) were added. Participants were seen 1 day and 1 week after administration of RGX-314, and then monthly for 2 years (up to week 106). The primary outcome was safety of RGX-314 delivered by subretinal injection up to week 26. This analysis includes all 42 patients enrolled in the study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03066258. FINDINGS: Between May 12, 2017, and May 21, 2019, we screened 110 patients for eligibility and enrolled 68. 42 participants demonstrated the required anatomic response to intravitreal ranibizumab and then received a single RGX-314 injection (dose range 3 × 109 to 2·5 × 1011 genome copies per eye) and were followed up for 2 years. There were 20 serious adverse events in 13 participants, of which one was possibly related to RGX-314: pigmentary changes in the macula with severe vision reduction 12 months after injection of RGX-314 at a dose of 2·5 × 1011 genome copies per eye. Asymptomatic pigmentary changes were seen in the inferior retinal periphery several months after subretinal injection of RGX-314 most commonly at doses of 6 × 1010 genome copies per eye or higher. There were no clinically determined immune responses or inflammation beyond that expected following routine vitrectomy. Doses of 6 × 1010 genome copies or higher resulted in sustained concentrations of RGX-314 protein in aqueous humour and stable or improved BCVA and central retinal thickness with few or no supplemental anti-VEGF-A injections in most participants. INTERPRETATION: Subretinal delivery of RGX-314 was generally well tolerated with no clinically recognised immune responses. RGX-314 gene therapy provides a novel approach for sustained VEGF-A suppression in patients with nAMD that has potential to control exudation, maintain vision, and reduce treatment burden after a single administration. Results from this study informed the pivotal programme to evaluate RGX-314 in patients with nAMD. FUNDING: RegenxBio.

Ocular Effects of MEK Inhibitor Therapy: Literature Review, Clinical Presentation, and Best Practices for Mitigation.

MEK signaling pathway targeting has emerged as a valuable addition to the options available for the treatment of advanced cancers including melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Ophthalmologic monitoring of patients taking part in clinical trials of MEK inhibitors has shown that while ocular effects are common, generally emerging during the first days to weeks of treatment, the majority are either asymptomatic or have minimal visual impact and are benign, resolving without intervention or the need to reduce or stop MEK inhibitor therapy. However rare cases of serious, potentially vision-threatening ocular toxicities have been reported during MEK inhibitor therapy. There is currently no recommendation for routine ophthalmologic screening or monitoring of patients with advanced cancer who are initiating MEK inhibitor therapy. However, baseline ophthalmologic examination may be useful for all patients initiating MEK inhibitor therapy to allow the differentiation of preexisting pathology versus the development of MEK inhibitor-associated retinopathy in the event of the emergence of symptomatic ocular events. Regular ophthalmologic examination may be appropriate for patients at increased risk for ocular events, such as patients with a history of ocular inflammation, infection, or underlying macular/retinal disease. All patients reporting visual disturbance should be referred for prompt ophthalmologic review to determine the potential seriousness of any underlying abnormalities and whether there is a need for treatment modification or specific intervention. Understanding the potential consequences of ocular toxicities is of particular importance in the context of decision-making for the continuation of potentially life-prolonging medications such as MEK inhibitors.

Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (PULSAR): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg could improve treatment outcomes and provide sustained disease control in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), with extended dosing compared with aflibercept 2 mg. METHODS: PULSAR is a phase 3, randomised, three-group, double-masked, non-inferiority, 96-week trial conducted across 223 sites worldwide. Adults with nAMD were randomised 1:1:1 to aflibercept 8 mg every 12 weeks (8q12), aflibercept 8 mg every 16 weeks (8q16), or aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (2q8), following three initial monthly doses in all groups. From week 16, patients in the aflibercept 8 mg groups had their dosing interval shortened if pre-specified dose regimen modification criteria denoting disease activity were met. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 48. All patients with at least one dose of study treatment were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04423718) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Of 1011 patients randomised to aflibercept 8q12 (n=336), 8q16 (n=338), or 2q8 (n=337) between Aug 11, 2020, and July 30, 2021, 1009 patients received study treatment (aflibercept 8q12 n=335; aflibercept 8q16 n=338; and aflibercept 2q8 n=336). Aflibercept 8q12 and 8q16 showed non-inferior BCVA gains versus aflibercept 2q8 (mean BCVA change from baseline +6·7 [SD 12·6] and +6·2 [11·7] vs +7·6 [12·2] letters). The least squares mean differences between aflibercept 8q12 versus 2q8 and 8q16 versus 2q8, respectively, were -0·97 (95% CI -2·87 to 0·92) and -1·14 (-2·97 to 0·69) letters (non-inferiority margin at 4 letters). The incidence of ocular adverse events in the study eye was similar across groups (aflibercept 8q12 n=129 [39%]; aflibercept 8q16 n=127 [38%]; and aflibercept 2q8 n=130 [39%]). INTERPRETATION: Aflibercept 8 mg showed efficacy and safety with extended dosing intervals, which has the potential to improve the management of patients with nAMD. FUNDING: Bayer AG and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

TENAYA and LUCERNE: Two-Year Results from the Phase 3 Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Trials of Faricimab with Treat-and-Extend Dosing in Year 2.

PURPOSE: To evaluate 2-year efficacy, durability, and safety of the bispecific antibody faricimab, which inhibits both angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A. DESIGN: TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823300) were identically designed, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled phase 3 noninferiority trials. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) 50 years of age or older. METHODS: Patients were randomized (1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6.0 mg up to every 16 weeks (Q16W) or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W). Faricimab fixed dosing based on protocol-defined disease activity at weeks 20 and 24 up to week 60, followed up to week 108 by a treat-and-extend personalized treatment interval regimen. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy analyses included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at 2 years (averaged over weeks 104, 108, and 112) and proportion of patients receiving Q16W, every 12 weeks (Q12W), and Q8W dosing at week 112 in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included ocular adverse events (AEs) in the study eye through study end at week 112. RESULTS: Of 1326 patients treated across TENAYA/LUCERNE, 1113 (83.9%) completed treatment (n = 555 faricimab; n = 558 aflibercept). The BCVA change from baseline at 2 years was comparable between faricimab and aflibercept groups in TENAYA (adjusted mean change, +3.7 letters [95% confidence interval (CI), +2.1 to +5.4] and +3.3 letters [95% CI, +1.7 to +4.9], respectively; mean difference, +0.4 letters [95% CI, -1.9 to +2.8]) and LUCERNE (adjusted mean change, +5.0 letters [95% CI, +3.4 to +6.6] and +5.2 letters [95% CI, +3.6 to +6.8], respectively; mean difference, -0.2 letters [95% CI, -2.4 to +2.1]). At week 112 in TENAYA and LUCERNE, 59.0% and 66.9%, respectively, achieved Q16W faricimab dosing, increasing from year 1, and 74.1% and 81.2%, achieved Q12W or longer dosing. Ocular AEs in the study eye were comparable between faricimab and aflibercept groups in TENAYA (55.0% and 56.5% of patients, respectively) and LUCERNE (52.9% and 47.5% of patients, respectively) through week 112. CONCLUSIONS: Treat-and-extend faricimab treatment based on nAMD disease activity maintained vision gains through year 2, with most patients achieving extended dosing intervals. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with early persistent retinal fluid: 96-week outcomes from the HAWK and HARRIER studies.

OBJECTIVE: Post-hoc analysis to compare the outcomes of brolucizumab 6 mg vs. aflibercept 2 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients with early persistent retinal fluid in HAWK and HARRIER. METHODS: After 3 monthly loading doses, brolucizumab-treated eyes (N = 730) received injections every 12 weeks (q12w) or q8w if disease activity was detected. Aflibercept-treated eyes (N = 729) received fixed q8w dosing. Early persistent fluid was defined as the presence of subretinal fluid and/or intraretinal fluid up to Week 12. RESULTS: A lower proportion of brolucizumab patients had early persistent retinal fluid compared with aflibercept (11.2% (n = 82) vs. 19.2% (n = 140)). In these patients, 34.1% of the brolucizumab-treated group achieved a ≥ 15 ETDRS letter gain in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at Week 96 compared with 20.7% of the aflibercept-treated group. Brolucizumab achieved numerically better BCVA outcomes (Week 96: brolucizumab, +6.4 letters; aflibercept, +3.7 letters) and significantly greater central subfield thickness reductions versus aflibercept from baseline through Week 96 (Week 96: -202 µm vs. -145 µm; p = 0.0206). Brolucizumab demonstrated an overall favourable benefit/risk profile in this patient cohort. In their unmasked, post-hoc review, the Safety Review Committee identified two cases of retinal vasculitis and no cases of retinal vascular occlusion in the brolucizumab arm; no cases of retinal vasculitis or retinal vascular occlusion were identified in the aflibercept arm. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, anatomical and visual outcomes were better with brolucizumab compared with aflibercept. Brolucizumab may therefore achieve greater disease control than aflibercept in nAMD patients with early persistent retinal fluid.

CATASTROPHIC, BILATERAL RETINAL VASCULAR OCCLUSION AFTER INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB INJECTION.

PURPOSE: To describe two cases of catastrophic, bilateral retinal vascular occlusion after intravitreal (IVT) bevacizumab injection. METHODS: Case series. Main outcome measures included clinical and fluorescein angiography findings. RESULTS: Case 1-A 65-year-old woman with calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysfunction, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasis syndrome developed acute, severe, bilateral visual loss 2 weeks after bilateral IVT bevacizumab injection for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Examination and fluorescein angiography revealed moderate anterior chamber inflammation, bilateral perivascular retinal hemorrhages, and near total retinal vascular occlusion. Extensive testing revealed moderately elevated anti-B2 glycoprotein (antiphospholipid) antibodies. Case 2-An 85-year-old man with polymyalgia rheumatica and left eye exudative age-related macular degeneration experienced severe, bilateral, sequential visual loss in the left eye and then right eye approximately 3 weeks after IVT bevacizumab left eye injection. Examination revealed bilateral panuveitis, diffuse perivascular exudates, and intraretinal hemorrhages. Fluorescein angiography showed diffuse venous leakage. Extensive testing revealed an elevated antinuclear antibody and mildly elevated anticardiolipin antibody. CONCLUSION: Patients with underlying retinal vascular vulnerabilities may be at increased risk of catastrophic, bilateral retinal vascular occlusion after treatment with IVT bevacizumab. The moderate-to-severe intraocular inflammation in both cases and the contralateral involvement after unilateral IVT injection in Case 2 suggest a possible delayed immune-mediated mechanism.

The Safety and Biological Activity of OTT166, a Novel Topical Selective Integrin Inhibitor for the Treatment of Diabetic Eye Disease: A Phase 1b Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and biological activity of a topical selective integrin inhibitor (OTT166) eyedrop administered BID for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked Phase 1b study. Subjects with nonproliferative DR and DME with central subfield thickness (CST) &gt; 325 microns were randomized to OTT166 eyedrops (2.5% or 5%) BID for 28 days. Subjects were followed for an additional 28 days after treatment cessation. RESULTS: Forty-four subjects were enrolled. No drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs) and two drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported. OTT166 was well-tolerated with no evidence of ocular toxicity. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained stable. Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) overall was variable: +12.8/+1.8 microns at Day 28 (end of treatment) and -50.3/+5.5 microns at Day 56 (end of study) for the 2.5% and 5% groups, respectively. Median CRT overall demonstrated consistent reduction by end of study: -39.0/-16.5 microns for the 2.5% and 5% groups, respectively. Median responses were greater in the treatment-naïve group (-41.5/-26.0 microns for the 2.5% and 5% groups, respectively). Thirty-seven percent of 'responder' subjects exhibited a mean reduction in CRT of 46.6 microns on optical coherence tomography (OCT) at end of treatment (Day 28) which persisted to end of the study (Day 56) - mean reduction of 67.4 microns, suggesting a durable effect. CONCLUSION: OTT166 eyedrops were safe, well-tolerated, and demonstrated biological activity in 37% of responders. These results warrant further evaluation of OTT166 eyedrops. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2022;53:553-560.]</b>.

Color Vision and Microperimetry Changes in Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration After Risuteganib Treatment: Exploratory Endpoints in a Multicenter Phase 2a Double-Masked, Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Crossover Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement and changes in microperimetry (MP) and color vision in patients with nonexudative age-related macular degeneration following administration of two 1.0-mg intravitreal doses of risuteganib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase 2a, prospective, double-masked, sham-controlled study, eyes with nonexudative age-related macular degeneration and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study BCVA between 20/40 and 20/200 were randomized to intravitreal risuteganib (1.0 mg) or sham injection. The risuteganib group received a second 1.0-mg dose, and patients in the sham group crossed over to receive 1.0 mg of risuteganib at week 16. Exploratory endpoints included changes in color vision and mesopic MP. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (risuteganib, n = 25; sham, n = 14) completed the study. There was a significant (P < .05) correlation between BCVA and the total error score (TES) for both Lanthony and Hue Style. Confusion index was close to the criterion for significance (P = .056) in the risuteganib group. All color vision metrics demonstrated a trend toward improvement in risuteganib responders (BCVA letter gain ≥8 letters) and no change in the nonresponders, with significant differences seen in confusion index between the risuteganib and control group (P = .0493) and between responders and nonresponders (P = .0478). MP showed that risuteganib responders improved in mean sensitivity and change in number of loci ≤11 dB and ≤0 dB, whereas nonresponders worsened. CONCLUSION: All color vision and MP parameters tested trended toward improvement in risuteganib-treated patients and risuteganib responders. Statistically significant improvement was evident in two metrics: confusion index (in risuteganib-treated patients and responders) and number of loci with decreased sensitivity (in responders). A significant correlation between BCVA and both TES Lanthony and TES Hue Style in risuteganib patients provides concurrent evidence of objective and subjective improvement of retinal function. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2022;53:430-438.].

The Association of Fluid Volatility With Subretinal Hyperreflective Material and Ellipsoid Zone Integrity in Neovascular AMD.

Purpose: To evaluate the association of fluid volatility with ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity and subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM) volume during anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: This study was a post hoc analysis of the OSPREY study. Retinal volatility was quantified as the standard deviation across weeks 12 to 56 for six optical coherence tomography (OCT) metrics: central subfield thickness (CST), total fluid (TF) volume, subretinal fluid (SRF) volume, intraretinal fluid (IRF) volume, macular total retinal fluid index (TRFI), and central macular TRFI. Eyes with volatility ≤ 25th or ≥ 75th percentile values were compared. Results: Eyes with low volatility in several exudative metrics showed greater change from baseline in SHRM volume at week 12 than eyes with high volatility. During the maintenance phase (weeks 12-56), eyes exhibiting high SRF volatility demonstrated increased SHRM volume compared to eyes with low SRF volatility (P = 0.027). Eyes exhibiting high volatility in CST, TF, and SRF demonstrated less improvement in EZ total attenuation (P < 0.001, P = 0.033, and P = 0.043, respectively) than eyes with low volatility. Early exudative instability (i.e., between weeks 4-8 or weeks 8-12) in multiple parameters (i.e., CST, TF, IRF, macular TRFI, or central macular TRFI) was associated with greater volatility during the maintenance phase (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Greater volatility in exudative OCT metrics, particularly SRF volatility, was associated with a greater increase in SHRM and less improvement in EZ integrity, suggesting that volatility is detrimental to multiple anatomic features in nAMD. Early exudative instability during the loading phase of treatment was associated with longer-term volatility in exudation.

MERLIN: Phase 3a, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked Trial of Brolucizumab in Participants with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Persistent Retinal Fluid.

PURPOSE: To assess the 52-week efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg administered every 4 weeks compared with aflibercept 2 mg dosed every 4 weeks in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and persistent retinal fluid. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked phase 3a study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with recalcitrant nAMD (persistent residual retinal fluid despite previous frequent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment). METHODS: Eyes were randomized (2:1) to intravitreal brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks up to and including week 100. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was analysis of noninferiority in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to week 52 (margin, 4 letters). Other key end points included change in central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to week 52, fluid-free status (no intraretinal fluid and no subretinal fluid), and safety. RESULTS: At week 52, brolucizumab was noninferior to aflibercept in BCVA change from baseline (least squares mean difference, -0.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.1 to 0.9; P < 0.001). A total of 4.8% and 1.7% of participants reported a 15-letter or more BCVA loss from baseline at week 52 in the brolucizumab and aflibercept groups, respectively. In eyes treated with brolucizumab compared with those treated with aflibercept, the CST was reduced significantly (P < 0.001), and a significantly greater proportion of eyes were fluid free at week 52 (40.4% brolucizumab vs. 19.0% aflibercept; 95% CI, 13.9-29.0; P < 0.001). Incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, were 9.3% (0.8% and 2.0%) for brolucizumab versus 4.5% (0% and 0%) for aflibercept, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity outcomes in previously treated participants with nAMD and persistent retinal fluid receiving brolucizumab 6 mg dosed every 4 weeks were noninferior to aflibercept 2 mg dosed every 4 weeks, with superior anatomic outcomes. However, incidences of IOI, including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, also were higher, leading to study termination.

INTRAVITREAL NESVACUMAB (ANTIANGIOPOIETIN 2) PLUS AFLIBERCEPT IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: Phase 2 RUBY Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare intravitreal nesvacumab (anti-angiopoietin 2) plus aflibercept with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in diabetic macular edema. METHODS: The eyes (n = 302) were randomized (1:2:3) to nesvacumab 3 mg + aflibercept 2 mg (LD combo), nesvacumab 6 mg + aflibercept 2 mg (HD combo), or IAI 2 mg at baseline, Weeks 4 and 8. LD combo continued every 8 weeks (q8w). HD combo was rerandomized at Week 12 to q8w or every 12 weeks (q12w); IAI to q8w, q12w, or HD combo q8w through Week 32. RESULTS: Week 12 best-corrected visual acuity gains for LD and HD combo versus IAI were 6.8, 8.5, and 8.8 letters; Week 36 changes were similar. Central subfield retinal thickness reductions at Week 12 were -169.4, -184.0, and -174.6 µm (nominal P = 0.0183, HD combo vs. IAI); Week 36 reductions for LD combo and HD combo q8w and q12w versus IAI were -210.4, -223.4, and -193.7 versus -61.9 µm (nominal P < 0.05). At Week 12, 13.3% and 21.3% versus 15.2% had ≥2-step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale improvement (LD and HD combos vs. IAI) and 59.6% and 66.3% versus 53.7% had complete foveal center fluid resolution. Safety was comparable across groups. CONCLUSION: Nesvacumab + aflibercept demonstrated no additional visual benefit over IAI. Anatomic improvements with HD combo may warrant further investigation.

Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (TENAYA and LUCERNE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3, non-inferiority trials.

BACKGROUND: Faricimab is a bispecific antibody that acts through dual inhibition of both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor A. We report primary results of two phase 3 trials evaluating intravitreal faricimab with extension up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: TENAYA and LUCERNE were randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority trials across 271 sites worldwide. Treatment-naive patients with nAMD aged 50 years or older were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6·0 mg up to every 16 weeks, based on protocol-defined disease activity assessments at weeks 20 and 24, or aflibercept 2·0 mg every 8 weeks. Randomisation was performed through an interactive voice or web-based response system using a stratified permuted block randomisation method. Patients, investigators, those assessing outcomes, and the funder were masked to group assignments. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline averaged over weeks 40, 44, and 48 (prespecified non-inferiority margin of four letters), in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (TENAYA NCT03823287 and LUCERNE NCT03823300). FINDINGS: Across the two trials, 1329 patients were randomly assigned between Feb 19 and Nov 19, 2019 (TENAYA n=334 faricimab and n=337 aflibercept), and between March 11 and Nov 1, 2019 (LUCERNE n=331 faricimab and n=327 aflibercept). BCVA change from baseline with faricimab was non-inferior to aflibercept in both TENAYA (adjusted mean change 5·8 letters [95% CI 4·6 to 7·1] and 5·1 letters [3·9 to 6·4]; treatment difference 0·7 letters [-1·1 to 2·5]) and LUCERNE (6·6 letters [5·3 to 7·8] and 6·6 letters [5·3 to 7·8]; treatment difference 0·0 letters [-1·7 to 1·8]). Rates of ocular adverse events were comparable between faricimab and aflibercept (TENAYA n=121 [36·3%] vs n=128 [38·1%], and LUCERNE n=133 [40·2%] vs n=118 [36·2%]). INTERPRETATION: Visual benefits with faricimab given at up to 16-week intervals demonstrates its potential to meaningfully extend the time between treatments with sustained efficacy, thereby reducing treatment burden in patients with nAMD. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Intravitreal conbercept for diabetic macular oedema: 2-year results from a randomised controlled trial and open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injections of conbercept versus laser photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). METHODS: A 12-month multicentre, randomised, double-masked, double-sham, parallel controlled, phase III trial (Sailing Study), followed by a 12-month open-label extension study. Patients with centre-involved DME were randomly assigned to receive either laser photocoagulation followed by pro re nata (PRN) sham intravitreal injections (laser/sham) or sham laser photocoagulation followed by PRN 0.5 mg conbercept intravitreal injections (sham/conbercept). Patients who entered the extension study received PRN conbercept treatment. The primary endpoint was the changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline. RESULTS: A total of 248 eyes were included in the full analysis set and 157 eyes continued in the extension study. Significant improvement in mean change in BCVA from baseline to month 12 was observed in the sham/conbercept group (8.2±9.5 letters), whereas no improvement was observed in the laser/sham group (0.3±12.0 letters). Patients in the laser/sham group showed a marked improvement in BCVA after the switch to conbercept in the extension study, and there was no difference in BCVA between the two groups at the end of the extension study. CONCLUSION: The use of a conbercept PRN intravitreal injection regimen improved the BCVA of patients with DME, and its efficacy was better than that of laser photocoagulations, and the same efficacy was observed when the eyes treated with laser alone were switched to conbercept. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02194634.

Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of Plasma Kallikrein Inhibitor THR-149 for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of a single intravitreal injection of 3 dose levels of THR-149 in adults with center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: A phase 1, open-label, multicenter 3 + 3 dose-esclation study with 3-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) up to and including the Day 14 visit. Additional key endpoints included the incidence of (serious) adverse events ([S]AEs), mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST), and additional imaging parameters on widefield fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography. Results: Twelve subjects were treated: 3 subjects received THR-149 0.005 mg, 3 received 0.022 mg and 6 received 0.13 mg. Baseline ocular characteristics were balanced between subjects at each dose level. There were no DLTs or ocular SAEs, and all subjects completed the study. Six subjects experienced a total of 10 AEs in the study eye; 1 case of mild anterior chamber inflammation was deemed related to THR-149 and/or the injection procedure. Mean change from Baseline in BCVA was +7.5 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters on Day 14, and +6.4 ETDRS letters by Month 3. CST was variable, and mean CST change from baseline was +30.0 µm at Month 3. There were no clinically meaningful changes in imaging parameters. Conclusions: THR-149 was safe and well tolerated; preliminary efficacy in terms of BCVA improvement was observed. Translational Relevance: This work bridges the gap between basic research and clinical care by providing first in human safety and preliminary efficacy data, supporting the further investigation of THR-149 as a potential treatment for DME.

Evaluation of Intravitreal Aflibercept for the Treatment of Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Results From the PANORAMA Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Proactive treatment of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) reduces the risk of progression to vision-threatening complications. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate vascular endothelial growth factor blockade therapy with intravitreal aflibercept injections in eyes with severe NPDR without diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept for the Improvement of Moderately Severe to Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PANORAMA) was a double-masked 100-week randomized clinical trial conducted in multiple centers worldwide. The study included 402 adults with Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) level 47 or 53 with no DME and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. INTERVENTIONS: Intravitreal injections of aflibercept, 2 mg, every 16 weeks after 3 initial monthly doses and one 8-week interval (aflibercept 2q16 group); intravitreal injections of aflibercept, 2 mg, every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses, with pro re nata (PRN) dosing beginning at week 56 (aflibercept 2q8/PRN group); or sham injections (control group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportions of eyes with a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level, vision-threatening complications, and center-involved DME from baseline to weeks 24, 52, and 100. RESULTS: Among 402 participants (1 eye per participant), the mean (SD) age was 55.7 (10.5) years; 225 (56.0%) were male, and 310 (77.1%) were White. A total of 135 were randomized to the aflibercept 2q16 group, 134 to the aflibercept 2q8/PRN group, and 133 to the control group. At 24 weeks, treatment with aflibercept resulted in a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level in 157 of 269 eyes (58.4%) in the combined aflibercept groups vs 8 of 133 eyes (6.0%) in the control group (adjusted difference, 52.3%; 95% CI, 45.2%-59.5%; P < .001). At 52 weeks, 88 of 135 eyes (65.2%) in the aflibercept 2q16 group (adjusted difference, 50.1%; 95% CI, 40.1%-60.1%) and 107 of 134 eyes (79.9%) in the aflibercept 2q8/PRN group (adjusted difference, 64.8%; 95% CI, 55.8%-73.9%) compared with 20 of 133 eyes (15.0%) in the control group (P < .001 for both comparisons) showed a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level. Fewer eyes treated with aflibercept vs sham injections developed vision-threatening complications and/or center-involved DME through week 100 (22 of 135 eyes [16.3%] in the 2q16 group [adjusted difference, -34.2%; 95% CI, -44.6 to -23.8] and 25 of 134 eyes [18.7%] in the 2q8/PRN group [adjusted difference, -31.7%; 95% CI, -42.5 to -20.9] compared with 67 of 133 eyes [50.4%] in the control group; P < .001 for both comparisons). No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, significantly more eyes with moderately severe to severe NPDR that were treated with aflibercept showed a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level at 24, 52, and 100 weeks, and significantly fewer eyes treated with aflibercept vs sham developed vision-threatening complications and center-involved DME. Outcomes on the DRSS between year 1 and 2 emphasize the need for ongoing vascular endothelial growth factor suppression and adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02718326.

Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection vs Sham as Prophylaxis Against Conversion to Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration in High-risk Eyes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents may provide a prophylactic effect in high-risk eyes with intermediate dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) against conversion to exudative AMD (eAMD), lowering the risk of vision loss. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) as prophylaxis against the conversion to eAMD in high-risk eyes at 24 months. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-masked, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial performed at 4 US clinical sites enrolled patients with intermediate AMD in 1 eye (study eye), defined as presence of more than 10 medium drusen (≥63 to <125 µm), at least 1 large druse (≥125 µm), and/or retinal pigmentary changes, and eAMD in the fellow eye. Patients were treated from June 23, 2015, to March 13, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Intravitreal aflibercept injection (2 mg) or sham quarterly injection for 24 months (1:1 randomization). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with conversion to eAMD at month 24 characterized by development of choroidal neovascularization, as assessed by leakage on fluorescein angiography and fluid on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography by an independent masked reading center. RESULTS: Of 128 patients enrolled, 127 (63 in the IAI group and 64 in the sham group) were included in the primary analysis (68 men [53.5%]; mean [SD] age, 76.5 [8.1] years). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were balanced between the groups. By month 24, 6 patients (9.5%) in the IAI group and 7 (10.9%) in the sham group developed eAMD (P = .98). Patients with a history of eAMD for longer than 2 years in their fellow eye at baseline showed a lower rate of conversion to eAMD in the study eye compared with those with a history of eAMD for 2 years or less in the fellow eye. Safety was consistent with previous studies involving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this evaluation of quarterly anti-VEGF exposure as prophylaxis to reduce conversion of eyes with high-risk dry AMD to eAMD, the rates of conversion were not lower in the IAI group compared with the sham treatment group at month 24. Understanding the mechanism of conversion to eAMD and therapies that could prevent this event remains an important unmet need. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02462889.

Longitudinal Assessment of Ellipsoid Zone Integrity, Subretinal Hyperreflective Material, and Subretinal Pigment Epithelium Disease in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To assess longitudinally the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment on ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), and the sub-retinal pigment epithelium (sub-RPE) compartment in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the OSPREY clinical trial, a prospective, double-masked, phase 2 study comparing brolucizumab 6 mg with aflibercept 2 mg over 56 weeks. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with treatment-naïve nAMD at the initiation of the trial were included in the analysis. METHODS: Eyes were evaluated with spectral-domain OCT at 4-week intervals in the OSPREY trial (n = 81). Spectral-domain OCT scans collected from each visit were segmented automatically using a proprietary, machine learning-enabled higher-order feature-extraction platform for retinal layer, SHRM, and sub-RPE boundary lines, which were evaluated and corrected as needed by masked trained graders. The current analysis focused only on patients evaluated with the Cirrus (Zeiss) platform (n = 28). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included change from baseline in EZ-RPE (i.e., photoreceptor outer segment) volume, EZ-RPE central subfield thickness (CST), total EZ attenuation, SHRM volume, SHRM CST, and total sub-RPE volume. The correlation between each of these measures and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at each visit was evaluated. RESULTS: EZ-RPE volume and EZ-RPE CST showed significant increases, and total EZ attenuation, SHRM volume, SHRM CST, and total sub-RPE volume showed significant decreases from baseline at each visit from weeks 4 through 56 (P < 0.05 at each visit). Ellipsoid zone integrity measures and SHRM volume correlated significantly with BCVA at most visits (P < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between total sub-RPE volume and BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: EZ integrity, SHRM, and sub-RPE disease features in eyes with nAMD showed improvement as early as week 4 of anti-VEGF treatment. EZ integrity measures and SHRM volume were predictors of visual acuity over the first year of treatment.

Risk of Inflammation, Retinal Vasculitis, and Retinal Occlusion-Related Events with Brolucizumab: Post Hoc Review of HAWK and HARRIER.

PURPOSE: An independent Safety Review Committee (SRC), supported by Novartis Pharma AG, analyzed investigator-reported cases of intraocular inflammation (IOI), endophthalmitis, and retinal arterial occlusion in the phase 3 HAWK and HARRIER trials of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: A post hoc analysis of a subset of data from two 2-year, double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled randomized phase 3 trials (NCT02307682, NCT02434328). PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N = 1817) with untreated, active choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration in the study eye were randomized and treated in HAWK/HARRIER. The SRC reviewed data from cases of investigator-reported IOI (60/1088 brolucizumab-treated eyes; 8/729 aflibercept-treated eyes). METHODS: The SRC received details and images (color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and OCT) for all investigator-determined cases of IOI, retinal arterial occlusion, and endophthalmitis. Cases were reviewed in detail by ≥2 readers, then adjudicated by the SRC as a group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Within this patient subset: incidence of IOI, signs and incidence of retinal vasculitis and/or retinal vascular occlusion, and visual acuity loss; time since first brolucizumab injection to IOI event onset; and frequency of visual acuity loss after brolucizumab injection by time of first IOI event onset. RESULTS: Fifty brolucizumab-treated eyes were considered to have definite/probable drug-related events within the spectrum of IOI, retinal vasculitis, and/or vascular occlusion. On the basis of these cases, incidence of definite/probable IOI was 4.6% (IOI + vasculitis, 3.3%; IOI + vasculitis + occlusion, 2.1%). There were 8 cases (incidence 0.74%) of at least moderate visual acuity loss (≥15 ETDRS letters) in eyes with IOI (7 in eyes with IOI + vasculitis + occlusion). Of the 8 cases, 5 experienced their first IOI-related event within 3 months of the first brolucizumab injection (increasing to 7/8 within 6 months). Incidence of IOI in aflibercept-treated eyes was 1.1%, with at least moderate visual acuity loss in 0.14%. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of IOI cases after brolucizumab injection identified signs of retinal vasculitis with or without retinal vascular occlusion and an associated risk of visual acuity loss. The findings will help physicians to evaluate the risks and benefits of brolucizumab treatment for nAMD.

APEX: a phase II randomised clinical trial evaluating the safety and preliminary efficacy of oral X-82 to treat exudative age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of X-82, an orally administered inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor, was investigated for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in a phase II clinical trial. METHODS: This phase II, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial enrolled subjects with a prior diagnosis of exudative AMD having received at least two intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF therapy. Subjects were randomised equally into four groups that received either daily 50mg, 100mg or 200mg dosages of X-82 or a placebo tablet. At each 4-week interval visit for 52 weeks, subjects were to be assessed to determine if rescue treatment was needed with anti-VEGF therapy. RESULTS: 157 patients were enrolled. Due to gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary adverse events and the fulfilment of the primary endpoint, the trial was stopped prematurely after a second interim analysis. The primary endpoint of non-inferiority of visual acuity compared with placebo was demonstrated in all groups receiving X-82 (p<0.001). There was a dose-dependent trend in the number of injections over a 52-week period, with the 50 mg (n=40), 100 mg (n=39), 200 mg (n=39) and placebo (n=39) group requiring 6.7, 6.0, 4.7 and 8.1 injections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: X-82 oral therapy in combination with pro re nata anti-VEGF injections showed non-inferiority in visual acuity outcomes while achieving a dose-dependent decrease in the number of anti-VEGF injections compared with placebo. Given the limited tolerability and safety issues observed, X-82 does not have a sufficient benefit to risk profile in treatment of patients with AMD.